Topic: Italy suspends schengen agreement with Spain
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 hours ago #136,625
Borders are closed for Spaniards, no visa-free flights.
ICYMI 50,000 blax broke into Spain over 24h
ICYMI 50,000 blax broke into Spain over 24h
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 hours ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #1,449,994
lol, you think these people are black?Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 hours ago, 3 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,997
Technically they ran into Ceuta, which is a part of Spain… that’s in Africa.
So it’s like, welp.
So it’s like, welp.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,998
Tbh they’re not really even different racially from Spaniards because Spain was colonized by these people for 800 years. They’re probably already mixed with each other genetically.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 3 hours ago, 59 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,999
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> Tbh they’re not really even different racially from Spaniards because Spain was colonized by these people for 800 years. They’re probably already mixed with each other genetically.
(It’s true Africans colonized Spain for 800 years which is longer than Europeans colonized Africa google it).
> Tbh they’re not really even different racially from Spaniards because Spain was colonized by these people for 800 years. They’re probably already mixed with each other genetically.
(It’s true Africans colonized Spain for 800 years which is longer than Europeans colonized Africa google it).
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quintuple-posted this 3 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,000
Muslim rule in Spain lasted for 781 years, running from the initial Umayyad conquest in 711 to the fall of the Emirate of Granada in 1492.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 14 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,002
@1,449,994 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
When you were confronted with the fact that no black man has ever been pope you gave a white guy from Tunisia as a counter example.
If you want to go back and forth depending on what's convenient, I'm just not going to bother.
When you were confronted with the fact that no black man has ever been pope you gave a white guy from Tunisia as a counter example.
If you want to go back and forth depending on what's convenient, I'm just not going to bother.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 hours ago, 14 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,006
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 hours ago, 34 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,007
You know what? Fuck it. Tunisians are white, I’m Chinese and Trump is Indian.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 hours ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,008
Anyway, I just think it’s interesting how European colonization needs a biological explanation but somehow you’re completely fine with the fact Africans colonized Europeans and you need no explanation for that. You know, because you’re not a narcissist, you’re just an honest guy saying "the truth" that only benefits you 100% of the time. Yeah right, moron.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 2 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,009
But yeah, no I see your point. The African popes weren’t African that’s why nobody ever pointed out that they were African and they’re called the African popes, makes sense.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quintuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,010
Also the claim that they were white is idiotic, it’s completely ignorant. If you actually research it every source will tell you "we don’t know what race they were because Romans had a completely different understanding of ethnicity from our modern understanding." There’s no evidence the African popes weren’t white. White supremacy didn’t exist in Ancient Rome, they had white slaves and they had African slaves, slavery wasn’t based on race. There were even Africans in Ancient Rome who owned slaves.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc sextuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,011
Basically this is all to say: you’re a fucking idiot.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc septuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,013
And this shouldn’t be news to anybody who actually knows anything about the world that the modern concept of a racial hierarchy with Europeans at the top was only invented 500 years ago. You can easily look back and find sources where people in the ancient world had totally different opinions. For example, in the politics Aristotle implies he thinks Northern Europeans are stupid and lack the capacity to control their neighbors because of it.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc octuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,014
And it’s even dumber because it really wasn’t even true in medieval Europe. Part of why Muslims could conquer parts of Europe in the Middle Ages and hold on to it for hundreds and hundreds of years was because in the Middle Ages the Arab world was more scientifically advanced than Europe was.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc nonuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,017
Really, if you went back to Roman times, which is when there were African popes, Germanic people in the Northern parts of Europe were considered by the Romans to be uncivilized barbarians and it wasn’t uncommon to use captured warriors as slaves. It’s just really stupid to try to use a white supremacist lens to think about the Roman Empire. They had their own prejudices, but they were completely different.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc decuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,018
And of course yeah, it’s true, black people didn’t conquer Europe.It has nothing to do with racial superiority or inferiority or anything moronic like that. The Umayyad caliphate didn’t conquer sub-Saharan Africa, but they conquered Spain.
