Topic: White supremacists be like
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago #136,402
This needs a biological explanationAnonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 10 seconds later[^] [v] #1,447,912
But this doesn’tAnonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 31 seconds after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,913
And neither does thisAnonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 47 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,914
Or thisAnonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,915
And absolutely not this. This can’t possibly have a biological explanation. Africans never colonized anything.Anonymous A (OP) sextuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,916
Madagascar was settled first by Asians and now it’s 50% Bantu. That absolutely does not need any biological explanation. Nobody should ever try to explain that biologically. Only the British Empire needs that. You do not need to explain why anybody else ever expanded into new territory. You just have to tell me why Europeans had huge empties. Nothing else needs biology.Anonymous A (OP) septuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,917
Africans never got on boats and took over an island that’s craaaaaazy. Never happened. Don’t worry about it.
Anonymous A (OP) octuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,918
You know, because they didn’t have governments. That’s how they successfully managed to become half the population of an island that was already settled by another people. They didn’t plan that, they just ended up there somehow. Don’t worry about it.
Anonymous A (OP) nonuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,919
It can’t possibly be that empires have always risen and fallen throughout all of history because nothing lasts forever and all humans are capable of innovation. No that can’t be the case, we must be special
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 22 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,921
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,924
Anonymous C double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,925
Technically they’re Austronesians not Polynesians.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,926
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,927
We can each have our own opinion but I’m pretty sure Indonesian people are Asian.Anonymous C double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 46 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,928
@1,447,926 (B)
Now you’re getting confused. People in Madagascar are half Bantu half Indonesian. The Bantu people originated in west Africa, I’m Bantu.
Now you’re getting confused. People in Madagascar are half Bantu half Indonesian. The Bantu people originated in west Africa, I’m Bantu.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,929
@previous (C)
The Bantu took longer to find that island than the austronesians, a demonstration of the black-asian IQ gap.
Of course once they realized it was there, there are many more bantu people in the area to migrate.
The Bantu took longer to find that island than the austronesians, a demonstration of the black-asian IQ gap.
Of course once they realized it was there, there are many more bantu people in the area to migrate.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,930
It’s actually kinda surprising because I’m an African American and I took a DNA test, I’m Nigerian but I’m also Bantu which is uncommon.
Anonymous C double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 58 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,931
@1,447,929 (B)
> The Bantu took longer to find that island than the austronesians, a demonstration of the black-asian IQ gap.
By that logic, aren’t Native Americans the smartest people in the world since they found the Americas first? You say the dumbest shit lol
> The Bantu took longer to find that island than the austronesians, a demonstration of the black-asian IQ gap.
By that logic, aren’t Native Americans the smartest people in the world since they found the Americas first? You say the dumbest shit lol
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,932
@previous (C)
They didn't sail across an ocean like the austronesians. The water just froze over where they lived at the time.
Leif Erikson was the first to actually navigate the sea to get there
They didn't sail across an ocean like the austronesians. The water just froze over where they lived at the time.
Leif Erikson was the first to actually navigate the sea to get there
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,934
Anonymous C double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,935
I knew you were stupid but goddamn this is a new level!
Anonymous C triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,936
It’s so crazy you have an opinion about this when it’s super obvious you’re just finding out about this as you’re taking to me lol
Anonymous C quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,937
@1,447,929 (B)
> Of course once they realized it was there, there are many more bantu people in the area to migrate.
We’re talking about East Africa though. The Bantu people originated in West Africa. It’s not just a given that East Africa should have a lot of Bantu people. That’s like saying "Yeah of course there are a lot of Japanese people in Iran" that’s the opposite side of the continent from where they came from.
> Of course once they realized it was there, there are many more bantu people in the area to migrate.
We’re talking about East Africa though. The Bantu people originated in West Africa. It’s not just a given that East Africa should have a lot of Bantu people. That’s like saying "Yeah of course there are a lot of Japanese people in Iran" that’s the opposite side of the continent from where they came from.
Anonymous C quintuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,938
But no, right the "IQ gap."Because Nigerian people were just a bunch of stupid tribal people walking around naked that’s why they made art like this
Anonymous C sextuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,940
Those damn low IQ west Africans with their double sided curved swords…Anonymous C septuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,942
And what about traditional Nigerian dress? These are obviously stupid tribal people walking around naked everywhere who don’t have writing or governments or two story buildings or wheels. (In case you can’t tell I’m being sarcastic because you have to have a peanut for a brain to believe colonial era propaganda when you can literally just research this shit yourself and find out the truth).Anonymous C octuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,943
Btw, have you ever googled what year guns were introduced to Nigeria and then googled what year Nigeria was colonized?The common narrative about how Europe colonized Africa is actually wrong.
