Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Topic: British man charged with possessing image of gas mask
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago#13,795
> The openly gay barrister said a second charge related to a picture of a man in a gas mask which was simply homosexual porn that would be on sale legally in sex shops.
> The second charge of possession of indecent images was brought as police judged the gas mask image to be "life-threatening", because of a risk of suffocation.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later[^][v]#246,368
> Still believe you don't live in a police state?
He hasn't been charged with anything, Walter. > British man charged with possessing image of gas mask > charged with possessing image of gas mask
Please reread the article. Thanks.
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#246,371
Do you prowl British news sites looking for things that you can twist into "hurr police state"?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^][v]#246,375
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,426
> charged with possessing image of gas mask
Funny, because I read:
> the charge of possessing and making an indecent picture of a child > the second charge of possession of indecent images
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,797
What exactly has he been accused of?
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 22 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,814
@previous (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
He opened an email that contained a picture that the police claim was of an underaged male. Furthermore, there was a second picture (can't remember if this was in the email or separate) that contained a picture of a male in a gas mask, which is an illegal image in the UK.
Anonymous D double-posted this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,815
> >charged with possessing image of gas mask > > Funny, because I read: > > >the charge of possessing and making an indecent picture of a child > >the second charge of possession of indecent images
Funny because these are the very things that we are arguing make you a police state. Thanks for confirming.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,817
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,838
@previous (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
The justification that the UK provides is that the production of such images involves a risk of suffocation, and possession of such images should therefore be banned.
buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,840
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,848
@previous (buspuppie !!hkv8K5ZEY)
Yes. Be thankful of the liberty protected by our constitution, and defend it against those who would remove such protections.
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,852
@246,838 (D)
So i guess y'all can't view choke porn either, eh?
Is that even a thing? Choke porn? I guess you'll never know.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,866
@previous (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)
They do it in normal porn all the time.
floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,879
@previous (D)
The type that risks suffocation? Like plastic bag over the face style? I looked it up and came back with autoerotic asphixyation (did i spell that right?) and i think it sounds worse than just gas mask porn. Think of the logistics of filming and setting up a safety system. Sounds pretty dangerous. Y'all best not google it if you live in a police state.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,904
@previous (floorboard !hbZVTk6JYc)
No they just choke the girl a little. So gay
sluggy joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,906
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,918
@previous (D)
It is violent, but chicks like it rough. Women are precious little lambs. They aren't slutty fuck machines. They just have very strange criteria for who they will fuck, which is the only difference between men and women. Men will fuck anything that doesn't disgust them.
Women cheat as much as men. They just get away with it more.
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,922
> It is violent, but chicks like it rough. Women are precious little lambs. They aren't slutty fuck machines. They just have very strange criteria for who they will fuck, which is the only difference between men and women. Men will fuck anything that doesn't disgust them. > > Women cheat as much as men. They just get away with it more.
i hope you are drugged up right now cos dat shit is wack
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,928
@previous (D)
What? Not all women, but many many women like it rough. Men think women aren't sexual but they are.
Many have rape fantasies. It's very common. Men do too, I guess.
Women are just as big of sluts as men. Men just evolved to be less particular about what we breed with. Women become attached after sex (there is a biological trigger, but that alone isnt gonna make a chick fall in love with you).
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,935
@previous (sluggy)
Re read his post. It's full of non-sequitors and seemingly random subject changes.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 days later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#248,009
So what happens when gas masks are actually needed in Britain? Will their government just provide them with an IOU and an apology?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#248,014
@246,848 (D) > Yes. Be thankful of the liberty protected by our constitution, and defend it against those who would remove such protections.
In October 2010, a 33 year old Idaho man, Steven Kutzner, entered into a plea agreement concerning images of child characters from the American animated television show, The Simpsons engaged in sexual acts. In January 2011, Kutzner was sentenced to serve 15 months in federal prison.
In Richmond, Virginia, on December 2005, Dwight Whorley was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive "...obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males."
lol
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#248,038
> > Yes. Be thankful of the liberty protected by our constitution, and defend it against those who would remove such protections. >
In October 2010, a 33 year old Idaho man, Steven Kutzner, entered into a plea agreement concerning images of child characters from the American animated television show, The Simpsons engaged in sexual acts. In January 2011, Kutzner was sentenced to serve 15 months in federal prison.
>
In Richmond, Virginia, on December 2005, Dwight Whorley was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive "...obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males."
> > lol
These are the people we must defend our constitution against.
Walter Calton !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#248,041
sluggy replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#248,046
@248,014 (K)
If you think pedophiles arent discriminated against, here is your proof
Also; we are routinely abuse and beaten in prison and people see it as a joke (not just child rapists).
You are all (not directed at you empathetic and aware individuals) sick and disgusting.
We can't even organize to gain support. The persecution is that entrenched.
Walter Calton !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#248,055
> police judged the gas mask image to be "life-threatening", because of a risk of suffocation.
BAHAHAHAHA
That is rich. And a lie.