Topic: I see workplaces that want huge efficiencies from AI.

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago #137,892

They distribute tools with no training and a bunch of people produce slop and replicate effort. Then VPNs and corporate Internet restrictions destroy a lot of the process flow and efficiency.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 hours later[^] [v] #1,459,442

Many companies have replaced their customer support teams with AI and clients aren't dropping them.

Coders are going away, the cs grad stats are too significant to ignore.

Waymo is going to kill all uber gigs.

Your cope won't save you.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 34 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,450

@previous (B)
raping nigguhs

Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 26 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,461

@previous (C)
That niche is safe for now, but there's no engineering limitation that will make it safe forever.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 58 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,462

@previous (B)
Are you ok?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,463

@1,459,442 (B)

> Coders are going away, the cs grad stats are too significant to ignore.

TBH I’m not sure I believe the AI explanation anymore. I’ve witnessed computer science majors trying to get hired, if you have five employers, and one of them is Google, Microsoft, or Apple, and the other four are smaller tech companies, you’ll get a line of 100+ people for Google, Microsoft, or Apple, and less than 10 people for the other employers. When you witness that in real life right in front of you, it sort of answers the question. CS majors are so ambitious they all want the same thing.

(Edited 40 seconds later.)

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,465

There’s something about the personality type of CS people, they all have a self belief that sort of defies logic. It’s just a thing I don’t know why.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,466

@1,459,463 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
The major failure of that explanation is that CS grads didn't start doing that right as consumer AI went mainstream.

Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,467

@1,459,465 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Did they develop that the same year ChatGPT took off?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,470

@previous (B)
The thing about AI is, I think people who are in CS see it differently. They’re always chasing the "next big thing." It’s difficult to describe, but I have noticed that people who learned how to program after LLMs became mainstream are much worse at programming but way more confident at the same time.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,477

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Why are the people who graduated right before LLMs doing poorly compared to other majors?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,479

@previous (B)
Do you actually want an answer or are you going to disregard what I say no matter what I say then reassert your own opinion again like you always do?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,480

Because that question has an answer that I’ve already told you. And I already know what you did last time.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 54 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,492

@1,459,479 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I actually explain why you're wrong, you just assert your side and say discussion is pointless.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,494

Well if what you say is true, then I’m not wrong that it’s pointless am I? So either I’m right about one thing and wrong about another or the other way around. So either way I’m not completely wrong, therefore I don’t care.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,496

That’s gotta be one of the best kinds of truth, truths that are true because you assert they’re true. You can debate me that debate is pointless, but if I think debate is pointless, then that makes debating me pointless, which makes me right. Which is kind of hilarious actually.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,497

Would you believe it? That’s how the stock market works. Should that be scary? I dunno, maybe.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,498

If everybody thinks the price is gonna go up, then it’s gonna go up. Silly, but true.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 43 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,517

@1,459,496 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
No, because you aren't the only one here.

You can regurgitate your programming, and I'll debunk it with reciepts for any naive susceptible readers passing by.

Anonymous B double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,459,518

@1,459,498 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Market makers follow P/E ratios, retail irrationality adds a bit of wobble to an otherwise rational market.

You're regurgitating the college-level version of "let's just print money because money isn't real".

Minichan