Anonymous C nonuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,944
You see most people think Africans didn’t have guns and didn’t have steel and that’s why Europe colonized Africa. It turns out, that’s actually not the reason. Europe had guns for hundreds of years before they were able to colonize Africa, guns were already introduced to Africa before Europe colonized it, and Africans entered the Iron Age before contact with Europeans independently of Europe.
Anonymous C decuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,945
And west Africans actually did have writing, and they had governments and they did record their history and some of their monarchical lines of succession survived colonization up to the present day. (The Oba of Benin for example).
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C undecuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,946
It’s a coincidence but Nigerian languages (Yoruba and Igbo for example) are tonal, and before colonization, they had a writing system called Nsibidi where every word had its own character similar to Chinese.Anonymous C duodecuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,947
Really colonization wasn’t "civilizing Africans" it was an attempt at cultural genocide. They lied and said we were stupid and had no written language and no written history and no governments because they wanted to replace us, but they failed.
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,963
@previous (C)
I hear they have bones in their noses and aren't good at stewing wascawwy wabbits though...
I hear they have bones in their noses and aren't good at stewing wascawwy wabbits though...
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,971
And white women are the dumbest
this replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,976
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 24 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,983
@1,447,942 (C)
> And what about traditional Nigerian dress? These are obviously stupid tribal people walking around naked everywhere who don’t have writing or governments or two story buildings or wheels. (In case you can’t tell I’m being sarcastic because you have to have a peanut for a brain to believe colonial era propaganda when you can literally just research this shit yourself and find out the truth).
Those are Fulani. Their heritage is that of Arab invaders who mixed with locals over the centuries. Dumbass!
> And what about traditional Nigerian dress? These are obviously stupid tribal people walking around naked everywhere who don’t have writing or governments or two story buildings or wheels. (In case you can’t tell I’m being sarcastic because you have to have a peanut for a brain to believe colonial era propaganda when you can literally just research this shit yourself and find out the truth).
Those are Fulani. Their heritage is that of Arab invaders who mixed with locals over the centuries. Dumbass!
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,987
@previous (F)> Their heritage is that of Arab invaders who mixed with locals over the centuries. Dumbass!
I know you’re kind of special, so I made a play by play map for visual learners.
Humans originated in Africa. Arabs are humans.
The red arrow shows how Arabs got to Arabia.
The blue arrow shows how Arabs got to Africa.
Any questions?
Anonymous F replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,988
@previous (G)
> > Their heritage is that of Arab invaders who mixed with locals over the centuries. Dumbass!
>
> I know you’re kind of special, so I made a play by play map for visual learners.
>
> Humans originated in Africa. Arabs are humans.
>
>
> The red arrow shows how Arabs got to Arabia.
>
> The blue arrow shows how Arabs got to Africa.
>
> Any questions?
Very distinct and separated population migrations.
You don’t need to sell me. I know of the old empires, and Somalia once was a regional super power. Ethiopia was a major Roman trading partner.
Just don’t pretend the Fulani aren’t descended from Arab invaders.
> > Their heritage is that of Arab invaders who mixed with locals over the centuries. Dumbass!
>
> I know you’re kind of special, so I made a play by play map for visual learners.
>
> Humans originated in Africa. Arabs are humans.
>
>
> The red arrow shows how Arabs got to Arabia.
>
> The blue arrow shows how Arabs got to Africa.
>
> Any questions?
Very distinct and separated population migrations.
You don’t need to sell me. I know of the old empires, and Somalia once was a regional super power. Ethiopia was a major Roman trading partner.
Just don’t pretend the Fulani aren’t descended from Arab invaders.
Anonymous G replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,991
Anonymous G double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,992
The country with the highest Fulani population is Nigeria. About 6% of Nigerians (15 million people) are Fulani. Nigeria is virtually 100% black, there are no significant non-black minorities in Nigeria.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,044
@1,447,987 (G)
What point are you trying to make every time you say Humans originated in Africa?
Do you think racists dislike the land itself, and want to avoid any association with it regardless of time period?
What point are you trying to make every time you say Humans originated in Africa?
