Topic: Set theory vs logic vs probability?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc started this discussion 3 weeks ago #137,989
I’d write a question but it would be too complicated to ask.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,460,165
Set theory and logic both have 16 boolean connectives. Then if you have a function P(x), you can denote x using set theory, so logic is also the same. One of the three things is fundamental, I’m just asking which one.Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,166
This reminds me of the time a homeless guy asked me for cash.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,167
You could also throw arithmetic in there since you can express arithmetic using logic (computers exist so that should be obvious). But then you can represent logic using arithmetic if 0 is false and 1 is true, then and is multiplication, and not is 1 - x, so NAND would be 1-ab, and NAND is functionally complete, so you can build up any other logical connective from multiplication and subtraction. So maybe arithmetic is more fundamental than logic and logic is a consequence of arithmetic?
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,168
You see homeless people are always walking around the area where I live and obviously they want money to buy drugs because they're all on drugs. So he asked me for money and I said no
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,170
The reason I said no is because he looked dirty I mean what am I supposed to say? He was a dirty filthy homeless person like ew? My mom taught me that dirty people don't get into heaven so obviously I wasn't going to help him with money.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,171
@1,460,168 (B)
I just tell them I don’t have any money, feel bad about it, then come back later to find them yelling at God in the middle of the road and then I feel better.
I just tell them I don’t have any money, feel bad about it, then come back later to find them yelling at God in the middle of the road and then I feel better.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,172
The government should do something, but they won’t, because they’re incompetent.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,174
Anyway after I said no this guy just starts flipping out. He starts yelling and taking his clothes off for some reason and obviously everyone starts staring. He started acting like I had a gun and forced him to get naked or I would shoot.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 41 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,176
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,178
Obviously everyone believes him because who the fuck just gets naked in public? So they start throwing cans and rocks at me and I have to flee and get away. Ugh I hate society
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,180
So next time I'm around the same area I see the homeless guy but this time he's in a fancy suit and has a gold watch on can you believe this shit? I ask him how the hell he got the fancy suit and why was he asking me for money if he was rich. You want to know what he tells me?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,182
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,183
He tells me "don't hate the player hate the game" and then he gets into a really fancy Lamborghini and drives off. Anyway set theory reminded me of that story
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !PCrdDxfj0A joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,184
I like boys too, so I guess it's alright.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,185
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,186
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,187
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,188
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,189
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,190
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,191
Anyway, if you want to be a racist retard, you can go hang yourself for all I care.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,192
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,193
@previous (B)
Dude, I don’t care if your parents were failures who never taught you basic human respect, if you’re an adult, and you have problems, be a man and fix them. Being racist towards me isn’t going to fix your pathetic life. Go fuck off and do something productive. I don’t care about you.
Dude, I don’t care if your parents were failures who never taught you basic human respect, if you’re an adult, and you have problems, be a man and fix them. Being racist towards me isn’t going to fix your pathetic life. Go fuck off and do something productive. I don’t care about you.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,194
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I was just asking but there goes that typical black aggression. You want to hit me too don't you? Typical black
I was just asking but there goes that typical black aggression. You want to hit me too don't you? Typical black
Bob replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,197
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,198
@previous (Bob)
Why are they so violent? I just tensed up as soon as he said he was black. I knew he'd blow up eventually. This lemonade guy is dangerous
Why are they so violent? I just tensed up as soon as he said he was black. I knew he'd blow up eventually. This lemonade guy is dangerous
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,199
@1,460,194 (B)
If your only purpose in life is to provoke people and be a nuisance, then we don’t need you. From the bottom of my heart, I feel more sad when I kill a fly than I’d feel if I found out you dropped dead. That’s how worthless your life is. Grow up and be a man. I don’t know if you’re fucking retarded and you can’t help it, if you have some type of special needs issue or whatever, but nobody wants people like you to exist.
