Topic: what do you think of this?
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #136,033
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 24 minutes later[^] [v] #1,444,561
That Christian lady sure is tolerant of all those Muslim women with their faces covered! It’s nice to see the progress we are making in America.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,563
not my problem lol
Anonymous B replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,565
@previous (C)
The picture is interesting to look at. They look like Nazis, yet at the same time they’re just casually on the metro line with black people right next to them. It simultaneously shows how dystopian America is and how utterly impotent racists are to stop black people from existing.
The picture is interesting to look at. They look like Nazis, yet at the same time they’re just casually on the metro line with black people right next to them. It simultaneously shows how dystopian America is and how utterly impotent racists are to stop black people from existing.
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,566
It also kinda makes them look like clowns tbh, like you did all that dress up to ride the subway? It’s all a front with nothing backing it up.
Anonymous B triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,567
Like, imagine if one of them individually decided to dress like that without being in a group. They’d get made fun of and probably get called gay for thinking putting a little cloth mask on makes them look tough. But because they hang out in a gang, oh now they’re big scary Neo Nazis.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 59 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,571
I was laughing my ass off. How do these guys manage to look so embarrassing? They seriously can't pool together enough money to get matching uniforms? And for another thing, if they're trying to emulate the Nazis then at least try and look cool like they did. Hire a fashion designer or something because you look like fags with the mismatching outfits and goofy masks. I mean look at this fucking guy with the backpack on lmao like a little school boy. Fucking hell at least carry your stuff in a briefcase or something good God you retards look so stupid and cringe. Meanwhile the black lady is like "I'm just trying to get to work" hahaha what a funny pic man. I bet half of those guys are feds gathering info on the other half for a case. How else do you explain these retards not having custom made uniforms? Embarrassing
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,572
@1,444,565 (B)
This was another thing that made me laugh. You would assume these guys would want to appear successful in pictures to not "damage the brand" of their ideology or whatever. So instead of going to the place and suiting up in a nearby bathroom or something they instead suit up and ride the bus like a bunch of bums. Part of me thinks it's an attempt to intimidate poor non-whites but then that's even more embarrassing. These people that ride the bus have seen drunk homeless men whip out their dick and piss on the floor. You're not intimidating them with your mismatching uniforms you faggots
This was another thing that made me laugh. You would assume these guys would want to appear successful in pictures to not "damage the brand" of their ideology or whatever. So instead of going to the place and suiting up in a nearby bathroom or something they instead suit up and ride the bus like a bunch of bums. Part of me thinks it's an attempt to intimidate poor non-whites but then that's even more embarrassing. These people that ride the bus have seen drunk homeless men whip out their dick and piss on the floor. You're not intimidating them with your mismatching uniforms you faggots
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 31 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,577
@1,444,565 (B)
Does the Patriot Front actually advocate for removing black people from society, or are you making up positions for your opponents as usual?
Does the Patriot Front actually advocate for removing black people from society, or are you making up positions for your opponents as usual?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,590
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,591
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They don't.
As usual, you made up a position for them, and then acted smug when they didn't act in line with the made-up position.
They don't.
As usual, you made up a position for them, and then acted smug when they didn't act in line with the made-up position.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,592
@previous (E)
They’re explicit white supremacists, they say the United States is for people of "European heritage" they’re the type of white supremacists who like playing word games to pretend they’re not racist, but they are. Nobody with an IQ over 70 is believing they’re not racist. They’re all in on it.
They’re explicit white supremacists, they say the United States is for people of "European heritage" they’re the type of white supremacists who like playing word games to pretend they’re not racist, but they are. Nobody with an IQ over 70 is believing they’re not racist. They’re all in on it.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,593
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
So you refuse to believe what they say, and then when you see a picture of them calmly riding transit with black people you point to this as them failing.
If their actions match their words, your disbelief in their words doesn't constitute a contradiction on their part.
So you refuse to believe what they say, and then when you see a picture of them calmly riding transit with black people you point to this as them failing.
If their actions match their words, your disbelief in their words doesn't constitute a contradiction on their part.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,594
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,595
@1,444,592 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I've seen "racist" evangelicals BBQ with black evangelicals while mocking white liberals.
The "far right nazi" (as collegues call him) in my building has been telling everyone that the 14th amendment was made for American blacks.
If someone's actions don't align with their words, that's a point against them. But calling people dishonest, and then bringing up evidence against your own evaluation will only ever be a point against you.
I've seen "racist" evangelicals BBQ with black evangelicals while mocking white liberals.
The "far right nazi" (as collegues call him) in my building has been telling everyone that the 14th amendment was made for American blacks.
If someone's actions don't align with their words, that's a point against them. But calling people dishonest, and then bringing up evidence against your own evaluation will only ever be a point against you.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,596
@previous (E)
Okay, so explain to me how you want me to interpret the sign saying "AMERICAN SPIRIT EUROPEAN BLOOD" in all caps?
https://youtu.be/kRyZgItx4lc?t=1m40s
Okay, so explain to me how you want me to interpret the sign saying "AMERICAN SPIRIT EUROPEAN BLOOD" in all caps?
https://youtu.be/kRyZgItx4lc?t=1m40s
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,597
@1,444,594 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They have never called for removing African-Americans, and they have not harassed random black people.
