Minichan

Topic: Looking at the Supreme Court today, the Know-Nothings were right.

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago #137,303

If you bow to Rome and follow the orders of a Pope, your loyalties aren’t to the Constitution.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later[^] [v] #1,454,892

Didn’t George Washington own 300 slaves?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,893

I mean obviously the checks and balances don’t work, right. I don’t like this sort of thinking, religious bigotry aside. Have you ever considered that the problem is that the constitution is a flawed document that was written by flawed men who didn’t know everything? The Supreme Court shouldn’t exist in the first place.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,894

Also by the way the largest denomination of Christianity in the United States is Catholicism.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 14 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,030

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Catholics aren't Christian, Christians worship Jesus Christ, not the pope.

And if your church tells you to pray to Mary too, you aren't in a monotheistic religion.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,031

@previous (C)

> Catholics aren't Christian, Christians worship Jesus Christ, not the pope.
>
> And if your church tells you to pray to Mary too, you aren't in a monotheistic religion.

Plus there’s the whole idolatry issue.

Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,049

@previous (D)
And protecting child abusers, even after they've been moved around and reaccused by a parish that didn't know about their past.

Any community is liable to have abusers, but the Catholics are unique because they aid and abet the abusers.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 59 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,055

@previous (C)

> And protecting child abusers, even after they've been moved around and reaccused by a parish that didn't know about their past.
>
> Any community is liable to have abusers, but the Catholics are unique because they aid and abet the abusers.

Every one of the abuser priests should be killed. The whole priest celibacy thing was a medieval adaptation to stem corruption. The Anglicans and Orthodox allow married clergy and yet don’t seem to have any issues. I’m sure you can find occasional abuses but nothing like the Catholic Church, going way back to the homes for children, the horrors in Ireland, global pederasty scandals.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,146

@previous (E)
Oh yeah, right, the British are more moral than the Irish, that’s why the British enslaved my ancestors and my Irish ancestors fought in the civil war against the south.

Shut the fuck up.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,171

@1,454,892 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)

> Didn’t George Washington own 300 slaves?

A reminder - The Bible allowed Slavery.

There are at least seven passages in the Bible where God is depicted as directly permitting or endorsing slavery. Two of these are in the Law of Moses: God permitted the Israelites to take slaves from conquered peoples permanently, and the Israelites could sell themselves into slavery temporarily to pay off debts (Exod 21:2-11; Lev 25:44-46). The other five passages are in the New Testament, where slavery as a social institution is endorsed and slaves are called to obey their masters “in everything” (Eph 6:5-9; Col 3:22-4:1; 1 Tim 6:1-2; Tit 2:9-10; 1 Pet 2:18-20).

Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,172

@previous (G)
At this point he's admitted his "faith" is just ethnic solidarity, so it's doubtful he cares what the Bible says.

He also thinks being called a hypocrite is the same as being told he can't have his own space, so chances are he can't even read properly.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,212

@1,455,171 (G)
Fun fact: none of the slaves in the Bible are black people.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,213

@1,455,172 (C)

> He also thinks being called a hypocrite is the same as being told he can't have his own space, so chances are he can't even read properly.

If that’s how you interpreted what I said I think that says more about your own lack of intellectual abilities.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,214

The slaveowners in the Bible also are not white people.

I find it dishonest that people leave that out. The Bible never states that blacks and white are different and never states that blacks should be enslaved by whites. There are different kinds of slavery and the slavery in the Bible isn’t remotely the same thing or as bad as the slavery in the American south.

Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,265

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
The "Irish" in America aren't actually Irish, and it's dishonest of you to leave that out.

The only real Irishman on this board is the other Romanist, lettuceman.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.