If your only purpose in life is to provoke people and be a nuisance, then we don’t need you. From the bottom of my heart, I feel more sad when I kill a fly than I’d feel if I found out you dropped dead. That’s how worthless your life is. Grow up and be a man. I don’t know if you’re fucking retarded and you can’t help it, if you have some type of special needs issue or whatever, but nobody wants people like you to exist.
Bob replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,200
@1,460,198 (B)
It's in their nature. They don't know how to be civilized people. All they want to do is murder and steal.
It's in their nature. They don't know how to be civilized people. All they want to do is murder and steal.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 second later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,201
And why do you have a fantasy of provoking me and then I hit you anyway? Are you too much of a coward to do it yourself so you want me to help you through with it? Is that what this is?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !PCrdDxfj0A replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,202
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,203
There’s only so much I can do to help you over the internet. Maybe it’s just a lack of bravery.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 7 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,204
@1,460,199 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Why are you chimping out? Just calm down I know it's hard since you're black but calm down please
Why are you chimping out? Just calm down I know it's hard since you're black but calm down please
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,205
Why are you scared?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 19 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,206
There’s nothing to be afraid of just do it like Nike.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,207
@1,460,202 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !PCrdDxfj0A)
Well now you're being reasonable. Sure I'll let you suck my dick as an apology
Well now you're being reasonable. Sure I'll let you suck my dick as an apology
Bob replied with this 3 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,208
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,209
Bob replied with this 3 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,210
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,211
@1,460,209 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You're saying you want to give me that diabolical head? Let's go man suck this dick clean
You're saying you want to give me that diabolical head? Let's go man suck this dick clean
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,212
It’s sad but they’ll understand.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,213
Time won’t stop.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,214
Bob replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,215
Bob joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,216
@1,460,213 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)Do you still believe in God? I hate the fucking world and all the goddamn niggers in it. I dont care if I die anymore. My religion is the white race. HEIL HITLER!
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,217
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,218
Bob replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,219
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,220
@1,460,165 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You will study set theory but then you don't know basic propositional logic that comes up in daily life, and you have frequently dismissed the utility of logic by saying it's abstract or by saying there's no point in bothering.
You will study set theory but then you don't know basic propositional logic that comes up in daily life, and you have frequently dismissed the utility of logic by saying it's abstract or by saying there's no point in bothering.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,223
@previous (F)
Look up what the word "abstract" means, come back here, and explain to me with a straight face why propositional logic isn’t abstract.
Look up what the word "abstract" means, come back here, and explain to me with a straight face why propositional logic isn’t abstract.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 49 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,224
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,225
If logic isn’t abstract, explain to me where I can find the logical connective "or" and tell me how much does it weigh?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,226
You have to be mentally retarded if you can’t see how logic is abstract.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,227
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,228
@1,460,223 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I'm not contesting that logic is abstract, I'm pointing out that you routinely come up with reasons to dismiss logic.
Here is the post I'm talking about:
> m not sure I agree with that. Logic is an abstraction, logic doesn’t physically exist. If things must obey logic, then if there’s nothing, there’s nothing to disobey logic, so I’m not sure that’s really impossible.
You are trying to jump from "logic is abstract" to "there's nothing to disobey logic".
Logic still applies, even if it's abstract.
And this isn't the only time you've tried to dismiss logic as important.
I'm not contesting that logic is abstract, I'm pointing out that you routinely come up with reasons to dismiss logic.
Here is the post I'm talking about:
> m not sure I agree with that. Logic is an abstraction, logic doesn’t physically exist. If things must obey logic, then if there’s nothing, there’s nothing to disobey logic, so I’m not sure that’s really impossible.
You are trying to jump from "logic is abstract" to "there's nothing to disobey logic".
Logic still applies, even if it's abstract.
And this isn't the only time you've tried to dismiss logic as important.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,229
@previous (F)
I said logic is abstract, I never said it doesn’t apply, I said that set theory is more fundamental with logic. And you’re lying, you did have a problem with the fact I said that logic is abstract, because you didn’t know what the word abstract meant. I’m tired of your low IQ bullshit, you’re a mental retard who doesn’t know anything.
