Minichan

Topic: The jury was 11-1 in favor of acquittal.

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #137,479

9 feminists, 2 simps, and 1 hero.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,456,168

Hero?
Thing is the accused has to go through hell until a decision is made.
I doubt any retrial will take place. Suicide would be the best option.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,169

He did what no one would...legend...

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,170

You should see Reddit. Lots of defending and justifications. Suddenly the problem is “nuanced” and requires a “deeper exploration” and in depth conversation on “women’s mental health”.

At this point if a woman can kill her three kids and call it “mental health crisis” then whats to stop another woman from committing the same crime? Or better yet whats to stop a man from raping or murdering children and then call it “Mental Health Crisis therefore give him a slap on the wrist!”

The bitch should in prison for life or euthanized. I seriously do not understand why all this gymnastics. They say facts over feeling and yet they’re ignoring the facts.

(Edited 38 seconds later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 2 weeks ago, 10 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,171

@previous (D)
Well the main issue at play here is most people view their children as their property which makes sense. You have to feed them, care for them, and if they fuck up you get in trouble. Those kids have their own ideas, opinions, and rights though so you can't just treat them like an object. It's ironic really that women scream about objectification while doing it to their kids

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,179

Why do you think you know better than the people who watched all the evidence laid out?

Anonymous C replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,184

@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
This. That one guy saw all the evidence and knew she was guilty. He's really a hero

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,188

@1,456,170 (D)

> You should see Reddit. Lots of defending and justifications. Suddenly the problem is “nuanced” and requires a “deeper exploration” and in depth conversation on “women’s mental health”.
>
> At this point if a woman can kill her three kids and call it “mental health crisis” then whats to stop another woman from committing the same crime? Or better yet whats to stop a man from raping or murdering children and then call it “Mental Health Crisis therefore give him a slap on the wrist!”
>
> The bitch should in prison for life or euthanized. I seriously do not understand why all this gymnastics. They say facts over feeling and yet they’re ignoring the facts.

Half of American women are medicated with SSRIs and other drugs. The other half aren’t getting the help they desperately need. This is systemic inequity.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,200

@1,456,170 (D)
It's not just Reddit.

Ask an AI about the case. I did, 3 different mainstream models, and they were framing it like the holdout wasn't following the law. They will even start avoiding questions about why the other 11 decided not guilty, and just start blaming the lone juror.

11/12 jurors, reddit, the AIs... I don't even want to ask the women in my life about this, because they've had batshit takes on other things and I don't think I could look at them the same.

It's like the entirety of society (including the men and machines) are in the gynocentric trance.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,219

I don’t understand why people get emotional over court cases. It’s like people have no concept that there are so many people in the world somebody somewhere is always going to commit a crime. I can’t genuinely be shocked at every single random time somebody killed somebody.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,234

Thsese are the type of movies that appeal to the hold-out juror
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfFptigQ60I

Meta joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,235

Well she's hardly likely to reoffend.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,245

@1,456,219 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
There will always be some random killers that's not why people are surprised.

It's the supporters, fundraising, and 11/12 jurors voting to acquit that is shocking.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,248

@previous (A)
This is America.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,249

If you want a culture that doesn’t glorify violence, you could go to Japan or Canada or Ireland or Finland. Okay? This is America.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,251

I actually don’t know if Finland has low crime, I just kinda assumed because I know the Nordic countries are supposed to be those cold progressive European countries lefty Americans like, so I just kind of assume people in Finland aren’t blasting their guns at each other, but I could be wrong, they are next to Russia after all.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,371

Check this out the copy cats are already starting: https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/06/us/illinois-corie-walsh-child-death

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,386

@previous (D)
Probably just a one-off, women aren't known for hopping on harmful fads.

god help us

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,387

@1,456,200 (A)

> It's not just Reddit.
>
> Ask an AI about the case. I did, 3 different mainstream models, and they were framing it like the holdout wasn't following the law. They will even start avoiding questions about why the other 11 decided not guilty, and just start blaming the lone juror.
>
> 11/12 jurors, reddit, the AIs... I don't even want to ask the women in my life about this, because they've had batshit takes on other things and I don't think I could look at them the same.
>
> It's like the entirety of society (including the men and machines) are in the gynocentric trance.

It reminds me of those dancing crazes and other forms of mass psychosis documented throughout history. The participants all claim they’re sane.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,388

@1,456,245 (A)

> There will always be some random killers that's not why people are surprised.
>
> It's the supporters, fundraising, and 11/12 jurors voting to acquit that is shocking.

Is it really that shocking? There have been loads of instances in history where people were fine with killing kids.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,389

Sometimes when people act like they’re shocked by something on the internet I feel like they’re faking outrage. There’s no way people actually care about a random murder case.

Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,390

@1,456,245 (A)

> There will always be some random killers that's not why people are surprised.
>
> It's the supporters, fundraising, and 11/12 jurors voting to acquit that is shocking.

Usually killers have twisted fans and hangers on, but not a groundswell of support. Especially in this case, where supporters point to make-believe, insist on conspiracies involving the husband, or claim the system “failed” Clancy when it couldn’t involuntarily commit her. And when she was actually pill shopping instead of seeking help.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,391

I mean in the past week I had some alert on my phone about an active shooter in the same city and I was over it in about 5 minutes.

Anonymous K replied with this 2 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,392

@1,456,389 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)

> Sometimes when people act like they’re shocked by something on the internet I feel like they’re faking outrage. There’s no way people actually care about a random murder case.

Your rationality isn’t to be projected to others. Our entire society is wrought with vicarious living and parasocial relationships. You’ve pointed this out yourself when discussing racist edgelords and fanboys obsessed with their Internet daddies.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,393

I remember my freshman year of college there was actually a fatal shooting that was close enough to campus some students said they heard it from their dorm rooms. Idk, it mean stuff happens.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 20 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,395

@1,456,387 (K)
“The light of a Star That Breaks Children's Minds” or I guess in this case it’s the adults.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,396

Then I remember there was a school shooting at a high school in the city where I live.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,398

@1,456,388 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Like when?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,399

@1,456,391 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)

> I mean in the past week I had some alert on my phone about an active shooter in the same city and I was over it in about 5 minutes.

This has been explained to you several times.

This is not about the fact that someone killed, it's about the supporters.

Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,400

@1,456,393 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)

> I remember my freshman year of college there was actually a fatal shooting that was close enough to campus some students said they heard it from their dorm rooms. Idk, it mean stuff happens.

Tell us about how everyone in the dorms got whipped up in a manic support for the killer.

Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,401

@1,456,396 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Can you think of one shooting that had 11 members of the jury supporting the school shooter?

Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,424

@previous (A)
She should be shot
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.