Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 16 minutes later[^][v]#1,442,829
Tbh I never heard of it and I’m Catholic. Apparently they have 2 bishops out of 5,600. I think the outcome is probably going to be predictable. Either they’ll back down or get excommunicated and replaced and everything will continue as usual.
Anonymous B double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,442,830
They have 733 priests… which seems impressive until you google how many Catholic priests there are and you realize this completely doesn’t matter at all.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,442,963
> "The founder of the SSPX, Marcel Lefebvre, was a French royalist who was fiercely opposed to communism, decolonization and secularism. Lefebvre was one of a small percentage of bishops who voted against key documents of the second Vatican council. He died in 1991. The sect has been dogged throughout its history by accusations of antisemitism and ties to the extreme right."
Oh wow so these guys are actually going to be very important in the future. Founded in 1970 so probably yet another CIA psyop lol but I'll definitely keep an eye on these guys. Very interesting
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 15 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,442,968
@previous (D)
Yeah I wouldn't be surprised but just having read up on it all a bit, the second vatican council seems like it was intended to start the process of uniting Christianity around the world. In particular they lifted really old excommunications on members of the Orthodox Church at that time so it's clear there's a desire to unite the religion under one banner which obviously requires reforms. This council in particular is the reason for the schism with the SSPX. Given everything going on in the US and JD vance recently converting to Catholicism in 2019, I would not be shocked at all to see the SSPX become big players in the coming years. Especially if Putin brings the war to EU proper and sentiment starts to turn against any kind of unification with Russian politics or religion. Just keep an eye on them
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,976
I mean, in the history of everything, a group of people 100 times smaller than the group they’re fighting against usually doesn’t win. I don’t think it’s particularly important or the end result will be particularly interesting or unexpected. If you have a ratio like that, the outcome is obvious.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,977
And even if JD Vance gets behind it or whatever, most Catholics aren’t American, there are four times as many Catholics as Americans, the pope is physically located in the Vatican which is a sovereign country, maybe I’m wrong, but I really don’t think this is going anywhere.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,978
@1,442,973 (E)
You're thinking about this the wrong way. Don't you remember the headlines about rumors of JD Vance threatening the pope? I think there's a not insignificant chance the CIA just offs Pope Leo, secretly threatens other leaders in the church, and installs some SSPX figurehead. Some things you just have to wait and see about so we'll see what happens
Anonymous C double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,979
@1,442,977 (E)
Unironically I think a good amount of maga republicans would become Catholic if some hardline right wing people were in charge of the church. Also this administration has literally killed or kidnapped the leaders of multiple sovereign nations recently
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,981
Also, the thing about the Catholic Church that’s different from Islam is, Iran is Shia, 90% of Muslims are Sunni, the United States. Neither sect of Islam has a single leader. There is no equivalent of the pope in Islam. The Catholic Church is one organization with 1.4 billion followers with one individual person as the leader. If Trump kidnapped or killed the pope, the US would completely lose all of its allies, especially in Europe.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,982
Even Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini didn’t do that, not because they liked the church but because they were smart enough not to. That’s actually why Mussolini made the church an independent nation state and Hitler signed a treaty granting the church religious freedom in Nazi Germany. If Trump actually used the military against the Catholic Church, that would be the most idiotic decision ever because there are Catholics in his government and in the American military and it’s the largest denomination of Christianity in the United States and Catholics believe that the pope is infallible. That would be so offensive to so many people in the world his life would probably be in danger if he did something like that.
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,983
I mean, literally 50% of Christians on the planet are Catholic, most of the Supreme Court is Catholic, JD Vance is Catholic, Trump’s wife is Catholic. He’s surrounded by people who are Catholic. That would be one of the most retarded things he could possibly do.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,988
@1,442,981 (E)
The US is already losing allies in Europe. Trump has been shitting on them nonstop and they have seen what's happened to Ukraine and are arming themselves. Candace Owens was another one that became Catholic recently. It's a growing movement in the US as the general sentiment across the country is "we need to go back to when things were better". I think there are those within the US that would see the Holy Roman Empire revived if possible. If there's literally anyone who would do something that's "never been done before" it's trump. Besides they could easily make it look like a car crash or something
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,990
@1,442,988 (C)
Catholics believe that the pope is the infallible leader of the one true Christian church founded by Jesus Christ and that he inherits his position directly from the Apostle Peter.