It’s obviously because of geography. It’s because of the Sahara desert. Europeans weren’t able to overwhelm the African continent even with guns until the Industrial Revolution. Before that they could only ever conquer North Africa and half the time North Africans took bits of Europe.
There’s no such thing as a superior race. It’s all one sided fake history made up to make you feel special for being white even though you’re a loser.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc undecuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,020
And hey, power has always shifted in the world, the only constant is change. The pendulum has always been swinging and this time won’t be different.Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,022
@1,450,007 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I hope we can put the past behind us, I didn't realize you were asian.
I hope we can put the past behind us, I didn't realize you were asian.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 hour ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,024
@1,450,020 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You're using power and population size interchangeably.
You're using power and population size interchangeably.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,025
@1,450,022 (A)
I was being sarcastic.
@previous (A)
Yeah, there’s a reason for that. Europe was only ever able to conquer Africa because Europe historically had 2 to 3 times the population of Africa. Population is the basis of economic power which is the basis of military power. The west is losing their population advantage which is the original reason why they were able to conquer the world and became wealthy. 200 years from now the most powerful countries will probably be African and/or Asian.
I was being sarcastic.
@previous (A)
Yeah, there’s a reason for that. Europe was only ever able to conquer Africa because Europe historically had 2 to 3 times the population of Africa. Population is the basis of economic power which is the basis of military power. The west is losing their population advantage which is the original reason why they were able to conquer the world and became wealthy. 200 years from now the most powerful countries will probably be African and/or Asian.
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,026
This is true by the way, for hundreds of years Europe had more people than Africa. Europe colonized Africa in the late 1800s and early 1900s, most of Africa was still colonized during World War Two, and decolonization began in the 60s. Africa only surpassed Europe in population in the 1990s and now there are twice as many Africans as Europeans. African’s average age is about half of the average age in Europe because their population is still young from this rapid population growth. The economic consequence of a population boom happens later when those children grow up. There’s a delay.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,027
@1,450,025 (C)
> I was being sarcastic.
Then fuck you nigger!
> Yeah, there’s a reason for that. Europe was only ever able to conquer Africa because Europe historically had 2 to 3 times the population of Africa. Population is the basis of economic power which is the basis of military power. The west is losing their population advantage which is the original reason why they were able to conquer the world and became wealthy. 200 years from now the most powerful countries will probably be African and/or Asian.
It looks like whites are a minority now, why aren't blacks or asians in charge now?
> I was being sarcastic.
Then fuck you nigger!
> Yeah, there’s a reason for that. Europe was only ever able to conquer Africa because Europe historically had 2 to 3 times the population of Africa. Population is the basis of economic power which is the basis of military power. The west is losing their population advantage which is the original reason why they were able to conquer the world and became wealthy. 200 years from now the most powerful countries will probably be African and/or Asian.
It looks like whites are a minority now, why aren't blacks or asians in charge now?
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,029
The United States might be the wealthiest nation, I’m thinking in larger terms than nations. Nations are artificial, and borders can change. I’m looking at the scale of continents. On the scale of continents, the largest continent is Asia and the continent with the largest GDP is Asia. Africa will come close to Asia in population by the end of the century. That’s why there’s so much Chinese investment in building infrastructure in Africa, they’re not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts, they’re making a calculation there.
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 hour ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,031
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,032
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,033
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,035
@previous (C)
America can arrest the President of a sovereign country.
What a map and a constitution says doesn't necessarily match reality.
America can arrest the President of a sovereign country.
What a map and a constitution says doesn't necessarily match reality.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,036
@previous (A)
So can China, France, the UK, Russia, what’s your point? A lot of countries can do that.
So can China, France, the UK, Russia, what’s your point? A lot of countries can do that.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,037
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 22 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,038
Arresting the president of a country isn’t a thing that most countries do because it doesn’t actually achieve anything. A government isn’t really led by one person. You can’t rule a country by yourself you need to delegate tasks to other powerful people. There is usually an ideological alignment between people who support the leader of a country so when you kill or kidnap the leader, the next leader is usually the same or worse.
