Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
It never ceases to amaze me how many retarded white people there are on the internet. I wonder if the whole racism thing is just cope for white people with low IQs. They might be correct that IQ is determined by genetics and there’s nothing you can do to change it, which is probably why they tell themselves they must be high IQ because they’re white in order to feel better about it.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 hour ago, 42 seconds later[^][v]#1,443,650
I don't believe in evolution or that we came from some monkey in Africa. That is non-sense. We are all descended from Adam and Eve and where in the world pre-flood people were, is hard to say. Where Noah landed, and the tower of Babel were most definitely not in Africa. So frankly, that to me means that the whole out of Africa theory is bullshit.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 3 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,443,651
Tbh I never really used 4chan but I was getting bored of this site so I went around there poking around looking for racism. The only problem is every single board is filled with gays except for /pol/. All the anime boards are filled with trans hentai, all the porn boards are filled with trans hentai. It’s just a bunch of autistic transgender boards and like one transgender racist board.
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,443,652
I do question the ideology of whoever made 4chan though, Japanese cartoon porn, transgenderism, and nazism. I mean… you know what, I almost wonder if 4chan was made by a progressive because this honestly made nazism feel less cool to me and that makes no sense because I always hated nazism so I didn’t realize that was possible. How are these people so fucking gay? I’m not even homophobic, I spent like 5 minutes on 4chan, didn’t even post anything, and I feel like it made me slightly homophobic because of how gay it is.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 14 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,443,668
@previous (boof)
This sounds awful, I’m trying to imagine somebody from my high school who would create 4chan. I don’t think anybody was bad enough, but it would have to be a skinny white autistic trans kid who’s also goth, likes guns, and is a weaboo.
Anonymous C double-posted this 25 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,443,679
Charles Darwin didn’t discover evolution, he discovered the means by which evolution occurs which is natural selection. Evolution had already been proposed before Darwin. Social Darwinism is the pseudoscientific idea that you can use natural selection to justify differences in social status, and eugenics is an extreme form of social Darwinism that advocates for artificially speeding up natural selections through murder, forced abortions, and sterilization (genocide) in order to benefit society.
Anonymous C triple-posted this 17 minutes ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,443,680
Of course social Darwinism isn’t really inspired by Darwinism, it was an attempt to justify older ideas that were threatened by Darwinism. Darwinism leads to the idea that humans are a part of nature rather than separate from it, and that we are animals that evolved from animals rather than separate from all the other non-human animals which threatened some peoples religious views about God. However, in various societies including Europe in the ancient and medieval world, most of the world existed under feudalism which was an economic system with rigid class hierarchy and limited social mobility where your place was determined entirely by birth. A noble was a noble because they were born a noble, a peasant was a peasant because they were born a peasant, and a king was a king because he was born a royal. Naturally, peasants outnumbered nobles and peasants hated this, so they had to come up with excuses for why this was justified, in India this was a caste system, in Europe it was the great chain of being which is the idea that all things in the universe exist on a hierarchy with God at the top as the most superior being and Satan at the bottom as the most superior being, with animals beneath humans and royals above peasants, etc. Which is complete nonsense, but that’s what they used to justify it. Darwinism threatened that view so social Darwinism was created as a pseudoscientific way to justify the great chain of being. And obviously social darwinists did fake science to justify the inferiority of groups that were oppressed. For example, anti black racism was invented to justify slavery, and the idea that blacks are genetically inferior was invented to justify anti black racism. But there was never serious science done, it was all just bullshit where white people just set out to prove what they assumed by default because they were never going to actually bother testing if whites are inferior, there was no scientific honesty or whatever.
Anonymous C quadruple-posted this 17 minutes ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,443,681
And basically the only two reasons to believe in social Darwinism in the modern day with access to the world’s information is if you’re either evil or stupid.
Anonymous C quintuple-posted this 14 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,443,683
And you know, the Nazis in World War Two took the idea of social Darwinism further than anyone else ever, and that ended with Dresden firebombed, Tokyo firebombed, Berlin leveled, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki both nuked, but some people think maybe we should try the most unsuccessful idea in the history of the world a second time because they’re dumb.
Anonymous C sextuple-posted this 9 minutes ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,443,684
Although the really ironic thing about all of this, is that blacks were enslaved by whites, because blacks had a higher resistance to European diseases than Native Americans because humans originated in Africa so Africans have the most genetic diversity of any group of people because they’ve been evolving in Africa for longer and face no population bottlenecks from migration. All of Eurasia and the Americas were essentially inbred. And ironically, Africans actually have the most pure Homo sapiens DNA because when humans left Africa they bred with other hominin species like Neanderthals (in Europe) and Denisovans (in Asia). Europeans enslaved Africans because when Europeans discovered the Americas, they conquered it easily since 90% of the natives died of disease, but they couldn’t enslave the natives, because 90% of the natives died of disease, and the settler populations were too small to extract the resources of the vast American continents, so they enslaved blacks, and then invented the idea that blacks have inferior genetics, even though the entire time they actually enslaved blacks because blacks had better disease resistance because of their genetics and they had no idea.
Anonymous C septuple-posted this 6 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,443,685
Although Africans aren’t completely pure Homo sapiens because some humans that left Africa went back to Africa, so they have a small percentage of Neanderthal DNA it’s not zero, but it’s much smaller than the amount Europeans, Asians, and Native Americans have.
Anonymous C octuple-posted this 2 minutes ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,443,686
And at some points in history, for example during the Black Death, the population of Europe dropped, but unlike the native Americans, the Europeans got lucky nobody was moving into Europe when 30% to 60% of them died from the plague. So it’s sort of random it happened to the Native Americans, it could have worked out a different way.