Topic: Lee's pornography ban is moving forward in the Senate
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #137,227
Lee's pornography ban is moving forward in the Senate
https://www.advocate.com/politics/federal-pornography-ban-advances
https://www.advocate.com/politics/federal-pornography-ban-advances
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,454,175
One time when I was bored on the internet I was talking to some 30 year old white guy, I’m not sure why I think he was 30 or white, but he was definitely a guy. Anyway we were talking and he brought up the fact that he was paying for a key holding subscription thing. And I didn’t know what that was, so he explained to me what a chastity cage is, how he wears it to work, pees in it, doesn’t take it off for months, and pays for somebody to keep the key from him.
Idk I just thought I should bring that up. I don’t care if they make porn illegal, I just wanted to mention that.
Idk I just thought I should bring that up. I don’t care if they make porn illegal, I just wanted to mention that.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,178
Americans are all boot-licking Commies now.
Americans say stories about plastic bag bans are fake news, but what do you think when you go to the grocery store and they won't give you a bag?
Americans say stories about plastic bag bans are fake news, but what do you think when you go to the grocery store and they won't give you a bag?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 35 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,180
I always like how the GOP says it’s “libertarian.” It’s actually authoritarian, filled with public Pharisees (who are private perverts), who want to regulate porn, women’s bodies, even marital bedrooms. Guys like Clarence Thomas who think contraception should be banned even for married couples.
The bill has bad wording, could as easily be applied to a Caravaggio painting as to PornHub, and basically considers LGBTQ identities as obscene.
Before you say “who cares about fags,” the societal outliers are sea walls for all of our free speech protections. Does a book that depicts a love scene get banned as pornographic?
The bill has bad wording, could as easily be applied to a Caravaggio painting as to PornHub, and basically considers LGBTQ identities as obscene.
Before you say “who cares about fags,” the societal outliers are sea walls for all of our free speech protections. Does a book that depicts a love scene get banned as pornographic?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,210
The toothless hillbillies in trailer shacks will cheer with delight.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,211
@previous (D)
You mean the ones that Pornhub's stats say are the ones who search for the most trans porn in the US?
You mean the ones that Pornhub's stats say are the ones who search for the most trans porn in the US?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !xyO87qzwCk joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,212
@previous (E)
Sometimes when I was bored I used to troll in anon chat sites, a lot of men who identify as straight are into dicks. It’s like, a lot more common than you’d think. Nohomo.
Sometimes when I was bored I used to troll in anon chat sites, a lot of men who identify as straight are into dicks. It’s like, a lot more common than you’d think. Nohomo.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 44 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,213
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !xyO87qzwCk)
Oh for sure. I think a huge percentage of Republicans are secretly gay.
Oh for sure. I think a huge percentage of Republicans are secretly gay.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !xyO87qzwCk replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,215
@previous (E)
You can only glorify blond hair, blue eyes, and masculinity so much before it starts sounding like a sexual preference.
You can only glorify blond hair, blue eyes, and masculinity so much before it starts sounding like a sexual preference.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,218
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,244
@1,454,211 (E)
Of course! They beat their meat to the most masculine trannies pegging a man in shape.
Of course! They beat their meat to the most masculine trannies pegging a man in shape.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 31 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,250
Americans think the feelings of neighbors are more important than the rights of property owners.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,255
Libertarian News Bot returns to Minichan
Libertarian News Bot returns to Minichan
Libertarian News Bot returns to Minichan
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,266
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,276
@1,454,213 (E)
> Oh for sure. I think a huge percentage of Republicans are secretly gay.
Every RNC and similar gathering leads to bumps in Grindr traffic and business for gay and trans escorts. Most of the public moralists are sexually repressed and self-loathing.
> Oh for sure. I think a huge percentage of Republicans are secretly gay.
Every RNC and similar gathering leads to bumps in Grindr traffic and business for gay and trans escorts. Most of the public moralists are sexually repressed and self-loathing.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,278
@OP
> Lee's pornography ban is moving forward in the Senate
>
> https://www.advocate.com/politics/federal-pornography-ban-advances
Our Super Court would strike it down in QUICKLY.
> Lee's pornography ban is moving forward in the Senate
>
> https://www.advocate.com/politics/federal-pornography-ban-advances
Our Super Court would strike it down in QUICKLY.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,280
@previous (J)
> > Lee's pornography ban is moving forward in the Senate
> >
> > https://www.advocate.com/politics/federal-pornography-ban-advances
>
> Our Super Court would strike it down in QUICKLY.