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,039
@1,450,037 (A)
Russia isn’t ideologically aligned with Europe. I just listed European counties because I’m American. South Korea could do the same thing. Most countries could do it. Do you know how easy it is to arrest a president? Presidents go to meet with other presidents in other countries all the time. Any president could just invite a leader to their country and then not let them leave, that would be super easy.
Russia isn’t ideologically aligned with Europe. I just listed European counties because I’m American. South Korea could do the same thing. Most countries could do it. Do you know how easy it is to arrest a president? Presidents go to meet with other presidents in other countries all the time. Any president could just invite a leader to their country and then not let them leave, that would be super easy.
Anonymous C triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,040
Hell between Russia and Nigeria, you’d be better off dealing with the Nigerian government than the Russian government if you’re a citizen of a western country. Pointing out that Russians are white is the most irrelevant thing.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 59 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,041
@1,450,038 (C)
Lol.
It's a demonstration of power. The person with the final say in a country might be self-sacrificing, and even that is embarassing for the country pretending to be sovereign.
Most rulers would be influenced, they won't just think "I'll annoy America, they can just pick a new President". They don't need to be a vassal, a little nudge on their foreign policy will end up being worth billions.
Lol.
It's a demonstration of power. The person with the final say in a country might be self-sacrificing, and even that is embarassing for the country pretending to be sovereign.
Most rulers would be influenced, they won't just think "I'll annoy America, they can just pick a new President". They don't need to be a vassal, a little nudge on their foreign policy will end up being worth billions.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,044
@previous (A)
Demonstrations of power are a display of weakness.
"Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak."
- Sun Tzu
Demonstrations of power are a display of weakness.
"Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak."
- Sun Tzu
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 48 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,045
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,046
Your entire ideology is based on insecurity. I don’t think that you’re strong. I know you’re weak.
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 hour ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,048
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,049
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,050
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,051
You’re insecure about your race which is why you so desperately want to convince me that white history is more glorious than it really is and why you so desperately want to convince me that white majority countries are more powerful than they actually are and why you so desperately want to convince me that by virtue of being white you are intelligent when I can clearly see you’re just lying to my face over and over again.
Anonymous C triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,052
I mean come on, you must take me for an idiot. If I was actually inferior to you, you wouldn’t need to convince me of anything. I’m obviously important if you need me to believe so badly that you’re better than I am. I’m not convinced at all.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 9 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,053
@1,450,048 (C)
You just said demonstrations of power are weakness.
Power and weakness are antonyms, and demontrate means to clearly prove it's the case.
So you're argument is that to prove something is to prove it's opposite?
That violates Aristotle's axiom of non-contradiction. Usually those first principles are obvious to everyone, but apparently not to blacks and catholics.
You just said demonstrations of power are weakness.
Power and weakness are antonyms, and demontrate means to clearly prove it's the case.
So you're argument is that to prove something is to prove it's opposite?
That violates Aristotle's axiom of non-contradiction. Usually those first principles are obvious to everyone, but apparently not to blacks and catholics.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,054
@previous (A)
You only think that because you’re an idiot. If you’re actually strong you want your enemies to think that you’re weak and if you’re actually weak you want your enemies to think that you’re strong.
You only think that because you’re an idiot. If you’re actually strong you want your enemies to think that you’re weak and if you’re actually weak you want your enemies to think that you’re strong.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 7 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,055
@1,450,051 (C)
I don't care what you think about whites, and I see a lot of suicidal whites anyway so I'm not really convinced of white supremacy per se.
I'm just here to point out your numerous errors and ideological contradictions.
I don't care what you think about whites, and I see a lot of suicidal whites anyway so I'm not really convinced of white supremacy per se.
I'm just here to point out your numerous errors and ideological contradictions.
