Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Apple in 2027 will release the iPhone Ultra

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago #136,063

It will have super high specs and a folding screen! But, it will cost $2500 and up at least. Will you get one? I sure will.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,444,973

Nigguhs tongue my anus

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,974

But how thin will it be? Is it isn't the thinnest phone yet, I'm not sure I want it...

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,976

@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
I don't care about thin. I care about specs and performance for my creative work.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,985

At least with laptops, I’d rather get a MacBook Pro than a MacBook Air because I like longer battery life. I’d imagine it’s the same with phones.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,986

Although a lot of people buy MacBook airs so… you know, when it comes down to it, every choice is a personal thing.

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 3 weeks ago, 52 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,001

@1,444,976 (A)
This is a shallow and superficial viewpoint. It needs to look amazing and that means thin.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,044

@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
It needs to be thin, foldable and the fastest iPhone yet.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,061

@previous (E)
To be fair, if your screen refreshes at 120Hz, but it takes 5 milliseconds to do a task, will doubling the performance of the CPU make you notice any difference?

Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,183

@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
iPhones are way faster than your green bubble Android piece of shit phones. Thanks.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,185

You'd save $1,000 buying a Samsung.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,186

@previous (G)
Overpriced piece of shit. Thanks.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,187

@previous (E)
Compared to a $2,500 apple product that came out 7 years later and costs $1K more?

Actually, there's a $1,000 off offer on that page. So it would be 2 grand cheaper.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,193

@previous (G)
I do suppose it's good to see Samsung looking out for some of its more low-income customers... But it's still an overpriced bloatware-spyware piece of shit. Thanks.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,194

@previous (E)

It would better to buy a samsung and uninstall the bloatware than to pay $2,000 over what the hardware actually should cost.

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,195

@previous (G)
Ok Edward Snowden

Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 57 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,196

@1,445,194 (G)
You are also paying for the quality control only Apple can provide, from the standardized and highly inspected hardware components to the software on the App Store.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,197

@previous (E)
I could buy 3 folds, have them all fail at some point, buy a 4th that works and still be spending less than apple.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,198

@previous (G)

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,199

@1,445,196 (E)
Tbh, idk if I think iPhones are particularly special, but MacBooks are great ever since they switched to M series chips. Way better than any windows PC I’ve ever owned. Also the terminal is better.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,200

@1,445,198 (E)
There's plenty of brands that work fine.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,201

@previous (G)
Macs are faster than windows PCs though because they’re SoCs with the memory and GPU cores fully integrated on one chip and they use arm instead of x64.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,202

Except the Intel Macs, until they switched, windows was definitely superior on the hardware front, the 2019 i9 MacBook Pro… we don’t need to talk about that.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,203

I just hope apple doesn’t make an OLED MacBook. It looks nicer but I don’t want burn in.

Anonymous H quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,205

@1,445,202 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They’re useful for frying eggs. 🍳

Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 48 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,208

@1,445,199 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They really are that much better with the M chips. The Intel chips were battery hogs and the NVIDIA chips were hot garbage.
@1,445,201 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Yep, and the closest they have on the PC market to the Macbook way is... a Steam Deck. And it's STILL x86-based, but thankfully without the needless overhead Windows 11 provides.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,211

@1,445,201 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
There are windows PCs that do that. Don't judge an ecosystem by it's budget offerings.

Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,212

@previous (G)
The budget offerings are more likely to go the way of SoCs with integrated memory than the more expensive gaming and CAD setups.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,213

@previous (E)
Because it has products specialized for every application.

Figure out your goals and pick the best PC for that goal, and the best Mac for it. PC wins.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,232

It's going to be the greatest phone ever, with amazing cameras, states, vapor chamber cooling, a brilliant folding screen, and more! I can't wait!

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,257

@1,445,213 (G)
Tbh, in my CS lectures, MacBooks are way more common than windows PCs.

Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,258

MacOS isn’t Linux, but it’s Unix based, so all the terminal commands are either exactly the same or incredibly similar to Linux.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,259

I'll probably go Apple watch 11 and an iPad Air myself - save $1,300 and still have access to the turtleneck club.

Anonymous G replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,445,279

@1,445,257 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Students want name brand products because that's what they see others using.

The same money would still go farther buying a PC, and you can still install linux on it.

"Everyone's doing it" isn't proof of anything.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.