In Matthew 16:18 Jesus said:
"And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it."
I literally can’t explain how stupid kidnapping or killing the pope would be. 1.4 billion people follow a religion that states that the pope is prevented from error when speaking by God himself, and you kill that person. You can’t be quantify how offensive that would be to so many people in the world. That would be incredibly dangerous.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,991
That would literally be going directly against what Jesus Christ said in the Bible, and Catholics don’t just believe that Jesus is the son of God, Catholics believe that Jesus is literally God in human form. If you believe that the creator of the universe communicates his will through someone, and you also believe that the creator of the universe is absolute good, and somebody kills that person, then the only conclusion you can come to is whoever did that is absolute evil and against the creator of the universe. Which isn’t a position you want to be in.
If the netherworld can't prevail against it, how can some mortal power?
Either you look the other way to preserve your faith, or you give it up because the keystone belief that gives that church authority has been proven void.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,993
@previous (A)
No it wouldn’t. Anyone who is a Catholic male can become the pope. It’s not possible to kill the position of pope. The church will still exist and Catholics would absolutely remain Catholic.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,997
@1,442,994 (A)
Why do you think Adolf Hitler and Mussolini, brutal genocidal dictators with aspirations of conquering the entire world left the Catholic Church intact if the Catholic Church isn’t under the special protection of God then explain that.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,998
@1,442,996 (A)
Trump wouldn’t prevail against it, that’s the whole point, if Trump did that, another pope would be elected, and a lot of people would have the desire to attack the United States.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 10 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,442,999
@1,442,990 (E)
Look, the pope is an old guy. They make up some story about the brakes on his fancy limo failing or hell just say he ate too many burgers during his time in the US and you poison him badabing badaboom he's done and then you threaten the guys that elect the new pope and make him one of the guys you can control. Nobody would even know if you do it right is all I'm saying and everyone would just welcome the new pope who as you say is infallible and can't be questioned so when he says "The US is allowed to do whatever it wants by my decree!" everyone then says "you got it boss".
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,001
@1,442,999 (C)
The United States isn’t a religion. The same logic doesn’t apply. Catholics believe that the authority of the pope comes from the Holy Spirit. We say "one nation under God" we don’t say "one nation above God."
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 40 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,003
@1,443,000 (A)
No, if Trump killed the pope, the Catholic Church would still exist and a new pope would be elected. It’s impossible for Trump to prevail against the Church.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,004
@1,443,001 (E)
I was exaggerating. Obviously the theoretical pope wouldn't be so on the nose with his wording but he wouldn't be condemning the current administration like Leo is. Look this would just be another power grab exactly like Venezuela
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 0 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,005
The Catholic Church is one of the largest religious organizations in the world, it would be impossible to get rid of the Catholic Church completely without attacking every single country in the world, that’s why it would be a political mistake.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,006
@1,443,001 (E)
The church has already given official support to nations before, saying that Catholic explorers should obey the laws of catholic nations and only overthrow non-catholic ones.
If the next pope sanctioned the US as following His holy word, then the US would have a power it didn't have before.
Just as during the conquistadors, he isn't saying the US is above god, he's saying the same thing as before: Catholics need to respect the nations actions as legitimate.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,009
@1,443,006 (A)
I don’t need to respect a nations actions as legitimate. This life is temporary, the next life is eternal. Your first loyalty as a Christian is to God. Jesus is the king of kings.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,010
If it’s between following God or the government, it’s worth dying for God since you’re going to spend an eternity in the next life regardless of if you die today or tomorrow. This life is a test anyway.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,011
@1,443,009 (E)
If you think you can ignore the pope because they aren't in line with Jesus, you are rejecting Catholicism.