Anonymous C replied with this 59 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,056
If you can actually kill your enemies, you don’t act tough in the hopes your enemies will be scared and run away, you kill your enemies. If you’re resorting to tactics of fear as a strategy that just shows you have nothing to back it up because there’s no reason you would ever do that if you could back it up. It’s a display of weakness.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 59 minutes ago, 21 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,057
@1,450,054 (C)
I think America is doing well with it's position as hegemon now.
Trying to hide in the shadows is only necessary if you can be destroyed. America is so much more powerful than everyone else that there's no need for that.
Demonstrations of power streamline the process of pressuring others and demanding tributes and deference.
I think America is doing well with it's position as hegemon now.
Trying to hide in the shadows is only necessary if you can be destroyed. America is so much more powerful than everyone else that there's no need for that.
Demonstrations of power streamline the process of pressuring others and demanding tributes and deference.
Anonymous C replied with this 58 minutes ago, 8 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,058
@1,450,055 (A)
> I don't care what you think about whites, and I see a lot of suicidal whites anyway so I'm not really convinced of white supremacy per se.
Then who do you believe is superior?
> I don't care what you think about whites, and I see a lot of suicidal whites anyway so I'm not really convinced of white supremacy per se.
Then who do you believe is superior?
Anonymous C double-posted this 57 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,059
@1,450,057 (A)
> Trying to hide in the shadows is only necessary if you can be destroyed. America is so much more powerful than everyone else that there's no need for that.
Is that why we’re running out of munitions?
> Trying to hide in the shadows is only necessary if you can be destroyed. America is so much more powerful than everyone else that there's no need for that.
Is that why we’re running out of munitions?
Anonymous C triple-posted this 56 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,060
We have weapons, sure, but we don’t have the manufacturing base to produce the munitions to fight a prolonged conflict.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 55 minutes ago, 48 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,061
@1,450,058 (C)
There's a lot of racial sub-types.
Anglos, jews, mandarins, brahmin, some mutt of one of those upper tiers.
There's a lot of racial sub-types.
Anglos, jews, mandarins, brahmin, some mutt of one of those upper tiers.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 54 minutes ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,062
@1,450,059 (C)
No, we're running out to keep the production on line. Downsizing is a vulnerability if you need to hire more workers in a rush.
No, we're running out to keep the production on line. Downsizing is a vulnerability if you need to hire more workers in a rush.
Anonymous C replied with this 54 minutes ago, 18 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,063
@1,450,061 (A)
Anglos and Jews are the master race?
What kinda lame racist are you?
Anglos and Jews are the master race?
What kinda lame racist are you?
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 53 minutes ago, 46 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,064
Anonymous C replied with this 52 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,066
@previous (A)
If your entire ideology is based on power and dominance why would you ever pick the English and the Jews? That doesn’t make any sense. England and Israel are tiny countries that don’t affect much of anything.
If your entire ideology is based on power and dominance why would you ever pick the English and the Jews? That doesn’t make any sense. England and Israel are tiny countries that don’t affect much of anything.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 51 minutes ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,067
Anonymous C replied with this 50 minutes ago, 52 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,070
@previous (A)
No I’m serious. Why would you think Jews and English people are superior? That’s the weirdest way to be racist ever. Usually people who think whites are superior hate Jews. And it doesn’t make sense to me why English because they’re not even the most powerful country in Europe anymore.
No I’m serious. Why would you think Jews and English people are superior? That’s the weirdest way to be racist ever. Usually people who think whites are superior hate Jews. And it doesn’t make sense to me why English because they’re not even the most powerful country in Europe anymore.
Anonymous C double-posted this 49 minutes ago, 53 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,072
It would be less weird to me if your ideology wasn’t so based on hard power as evidence for superiority and inferiority.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 49 minutes ago, 5 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,073
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 48 minutes ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,074
Anonymous C replied with this 48 minutes ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,075
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 47 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,076
Anonymous C replied with this 45 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,077
@previous (A)
I don’t dispute that the leaders of the British Empire were British, but the Jews were an oppressed minority group for most of history and the English only led the British Empire.