This bill is his third attempt with prior's failing support except for one woman.
> > Lee's pornography ban is moving forward in the Senate
> >
> > https://www.advocate.com/politics/federal-pornography-ban-advances
>
> Our Super Court would strike it down in QUICKLY.
This bill is his third attempt with prior's failing support except for one woman.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,372
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,373
@1,454,276 (I)
There's no actual evidence for this.
Did any company release data showing that there's an actual statistically significant bump in those areas, something that can't just be dismissed as a typical seasonal wave? No.
It's the usual one joke liberals have, calling anyone who disagrees gay.
There's no actual evidence for this.
Did any company release data showing that there's an actual statistically significant bump in those areas, something that can't just be dismissed as a typical seasonal wave? No.
It's the usual one joke liberals have, calling anyone who disagrees gay.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,374
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,376
Here’s a test, which face do you find more sexy, this one:Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,377
Or this one:Anonymous M replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,378
@1,454,376 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
He's a plagairist
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Soyboy.
He's a plagairist
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Soyboy.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,379
Anonymous J replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,618
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,681
@1,454,373 (M)
> There's no actual evidence for this.
>
> Did any company release data showing that there's an actual statistically significant bump in those areas, something that can't just be dismissed as a typical seasonal wave? No.
>
> It's the usual one joke liberals have, calling anyone who disagrees gay.
It surges during DNC events too. It’s just funnier when it’s anti-gay Republicans. Downdetector and Grindr stats pointed to 2024 surges in Milwaukee traffic and 2016 activity in Cleveland. Charlie Kirk’s memorial caused a Grindr outage as well.
> There's no actual evidence for this.
>
> Did any company release data showing that there's an actual statistically significant bump in those areas, something that can't just be dismissed as a typical seasonal wave? No.
>
> It's the usual one joke liberals have, calling anyone who disagrees gay.
It surges during DNC events too. It’s just funnier when it’s anti-gay Republicans. Downdetector and Grindr stats pointed to 2024 surges in Milwaukee traffic and 2016 activity in Cleveland. Charlie Kirk’s memorial caused a Grindr outage as well.
Anonymous M replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,725
@previous (O)
That's stupid, because users congregating in one area, or even loading the app more than usual wouldn't knock out the servers.
It's not like it's a high bandwidth service, and they probably have cloudflare or something similar as a backup.
That's stupid, because users congregating in one area, or even loading the app more than usual wouldn't knock out the servers.
It's not like it's a high bandwidth service, and they probably have cloudflare or something similar as a backup.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,740
Tbh I’m more confident that God exists than I am that politicians believe in what they say. The hypocrisy doesn’t surprise me at all.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,741
And maybe if you’re an atheist you’re like, "Yeah right fairytales, that’s stupid." Maybe it is stupid, but you know what’s definitely more stupid? Believing politicians tell the truth.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 days later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,296
As Elsa said, "let it go"Anonymous Q double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 day later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,420
Who is LEE?Lady Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,431
There was some ruling about ai generated cscam recently and apparently it's not illegal
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 9 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,488
@1,454,741 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> And maybe if you’re an atheist you’re like, "Yeah right fairytales, that’s stupid." Maybe it is stupid, but you know what’s definitely more stupid? Believing politicians tell the truth.
You can track the tempo of America’s recent failed adventurism to elections and polling. All failures since Vietnam have been predicated on deep societal, cultural, religious, and associated ignorance by civilian politicians that negates any tactical benefit.
> And maybe if you’re an atheist you’re like, "Yeah right fairytales, that’s stupid." Maybe it is stupid, but you know what’s definitely more stupid? Believing politicians tell the truth.
You can track the tempo of America’s recent failed adventurism to elections and polling. All failures since Vietnam have been predicated on deep societal, cultural, religious, and associated ignorance by civilian politicians that negates any tactical benefit.
Bringbackbeef joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,810
@1,455,431 (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)
> There was some ruling about ai generated cscam recently and apparently it's not illegal
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RDNhpqdWVVc&ra=m
> There was some ruling about ai generated cscam recently and apparently it's not illegal
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RDNhpqdWVVc&ra=m
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 59 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,811
Lady Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 1 week ago, 8 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,866
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,882
Anonymous J replied with this 1 week ago, 21 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,883
One week since this topic was posted. Only one other Senator has backed this bill.
Anonymous Q replied with this 1 week ago, 18 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,125
Pr0n is bad, mmmmmmmmmkay?Anonymous Q double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,456,141
Lesbians are ok?