They are known for organized protests and nationalist views.
The native blacks here could be related to Jefferson, and have an established history in the US. They aren't trying to remove them.
They probably are against new Nigerians coming over on an H1-B.
They have never called for removing African-Americans, and they have not harassed random black people.
They are known for organized protests and nationalist views.
The native blacks here could be related to Jefferson, and have an established history in the US. They aren't trying to remove them.
They probably are against new Nigerians coming over on an H1-B.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,598
…and the confederate flag hat.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 20 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,599
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,600
@1,444,598 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Find one of their members saying American blacks should be deported or something.
They aren't shy about their views, if it were true you's find a lot.
Find one of their members saying American blacks should be deported or something.
They aren't shy about their views, if it were true you's find a lot.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,601
@1,444,597 (E)
What’s wrong with Nigerians immigrating to the United States? They do as well in American universities as Chinese immigrants 29% of Nigerian immigrants have graduate degrees and 31% of Chinese immigrants do. A lot of them also end up becoming business owners. I have a positive view of Nigerian immigrants, that seems kinda racist.
What’s wrong with Nigerians immigrating to the United States? They do as well in American universities as Chinese immigrants 29% of Nigerian immigrants have graduate degrees and 31% of Chinese immigrants do. A lot of them also end up becoming business owners. I have a positive view of Nigerian immigrants, that seems kinda racist.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 49 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,602
@1,444,600 (E)
Well why should they get a say in who we should and shouldn’t have in our country if they’re supportive of traitors against the United States?
Well why should they get a say in who we should and shouldn’t have in our country if they’re supportive of traitors against the United States?
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,603
@1,444,601 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Ask someone in the patriot front.
You have your racists confused and you're embarassing yourself.
Ask someone in the patriot front.
You have your racists confused and you're embarassing yourself.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,604
My ancestors fought in the civil war against the south, I don’t support the confederate flag.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,605
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,606
@1,444,603 (E)
Well if they’re not racist then what’s the confederate flag about? And if they’re patriots what’s with wearing the flag of the enemy we defeated?
Well if they’re not racist then what’s the confederate flag about? And if they’re patriots what’s with wearing the flag of the enemy we defeated?
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 19 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,607
@1,444,604 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Yeah, well then make that your point of contention.
They'll defend flying that flag, they won't defend deporting blacks in the south.
Yeah, well then make that your point of contention.
They'll defend flying that flag, they won't defend deporting blacks in the south.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,608
@1,444,605 (E)
If an American soldier is out in the Middle East and they see someone waving an ISIS flag, should they go up and ask them or just shoot them?
If an American soldier is out in the Middle East and they see someone waving an ISIS flag, should they go up and ask them or just shoot them?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,609
I see no difference between the confederate flag and the ISIS flag, they’re both enemies of America and people who support either ideology are both terrorists.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,610
@1,444,606 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Freedom of expression, and private spaces that can be ethnic-specific.
Freedom of expression, and private spaces that can be ethnic-specific.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 43 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,611
@previous (E)
Then why choose the confederate flag specifically, why not fly the North Korean flag if it’s just a free speech thing?
Then why choose the confederate flag specifically, why not fly the North Korean flag if it’s just a free speech thing?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 20 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,612
Why specifically fly a flag that’s only associated with anti black racism if they’re not racist against blacks?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,613
I’m just saying, my ancestors shot and killed people flying the confederate flag on the battlefield. They were patriots, they defended the union. Walking around provoking people by flying the flag of treason against the United States and having the audacity to call themselves patriots isn’t patriotism.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,614
@1,444,608 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
The right has a lot of diversity, groups that are diametrically opposed, and they get along because they follow rules of engagement and respect the territory of others.
The far left looks for fights, creates purity tests, and eats their own.
Shooting at any group that wants their own space is how you lose. Are you going to do the same for a jewish community becase the slave merchants were often jewish?
What about an african group that sold a different group? If the former flies their flag and has their own private spaces, will you attsck them?
The right has a lot of diversity, groups that are diametrically opposed, and they get along because they follow rules of engagement and respect the territory of others.
The far left looks for fights, creates purity tests, and eats their own.
Shooting at any group that wants their own space is how you lose. Are you going to do the same for a jewish community becase the slave merchants were often jewish?
What about an african group that sold a different group? If the former flies their flag and has their own private spaces, will you attsck them?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,615
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,616
@1,444,611 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
There aren't many koreans in groups like this, and freedom of expression implies their expressing their own ethnic ties.
@1,444,612 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
It's the flag of an ethnic group that owned blacks and refused to give up their slaves until forced to.
Even after they give up on slavery, that ethnic group still exists.
There aren't many koreans in groups like this, and freedom of expression implies their expressing their own ethnic ties.