I don’t dispute that the leaders of the British Empire were British, but the Jews were an oppressed minority group for most of history and the English only led the British Empire.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 43 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,078
@previous (C)
> the Jews were an oppressed minority group for most of history
Resilient when they were, and they have had a lot of powerful positions in recent history.
My house keeps a couple on retainer, I have nothing against them.
> the English only led the British Empire.
🤔
> the Jews were an oppressed minority group for most of history
Resilient when they were, and they have had a lot of powerful positions in recent history.
My house keeps a couple on retainer, I have nothing against them.
> the English only led the British Empire.
🤔
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 42 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,079
@previous (A)
> Resilient when they were, and they have had a lot of powerful positions in recent history.
Like what?
> Resilient when they were, and they have had a lot of powerful positions in recent history.
Like what?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 42 minutes ago, 31 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,080
@previous (C)
I'm not even trying to be rude with this, but how long have you had access to the internet?
I'm not even trying to be rude with this, but how long have you had access to the internet?
Anonymous C replied with this 41 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,081
I just find your choices very odd because you talk all this talk about power and dominance. Why wouldn’t you say the Russians or the Chinese are the master race if you’re so obsessed with power? The English and the Jews just seem like a really bizarre choice. I never would have guessed that.
Anonymous C double-posted this 40 minutes ago, 20 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,082
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 40 minutes ago, 18 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,083
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 39 minutes ago, 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,084
@1,450,082 (C)
I wouldn't know where to start. Is there a certain area you can think of, and I can see if I have an example.
I wouldn't know where to start. Is there a certain area you can think of, and I can see if I have an example.
Anonymous C replied with this 39 minutes ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,085
Anonymous C double-posted this 39 minutes ago, 27 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,086
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 38 minutes ago, 36 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,087
Anonymous C replied with this 37 minutes ago, 46 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,088
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 36 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,090
@previous (C)
I studied race science but I don't know that region very well, sorry to say.
Can we come back to you questioning jews in positions of power? Do you disagree with that?
I studied race science but I don't know that region very well, sorry to say.
Can we come back to you questioning jews in positions of power? Do you disagree with that?
Anonymous C replied with this 35 minutes ago, 30 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,091
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 34 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,092
@previous (C)
No, because you're wasting time.
You can keep bringing up that I wouldn't answer this question if you think it makes me look bad.
No, because you're wasting time.
You can keep bringing up that I wouldn't answer this question if you think it makes me look bad.
Anonymous C replied with this 33 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,093
@previous (A)
Well yeah it kind of does, you made a claim and acted all high and mighty like it must be ridiculous that I don’t know about all the powerful Jews running the world so I just asked you to inform me of the names of a few powerful Jews.
Well yeah it kind of does, you made a claim and acted all high and mighty like it must be ridiculous that I don’t know about all the powerful Jews running the world so I just asked you to inform me of the names of a few powerful Jews.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 31 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,094
@previous (C)
Is this related to how catholics don't proselytize to jews anymore?
Do you have to play dumb if this comes up?
Is this related to how catholics don't proselytize to jews anymore?
Do you have to play dumb if this comes up?
Anonymous C replied with this 30 minutes ago, 58 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,095
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 28 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,097
@previous (C)
How about the names of Bishops that covered up priest abuse, and never faced consequences?
How about the names of Bishops that covered up priest abuse, and never faced consequences?
Anonymous C replied with this 27 minutes ago, 52 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,098
Anonymous C double-posted this 26 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,099
I wonder what the imaginary audience in your head thinks of the fact that you can’t answer basic questions when asked about your worldview.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 23 minutes ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,100
@1,450,098 (C)
From the globe story: Cardinal Bernard Francis Law, Bishop John B. McCormack, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, Bishop Robert Finn
From the globe story: Cardinal Bernard Francis Law, Bishop John B. McCormack, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, Bishop Robert Finn
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 22 minutes ago, 43 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,101
@1,450,098 (C)
The church says it doesn't proseltyize because they're already god's people and it's the same god, which means every catholic is a jew in a way.