I said logic is abstract, I never said it doesn’t apply, I said that set theory is more fundamental with logic. And you’re lying, you did have a problem with the fact I said that logic is abstract, because you didn’t know what the word abstract meant. I’m tired of your low IQ bullshit, you’re a mental retard who doesn’t know anything.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,230
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,231
@1,460,228 (F)
For Christ sake, you quoted me directly, and then misrepresented what I said right after. You always do this shit. This is what I said.
> If things must obey logic, then if there’s nothing, there’s nothing to disobey logic, so I’m not sure that’s really impossible.
READ WHAT I FUCKING WROTE. I said that if there is nothing, then there’s nothing to disobey logic. What do you think that means you absolute moron? Can you do logic without any variables? Do you understand what I said or are you really this stupid?
For Christ sake, you quoted me directly, and then misrepresented what I said right after. You always do this shit. This is what I said.
> If things must obey logic, then if there’s nothing, there’s nothing to disobey logic, so I’m not sure that’s really impossible.
READ WHAT I FUCKING WROTE. I said that if there is nothing, then there’s nothing to disobey logic. What do you think that means you absolute moron? Can you do logic without any variables? Do you understand what I said or are you really this stupid?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,232
How do you think you’re superior for being white when you can’t even understand English? You can’t even read.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,233
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,234
@1,460,229 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> I never said it doesn’t apply
I have a direct quote, here it is again: "there's nothing to disobey logic".
Please explain how logic being abstact or built on set theory means "there's nothing to disobey logic".
> And you’re lying, you did have a problem with the fact I said that logic is abstract
Then quote where I took issue with that.
When I call you a liar, I can actually quote and prove it.
When you call me a liar it's always because you want me to take responsibility for some assumption you made, not something I actually said.
> I never said it doesn’t apply
I have a direct quote, here it is again: "there's nothing to disobey logic".
Please explain how logic being abstact or built on set theory means "there's nothing to disobey logic".
> And you’re lying, you did have a problem with the fact I said that logic is abstract
Then quote where I took issue with that.
When I call you a liar, I can actually quote and prove it.
When you call me a liar it's always because you want me to take responsibility for some assumption you made, not something I actually said.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,235
What I basically said, is that logic doesn’t apply to things that don’t exist. Can the magical unicorn in my kitchen walk through walls? It doesn’t exist so maybe it does or maybe it doesn’t, that’s the point. If something doesn’t exist then logic doesn’t apply because it doesn’t exist.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,236
@1,460,234 (F)
You removed half the sentence to make it sound like I said something I didn’t say. How fucking dishonest can you be?
You removed half the sentence to make it sound like I said something I didn’t say. How fucking dishonest can you be?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,237
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,238
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,239
This isn’t the full sentence: "there's nothing to disobey logic".
You absolute moron.
You absolute moron.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,240
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,241
@1,460,231 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I really doubt you could even come up with some alternative explanation for what that's supposed to mean.
I'm sure you're working hard to contrive something, so I'd be happy to hear.
I really doubt you could even come up with some alternative explanation for what that's supposed to mean.
I'm sure you're working hard to contrive something, so I'd be happy to hear.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade replied with this 3 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,242
Truth be told I do low key want to suck some dick right now
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,243
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,244
@1,460,241 (F)
Why the hell would you quote me and remove half the sentence intentionally? Do you think that makes you look smart? What the hell is wrong with you?
Why the hell would you quote me and remove half the sentence intentionally? Do you think that makes you look smart? What the hell is wrong with you?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,245
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,246
@1,460,239 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Putting it into the full sentence doesn't help you at all.
This isn't the first time you've dismissed logic, and you clearly can't come up with any actual explanation for what "if there's nothing" is supposed to mean. You have a word salad post that is clearly another one of your rants against logic.
Putting it into the full sentence doesn't help you at all.
This isn't the first time you've dismissed logic, and you clearly can't come up with any actual explanation for what "if there's nothing" is supposed to mean. You have a word salad post that is clearly another one of your rants against logic.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 14 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,247
@1,460,241 (F)
> I really doubt you could even come up with some alternative explanation for what that's supposed to mean.
