Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 57 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,447,021
Here’s an idea: let’s pretend climate change doesn’t exist and brag about stealing all the oil so we can burn it and pollute the atmosphere even more while the whole goddamn North American continent is covered in smoke. That’s a fun idea!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 41 minutes ago, 6 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,447,025
@previous (B)
Yeah, right, the carbon getting released by trees burning is good for the trees. 🙄
You’re the type of person where if your house was on fire you wouldn’t leave until it was 51% on fire because when it’s 49% on fire, it’s mostly not on fire.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 37 minutes ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,447,026
It’s more like, the carbon cycle has a natural balance. But we added more carbon into the atmosphere than was naturally present, leading to increased temperatures which makes wildfires more common which releases even more carbon into the atmosphere, which will lead to even more wildfires in the future. I’m in my early 20s, I was born in the northern US, and I never saw smoke from wildfires until my late teens and in the past few years this has happened more than once. It’s obviously not normal. When I was a kid I never saw picture of cities looking like this.
Anonymous B replied with this 26 minutes ago, 3 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,447,029
@1,447,025 (A)
That's a very random accusation, how are you connecting it to what I said?
I never said some problem has to be more common than not having a problem before it mattered.
Notice you didn't actually respond to or refute what I said. You made a sarcastic remark and then some random claim about how I think that you can't connect back to what I said.