Minichan

Topic: Trump wears lifts! Fucking high heels! Go sniff his diaper MAGA faggots!

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #136,363

And before you call me a libtard know that I hate Democrats and Woke assholes. But Trump is a wannabe monarch backed by douchebags and tech oligarchs.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,447,418

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 40 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,424

He wasn't going to look up to anyone anyway so just cutting that step out I guess.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 days later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,604

@OP

> And before you call me a libtard know that I hate Democrats and Woke assholes. But Trump is a wannabe monarch backed by douchebags and tech oligarchs.

why is that never supported? like do people really not like someone who is neither of the two and actively criticizes the two sides?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,606

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,619

@1,447,604 (D)

> > And before you call me a libtard know that I hate Democrats and Woke assholes. But Trump is a wannabe monarch backed by douchebags and tech oligarchs.
>
> why is that never supported? like do people really not like someone who is neither of the two and actively criticizes the two sides?

A seesaw duopoly overseen by the Uniparty.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,654

@1,447,604 (D)
To be fair, I don’t actually say much in support of either side either, I just dislike one side more because they’re low IQ racists.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 26 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,660

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If low IQ is bad, what does it mean that blacks have lower IQs?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,662

@previous (H)
My IQ is 140. What’s your IQ?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,663

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
140 IQ would mean 1 in 261 people, but you can't follow conversations and routinely repeat the same debunked factoids that you've had pointed out multiple times before.

Where'd you get tested lol

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,664

@previous (H)
Countries that have a lower average IQ than my IQ:

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua & Deps, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Rep, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, East Timor, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Korea North, Korea South, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, St Kitts & Nevis, St Lucia, Saint Vincent & the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome & Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad & Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican City, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

Do you have any questions?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,668

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Yes, the last two questions I asked you are still unanswered.

Where'd you get tested, and what do think it means that blacks score lower on average?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,676

@previous (H)
In middle school they gave everyone IQ tests to see if we’d get into the gifted program or not.

I also don’t really get what your point is, I’m black and I’m white and my IQ is higher than the average IQ of every race so I’m not sure why you think I’m supposed to care. What do you think it means whites on average score lower than Asians?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,679

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Those tests are age normed, if you scored 140 in middle school that doesn't mean you would score 140 on an adult test.

It's also hard to believe that someone who can't follow conversations is actually scoring better than 99.5% of the population.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,680

@previous (H)

> Those tests are age normed, if you scored 140 in middle school that doesn't mean you would score 140 on an adult test.

Yeah because I was in middle school. It was a fair test because I was the same age as everybody else taking the test. Thanks for pointing out something blatantly obvious.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,682

@1,447,679 (H)

> It's also hard to believe that someone who can't follow conversations is actually scoring better than 99.5% of the population.

I find it incredibly easy to believe I’m smarter than you, given you’re an ideologue, a pathological liar, a narcissist, and a self-confessed racist. Obviously I’m smarter than you.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,683

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You just implied it doesn't make sense to care about women being destructive if you aren't a woman yourself in another thread lol.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,684

@previous (H)
I don’t think sexism is intelligent, that’s another reason why I find it easy to believe I’m smarter than you.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,686

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
And now you're changing the subject.

You asked why someone should care about women being destructive if they aren't women themselves.

That's not the same thing as being against sexism, and if you think it is you have no understanding of basic English.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,687

I mean, how exactly would you be smarter than me? What are your beliefs? White supremacy. Oh, so the thing that killed more people than anything ever in history. Yeah, I don’t think you’re smart.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,688

@1,447,686 (H)

> That's not the same thing as being against sexism, and if you think it is you have no understanding of basic English.

我是中国人我不是英国人

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,689

Jk, do you think about what you say before you say it? I don’t think you do. I don’t understand basic English? Uh… hello? What language am I speaking right now idiot?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 0 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,690

@1,447,687 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
By your own logic, black people shouldn't care about white people being destructive if they aren't white themselves lol.