I just told you what this sentence means:
> If things must obey logic, then if there’s nothing, there’s nothing to disobey logic, so I’m not sure that’s really impossible.
If you can’t fucking read a complex sentence that’s your own fault for being bad at English.
> I really doubt you could even come up with some alternative explanation for what that's supposed to mean.
I just told you what this sentence means:
> If things must obey logic, then if there’s nothing, there’s nothing to disobey logic, so I’m not sure that’s really impossible.
If you can’t fucking read a complex sentence that’s your own fault for being bad at English.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,248
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 31 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,249
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,250
@1,460,244 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Because that was the specific phrase I was taking issue with, and adding more context doesn't change anything.
"If there's nothing" isn't a meaningful statement either
Because that was the specific phrase I was taking issue with, and adding more context doesn't change anything.
"If there's nothing" isn't a meaningful statement either
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,251
Oh my God, there are two if statements in that sentence. If I said a implies b and c implies d, you can’t just claim that I made the claim that d is true when a and c were both hypotheticals, that’s so stupid.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,252
@1,460,250 (F)
> Because that was the specific phrase I was taking issue with, and adding more context doesn't change anything.
What the fuck, you can’t read a complex sentence?
> Because that was the specific phrase I was taking issue with, and adding more context doesn't change anything.
What the fuck, you can’t read a complex sentence?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 second later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,253
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,254
@1,460,247 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Repeating a sentence verbatim is not explaining what the sentence means lol.
Although you've been consistently repeating your claim in lieu of actually backing it up since you've been on this site so, no surprise I guess.
Repeating a sentence verbatim is not explaining what the sentence means lol.
Although you've been consistently repeating your claim in lieu of actually backing it up since you've been on this site so, no surprise I guess.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,255
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,256
@1,460,254 (F)
Yes it does, I said if this then that, it was a hypothetical that depends on a premise being true but the premise is that nothing exists, how stupid are you?
Yes it does, I said if this then that, it was a hypothetical that depends on a premise being true but the premise is that nothing exists, how stupid are you?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,257
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,258
Are you actually disabled mentally or something?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,259
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,260
I said if nothing exists then there’s nothing to disobey logic. Open your eyes, does something exist? Is this really so complicated that you can’t understand it?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,261
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,262
If I said, "if I was a woman I’d have two X chromosomes" do you think I said said I have two X chromosomes? Are you that retarded?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,263
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I knew you were a bitch. Hey bitch come suck this here dick
I knew you were a bitch. Hey bitch come suck this here dick
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,264
Then imagine if you quoted somebody saying "if I was a woman I’d have two X chromosomes" as "I’d have two X chromosomes" and acting like that’s reasonable. No it’s not idiot.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,265
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,266
You know what? Never talk to me about IQ again, you should never use the word intelligence with me like you know anything about intelligence.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,267
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,280
@1,460,260 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> I said if nothing exists then there’s nothing to disobey logic. Open your eyes, does something exist? Is this really so complicated that you can’t understand it?
I get it, but it's still stupid. Why do you think saying this adds anything to the conversation?
> I said if nothing exists then there’s nothing to disobey logic. Open your eyes, does something exist? Is this really so complicated that you can’t understand it?
I get it, but it's still stupid. Why do you think saying this adds anything to the conversation?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,281
@previous (F)
You’re the one who brought it up, I was talking to boof not you. Don’t ask me why it’s relevant to this conversation.
You’re the one who brought it up, I was talking to boof not you. Don’t ask me why it’s relevant to this conversation.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,282
For a man who’s so dumb, it would be nice if you were less arrogant.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,283
@1,460,262 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If you had a record of gender critical opinions and then said that people would probably take it as an anti-trans statement.
Context matters when inferring meaning, and it looks like you are going out of your way to say something no one actually contests just to try to and get a "gotcha".
