Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,455,640
@1,455,617 (A)
The manosphere preaches that men should only see women as sexual objects. The femosphere says men should all be murdered. These two are not the same. Women need a reality check and fast!
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,455,666
Think about it this way: maybe some women do want to kill their children. That’s a possibility. Will these women pass on their genes to the next generation? Let natural selection do its thing. This is an issue that solves itself, don’t even worry about it.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,455,671
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I never said all women are like this. I'm saying women need to collectively acknowledge you can't just murder your kids
> I never said murder is good, murder is bad. I’m saying you’re being childish by thinking all women are like this.
That’s not what he’s saying. He’s saying that the clamor of support for a child murderer borders on mass psychosis considering its sufficient to create courthouse crowds, a huge number of unique Internet postings, and to raise $1M for her. All from women.
> A man who's locked up for life can't be a provider or protector, there's nothing smart about it.
1) Women get to daydream about a romance novel bad boy who is all theirs.
2) It’s a fake relationship by correspondence and rare meet ups.
3) The women can avoid sex, often for life.
I only knew one IRL woman who married a lifer. Good job and everything but she was a head case.