Topic: Did Becky and Fake anon ever recover from the 2016 US election loss?
Erik !saAqdaazn2 started this discussion 1 month ago#136,753
For those of you who has been around for a while Becky and Fake Anon were pretty big Hillary fans and were never the same after Trump won. You can even see a decline in their posting after her loss.
> Nuking Japan to end WW2 with fewer deaths is a complicated decision, but it's within the realm of reason.
Does anyone unironically actually believe that?
Have you ever googled how many Koreans were living in Hiroshima? It’s one thing to say that the Japanese civilians deserved to die for the actions of their government which is already kinda bullshit, but they basically burned thousands of ethnic Koreans alive.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,022
Also, the idea we would have had to invade Japan to get Japan to surrender is stupid at face value. Japan is an island, they had no navy, we sank their entire navy. Japan can’t support its own population because it doesn’t have enough land to grow its own food and they have basically no natural oil reserves. We could have literally just sat there and done nothing and a year later they’d be on their knees begging us to let them surrender.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 1 month ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,023
Or even the idea that it had anything to do with reducing deaths is also stupid. Take the Nigerian civil war for example, there are estimates that between 500,000 and 3 million Biafrans died from starvation as a result of Nigeria’s naval blockade. That’s more people than died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Question: have you ever heard about the Nigerian civil war? Probably not. If we let Japanese people starve, nobody would ever ask any questions about it. We should have just done that instead. The atomic bombing was stupid from an image perspective. If any other country did it everyone would say it was a war crime because it obviously was.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 23 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,025
It would also be smarter from the perspective of we wouldn’t have to spend money rebuilding anything if we just blockaded Japan and waited from them to surrender due to starvation rather than burn everything down. It’s also stupid from that perspective. We gave billions of dollars to Japan when they were the aggressors but people have the audacity to say giving reparations to black people is absurd. The entire thing is stupid.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,082
I’m also pretty sure that the government has been wrong before about things that everyday people weren’t wrong about. I’m pretty sure that’s possible and that’s happened more than once.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 11 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,083
Also, just being real here, it was the United States in the 1940s. We had already firebombed Japanese cities. We could easily fly over Japan and drop bombs and burn down entire cities without sending in ground troops and we were fine with doing that. Do you honestly believe that if we had the ability to burn Japanese people alive without losing American lives, and we were actively fine with doing it, that preventing deaths was even a consideration? You can’t actually seriously believe that.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,084
I mean for example, what do you know about the US in the 1940s? We had racial segregation, thousands of black people were murdered by the KKK in the Deep South, and the government put Japanese American citizens in concentration camps based on their ethnicity. Given that, do you actually believe that saving lives had anything to do with it? You can’t believe that…
Anonymous L quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,086
And of course maybe they didn’t want Americans to die, but what happened next in history after that? If they were so worried about American lives, why did what happened next happen next? That’s pretty weird.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 20 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,451,087
@1,451,085 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Ok, so a woman on the ambo managing the flock is a problem, but we can let her use that feminine intuition to direct the world's largest nuclear stockpile in the event that kind of decision needs to be made in minutes.
> Yes, because men have been in charge. > > Nuking Japan to end WW2 with fewer deaths is a complicated decision, but it's within the realm of reason. > > We don't need some woman who's peeved and refuses to tell another head of state why she's mad, and then sends the nukes when he can't read her mind.
Fighting on the wrong side of WW2 is a soyboy move.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,451,561
@previous (N)
Just look at this effeminate queer, just about as far from masculinity and dignity as can be. Looks like a someone photoshopped a babies head onto a mans body.