Topic: Republicans/MAGA are hilarious
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #137,330
They just keep throwing boogeymen out there to see which one sticks. Communists are taking over! Wait, people don't care? Okay, okay, then, um, Muslims! Sharia Law! What? No reaction? Dammit. Alright, um, trans athletes! lol
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,455,072
Islamic trans communism…
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,073
It is funny if you think about it because those things aren’t really compatible with each other.
Anonymous B triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,074
I guess ba’athism is the closest thing maybe.
Doc !mjoQJhzjwM joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,079
It’s because they losing the plot so theyre just grasping at straws at this point.
But when you think about it the MAGA/republicans already did the damage anyway. It’s like thanos in IW. They already snapped half the population away and they’ve more or less achieved their goals. Now it’s just matter of an exit strategy because a reckoning is definitely coming when those seats start flipping blue.
But when you think about it the MAGA/republicans already did the damage anyway. It’s like thanos in IW. They already snapped half the population away and they’ve more or less achieved their goals. Now it’s just matter of an exit strategy because a reckoning is definitely coming when those seats start flipping blue.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 59 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,106
Hey wait, Marsden Miller in prison for fraud? No way!!
boof joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 56 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,123
I miss when it was the ordinary fags that we were supposed to be fighting against
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,218
@1,455,079 (Doc !mjoQJhzjwM)
> It’s because they losing the plot so theyre just grasping at straws at this point.
>
> But when you think about it the MAGA/republicans already did the damage anyway. It’s like thanos in IW. They already snapped half the population away and they’ve more or less achieved their goals. Now it’s just matter of an exit strategy because a reckoning is definitely coming when those seats start flipping blue.
MAGA is astroturf populism. The loyalists don’t realize it’s a money and power grab by Trump Inc., and they’re the useful idiots in turning America into the first family’s personal sovereign wealth fund.
> It’s because they losing the plot so theyre just grasping at straws at this point.
>
> But when you think about it the MAGA/republicans already did the damage anyway. It’s like thanos in IW. They already snapped half the population away and they’ve more or less achieved their goals. Now it’s just matter of an exit strategy because a reckoning is definitely coming when those seats start flipping blue.
MAGA is astroturf populism. The loyalists don’t realize it’s a money and power grab by Trump Inc., and they’re the useful idiots in turning America into the first family’s personal sovereign wealth fund.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,219
@previous (F)
In an odd way it’s almost comforting that we’ve created a world where it’s possible to be that dumb and survive.
In an odd way it’s almost comforting that we’ve created a world where it’s possible to be that dumb and survive.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,224
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> In an odd way it’s almost comforting that we’ve created a world where it’s possible to be that dumb and survive.
It is. But it’s also a dangerous inversion. Trump IS smart enough to continually fool oligarchs that he’s a Manchurian candidate but then does his own crazy shit while only being a partial, unreliable patsy.
> In an odd way it’s almost comforting that we’ve created a world where it’s possible to be that dumb and survive.
It is. But it’s also a dangerous inversion. Trump IS smart enough to continually fool oligarchs that he’s a Manchurian candidate but then does his own crazy shit while only being a partial, unreliable patsy.
Bringbackbeef joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,585
@1,455,073 (B)
> It is funny if you think about it because those things aren’t really compatible with each other.
It is because Jews are the problem but they can’t admit that
> It is funny if you think about it because those things aren’t really compatible with each other.
It is because Jews are the problem but they can’t admit that
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,611
The "communists are taking over line" is a bipartisan talking point. A lot of establishment dems are warning about the DSA and some are leaving over it.
Muslims might actually take over some day, they are good at multiplying.
No Republicans are saying trans athletes are taking over, they are pointing to the issue as a reflection of democrat ideology. How you dress and present yourself can be justified under a liberal system, but demanding access to female spaces takes away freedom of association from ciswomen. Transitioning doesn't remove sex-based advantages completely, even when on HRT, and the whole thing essentially nullifies Title IX.
Muslims might actually take over some day, they are good at multiplying.
No Republicans are saying trans athletes are taking over, they are pointing to the issue as a reflection of democrat ideology. How you dress and present yourself can be justified under a liberal system, but demanding access to female spaces takes away freedom of association from ciswomen. Transitioning doesn't remove sex-based advantages completely, even when on HRT, and the whole thing essentially nullifies Title IX.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,626
@previous (J)
I’m not a social Darwinist, but I do find it funny how far right racists will say that women are inferior in terms of physical strength to men, therefore they need their own league to compete. But they’ll also claim that some races are intellectually inferior to others, except they use the opposite logic and say that it’s not fair to treat them different because of that. Which doesn’t make any sense. It’s not consistent logic.
I’m not a social Darwinist, but I do find it funny how far right racists will say that women are inferior in terms of physical strength to men, therefore they need their own league to compete. But they’ll also claim that some races are intellectually inferior to others, except they use the opposite logic and say that it’s not fair to treat them different because of that. Which doesn’t make any sense. It’s not consistent logic.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,627
You ever think about it? "Women are worse than men, therefore we should treat women better."
"Black people are worse than white people, therefore we should exclude black people to make sure they don’t become successful because they don’t deserve it."
I just find it crazy nobody ever has the balls to point this out. Or maybe everybody is just too dumb to even think about it. But it is pretty funny.
"Black people are worse than white people, therefore we should exclude black people to make sure they don’t become successful because they don’t deserve it."
I just find it crazy nobody ever has the balls to point this out. Or maybe everybody is just too dumb to even think about it. But it is pretty funny.
