Topic: Every Poster Here...
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #137,435
...has the Habsburg jaw.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,455,842
The existence of negative recessive traits isn't an indicator recessive traits in general are bad.
Many recessive traits are desireable.
Incest isn't inherently harmful, that's a myth the Romanist church invented to break up aristocratic wealth.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,843
@previous (B)
Just what a Tiptoucher™ would say.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,844
@previous (A)
The tiptouchers were the ones who created the myth.
Every adult catholic male has his shits fall right out, and misery loves company so they defend the institution.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,845
@previous (B)
Wait, are you saying the Habsburg traits were GOOD? You know they were retarded, right?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,846
@previous (A)
> Wait, are you saying the Habsburg traits were GOOD? You know they were retarded, right?
Here's the first sentence I wrote:
> The existence of negative recessive traits isn't an indicator recessive traits in general are bad.
Why do you think I was commenting on the existence of negative traits?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,847
@previous (B)
I am talking about the Habsburgs specifically. Was their inbreeding good or bad?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,864
@previous (A)
In their case it was a bad genetic match.
↕