Do you think racists dislike the land itself, and want to avoid any association with it regardless of time period?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,045
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,046
At least, personally, I tend to respect my ancestors. The reason why the n word is offensive isn’t because it offends me it’s because it’s offensive to my ancestors who were enslaved. I’ve never been a slave. But I think a part of your self respect and honor as a human being is respect for your ancestors, because you wouldn’t be here without them. If you don’t respect your ancestors, they’re the reason why you’re here, so what does that say about your own worth? Somebody who doesn’t respect their ancestors is disrespecting themself.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,047
I mean, it’s like, people were enslaved their whole lives and they knew they wouldn’t ever see freedom and would suffer their entire life but they kept pushing forward anyway and without their hard work I wouldn’t be here. If someone is such a coward they want to disrespect my dead ancestors over some petty issue they have in their life, then life was wasted on that person.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,048
I mean, just think about how selfish that would be for me to say I’m superior to my ancestors and I hate my ancestors. What kind of person would say that? What kind of selfish brat?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 46 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,049
@1,448,045 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Everyone has fish ancestors, but you'd be an idiot to think that makes us fish.
Everyone has fish ancestors, but you'd be an idiot to think that makes us fish.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,050
@1,448,048 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
It's not selfish to understand you're superior to the single-cell organisms, or the fish.
What is different about seeing yourself as superior to early hominids? Life evolves.
It's not selfish to understand you're superior to the single-cell organisms, or the fish.
What is different about seeing yourself as superior to early hominids? Life evolves.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,051
@1,448,049 (B)
If fish didn’t exist, we wouldn’t exist. Our skeleton is based on the fish skeleton. Just because you’re not a fish and you don’t value the life of a fish in the same way you value the life of a human doesn’t mean you can’t understand that fish have some value in the universe. We are a part of nature, we can’t exist without it. It would be stupid to think that fish have no purpose in our world and I think it would be sad if they went extinct.
If fish didn’t exist, we wouldn’t exist. Our skeleton is based on the fish skeleton. Just because you’re not a fish and you don’t value the life of a fish in the same way you value the life of a human doesn’t mean you can’t understand that fish have some value in the universe. We are a part of nature, we can’t exist without it. It would be stupid to think that fish have no purpose in our world and I think it would be sad if they went extinct.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,052
@1,448,050 (B)
You are selfish and life was wasted on you. Your ancestors created you, if you don’t respect your own creation, then can someone who rejects their own creator be accepted by their creator? What are you exactly? Not much.
You are selfish and life was wasted on you. Your ancestors created you, if you don’t respect your own creation, then can someone who rejects their own creator be accepted by their creator? What are you exactly? Not much.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,053
Even in the Bible, the Ten Commandments say you should honor your mother and your father. In Christianity, the only unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. I’m not saying you have to believe in God or anything, I’m just saying even in Christianity which is a religion based on forgiveness, your ability to be forgiven is based on your ability to forgive. If you can’t accept your creator then your creator can’t accept you. And that’s what hell is, that’s what endless suffering is. It has metaphorical meaning. People have understood this morality for thousands of years, it’s not new, it’s a part of being human.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 12 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,054
@1,448,050 (B)
> What is different about seeing yourself as superior to early hominids? Life evolves.
"If I have seen father than most it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."
If our ancestors didn’t bang sticks and rocks together, we wouldn’t exist in order to be using the internet right now, so I don’t care. They did a good job, and they did what was needed to be done in their time for us to be here in our time and I respect them for that.
> What is different about seeing yourself as superior to early hominids? Life evolves.
"If I have seen father than most it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."
If our ancestors didn’t bang sticks and rocks together, we wouldn’t exist in order to be using the internet right now, so I don’t care. They did a good job, and they did what was needed to be done in their time for us to be here in our time and I respect them for that.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 18 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,056
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,057
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 0 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,058
@1,448,052 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
A dead fish can't accept me no matter what.
I like to apply think forward. What if I have a descendent who is more advanced than me, and knows it? That's good, there's nothing wrong with that. Better than stagnation, or a creature that lies about its own status to virtue signal.
A dead fish can't accept me no matter what.
I like to apply think forward. What if I have a descendent who is more advanced than me, and knows it? That's good, there's nothing wrong with that. Better than stagnation, or a creature that lies about its own status to virtue signal.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 47 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,059
@1,448,057 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I don't need to think I'm the same as a fish to appreciate the fish.
You're endlessly hostile, is that the type of person you want to be?
I don't need to think I'm the same as a fish to appreciate the fish.