@1,444,612 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
It's the flag of an ethnic group that owned blacks and refused to give up their slaves until forced to.
Even after they give up on slavery, that ethnic group still exists.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,617
It’s a yes or no question, if an American soldier sees somebody flying the ISIS flag somewhere in the Middle East should they walk up to them and have a conversation and ask them if they’re doing a free speech thing or should they shoot them and kill them?
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,618
@1,444,615 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I did answer.
You have to weigh the costs and benefits.
Is an ISIS flag a real threat, or do random villagers fly it all the time with little political education and their harmless.
Shoot at every group that isn't aligned with the US and every formation will be bogged down with fights.
Focus on whatever enemy your rules of engagement tell you to fire at according to the mission.
I did answer.
You have to weigh the costs and benefits.
Is an ISIS flag a real threat, or do random villagers fly it all the time with little political education and their harmless.
Shoot at every group that isn't aligned with the US and every formation will be bogged down with fights.
Focus on whatever enemy your rules of engagement tell you to fire at according to the mission.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,619
@1,444,616 (E)
What ethnic ties do white people have with the confederacy? The confederacy only lasted four years, it’s not an ethnic group. It was an act of treason where states seceded from the union and went to war against the United States because they wanted to own black people as slaves. That’s not heritage, that’s evil, and I think my ancestors did a good thing by killing them.
What ethnic ties do white people have with the confederacy? The confederacy only lasted four years, it’s not an ethnic group. It was an act of treason where states seceded from the union and went to war against the United States because they wanted to own black people as slaves. That’s not heritage, that’s evil, and I think my ancestors did a good thing by killing them.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,620
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 17 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,621
@1,444,618 (E)
How is it against the rules of engagement to kill someone who’s identifying themself as an enemy combatant? If someone is flying the ISIS flag, you can kill them.
How is it against the rules of engagement to kill someone who’s identifying themself as an enemy combatant? If someone is flying the ISIS flag, you can kill them.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 59 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,622
@1,444,620 (E)
When we killed people in the Middle East with drones, how often do you think waving an ISIS flag would be enough justification to blow somebody up in their car given how many people we killed that way?
When we killed people in the Middle East with drones, how often do you think waving an ISIS flag would be enough justification to blow somebody up in their car given how many people we killed that way?
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,623
@1,444,619 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Yankee and Dixie are distinct ethnic groups in the US.
Not many people have strong ties to the northern side, but there is a lot of people who delebrate the Southern Dixie culture.
Yankee and Dixie are distinct ethnic groups in the US.
Not many people have strong ties to the northern side, but there is a lot of people who delebrate the Southern Dixie culture.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,624
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 51 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,625
There are English Americans, German Americans, Italian Americans, Chinese Americans, Japanese Americans, Indian Americans, Nigerian Americans, Congolese Americans, there’s no such thing as a Yankee or Dixie American. Those aren’t ethnic groups.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,626
@1,444,621 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I didn't say it was against the rules of engagement, I said it depended on their mission and that units rules of engagement.
If you are fighting in a mission unrelated to ISIS, and some villager flies the flag, you can't just murder them for being stupid.
If you are in an active firefight in an area that has ISIS attacks, you could and even get off if they weren't a combatant because it was a reasonable decision.
I didn't say it was against the rules of engagement, I said it depended on their mission and that units rules of engagement.
If you are fighting in a mission unrelated to ISIS, and some villager flies the flag, you can't just murder them for being stupid.
If you are in an active firefight in an area that has ISIS attacks, you could and even get off if they weren't a combatant because it was a reasonable decision.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 42 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,627
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,628
@1,444,624 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They "arguably" are according to wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Southerners
Not hard to see why: distinct form of speech, religion, and political history.
They "arguably" are according to wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Southerners
Not hard to see why: distinct form of speech, religion, and political history.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 44 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,629
I don’t care about this whole silly argument that they’re just doing it because they have the freedom to do it. If they were flying offensive flags for the sake of flying offensive flags, they’d be flying the ISIS flag, the North Korean flag, the Russian flag, etc. They’re specifically flying the confederate flag because they’re white supremacists. You said yourself they’re not flying the North Korean flag because they’re not Korean, that means it’s a race thing not a free speech thing.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,630
@1,444,628 (E)
White southerners are southerners who live in the south, it’s not an ethnic group. I used to live in the south. Being southern isn’t an ethnic group.
White southerners are southerners who live in the south, it’s not an ethnic group. I used to live in the south. Being southern isn’t an ethnic group.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,631
@1,444,627 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
And I just explained 3 times that there are times when it would be considered a reasonable time to shoot and times when it couldn't.
The US military does not allow you to murder anyone waving that flag, but there are times when it will be considered reasonable or necessary.
That should be obvious, but you are completely saturated in an ideology of pride and hatred.
And I just explained 3 times that there are times when it would be considered a reasonable time to shoot and times when it couldn't.
The US military does not allow you to murder anyone waving that flag, but there are times when it will be considered reasonable or necessary.