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,718
@1,455,626 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Most Republicans deny races, and attribute differences to culture. Most Republicans do say there are biological differences between men and women.
Most Republicans deny races, and attribute differences to culture. Most Republicans do say there are biological differences between men and women.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,719
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 46 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,720
@1,455,627 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> "Black people are worse than white people, therefore we should exclude black people to make sure they don’t become successful because they don’t deserve it."
That's a strawman.
The actual argument is that meritocracy should be race blind, and you aren't guranteed a proportional outcome.
Every time you try to model your opponent's positions, you fail.
> "Black people are worse than white people, therefore we should exclude black people to make sure they don’t become successful because they don’t deserve it."
That's a strawman.
The actual argument is that meritocracy should be race blind, and you aren't guranteed a proportional outcome.
Every time you try to model your opponent's positions, you fail.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,721
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,722
@1,455,719 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Listen to the majority of Republican public figures, and that is the line.
There are open racists, but they are the exception.
Listen to the majority of Republican public figures, and that is the line.
There are open racists, but they are the exception.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,723
@previous (J)
But what are you though? What are your thoughts on this? Do you believe black people and white people are equal?
But what are you though? What are your thoughts on this? Do you believe black people and white people are equal?
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,724
@1,455,721 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I do believe in race, but I know I'm the exception among Republicans.
I do believe in race, but I know I'm the exception among Republicans.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,725
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,726
Anonymous J double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,727
@1,455,725 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
So you didn't find an actual contradiction, you just confused two groups of people.
So you didn't find an actual contradiction, you just confused two groups of people.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,728
@1,455,726 (J)
I asked you one time and you said you think most people secretly agree with you but are afraid to say it out loud. Now you’re claiming that your beliefs are actually unpopular.
I asked you one time and you said you think most people secretly agree with you but are afraid to say it out loud. Now you’re claiming that your beliefs are actually unpopular.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,729
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,730
You see my problem with you is you’re very confident and you think you’re smart and good at logic when it’s clear you’re the opposite of all that.
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,731
Anonymous J double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,732
@1,455,729 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You pointed out a contradiction that doesn't exist. I don't care if ethnic groups have their own league.
You pointed out a contradiction that doesn't exist. I don't care if ethnic groups have their own league.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,733
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,734
Surely as a conservative you see nothing wrong with having an in-group preference.
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 58 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,736
@1,455,730 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Then find an actual contradiction I made and point it out.
Then find an actual contradiction I made and point it out.
Anonymous J double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,737
@1,455,733 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Sure, why would I tell black people they can't have their own space? I've literally never said anything like that before.
Sure, why would I tell black people they can't have their own space? I've literally never said anything like that before.
Anonymous J triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 41 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,739
@1,455,734 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
There's a natural heirarchy, people put family first, then broader group, then nation. To put it simply.
There's a natural heirarchy, people put family first, then broader group, then nation. To put it simply.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 19 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,740
@1,455,736 (J)
You believe that different races have different intellectual abilities but you think affirmative action is bad even though you think men and women shouldn’t compete against each other in sports because men and women innately have different athletic ability. So your idea of fairness with regards to gender is opposite from your idea of fairness with regards to race.
You believe that different races have different intellectual abilities but you think affirmative action is bad even though you think men and women shouldn’t compete against each other in sports because men and women innately have different athletic ability. So your idea of fairness with regards to gender is opposite from your idea of fairness with regards to race.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 43 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,742
@1,455,739 (J)
So you should support HBCUs then, because it’s just part of the natural hierarchy that blacks would want to make universities for black people.
So you should support HBCUs then, because it’s just part of the natural hierarchy that blacks would want to make universities for black people.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,743
For the record I don’t think different races have different intellectual abilities or even exist in the first place. I’m just pointing out that your beliefs are stupid and contradictory.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 50 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,759
@1,455,740 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)@1,455,742 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 37 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,767
@1,455,740 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
The obvious error you made here is that there's a difference between the parts of society that exist to get things done vs sports.
If you genuinely can't do a job the best, for whatever reason, that doesn't obligate everyone else to sacrifice their basic needs to make you happy. This applies to much more than race, we wouldn't sabotage infrastructure, food, security, or another essential organization to make someone with a severe disability feel welcomed, for example.
Sports are different, because making an all-woman team doesn't mean that we have shortages, or extensive waste, or put security at risk. Lowering standards for military to get more women in would do that, though.
The obvious error you made here is that there's a difference between the parts of society that exist to get things done vs sports.
If you genuinely can't do a job the best, for whatever reason, that doesn't obligate everyone else to sacrifice their basic needs to make you happy. This applies to much more than race, we wouldn't sabotage infrastructure, food, security, or another essential organization to make someone with a severe disability feel welcomed, for example.
Sports are different, because making an all-woman team doesn't mean that we have shortages, or extensive waste, or put security at risk. Lowering standards for military to get more women in would do that, though.
Anonymous J double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,768
@1,455,742 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I already said I'm fine with them, why are you still acting like I'm not?
I've never said HBCUs can't exist.
I already said I'm fine with them, why are you still acting like I'm not?
I've never said HBCUs can't exist.
Anonymous J triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,769
@1,455,743 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You are trying to show that I'm stupid by showing everyone you can't tell the difference between DEI in places of material consequence compared to actual games?
You are trying to show that I'm stupid by showing everyone you can't tell the difference between DEI in places of material consequence compared to actual games?