Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: My ex-wife had an interesting take on Lindsay Clancy.

Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #137,425

We were out to dinner last night when the topic came up. Her thought, “Why didn’t her husband kill her when he came home?”

Two women at a table next to us bristled and interjected. My ex told them not to project their past relationship trauma and post-partum issues onto the case. “She’s a narcissistic child killer. Her husband should have stomped her in the front yard after he saw the basement.”

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 17 hours later[^] [v] #1,455,865

Oh I c, it's a twist on the trend going around because of that trial.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,867

Seriously... what did he have to lose?

They'd still convict him (he's a man) but it would be considered a crime of passion and the prosecutors would likely plea him down to a nominal sentence and the probation comittee would realize he's unlikely to ever be in that situation again.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,890

@previous (C)

> Seriously... what did he have to lose?
>
> They'd still convict him (he's a man) but it would be considered a crime of passion and the prosecutors would likely plea him down to a nominal sentence and the probation comittee would realize he's unlikely to ever be in that situation again.

It would be a justifiable crime of outrage.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.