If you can't understand the flaw in your reasoning, you certainly are not above 100 IQ lol

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 59 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,691

@previous (H)
Except I am white so that doesn’t work.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 7 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,692

@1,447,689 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
As in every thread you make a non sequitor, try to act like you meant something completely different, and then run with endless distractions.

Even an average person would realize how stupid it was before they said it, but you didn't.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 44 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,693

@previous (H)
Everything I say is unrelated to what you’re talking about if you don’t like what I’m saying.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 57 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,694

@1,447,691 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
But an actual black man shouldn't care about destructive white supremacy, right? Because he's not white.

That's literally the line of reasoning you used earlier, with no ability to see how retarded it was before you hit submit.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,695

@previous (H)
I am an actual black man. I just happen to also be an actual white man.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,696

We can talk about this hypothetical black man who isn’t white until the cows come home, but that guy isn’t me so whatever is true for that guy doesn’t apply to me and I don’t care about stuff that doesn’t apply to me.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 42 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,697

@1,447,695 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Really beside the point that you don't need to be the same demographic as someone being destructive to dislike it.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,698

@previous (H)
My point is you’re obsessing over women when women aren’t thinking about you in the first place. It’s some weird narcissistic desire you have to constantly complain about anyone who’s different from yourself as if you think you’re better than everybody else. Everyone is different, that’s true, but you think that makes you better and your way of being different is the correct way of being different out of nothing except narcissism. Which is incredibly stupid.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,700

The only reason why I even bother taking about racism isn’t because I have anything against white people, I just feel like racist white people want to make my life harder for no reason, I resent that, and I want to wipe you off the face of the earth for that. There’s nothing more to it than that.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 51 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,701

It’s like oh, you think I’m inferior because I’m black therefore I should listen to you, and I should let you have all the opportunities. Right. Or I could just kill you.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,704

It’s like, your ideology leaves space for white people and nobody else. Except I want to live. So what options are on the table for me? I don’t feel guilty about admitting it.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,708

@1,447,698 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Ignoring problems on this scale isn't the answer.

Acknowledging when someone is behaving badly is not "complaining about anyone different than you".

Whole demographics don't get a pass on bad behavior just because they can shout "racism" or "sexism".

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,709

@1,447,704 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> It’s like, your ideology leaves space for white people and nobody else. Except I want to live.
I've never said other races should die, but you are trying to make it sound like it.

If what I say is really so bad you wouldn't need to lie.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,711

@1,447,708 (H)

> Whole demographics don't get a pass on bad behavior just because they can shout "racism" or "sexism".

So collective punishment is justified according to you? Whole demographics can’t be collectively held responsible for anything because actions are taken by individuals not collectives.

Unless you wanna start paying me reparations for slavery.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,712

Hey and I’m not a hypocrite now. I transferred money from the savings account of a white man to the checking account of a black man who happen to have the same name and birth date, so that’s my reparations.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,713

@1,447,711 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I never said women should face collective punishment, that's another strawman.

It's amazing that you keep repeating the same fallacy, when all you have to do to avoid it is to check and see if you can find a quote first.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,714

@previous (H)
Well are you talking about women or a woman?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,715

Because it seems to me like you keep talking about women as a collective.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,718

…just saying:

- women isn’t a person

- black people isn’t a person

- the average black person isn’t a person

How can we hold the average black person accountable? Who is the average black person? Where are they? They don’t exist.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,719

@1,447,714 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@1,447,715 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)

Women, on average, are acting destructively.

Making that observation, and prescribing collective punishment, are two different things.

There are women who act like adults, take care of their responsibilities, take accountability for their mistakes, and avoid lying and creating drama. It would be wrong to punish those women.

But if we actually enforced basic rules in society to avoid destructive antisocial behaviors, and we did it equally, there would be a lot of women crying sexism because they got punished for their bad behavior, but fewer men (who don't do this shit nearly as often) got punished.