You're endlessly hostile, is that the type of person you want to be?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,060
@1,448,058 (B)
I love my parents and if I have children I would want them to love me. It’s my bloodline. Why would you feel disgust at your own blood and say you love yourself? You can’t love yourself that way. You can lie to yourself to try and make it work but that’s broken.
I love my parents and if I have children I would want them to love me. It’s my bloodline. Why would you feel disgust at your own blood and say you love yourself? You can’t love yourself that way. You can lie to yourself to try and make it work but that’s broken.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,061
@1,448,054 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Why are you acting like I don't appreciate them?
Do you just make up a new thing you imagine I think and then start complaining about it?
Why are you acting like I don't appreciate them?
Do you just make up a new thing you imagine I think and then start complaining about it?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 11 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,062
@1,448,059 (B)
To you, but not to my ancestors who are a part of who I am, because I love myself and you disrespect me and my ancestors so how could I ever love you?
To you, but not to my ancestors who are a part of who I am, because I love myself and you disrespect me and my ancestors so how could I ever love you?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,063
@1,448,060 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
See, you're doing the same thing you always do.
You put words in my mouth and then get angry at me for them.
See, you're doing the same thing you always do.
You put words in my mouth and then get angry at me for them.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,064
@1,448,061 (B)
> Why are you acting like I don't appreciate them?
Because you don’t, that’s why you decided to argue with me in the first instance.
> Why are you acting like I don't appreciate them?
Because you don’t, that’s why you decided to argue with me in the first instance.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,065
@1,448,062 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They should make a religion where you are taught to love creatures that aren't your blood relatives.
They should make a religion where you are taught to love creatures that aren't your blood relatives.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,066
@1,448,063 (B)
I don’t like anything that’s ever come out of your mouth. I don’t like anything about you. That’s not my failing, I’m not required to like you, especially if you think you have the right to disrespect me for no reason.
I don’t like anything that’s ever come out of your mouth. I don’t like anything about you. That’s not my failing, I’m not required to like you, especially if you think you have the right to disrespect me for no reason.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,067
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,068
@1,448,064 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I never said I didn't appreciate the fish.
Seriously, try any other sophism.
I never said I didn't appreciate the fish.
Seriously, try any other sophism.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,069
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,070
@1,448,066 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
What is required for something to be "disrespect" to you?
Obviously you won't answer, you have no coherant justifiable ideology.
What is required for something to be "disrespect" to you?
Obviously you won't answer, you have no coherant justifiable ideology.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 38 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,071
You can’t give me a reason why I should like you. All your views are selfish and twisted in your favor against anything different from you. It’s obviously directly against my own self interest and you must be a moron if you really can’t understand why I don’t like you.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,072
@1,448,070 (B)
> Obviously you won't answer, you have no coherant justifiable ideology.
Looks like I’ve won that debate.
> Obviously you won't answer, you have no coherant justifiable ideology.
Looks like I’ve won that debate.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,073
@1,448,069 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
✔️ claim
❌ supporting argument
Not sure what there is to say with this one until you can do the second part.
✔️ claim
❌ supporting argument
Not sure what there is to say with this one until you can do the second part.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,074
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,075
@1,448,073 (B)
The moon orbits the earth.
I made a claim with no supporting argument, therefore the moon doesn’t orbit the earth?
You are confident in logic but very bad at it.
The moon orbits the earth.
I made a claim with no supporting argument, therefore the moon doesn’t orbit the earth?
You are confident in logic but very bad at it.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,077
@1,448,074 (B)
No, before we had a debate where I said I didn’t have an ideology. I’ve finally converted you to my side. I was arguing I have no ideology. You slipped out of frustration, but I was telling the truth.
No, before we had a debate where I said I didn’t have an ideology. I’ve finally converted you to my side. I was arguing I have no ideology. You slipped out of frustration, but I was telling the truth.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,078
@1,448,075 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I didn't say the lack of a supporting argument proves you wrong.
I said there's no supporting argument, so there's nothing to say until you make one.
I didn't say the lack of a supporting argument proves you wrong.
I said there's no supporting argument, so there's nothing to say until you make one.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,079
@previous (B)
Oh. Then why did you say this?
@previous (B)
> I didn't say the lack of a supporting argument proves you wrong.
>
> I said there's no supporting argument, so there's nothing to say until you make one.
Oh. Then why did you say this?
@previous (B)
> I didn't say the lack of a supporting argument proves you wrong.
>
> I said there's no supporting argument, so there's nothing to say until you make one.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,080
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,081
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,082
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,083
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,084
@1,448,081 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You have patterns of behavior, you don't actually act randomly.