Imagine Charlie Kirk is debating and then says "Actually I just said if I was a woman, I didn't say anything about trans people" after making the chromosome example you just gave. Everyone would roll their eyes at that.
No different than your "technically" here.
If you had a record of gender critical opinions and then said that people would probably take it as an anti-trans statement.
Context matters when inferring meaning, and it looks like you are going out of your way to say something no one actually contests just to try to and get a "gotcha".
Imagine Charlie Kirk is debating and then says "Actually I just said if I was a woman, I didn't say anything about trans people" after making the chromosome example you just gave. Everyone would roll their eyes at that.
No different than your "technically" here.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,284
@previous (F)
> If you had a record of gender critical opinions and then said that people would probably take it as an anti-trans statement.
Now I don’t even know what the fuck you’re talking about anymore.
> If you had a record of gender critical opinions and then said that people would probably take it as an anti-trans statement.
Now I don’t even know what the fuck you’re talking about anymore.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 20 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,285
@1,460,266 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You didn't even know what IQ was, you've repeatedly thought it was a test of knowledge or that it had some racial biases yet you've never been able to give an example of either.
You decide your position before even understanding the issue you're taking a position on.
You didn't even know what IQ was, you've repeatedly thought it was a test of knowledge or that it had some racial biases yet you've never been able to give an example of either.
You decide your position before even understanding the issue you're taking a position on.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 49 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,286
@previous (F)
I’m sorry, what are we talking about? Are we talking about logic, trans people or IQ? Just stick to one thing.
I’m sorry, what are we talking about? Are we talking about logic, trans people or IQ? Just stick to one thing.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,287
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You were the one that brought up IQ for no reason, but you're blaming me for it?
You were the one that brought up IQ for no reason, but you're blaming me for it?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,288
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,289
Whenever you’re challenged and don’t have a response you just bring up random political topics and start arguing for conservatism for no reason.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,290
@1,460,288 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You were the one that brought it up lol
If no one is talking about something, and you like it that way, just don't mention it.
You were the one that brought it up lol
If no one is talking about something, and you like it that way, just don't mention it.
Anonymous F double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,291
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,293
@previous (F)
I told you not to talk about it because you always work it into every conversation and I’m sick of hearing the same crap from you over and over again with no progression.
I told you not to talk about it because you always work it into every conversation and I’m sick of hearing the same crap from you over and over again with no progression.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,294
I’ve asked you not to talk to me multiple times but you can’t help yourself, I don’t like you.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !PCrdDxfj0A replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,296
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,314
@1,460,293 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
YOU worked it into the conversation LOL.
And you make 10 new topics a day with "IQ" in the title
YOU worked it into the conversation LOL.
And you make 10 new topics a day with "IQ" in the title
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,315
@previous (F)
That doesn’t mean I’m interested in what you have to say about it. I want to hear from other people, they have more interesting ideas but you’re the most obsessive.
That doesn’t mean I’m interested in what you have to say about it. I want to hear from other people, they have more interesting ideas but you’re the most obsessive.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,316
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You want to hear what other people have to say about IQ so much you make multiple topics a day, but I'm obsessed with IQ??
You want to hear what other people have to say about IQ so much you make multiple topics a day, but I'm obsessed with IQ??
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,317
raping nigguhs
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,321
@1,460,316 (F)
Is English your native language? You misinterpret what I say a lot and other people don’t.
Is English your native language? You misinterpret what I say a lot and other people don’t.
Anonymous K replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,322
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,323
I said you’re obsessive, I didn’t say you’re obsessed with IQ, I meant you’re obsessed with talking with me which is annoying because you’re the person I like the least out of everybody here. Whenever I don’t restate every little detail you can’t follow it even though everybody else can, it’s really annoying. You think you’re smarter than everybody because you notice things that make sense to everybody else don’t make sense to you, but it’s not because you’re smart it’s the other way around. If you were smart that wouldn’t be hard for you.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,362
Ignited Lemonaide joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,364
Ignited Lemonaide double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,460,365
Have fun not reading that.