That should be obvious, but you are completely saturated in an ideology of pride and hatred.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,633
@1,444,629 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
They aren't korean, as I've already explained.
They will fly their own cultural symbol, not the symbol of a random country.
They aren't korean, as I've already explained.
They will fly their own cultural symbol, not the symbol of a random country.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,634
@1,444,631 (E)
You must take me for a retard or something. I know white supremacists tell yourselves that black people have low IQs, but you can’t possibly think I’m this stupid that I would buy any of your arguments. Honestly I’m just offended that you’re even trying to convince me of this as if you think I’m stupid enough to not see what you’re doing.
You must take me for a retard or something. I know white supremacists tell yourselves that black people have low IQs, but you can’t possibly think I’m this stupid that I would buy any of your arguments. Honestly I’m just offended that you’re even trying to convince me of this as if you think I’m stupid enough to not see what you’re doing.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 44 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,635
@1,444,633 (E)
Because they’re calling themselves patriots, why the fuck is their symbol anything other than the American flag if they’re patriots? If you fly the flag of our enemies, you’re not a patriot, you’re a traitor. They aren’t Americans.
Because they’re calling themselves patriots, why the fuck is their symbol anything other than the American flag if they’re patriots? If you fly the flag of our enemies, you’re not a patriot, you’re a traitor. They aren’t Americans.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,636
@1,444,630 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
The term can mean either, and the article linked is about people that match a particular speech, religion, and political identity.
Not everyone living in the south is part of the ethnic group that often goes by "White Southerner".
The term can mean either, and the article linked is about people that match a particular speech, religion, and political identity.
Not everyone living in the south is part of the ethnic group that often goes by "White Southerner".
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,637
@1,444,594 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> Riding the transit with black people doesn’t mean their not racist dummy.
George Lincoln Rockwell loved the Nation of Islam and always spoke of “The Honorable Elijah Mohammed.” Marcus Garvey met with the KKK in the 1920s. South African white nationalists have colluded with Zulus. Extremists make strange bedfellows.
> Riding the transit with black people doesn’t mean their not racist dummy.
George Lincoln Rockwell loved the Nation of Islam and always spoke of “The Honorable Elijah Mohammed.” Marcus Garvey met with the KKK in the 1920s. South African white nationalists have colluded with Zulus. Extremists make strange bedfellows.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,638
@1,444,636 (E)
Do you honestly believe in what you’re saying? I don’t think that you do. Why are you lying to me? Just tell me what you really think.
Do you honestly believe in what you’re saying? I don’t think that you do. Why are you lying to me? Just tell me what you really think.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,639
@1,444,637 (G)
That’s kinda my point, just because a man is willing to sit down in a room full of black people doesn’t mean he’s not also a Nazi. You can’t trust extremists and extremists always have an incentive to try and gaslight you that they’re not extremists.
That’s kinda my point, just because a man is willing to sit down in a room full of black people doesn’t mean he’s not also a Nazi. You can’t trust extremists and extremists always have an incentive to try and gaslight you that they’re not extremists.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,640
@1,444,634 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If you think the US military just murders people willy nilly you need to take a walk off campus sometime.
@1,444,635 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You can call them contradictory, I don't identify with this group so why should I care?
I'm just here to point out you don't know anything about them, or about ethnic groups, or how militaries work, and some basic ideas about when someone has erred vs when your predictions about them have erred.
If you think the US military just murders people willy nilly you need to take a walk off campus sometime.
@1,444,635 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You can call them contradictory, I don't identify with this group so why should I care?
I'm just here to point out you don't know anything about them, or about ethnic groups, or how militaries work, and some basic ideas about when someone has erred vs when your predictions about them have erred.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 45 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,642
@previous (E)
I don’t think the US military murders people willy nilly. They kill our enemies. If ISIS is our enemy, we kill members of ISIS because they’re members of ISIS and that’s the end of the story.
I don’t think the US military murders people willy nilly. They kill our enemies. If ISIS is our enemy, we kill members of ISIS because they’re members of ISIS and that’s the end of the story.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 59 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,643
Neo confederate organizations are terrorist organizations. ISIS and Patriot Front are both terrorist organizations. Those men aren’t patriots who love America, they’re racist terrorists and they should be treated like the Islamic State.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,644
You wouldn’t waste your time making these arguments to defend guys in the Middle East who get blown up in drone strikes while they’re waving around ISIS flags because you’re not a jihadist. You are a white nationalist so that’s why you make these bullshit free speech excuses. The fact of the matter is, this is a terrorist organization, and terrorists shouldn’t get to live in our world.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,645
@1,444,639 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Alliances between nationalists of different countries isn't rare, it happens whenever fascism is on the rise. They see natural agreements, like banning miscgenation but not necessarily trade. If they don't have any active border dispute it's an easy tit-for-tat: I make the rules for my area, you make the rules for your area.
Leftists are so yoked to the spirit of hatred they will find ways to declare their own teammates heretics, even if this level of pride hurts their own ambitions. Ask the Judean Peolle's Front what they think of the People's front of Judea.