You have patterns of behavior, you don't actually act randomly.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,085
@previous (B)
It’s interesting how you’re always complaining that you think I’m stupid because I’m black and I don’t have rationality and can’t use logic, yet you noticed that I’m a rational actor. You lie to yourself too much.
It’s interesting how you’re always complaining that you think I’m stupid because I’m black and I don’t have rationality and can’t use logic, yet you noticed that I’m a rational actor. You lie to yourself too much.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,086
I have no idea why you have a suffering soul, but I see no evidence you’re strong enough to fix it.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,087
@1,448,085 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Patterns isn't a synonym for rational, lol.
I think you're stupid because you can't defend your position in any discussion. You try to distract with tangents you can't connect back to the main issue, you strawman arguments to avoid the real one, and then you go on a spree of ad hominems.
I've met black people who can hold their own in a debate.
Patterns isn't a synonym for rational, lol.
I think you're stupid because you can't defend your position in any discussion. You try to distract with tangents you can't connect back to the main issue, you strawman arguments to avoid the real one, and then you go on a spree of ad hominems.
I've met black people who can hold their own in a debate.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 42 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,088
@1,448,086 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Suffering souls go on hateful rants, they don't calmly dismantle inaccurate ideas
Suffering souls go on hateful rants, they don't calmly dismantle inaccurate ideas
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,089
@1,448,087 (B)
I know that I’m more intelligent than you because I can see that you’re unintelligent and you can’t.
I know that I’m more intelligent than you because I can see that you’re unintelligent and you can’t.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,090
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,091
@1,448,089 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
That sounds like something a toddler would say.
If you're more intelligent, you should actually refute the ideas you insist are wrong.
That sounds like something a toddler would say.
If you're more intelligent, you should actually refute the ideas you insist are wrong.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,092
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 27 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,093
@1,448,091 (B)
Like I said, you’re not calm. You should chill out, take a stress pill. It’s not that serious.
Like I said, you’re not calm. You should chill out, take a stress pill. It’s not that serious.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,094
@1,448,092 (B)
We’ve already established that a lack of supporting evidence does not say anything about the validity of a claim so next time you should ask yourself if what you say has any value before you say it. And please clam down.
We’ve already established that a lack of supporting evidence does not say anything about the validity of a claim so next time you should ask yourself if what you say has any value before you say it. And please clam down.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,095
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> We’ve already established that a lack of supporting evidence does not say anything about the validity of a claim
Burn every book on logic, lol.
> We’ve already established that a lack of supporting evidence does not say anything about the validity of a claim
Burn every book on logic, lol.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,096
@previous (B)
You have already conceded this point here.
@1,448,078 (B)
> I didn't say the lack of a supporting argument proves you wrong.
I am correct that it is not logical to assume that just because I didn’t provide evidence for my claim that my claim is false. You have failed at using logic to disprove my ideas once again.
You have already conceded this point here.
@1,448,078 (B)
> I didn't say the lack of a supporting argument proves you wrong.
I am correct that it is not logical to assume that just because I didn’t provide evidence for my claim that my claim is false. You have failed at using logic to disprove my ideas once again.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,097
@1,448,094 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
But seriously, no.
I said the lack of an argument doesn't prove it false. That's a statement about deduction.
That's different than knowing that if you can never provide an argument or evidence for your case, it's a sign you are unable.
But seriously, no.
I said the lack of an argument doesn't prove it false. That's a statement about deduction.
That's different than knowing that if you can never provide an argument or evidence for your case, it's a sign you are unable.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,098
@previous (B)
I don’t need to provide an argument because the presence or lack of an argument has nothing to do with whether the statement itself is true or false. You just want me to think for you because you can’t think for yourself. When I make a statement, next time, ask yourself whether you think it’s true or false instead of relying on me.
I don’t need to provide an argument because the presence or lack of an argument has nothing to do with whether the statement itself is true or false. You just want me to think for you because you can’t think for yourself. When I make a statement, next time, ask yourself whether you think it’s true or false instead of relying on me.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,099
@1,448,096 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I'm not claiming it's proof.
I'm pointing to the fact that you're unable to provide arguments because your ideas are either not backed by any argument you know of, or the argument is easily refuted and you are hiding it to avoid that.
I'm not claiming it's proof.