(Edited 53 seconds later.)

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,720

@1,447,718 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You hold the individuals accountable.

But if we did that, the demographics that cause problems more often would insist they were eving discriminated against.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 14 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,721

See look: take this up with Dude Person.

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/5152030/dude-person

Not me, I don’t have anything to do with this. You have beef with NPCs.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,722

@1,447,719 (H)

> Women, on average, are acting destructively.

Oh wow. That sounds bad. What’s her name?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,723

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Is there supposed to be a point to this comment, or are you just wasting time?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,724

@previous (H)
There’s a point to it, you’re just too retarded to understand.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,727

Honestly, I think that you can’t understand people as individuals and categorize people into discrete groups and judge each group as a collective because your brain can’t process that much information. If you saw somebody and you had to remember, "Ah, shit, that guys name is David, he lives in New York" your brain would go haywire from all the computations. Your brain can’t handle the data processing required to store that many bits of information. No, how your brain works is your brain goes, "Oh, this Chinese man from China who was born in Beijing and eats nothing but rice came up to me saying his name is David and he’s from New York because he’s Chinese so he must be stupid and delusional, I bet he’s a commie."

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,729

@1,447,724 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
As always, I can say explicitly why you are wrong, but you can only vaguely allude to me being wrong because if you gave any specific line of reasoning I'd point the flaw out.

You're acting like there's a problem with me making an observation of an average stat. But I already said it doesn't mean collective punishment.

So what's your problem. Articulate it if you can.

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,730

@1,447,727 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If that was true, then why did I make the point of saying the women that don't do those things shouldn't be punished?

How do I tell you how they should be different, if I'm not accounting for them in the first place?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,731

@1,447,729 (H)
And you wonder why I call you an idiot.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 31 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,732

@1,447,730 (H)

> If that was true, then why did I make the point of saying the women that don't do those things shouldn't be punished?

Because you were lying.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,733

@1,447,731 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
No, I don't wonder, I've said many times you do it because you wouldn't have any else if you didn't. You can't refute anything, so you use insults as filler.

After all, you could insult, and then also refute in the same comment. That would really make me look like an idiot, yet you always leave out the refutation. It's obvious why!

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
How do I lie about how I'd treat the group if I didn't understand them as individuals? If I conflated the whole demographic I wouldn't think they need accounting for in the first place.

And if I really thought the whole group should get collective punishment, there would be a quote that showed that so you wouldn't need to strawman.

I don't say the bad thing, and you dismiss the good thing I say as a lie. So what exactly am I writing that's untrue or immoral? Nothing, or you'd refute that.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,734

@previous (H)
Why should I believe anything you say? You’ve literally said to me multiple times that you’re a racist. You can’t be a racist and not judge people based on what they look like. Racism and fairness are fundamentally incompatible. I have absolutely no reason to trust you at your word.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,736

Now I do know that you lie to me, the only part I’m confused about it is whether you know or not. It seems pathological, but I’ve never been entirely convinced that you really believe everything you say to me.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,737

Like for example, when you said you never said you don’t want other races to die or you think that there’s a place for "inferior" people. I don’t believe that. I just wonder if you believed that when you said it to me because I can’t imagine that you could believe what you said when you said it.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !PCrdDxfj0A joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,739

You know what? It doesn't matter what my IQ is. When it comes to sucking cock, I am the greatest in the world!

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 7 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,740

@1,447,734 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I never said you should believe or trust me, but I have no obligation to play along with your strawmen arguments.

If you want to quote something I actually said, I'll defend it or concede, but when you strawman I'll call it out.

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,741

@1,447,736 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If you see something I actually wrote that is incorrect or immoral, you could point that out.

But I must be writing correct, moral statements because you always have to rely on strawmanning. That wouldn't be necessary if the things I said were actually wrong.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 40 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,743

@previous (H)
I think it’s immoral that you’re allowed to exist on this planet.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,744

@1,447,737 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Ok, so you have some psycho image of me in your mind, you keep saying so.

