Topic: Yes, it’s worth reading ESG reports some companies put out.
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #136,306
Like Amazon. Electricity use is up 35% year over year. It used 2.6 billion gallons of water. Yet it’s backing a bunch of “look over there” greenwashing initiatives.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #1,446,832
AKA, the few competent people left are made to smash their heads against brick walls fixing jamal and poojas violently insufficient work so as to minimise the coworkers getting repilled
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 28 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,446,839
That's your solution to amazon employees pissing in bottles? That they give them less water??
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,446,840
Water doesn't disappear when it gets used.Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 13 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,446,844
@previous (D)What if I want to make a zeppelin?
Helium is a finite resource. We should conserve it.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 17 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,042
@1,446,839 (C)
> That's your solution to amazon employees pissing in bottles? That they give them less water??
I had a job like that. Several actually. One was a desk job FFS where we had to sign out to use the bathroom. We had tiny windowless offices so I’d sneak the bottles into a bag to exfiltrate at night. We also worked early to late so we all had Vitamin D deficiency.
> That's your solution to amazon employees pissing in bottles? That they give them less water??
I had a job like that. Several actually. One was a desk job FFS where we had to sign out to use the bathroom. We had tiny windowless offices so I’d sneak the bottles into a bag to exfiltrate at night. We also worked early to late so we all had Vitamin D deficiency.
boof joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 13 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,050
who paid who to fuck around with light bulbs so god damn much
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,265
What in the world is ESG?
in4mer replied with this 1 month ago, 28 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,267
@previous (H)
Equity Sustainability Guidance
It's a score for how woke your company is. Because all the guidlines fuck up corporate functioning, companies tend to adopt it when they want to get benefits.
Some index funds only invest in conpanies that have high ESG scores.
Equity Sustainability Guidance
It's a score for how woke your company is. Because all the guidlines fuck up corporate functioning, companies tend to adopt it when they want to get benefits.
Some index funds only invest in conpanies that have high ESG scores.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,427
@previous (in4mer)
> Equity Sustainability Guidance
>
> It's a score for how woke your company is. Because all the guidlines fuck up corporate functioning, companies tend to adopt it when they want to get benefits.
>
> Some index funds only invest in conpanies that have high ESG scores.
Which is dumb because the metrics are easy to work, and none of the ESG funds have meaningful returns. Or they have negative returns.
> Equity Sustainability Guidance
>
> It's a score for how woke your company is. Because all the guidlines fuck up corporate functioning, companies tend to adopt it when they want to get benefits.
>
> Some index funds only invest in conpanies that have high ESG scores.
Which is dumb because the metrics are easy to work, and none of the ESG funds have meaningful returns. Or they have negative returns.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 4 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,447,445
@previous (I)
You get companies hiring women just to boost the numbers and then women who chat all day knowing they won't be fired because all the other women do it.
The executives are making a calculated decision based on the incentives of the game, but the average person can't figure out why the economy has been broken since we adopted a gynocentric society.
You get companies hiring women just to boost the numbers and then women who chat all day knowing they won't be fired because all the other women do it.
The executives are making a calculated decision based on the incentives of the game, but the average person can't figure out why the economy has been broken since we adopted a gynocentric society.