Topic: Racism is going somewhere!
Rothals started this discussion 2 hours ago #135,945
Between Trump getting kingly powers from scotus today and the far right sweeps in Europe, I smell a new era of racial purity!
Antiracists can't tell you why some dogs are clever, and others not, but insist all great apes are equally capable. By this axiom they reason that any inequality must be evidence of a theft, which they would remedy with a theft of their own.
The propaganda is failing, censors can't control the countersignal now that the internet has eroded the monopoly of feelgoodslop.
Antiracists can't tell you why some dogs are clever, and others not, but insist all great apes are equally capable. By this axiom they reason that any inequality must be evidence of a theft, which they would remedy with a theft of their own.
The propaganda is failing, censors can't control the countersignal now that the internet has eroded the monopoly of feelgoodslop.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #1,443,628
CopeAnonymous B double-posted this 2 hours ago, 57 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,629
Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,630
Anonymous B quadruple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,631
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 4 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,633
@previous (B)
>
Well it’s a good thing that Congress is focused on culture wars! It would be a shame if they stopped burning money on pointless wars, a bloated bureaucracy, and failed programs. Of course, DOGE managed to cut all the wrong shit and fucked things up.
>
Well it’s a good thing that Congress is focused on culture wars! It would be a shame if they stopped burning money on pointless wars, a bloated bureaucracy, and failed programs. Of course, DOGE managed to cut all the wrong shit and fucked things up.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 hour ago, 39 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,634
The west has two options for 2100:
1. Face economic collapse due to a shrinking population thereby losing power and influence in the world.
2. Become less than 50% white to retain the population preventing a loss of power and influence in the world.
Pick your favorite.
1. Face economic collapse due to a shrinking population thereby losing power and influence in the world.
2. Become less than 50% white to retain the population preventing a loss of power and influence in the world.
Pick your favorite.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 hour ago, 50 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,635
Either that, or the 3rd option is you could get laid with a woman who doesn’t want an abortion. But that’s not possible.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,636
@1,443,634 (B)
> The west has two options for 2100:
>
> 1. Face economic collapse due to a shrinking population thereby losing power and influence in the world.
>
> 2. Become less than 50% white to retain the population preventing a loss of power and influence in the world.
>
> Pick your favorite.
A third option exists but neither party would do it. Tackle affordability, fertility, and make facilitate larger families. Go try to afford kids beyond the replacement rate. Christopher Lasch pointed out that conservatives and neoliberal economics were at cross purposes with their stated aims.
> The west has two options for 2100:
>
> 1. Face economic collapse due to a shrinking population thereby losing power and influence in the world.
>
> 2. Become less than 50% white to retain the population preventing a loss of power and influence in the world.
>
> Pick your favorite.
A third option exists but neither party would do it. Tackle affordability, fertility, and make facilitate larger families. Go try to afford kids beyond the replacement rate. Christopher Lasch pointed out that conservatives and neoliberal economics were at cross purposes with their stated aims.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 hour ago, 36 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,637
@1,443,633 (C)
From the debt to GDP ratio, we must be fighting the culture war as hard as World War Two.
From the debt to GDP ratio, we must be fighting the culture war as hard as World War Two.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,638
@1,443,636 (C)
I think, a part of me hoped that America would do that, but I think the moment all the billionaires attended Trump’s inauguration, that hope is dead. America is and will remain an oligarchy by the rich and for the rich. There is no force in America that will stop this.
I think, a part of me hoped that America would do that, but I think the moment all the billionaires attended Trump’s inauguration, that hope is dead. America is and will remain an oligarchy by the rich and for the rich. There is no force in America that will stop this.
Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 5 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,639
One of the issues with wealth distribution is there isn’t a good way to represent it. But the wealth inequality in the US is really, really bad.Anonymous B quadruple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,640
People get caught up in racial wealth disparities, and that matters, but the difference between the average black or white or Asian American means absolutely nothing at all compared to the people at the top.
Anonymous B quintuple-posted this 1 hour ago, 5 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,641
Just based off a quick google search, the top 0.1% has 14.4% of the wealth and the bottom 50% has 2.5% of the wealth. If things continue this way, eventually they’ll just start buying elections and it will turn into something like Russia.