Don't act like you found some contradiction when something you came up with contradicts something I actually said. That's just more evidence you are bad at understanding people, it's not my problem when the statements I *actually* said are consistent.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,748

@previous (H)

> Ok, so you have some psycho image of me in your mind, you keep saying so.

It’s black and white. Nothing you say will change my mind.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,749

@1,447,743 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I keep noticing that you accuse me of wanting people eliminated, and then you talk about how you want this yourself.

Like how you accuse me of hate, but then I don't go off on angry rants, but you actually do make post after post seething and talking about how much you hate.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,750

Annoyingly sometimes you pretend I agree with you, but you’re just lying to yourself. I don’t see any value in your existence. I don’t think your ego is capable of understanding what I really think of you.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,752

@1,447,748 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
So be it.

I'll still point out when you are strawmanning, for any audience we have.

Anyone watching will see you can't find any errors in what I actually say.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,753

@1,447,749 (H)

> I keep noticing that you accuse me of wanting people eliminated, and then you talk about how you want this yourself.

Yes.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,754

@1,447,750 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
See? Another rant about how much you hate.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 10 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,755

Some people are evil.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,756

@1,447,754 (H)
I think it’s entirely justified.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,757

@1,447,753 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
This is a pattern I've noticed across politics.

Leftists constantly accuse the right of hate, but it's always the leftists with their faces twisted up talking about who they'd kill.

The right is always talking about free speech, rules of civility, and Christ's love.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,758

@1,447,752 (H)

> So be it.
>
> I'll still point out when you are strawmanning, for any audience we have.
>
> Anyone watching will see you can't find any errors in what I actually say.

And what if God isn’t watching us?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,759

@1,447,755 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@1,447,756 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)

Yet you aren't ever motivated to actually show how what I said was wrong, or do the smallest defense of your own positions.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,760

@1,447,757 (H)
Boo hoo

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,761

@1,447,758 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Tens of impressionable minichanners could read this.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 11 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,762

@1,447,759 (H)
Well it doesn’t really matter if I know you’re lying now does it?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,763

@1,447,760 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Not boo hoo, it just shows who is rational and who is emotionally unstable.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,764

@1,447,761 (H)
Crazy. Don’t care.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,765

@1,447,762 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
It matters because anyone reading can see which side is defensible, and which is not.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,766

@previous (H)
Oh no, what if someone has a thought?

You do realize that it doesn’t matter what people think, right?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,767

If you have a thought in your head, nobody else hears it except you. People can think whatever the hell they want and I’ll never know about it.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,768

@1,447,766 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Ideology is why some cultures flourish and others perish.

Angry nihilistic leftists think that lying is useful, and look down on Christians as naive. But look at nihilistic and Christian societies. Leftists degenerate fast, they can't work together because they don't hold lies accountable. Christian societies have enforced rules that maintain everyone.

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,769

@1,447,767 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You have an incorrect model of the world, and those errant thoughts make you look dumb whenever you share your ideas.

You keep running into contradictions, and you keep using words wrong. Thoughts become actions, and the people running into obstacles in life are thoughtless.

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,770

@1,447,768 (H)
Oh, right. The strong correlation between this graph and Christianity. How could I forget.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,771

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
The largest bar is a Christian nation, and China has strong social norms around lying and objective epistemologies.

Relativism is a loser.

(Edited 9 seconds later.)

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,772

You know how after World War Two, the two most powerful countries were the United States and the Soviet Union because the US and USSR were both founded on good old fashioned Christian values. And now the US and China are the two most powerful nations by far because the United States and China both were founded on good old Christian values. And China has a larger economy than any country in Africa because China is far far more Christian than any nation in Africa. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,773

@1,447,771 (H)

> and China has strong social norms around lying

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,774

@1,447,772 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I wasn't talking about nation states anyway.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 40 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,775

@previous (H)
Oh cool. So you were just saying stuff that doesn’t actually apply to anything. That’s cool.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,777

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Saying it doesn't apply to one thing isn't the same as saying it applies to nothing.