I'm pointing to the fact that you're unable to provide arguments because your ideas are either not backed by any argument you know of, or the argument is easily refuted and you are hiding it to avoid that.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 51 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,100
@previous (B)
Well you’re not claiming anything at all are you? Because my statement can be true regardless of the presence or absence of an argument so the fact that you care so much about the argument shows you have no understanding of logical reasoning which is why you always fail to disprove any of my assertions.
Well you’re not claiming anything at all are you? Because my statement can be true regardless of the presence or absence of an argument so the fact that you care so much about the argument shows you have no understanding of logical reasoning which is why you always fail to disprove any of my assertions.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,101
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,102
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,103
@1,448,100 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I'm claiming that you are either unable to provide an argument (because you don't care if your beliefs are rational) or you have an argument you are hiding because we both know I will easily refute it.
I'm claiming that you are either unable to provide an argument (because you don't care if your beliefs are rational) or you have an argument you are hiding because we both know I will easily refute it.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,104
I am simply asking you to think for yourself. Maybe it isn’t your job to think for yourself and it is my job to think for you. I am much smarter than you after all.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,106
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 49 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,107
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Correct, I can't refute an argument that you are either hiding or don't have.
Correct, I can't refute an argument that you are either hiding or don't have.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,108
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,109
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,110
@previous (B)
Hey, calm down. I told you that you always do this. You need to stay calm, okay? Just take a breather, it’s not that serious.
Hey, calm down. I told you that you always do this. You need to stay calm, okay? Just take a breather, it’s not that serious.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,111
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 56 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,112
@previous (B)
You always resort to insults when you can’t disprove what I have to say. This only reveals your low IQ to everyone watching.
You always resort to insults when you can’t disprove what I have to say. This only reveals your low IQ to everyone watching.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 59 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,114
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 45 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,115
You can see what I’m doing right? I’m showing you that you’re not more intelligent than I am I can be an asshole the same way you can be, it’s not hard. What you’re doing isn’t actually smart, it’s just a way of bullying to distract from anything of substance and dominate. It’s low IQ behavior, and I can emulate your personality easily.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,116
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Try emulating the part where I respond to arguments with a refutation so the conversation can move forward
Try emulating the part where I respond to arguments with a refutation so the conversation can move forward
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,117
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,118
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Do you know what an argument is? Do you know what refute means?
Do you know what an argument is? Do you know what refute means?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,119
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,120
I said what I said, and maybe you’re so shocked by it you wonder if I really meant what I just said, but I meant it.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,121
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 58 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,122
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,124
As a matter of fact, you and I have both established that absolutely everything I’ve ever said is true and correct.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,125
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,126
@previous (B)
To refute means to prove a statement, theory, or argument to be false or incorrect by presenting evidence or logical reasoning.
So yes I am correct, you have never proved anything I’ve said false. You have only ever agreed with me that everything I’ve ever said is true.
To refute means to prove a statement, theory, or argument to be false or incorrect by presenting evidence or logical reasoning.
So yes I am correct, you have never proved anything I’ve said false. You have only ever agreed with me that everything I’ve ever said is true.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,127
You can’t name a single thing you’ve ever refuted. This is why you fail to disprove any of my claims or arguments. You simply lack the intellectual capacity to do so and that’s why it is my job to think on behalf of you for your own good.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,128
@1,448,126 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Is that why you make a dozen posts telling me you hate me in each thread? Because of our agreements?
Is that why you make a dozen posts telling me you hate me in each thread? Because of our agreements?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,129
You know that I would never lie to you because I only want the best for you, right?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,130
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,131
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 49 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,132
@previous (B)
It’s good that you’ve finally been converted to my side. Now that I have shown you the light, I hope that you will continue to walk the path of truth and justice.
It’s good that you’ve finally been converted to my side. Now that I have shown you the light, I hope that you will continue to walk the path of truth and justice.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 59 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,133
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I accept your concession, goodbye!
EDIT: 123rd post GET
I accept your concession, goodbye!
EDIT: 123rd post GET
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,134
@previous (B)
You used to love life and hate death, but I have taught you that something which you love can be bad for you, and something which you hate can be good for you. Rest is prescribed for you.
You used to love life and hate death, but I have taught you that something which you love can be bad for you, and something which you hate can be good for you. Rest is prescribed for you.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,135
Remember: duty is as heavy as a mountain but death is as light as a feather.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,136
And when you carry your cross up the hill, tell the Lord I sent you with two buckets because one wasn’t enough.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,138
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !xyO87qzwCk joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,189
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,190
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !xyO87qzwCk triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,192
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,232
Shush, penfold.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,448,257
White Supremacists need to be raped and gassed.