Topic: Marx was right about Capitalism
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago #136,444
He just was.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,448,441
I for one love the corporate elite dearly because they know what’s best for us! They feed us and show us the way!
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,445
boof joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,458
so like, why is it called capitalism anyway
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,460
boof replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,462
so there's capital, but what's the ism suffix doing
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 9 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,489
@previous (boof)
Capitalists are racist against capital unlike communist who are racist against communes.
Capitalists are racist against capital unlike communist who are racist against communes.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,519
So the solution to capitalist excesses isn’t reform or regulation, it’s Communism? Lenin started his New Economy Policy, with a free market, after human meet was being sold at city markets. Communism = failure.
beef joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,751
Capitalism means rule by bankers. This doesn’t sound good so they try to pitch in another way.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,892
@previous (beef)
> Capitalism means rule by bankers.
This is one of the dumbest statements I’ve read in a while.
> Capitalism means rule by bankers.
This is one of the dumbest statements I’ve read in a while.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,893
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 16 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,026
@previous (I)
To be fair, if somebody doesn’t like bankers, you don’t have to keep your money in a bank, there are alternative options out there.
To be fair, if somebody doesn’t like bankers, you don’t have to keep your money in a bank, there are alternative options out there.
Anonymous I replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,055
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Taking your money out of the bank doesn't change the fact that the country is ruled by bankers.
Their power doesn't rely on regular people keeping an account open. They still have their own money, super rich depositors, and the ability to borrow from the fed.
Taking your money out of the bank doesn't change the fact that the country is ruled by bankers.
Their power doesn't rely on regular people keeping an account open. They still have their own money, super rich depositors, and the ability to borrow from the fed.
Mr. Bloody Lemoande !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 54 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,064
@previous (I)
Here’s a question: how do you want money to exist without a central bank to regulate the supply of money?
Here’s a question: how do you want money to exist without a central bank to regulate the supply of money?
Anonymous I replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,066
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemoande !0JqexkOGBc)
Here's a question: where did I say we should get rid of a central bank?
As usual you have no reading comprehension, make an assumption, and can't spend a few seconds asking "was this actually said?"
Here's a question: where did I say we should get rid of a central bank?
As usual you have no reading comprehension, make an assumption, and can't spend a few seconds asking "was this actually said?"
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 35 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,071
@previous (I)
Oh so you’re complaining about bankers and I’m just supposed to assume you support bankers that are necessary for capitalism to function even though you’re complaining that bankers are controlling capitalism. Wow, it’s almost like you just change your argument whenever you feel like it.
Oh so you’re complaining about bankers and I’m just supposed to assume you support bankers that are necessary for capitalism to function even though you’re complaining that bankers are controlling capitalism. Wow, it’s almost like you just change your argument whenever you feel like it.
Anonymous I replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,087
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> I'm just supposed to assume you support bankers
No, you're supposed to stop assuming.
Which is why my last comment called you out for making assumptions.
> Wow, it’s almost like you just change your argument whenever you feel like it.
I didn't change my argument. As usual, I suggest you *quote the argument* if you want to insist I made it.
But as with every other time you insist I made an argument, you will refuse to actually quote where I said it.
What I actually said was that pulling your money out of a bank doesn't stop bankers from having power. I said that in response to you pointing out that people can stop using banks, which you commented in response to boof saying bankers control society.
> I'm just supposed to assume you support bankers
No, you're supposed to stop assuming.
Which is why my last comment called you out for making assumptions.
> Wow, it’s almost like you just change your argument whenever you feel like it.
I didn't change my argument. As usual, I suggest you *quote the argument* if you want to insist I made it.
But as with every other time you insist I made an argument, you will refuse to actually quote where I said it.
What I actually said was that pulling your money out of a bank doesn't stop bankers from having power. I said that in response to you pointing out that people can stop using banks, which you commented in response to boof saying bankers control society.
(Edited 55 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,089
@previous (I)
You never argue in good faith. It’s just a game for you to act arrogant despite being stupid.
You never argue in good faith. It’s just a game for you to act arrogant despite being stupid.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,092
Of course, you and I know the real reason you’re yapping about bankers is because of your views on race, more specifically your hypocritical views on Jews. You think that income is determined by IQ and you think that Hitler understood the Jews were too wealthy and therefore that was bad for Germans (white people). Yet you dehumanize blacks and use racial slurs and compared blacks to fish. I think it’s safe to say you have no real concept of logic and only selfishness born out of some deep rooted insecurity as a man (since it’s connected with gender). That’s the other thing, you hate blacks so much and you hate women so much, I think this isn’t even about race, this is all about your manhood or lack there of.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,093
Now that I think of it, your views on Jews contrasted with your views on Africans reveals something. You think it is right to take away an advantage in wealth a minority has, but you think it is wrong to give an academic advantage to a minority that has historically been oppressed in that regard. That’s not the strategy of a man who truly believes that he is superior. It’s the strategy of someone who knows they’re not superior but wants to unjustly take from others and push their status lower just to look down on them without actually accomplishing any achievements of your own.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,094
It’s really not about fairness at all.
Anonymous I replied with this 3 weeks ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,108
@1,449,089 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@1,449,092 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@1,449,093 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Walls of text, consecutive posts, yet not one quote of me making the argument you claim I made.
It's literally the same exact mistake you make every single time.
You insist I made an argument, you insist I'm trying to change the argument, but you're unable to show where.
If this is all some troll shtick, at least mix it up. Find a new fallacy.
@1,449,092 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@1,449,093 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Walls of text, consecutive posts, yet not one quote of me making the argument you claim I made.
It's literally the same exact mistake you make every single time.
You insist I made an argument, you insist I'm trying to change the argument, but you're unable to show where.
If this is all some troll shtick, at least mix it up. Find a new fallacy.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
boof replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,449,177
COCK