There are numerous and many similarities, but you're a twat if you equate working class people with chavs.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#245,980
@previous (E)
You're right and I apologise. Chavs aren't even working-class because they aren't working.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 53 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#245,994
@previous (A)
Underclass is the term you're looking for.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#245,995
Because they're Brits.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#245,996
@245,994 (F)
Thanks. @previous (G)
LOL
Not all Brits are bad. See: all brits north, south, east and west of London.
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 43 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#245,997
@previous (A)
I know, but they always get so cranky when they can't afford their bowler hats and monocles.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,003
@previous (G)
Hey now, don't paint us all with the same brush. Down here it's an entirely different set of stereotypes, I get cranky when I can't afford a flat cap and farming equipment.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,007
@245,996 (A) > Not all Brits are bad. See: all brits north [...] of London.
lolno
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#246,010
Stereotypes are bad and are not helpful to the progression of society. Many chavs do not work, but many do work. Most workers in retail are either students, chavs, or ex-chavs who grew out of it and got old.