Since you are just doing strawmen each time, I'm going to move on. Bye bye.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,778

Like I said. Ideologue.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,780

@1,447,768 (H)

> Ideology is why some cultures flourish and others perish.

Have you considered that maybe you’re in over your head with the whole politics thing?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,781

@1,447,778 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You are putting ideology first.

I'll switch ideologies if there's sufficient new data, or a valid logical argument.

You are entirely emotional.

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,783

@1,447,780 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If you study the history of politics you can see patterns.

Every successful country will have administrative structure and a class of scholars who defend the core legal norms ideologically.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 38 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,784

@previous (H)
And so does North Korea, so what’s your point?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,785

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They actually matter.

Dismissing thoughts as unimportant means ignoring the most important part.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 11 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,786

@1,447,781 (H)

> You are putting ideology first.
>
> I'll switch ideologies if there's sufficient new data, or a valid logical argument.
>
> You are entirely emotional.

I don’t think ideology is good. It’s a very strong opinion of mine.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,787

Ideology is unscientific.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,788

@1,447,786 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Everyone has an ideology.

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,789

@1,447,787 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Empiricism is an ideology.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,790

@1,447,788 (H)
What’s my ideology?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,791

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You tell me. You don't actually bother taking the discussion seriously and engaging with the arguments, so it would be hard for me to know.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 19 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,792

@previous (H)
I don’t have one.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 40 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,793

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You said you believe in science, but you aren't an empiricist?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,794

@previous (H)
I think the universe is infinite.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,795

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If you have beliefs about the universe, and believe in the scientific method to some extent, you have an ideology.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,796

@previous (H)
I just named a belief that isn’t based on the scientific method.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,797

Think about this: how do you prove the universe is infinite?

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 44 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,798

@1,447,796 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)

A mix of faith and empiricism is still an ideology.

Everyone has an ideology, unless they are braindead.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,799

@previous (H)
You can tell yourself that if it makes you feel better about yourself.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 31 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,800

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Arguing just to argue?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,801

@previous (H)
Whatever floats your boat.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,804

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
What do YOU think an ideology is?

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 4 weeks ago, 56 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,806

@previous (H)
A system of core beliefs, ideas, and values that you make decisions based off of.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,808

You like asking me stupid questions that I obviously know the answer to to pretend I don’t know the answer because it satisfies your ego because you’re a narcissistic dickhead but whatever, that’s just how it goes. Someday you’ll be worm food and better for it.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,809

There have been more than a trillion days, how many of those have you been a part of? Oh but you know everything? As if God cares.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,811

Oh, you think you’re superior. Your life in this tiny tiny world is so incredibly short, what are you even bragging about? You don’t matter and the fact you don’t realize that is a byproduct of your own mental deficiency.

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,814

@1,447,806 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
And you don't have one??

Are you just going off vibes?

Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,816

@1,447,808 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I like to check to make sure you understand the definitions, because you often don't.

You gave an actual standard definition, but are you saying you don't have any core beliefs, ideas, or values? How would you have any consistency in character without those?

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,855

@previous (H)
I like how you have 3 possible responses either: I didn’t say that, you don’t understand definitions, or strawman. And you just rotate between those 3 randomly and think that makes you smart somehow.

beef joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,866

@1,447,660 (H)

> If low IQ is bad, what does it mean that blacks have lower IQs?

😀

Anonymous H replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,892

@1,447,855 (J)
I didn't say that and strawman are the same.

I'll keep pointing it out as long as you do it.

Repeating the same mistake is on you, not on the one calling it out. If it was 't actually a strawman, you would be able to provide a quote.

Imagine a repeat offender trying this in court "you always charge me with robbery, that's all you have". Would that be a valid defense? lol
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.