Alliances between nationalists of different countries isn't rare, it happens whenever fascism is on the rise. They see natural agreements, like banning miscgenation but not necessarily trade. If they don't have any active border dispute it's an easy tit-for-tat: I make the rules for my area, you make the rules for your area.
Leftists are so yoked to the spirit of hatred they will find ways to declare their own teammates heretics, even if this level of pride hurts their own ambitions. Ask the Judean Peolle's Front what they think of the People's front of Judea.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,646
@previous (E)
It’s interesting how you bring up Fascism but don’t condemn it instead you condemn leftists. When the United States was fighting in World War Two, who’s side were we on? Germany and Japan or Russia and China?
We were allied with Russia and China during World War Two. Why are you consistently defending enemies of the United States if you’re really a patriot? It doesn’t make sense. If you love America, you wouldn’t do that. Only someone who hates America would do that.
It’s interesting how you bring up Fascism but don’t condemn it instead you condemn leftists. When the United States was fighting in World War Two, who’s side were we on? Germany and Japan or Russia and China?
We were allied with Russia and China during World War Two. Why are you consistently defending enemies of the United States if you’re really a patriot? It doesn’t make sense. If you love America, you wouldn’t do that. Only someone who hates America would do that.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 19 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,647
@1,444,644 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
If a random serviceman killed someone because they were waving around a piece of cloth, and they clearly posed no serious danger then I would say it was wrong.
It has blowback anyway, any self-interested patriot should know that tarnishing the brand with death would be bad for America.
And I'm obviously not saying they can't use it as a signal when they're in a dangerous area where they've been warned about that group.
If a random serviceman killed someone because they were waving around a piece of cloth, and they clearly posed no serious danger then I would say it was wrong.
It has blowback anyway, any self-interested patriot should know that tarnishing the brand with death would be bad for America.
And I'm obviously not saying they can't use it as a signal when they're in a dangerous area where they've been warned about that group.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,648
@previous (E)
I wouldn’t say it was wrong. I would say they did their job, they killed our enemies, and they protected the United States of America.
I wouldn’t say it was wrong. I would say they did their job, they killed our enemies, and they protected the United States of America.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,649
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,650
@previous (E)
I don’t particularly care. The Germans and Japanese were fighting a genocidal war. It was either us or them, they started it, we ended it.
I don’t particularly care. The Germans and Japanese were fighting a genocidal war. It was either us or them, they started it, we ended it.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,651
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,652
If you keep consistently taking the side of our enemies over the interests of the United States, how can you say you’re a patriot?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,653
@1,444,651 (E)
I have no respect for the lives of enemies of the United States, because I’m an American and I believe we should do what’s in the best interest of protecting the security of the United States.
I have no respect for the lives of enemies of the United States, because I’m an American and I believe we should do what’s in the best interest of protecting the security of the United States.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,654
@1,444,650 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
And then the administration that ended it immediately realigned everything in the government to counter the soviets 😂
And then the administration that ended it immediately realigned everything in the government to counter the soviets 😂
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,655
@previous (E)
The Nazis were worse than the Soviets, that’s why we allied with the Soviets during World War Two. We acted in our own self interest. It wasn’t in the interest of the United States to align with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, they attacked us first. We waited until they attacked us before we joined the war.
The Nazis were worse than the Soviets, that’s why we allied with the Soviets during World War Two. We acted in our own self interest. It wasn’t in the interest of the United States to align with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, they attacked us first. We waited until they attacked us before we joined the war.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 45 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,656
@1,444,652 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I don't think murdering a civilian in a peaceful area would be good for America, American soldiers, or the bystanders.
I'm glad you aren't enlisted.
You constantly complain about America and the person America ELECTED BY POPULAR VOTE to lead the country. Why don't you just leave already?
I don't think murdering a civilian in a peaceful area would be good for America, American soldiers, or the bystanders.
I'm glad you aren't enlisted.
You constantly complain about America and the person America ELECTED BY POPULAR VOTE to lead the country. Why don't you just leave already?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 0 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,657
You’re claiming you’re not a Nazi but you really want to defend Nazis a whole lot more than you want to defend America. I don’t think you’re a patriot.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,658
@1,444,656 (E)
If you’re flying the flag of our enemies in a combat zone, you’re not identifying yourself as a civilian so it’s fair game.
If you’re flying the flag of our enemies in a combat zone, you’re not identifying yourself as a civilian so it’s fair game.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,659
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 43 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,660
@1,444,657 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I didn't defend Nazis, but I did say I wasn't aligned with the Patriot Front. I also said troops shouldn't murder peaceful civilians.
I didn't defend Nazis, but I did say I wasn't aligned with the Patriot Front. I also said troops shouldn't murder peaceful civilians.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,661
@1,444,658 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Oh, I was talking about being a pacificst in a combat zone when I said:
> And I'm obviously not saying they can't use it as a signal when they're in a dangerous area where they've been warned about that group.
??
Oh, I was talking about being a pacificst in a combat zone when I said:
> And I'm obviously not saying they can't use it as a signal when they're in a dangerous area where they've been warned about that group.
