Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 17 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,453,573
But I mean seriously, think about how much we’re wasting as a species by being divided up into these imaginary things called country wasting resources on fighting over the surface of the Earth.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 46 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,453,586
We would have endless proposals for NASA projects and decades of go nowhere development. I say put NASA back on analog and slide rulers and see if they can replicate 1960-1972 successes.
Live&Lemon joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,453,599
@previous (C)
To be fair, most of the issues with the Artemis program come from the fact that congress dictated to NASA that the SLS should be made with shuttle parts and the lander should be made by a private contractor.
Live&Lemon double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,453,600
Although, they did successfully launch the rocket to lunar orbit on the first attempt, which is pretty impressive. They only had one test flight before they flew humans on it and both flights were completely successful. If you think about the complexity involved that’s kinda crazy. So they’re definitely competent if their hands aren’t tied behind their backs.
> To be fair, most of the issues with the Artemis program come from the fact that congress dictated to NASA that the SLS should be made with shuttle parts and the lander should be made by a private contractor. > > The lander currently does not exist.