Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) double-posted this 2 hours ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#1,449,099
I’m just saying, it’s weird people make biological determinist or cultural determinist arguments when culture and biology are relatively static but the power of nations has never been static.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) quadruple-posted this 2 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,449,101
Then obviously, the number of people in a society determines how powerful it is possible for that society to be. A country with 100 million people can obviously out produce a country with 1 million people. And the population of the continents are different, but that isn’t static either.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc (OP) octuple-posted this 1 hour ago, 3 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,449,107
It’s also weird people think European dominance in the past is completely unrelated to this.
"They invented more stuff than black people."
But it has nothing to do with the fact there were more white people?
"They won more wars than Africans."
But it has nothing to do with the fact they had more people than Africa?
It’s all really freaking obvious if you just look at how things change over time. And it also become really freaking obvious that it’s not going to stay the way it is now until the end of time.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 7 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,449,110
Then people just assume "oh the future will be between China and the United States." It probably won’t, and that’s obvious if you look at population data.