??
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,662
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,663
Japan bombed the United States. That’s why we went to war against the Japanese, the Nazis, and the Fascists in Italy in World War Two and allied with Russia and China. It doesn’t make any sense to defend people who want to kill you. Either we killed them first or they would have killed us and then you wouldn’t have been born.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,664
@1,444,662 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I condemn them both, and you insist that when I say "follow the rules of engagement" I mean don't fight fights.
I condemn them both, and you insist that when I say "follow the rules of engagement" I mean don't fight fights.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,665
@1,444,663 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Is there a reason you're stuck on strawmanning this?
Did I ever say we shouldn't have fought the Nazis? Want to find the quote?
Is there a reason you're stuck on strawmanning this?
Did I ever say we shouldn't have fought the Nazis? Want to find the quote?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,666
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,667
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
In Germany's case they were invading multiple countries in Europe.
You can't allow a country to attack and expand, because they'll just keep going.
A humanitarian intervention for the genocide would have been a good reason too, but it wasn't actually well-known how extensive it was. Emigrants and stories of discrimination were out, but not death camps.
In Germany's case they were invading multiple countries in Europe.
You can't allow a country to attack and expand, because they'll just keep going.
A humanitarian intervention for the genocide would have been a good reason too, but it wasn't actually well-known how extensive it was. Emigrants and stories of discrimination were out, but not death camps.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,668
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,669
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Hitler's? Yes.
The term means a lot of different things. A woman I know thinks it means voting for Trump, and I don't think that's the same thing.
Hitler's? Yes.
The term means a lot of different things. A woman I know thinks it means voting for Trump, and I don't think that's the same thing.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,670
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,671
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,672
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 31 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,673
I’m noticing in all your answers your avoiding directly criticizing the ideology of Nazism.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,674
@1,444,672 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Which part?
The automotive industrial parts were good, the parts about Poles were harsh and unfair.
Which part?
The automotive industrial parts were good, the parts about Poles were harsh and unfair.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 19 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,675
You see, what most people say, is they say Hitler was a racist, he hated Jews, and he believed in a race hierarchy, and that’s why his ideology was evil, but you’re not going to say that, because you believe in those things despite claiming you’re not a Nazi.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,676
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,677
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,678
@1,444,675 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
A foreign ethnic group that takes positions of power and accunulated disproportionate wealth is a problem.
Race heirarchies form naturally in private enterprise, not every group of humans has the same advantages and disavldvantages. Interfering with private enterprise to "fix" that will have adverse effects.
A foreign ethnic group that takes positions of power and accunulated disproportionate wealth is a problem.
Race heirarchies form naturally in private enterprise, not every group of humans has the same advantages and disavldvantages. Interfering with private enterprise to "fix" that will have adverse effects.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,679
@previous (E)
> A foreign ethnic group that takes positions of power and accunulated disproportionate wealth is a problem.
Are you talking about white people in Africa?
> A foreign ethnic group that takes positions of power and accunulated disproportionate wealth is a problem.
Are you talking about white people in Africa?
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,680
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,681
@1,444,679 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I'm saying I can understand why the locals had a problem with it, even if the White upper class did increase GDP.
And I understand that they have a natural right to throw off their rulers.
I'm saying I can understand why the locals had a problem with it, even if the White upper class did increase GDP.
And I understand that they have a natural right to throw off their rulers.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,682
Explain to me why it’s a problem that a particular ethnic group is successful and why a particular ethnic group isn’t allowed to be successful.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,683
Supposedly you’re not a leftist, but the idea behind socialism is that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. You’re not a Marxist since you’re not a leftist, but you seem to like nationalism, but your ideas seem to be relatively socialist, only on the basis of race. Am I incorrect about that?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,684
@1,444,682 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Letting another tribe come in and take over everything means voluntarily relinquishing sovereignity.
Hitler identified what that meant in this case, subversion of german cultural norms.
Doing nothing meant allowing a hostile group to continue infiltrating and destroying the nation he was leading.
It's not always the case, often a foreign rich group just comes in to work and participate normally.
Letting another tribe come in and take over everything means voluntarily relinquishing sovereignity.
Hitler identified what that meant in this case, subversion of german cultural norms.
Doing nothing meant allowing a hostile group to continue infiltrating and destroying the nation he was leading.
It's not always the case, often a foreign rich group just comes in to work and participate normally.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,685
@previous (E)
Okay, so basically what you’re saying, is you’re a national socialist, but you just don’t really like labels because Nazi is a slur. Got it.
Okay, so basically what you’re saying, is you’re a national socialist, but you just don’t really like labels because Nazi is a slur. Got it.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,686
@1,444,683 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
I'm a cultural nationalist, but I don't expect that will end up being a perfect representation of race.
There are many non-whites that have the cultural norms, but whites are overrepresented.
I'm a cultural nationalist, but I don't expect that will end up being a perfect representation of race.
There are many non-whites that have the cultural norms, but whites are overrepresented.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,687
@1,444,685 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You claim both titles don't you?