The church says it doesn't proseltyize because they're already god's people and it's the same god, which means every catholic is a jew in a way.
Anonymous C replied with this 22 minutes ago, 41 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,103
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 21 minutes ago, 19 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,104
Anonymous C replied with this 21 minutes ago, 40 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,105
Anonymous C double-posted this 19 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,106
Also that would be confusing because that would make me categorized as racially superior in your worldview if all Catholics were Jews.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 19 minutes ago, 15 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,107
@1,450,105 (C)
So the bishops I mentioned, the ones protecting pedophiles and being protected by the church themselves, aren't jews?
But the church says it's god is the god of israel, which is why there is no need to proselytize. I think that means the people involved in this sex ring are actually jews, right?
So the bishops I mentioned, the ones protecting pedophiles and being protected by the church themselves, aren't jews?
But the church says it's god is the god of israel, which is why there is no need to proselytize. I think that means the people involved in this sex ring are actually jews, right?
Anonymous C replied with this 19 minutes ago, 11 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,108
Although I’m not Jewish, I’m Catholic.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 18 minutes ago, 23 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,109
@1,450,106 (C)
I only meant Ashkenazis, not "spiritual jews" because catholic isn't a genetic group really.
I only meant Ashkenazis, not "spiritual jews" because catholic isn't a genetic group really.
Anonymous C replied with this 18 minutes ago, 22 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,110
@1,450,107 (A)
Fun fact: the God of Israel is also the God of Germany, the God of Vermont, and the God of snakes.
Fun fact: the God of Israel is also the God of Germany, the God of Vermont, and the God of snakes.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 17 minutes ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,111
@1,450,108 (C)
I haven't heard of a synogogue touching boys as part of an institutional level, so maybe you're right.
I haven't heard of a synogogue touching boys as part of an institutional level, so maybe you're right.
Anonymous C replied with this 17 minutes ago, 46 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,112
Anonymous C double-posted this 16 minutes ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,113
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,114
@1,450,112 (C)
I can't find one.
@previous (C)
I'm on a teletype, I can't watch videos.
I can't find one.
@previous (C)
I'm on a teletype, I can't watch videos.
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 15 minutes ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,115
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,116
@previous (C)
It's good to know that there isn't any jewish organization supporting that type of thing.
It's good to know that there isn't any jewish organization supporting that type of thing.
Anonymous C replied with this 12 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,117
Anonymous C double-posted this 10 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,118
I’ll help you out with your search, have you tried searching for "right to rape?"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 9 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,120
@previous (C)
Israel is made up of a lot of russians really they aren't even jews.
russian language communities, they are a lot of settlers and new migrants. you can say you feel jewish if you're white and they will let you steal a house from an Arab.
Israel is made up of a lot of russians really they aren't even jews.
russian language communities, they are a lot of settlers and new migrants. you can say you feel jewish if you're white and they will let you steal a house from an Arab.
Anonymous C replied with this 8 minutes ago, 40 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,121
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 minutes ago, 54 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,122
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 minutes ago, 31 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,123
Anonymous C replied with this 7 minutes ago, 8 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,124
Anonymous C double-posted this 6 minutes ago, 22 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,125
@1,450,123 (A)
Wow, I guess by that logic Americans aren’t even white, we truly are a black country.
Wow, I guess by that logic Americans aren’t even white, we truly are a black country.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,126
Anonymous C replied with this 4 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,127
You know man, I’ve been thinking. You taught me about all that IQ data, and I truly have changed my mind on this. I see your point. Jews have higher IQs than white people and they’re superior, so I’m going to stop listening to you because you’re white and Jews are smarter than you and listen to Jews instead.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 minutes ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,128
@previous (C)
Most of my information comes from books written by jews anyway, you'll get closer to the source.
Most of my information comes from books written by jews anyway, you'll get closer to the source.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 49 seconds ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,450,129
@previous (A)Anyway, I just talked to some boys down at the IDF, we wanna know what you think of the new plans for greater Israel.