Are you not a nationalist or not a socialist?
You claim both titles don't you?
Are you not a nationalist or not a socialist?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,688
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,689
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,690
The opposite of nationalism isn’t socialism, the opposite of nationalism is globalism, the "opposite" of socialism is capitalism. Although, it is possible to have elements of capitalism and socialism working at the same time so it’s a bit of a false dichotomy.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,692
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,693
If you want my honest opinion on nationalism, I think it’s primitive and incomparable with the continued technological progress of humanity.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,694
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
It's the current order. Nations are sovereign, even as much as multi-national corps have grown in power.
It's the current order. Nations are sovereign, even as much as multi-national corps have grown in power.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,695
@previous (E)
But the world has become much more peaceful than any time in history due to international organizations. I support the United States because the United States generally has advocated for an international rules based order.
But the world has become much more peaceful than any time in history due to international organizations. I support the United States because the United States generally has advocated for an international rules based order.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 58 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,696
The problem with fighting for dominance is that it follows this very predictable pattern where every territorial empire always falls
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,697
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,698
Which is why it’s genius that America isn’t a territorial empire.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 32 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,699
@1,444,696 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Most nationalists, and even most fascists don't want wars of domination and territorial conquest. That's why they form alliances easily.
Capital has a never ending hunger for new markets.
Most nationalists, and even most fascists don't want wars of domination and territorial conquest. That's why they form alliances easily.
Capital has a never ending hunger for new markets.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,700
@1,444,697 (E)
Yes, and the common international law that you can’t violate those borders through invasion. You need international organizations, continental unions, and networks of military alliances in order to enforce that.
Yes, and the common international law that you can’t violate those borders through invasion. You need international organizations, continental unions, and networks of military alliances in order to enforce that.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 46 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,701
@1,444,699 (E)
That’s… not an accurate view of geopolitics, but you’re stupid so whatever.
That’s… not an accurate view of geopolitics, but you’re stupid so whatever.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,702
@1,444,700 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Fascists and Communists both form international networks.
Do you think this is unique to capitalism?
Fascists and Communists both form international networks.
Do you think this is unique to capitalism?
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,703
@1,444,701 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
You haven't refuted anything or contributed to the conversation, you're just name calling.
You haven't refuted anything or contributed to the conversation, you're just name calling.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,704
@1,444,702 (E)
I already explained that socialism isn’t the opposite of nationalism, that’s a stupid question.
I already explained that socialism isn’t the opposite of nationalism, that’s a stupid question.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 47 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,705
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,706
It’s so stupid to me that you want me to believe you’re not a Nazi when you obviously strongly agree with Nazi ideology.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,707
You’d think if your ideas are so great you could just call your beliefs what they are, but you’re so afraid of the label of Nazi when it fits your beliefs perfectly. So you know the difference between right and wrong but you’re choosing wrong anyway.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 38 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,711
@1,444,704 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Nothing to do with what I said.
@1,444,705 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Never to avoid an argument or question.
@1,444,706 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
It always depends on what in particular. 100% of vegetarians agree with Hitler on certain issues.
Nothing to do with what I said.
@1,444,705 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
Never to avoid an argument or question.
@1,444,706 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
It always depends on what in particular. 100% of vegetarians agree with Hitler on certain issues.
Anonymous E double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 58 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,712
@1,444,707 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
This is exactly what I'm talking about when I say you strawman, and invent words for your opponents.
You can't empathize, and then you fail to listen, and then you smugly show contradictions between "their words" (your words) and their actions.
This is exactly what I'm talking about when I say you strawman, and invent words for your opponents.
You can't empathize, and then you fail to listen, and then you smugly show contradictions between "their words" (your words) and their actions.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous E triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,713
@previous (E)
And the way a normal person handles evidence contrary to their preconceptions is to say "oh, I got that wrong" not to strawman endlessly to bow to pride.
And the way a normal person handles evidence contrary to their preconceptions is to say "oh, I got that wrong" not to strawman endlessly to bow to pride.
Albert Einstein II joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,714
@1,444,684 (E)> Letting another tribe come in and take over everything means voluntarily relinquishing sovereignity.
>
> Hitler identified what that meant in this case, subversion of german cultural norms.
>
> Doing nothing meant allowing a hostile group to continue infiltrating and destroying the nation he was leading.
>
> It's not always the case, often a foreign rich group just comes in to work and participate normally.
I think that Anonymous E is not not a Nazi.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,715
Albert Einstein II replied with this 2 weeks ago, 47 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,716
I am not willing to say that Anonymous E is not a Nazi, but I’m pretty sure I have been able to deduce using facts and logic along with the scientific method and the most advanced simulations and theoretical physics known to mankind, that he is definitely not not a Nazi. I’m pretty sure of that. Is he a Nazi? I can’t say. But I’m pretty sure, Anonymous E isn’t not a Nazi.Big Brain double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,717
@previous (Albert Einstein II)
Albert II… what about double negation? Have we considered the implication of double negation?
Albert II… what about double negation? Have we considered the implication of double negation?
Albert Einstein II triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,718
@previous (Big Brain)
The world isn’t ready for that yet. There simply is not enough evidence to be sure that double negation works in every case. It works in every case we have tested thus far, but there could always be another case that comes up later where it doesn’t work, and there is no way to prove that. I am not confident enough to make such an assertion. It is wild what is being accepted in the scientific community. So much money wasted on researching things based on this silly concept of double negation that requires false turning into true. Two wrongs don’t make a right, it’s not a part of my philosophy. You don’t have to be a genius to know that isn’t how the world works. I will not consider the theory of double negation if you can even call it that to this matter of whether Anonymous En is or is not a Nazi. This suggestion is preposterous!
The world isn’t ready for that yet. There simply is not enough evidence to be sure that double negation works in every case. It works in every case we have tested thus far, but there could always be another case that comes up later where it doesn’t work, and there is no way to prove that. I am not confident enough to make such an assertion. It is wild what is being accepted in the scientific community. So much money wasted on researching things based on this silly concept of double negation that requires false turning into true. Two wrongs don’t make a right, it’s not a part of my philosophy. You don’t have to be a genius to know that isn’t how the world works. I will not consider the theory of double negation if you can even call it that to this matter of whether Anonymous En is or is not a Nazi. This suggestion is preposterous!
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Big Brain quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,719
@previous (Albert Einstein II)Hypothetically if one makes the assertion that you are wrong, their assertion is the negation of the statement that you are right, but if we negate the assertion they made and say that their assertion that you are wrong is wrong, does that not make you correct rather than doubly wrong?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,720
I think theres too many niggerposts, tbh.
Albert Einstein II replied with this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,721
Anonymous H double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,725
@1,444,720 (I)
And so, the reactionary retard spam begins after the totally not a Nazi who just agrees with Hitler on everything except one thing which he has not mentioned loses a debate…
And so, the reactionary retard spam begins after the totally not a Nazi who just agrees with Hitler on everything except one thing which he has not mentioned loses a debate…
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,727
@previous (H)
The logic you used would implicate vegetqrians as nazis, and you still haven't responded to that.
The logic you used would implicate vegetqrians as nazis, and you still haven't responded to that.
MusicBoi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,729
@previous (E)
Ideally I’d like to imagine myself in Nazi occupied Paris, France. I hate Hitler, but he’d probably make me his top guy, and put me in charge of a platoon of Panzers.
https://youtu.be/drC9WIa3b6k
Ideally I’d like to imagine myself in Nazi occupied Paris, France. I hate Hitler, but he’d probably make me his top guy, and put me in charge of a platoon of Panzers.
https://youtu.be/drC9WIa3b6k
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,732
@previous (MusicBoi)
The war is over, if you want to read real race science get something from Oxford University Press.
The war is over, if you want to read real race science get something from Oxford University Press.
MusicBoi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,734
@previous (E)> Oxford University
A school you clearly didn’t go to.
Hey, Anonymous E, if Europeans are so great, why did you need a Filipino to invent the nut box for you?
Anonymous E replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,735
MusicBoi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,736
Even the rock has been rocking a nut box fanny pack.MusicBoi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,737
MusicBoi triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,738
by the way, you still haven’t answered my question because you Eurotrash are low IQ and cannot answer basic questions using facts and logic because you are emotional. Why did it take a Filipino to invent the nut box? How come Europeans never invented the nut box on their own? Why are Swedish men still using cum jars instead of electronic nut boxes? It is clearly the inferior way to doing things to not be using electric nut boxes in 2026.
MusicBoi quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,740
I will admit, I do agree with what this Japanese imperial general said in his warning to the world after Japan lost World War Two. I think a lot of people really need to hear this. Japan was going to overtake the US economically but it didn’t. Why? This makes it all clear who is really controlling everything behind the scenes.
https://youtu.be/ce4IzbEQyNo
https://youtu.be/ce4IzbEQyNo
MusicBoi quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,741
Anonymous I replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,742
MusicBoi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,743
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,795
@1,444,681 (E)
> I'm saying I can understand why the locals had a problem with it, even if the White upper class did increase GDP.
Fun fact: they did not increase the GDP, the GDP grew massively when colonialism ended.
https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/ssf/sub-saharan-africa/gdp-gross-domestic-product
Whites made Africa poor.
> I'm saying I can understand why the locals had a problem with it, even if the White upper class did increase GDP.
Fun fact: they did not increase the GDP, the GDP grew massively when colonialism ended.
https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/ssf/sub-saharan-africa/gdp-gross-domestic-product
Whites made Africa poor.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,796
When Africa was under European control, the GDP of the continent was less than 50 billion USD, now it’s 3.5 trillion USD.
Anonymous I replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,444,931
@1,444,743 (MusicBoi)
reread de followin poast
@1,444,742 (I)
>
reread de followin poast
@1,444,742 (I)
>
i cannot speak ebonics, try again in human language