Imagine telling people you are a Catholic hundreds of years ago, and then saying "the pope is wrong, I don't have to respect the laws on New Spain, I follow Jesus". You'd be excommunicated
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,012
@1,443,005 (E)
You wouldn't be getting rid of anything. It would be a power grab so obviously you want to preserve the power structure. You're just changing the guy at the top with somebody who agrees with you a little more maybe regarding those communists like the SSPX guys. Just food for thought anyway relax the pope is still breathing for now
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,019
@1,443,007 (E)
The US doesn't need to control the Venezuelan government's day to day operations anon. What happened in Venezuela was pretty simple
1. Get rid of the guy that's explicitly anti-US (maduro)
2. Control the oil
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,020
@1,443,018 (E)
So you are going to start with the personal attacks because you can't think of why Anon C's plan would fail?
I think he's right, if the pope did what he did during the exploration of the new world (and many other times) people would do today what they did then: they'd listen to the pope, and accept what the nation did.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,025
@1,443,023 (E)
That's not really the question though, the question is would the plan work?
Would Catholics do what they've done in the past and accept the pope's decree about a nation's actions? Or would they do something completely ahistorical and say "I don't believe the pope, I only believe Jesus"?
I think they'd do what they did in the past.
inb4 you act like people in this situation knew it was a coup, when the whole premise was a covert CIA plot to make it look like a crash.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 55 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,026
@1,443,021 (E)
You think the US wants lower fuel prices? When you're the dealer you want prices as high as possible. Control venezuelan oil, block hormuz to control middle east oil, maybe support Ukraine a little behind the scenes so they can blow up oil refineries in Russia (they're doing this) to control Russian oil. Who is everybody going to buy from? That's right baby daddy america is here for all your oil needs just line up and pay top dolla
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 18 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,028
@1,443,024 (E)
You're ignoring the premise of the hypothetical, which is that the CIA makes it look like an accident. They are trained and funded well to do things like that.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,029
@1,443,025 (A)
The pope hasn’t contradicted Jesus, and the pope won’t contradict Jesus because it is the will of God. If you believe in something else then you don’t believe in the God I do.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 35 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,032
@1,443,029 (E)
Right, Catholics agree that when the pope did this in the past it didn't contradict Jesus. Telling people New Spain was legitimate isn't considered heretical by anyone in the church.
So why would it be different if it happened *one more time*?
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,039
@1,443,036 (A)
You’re proposing that Trump choose a pope that defies Jesus and you’re imagining that Catholics would all bow to Trump and defy Jesus if a fake pope tells them to do that. Which is childish.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,048
@1,443,043 (A)
You’re not clever, I know what you’re doing. You like Trump so you want to imagine that Trump will take over the world whole because you think he’s so awesome and smart and nobody will be able to resist him. It’s stupid. Trump won’t be alive in 15 years due to biology, the future isn’t determined by him.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,049
@1,443,047 (A)
I’m not answering because all you’re doing is schizophrenic obsessive fantasizing about Trump winning at everything, it makes you sound stupid and immature.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,051
@previous (A)
It’s a situation that won’t happen in the first place. Catholics have far too much influence in the American government for Trump to attack the Catholic Church using the US military. Even in World War Two when we were literally at war with Italy we didn’t do that.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,054
@1,443,031 (E) > Welcome to your life
There's no turning back
Even while we sleep
We will find you
Acting on your best behaviour
Turn your back on mother nature
Everybody wants to rule the world
Damn that song is catchy. Anyway we all just have to wait and see if any of this comes true. I'm not saying any of this is guaranteed. It just makes a lot of sense to me but who knows maybe trump dies tomorrow. We'll see
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,055
@1,443,052 (A)
Can you shut up about the CIA? The CIA isn’t magical they can’t just do whatever they want, they have limitations. This is like when 10 year olds say, "oh I’ll use a nuke," "oh I’ll use a black hole that’s invincible!" Other countries have intelligence agencies, it’s not a trump card.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,062
@1,443,056 (E) > Yeah, it won’t happen
You know people said the same thing before Trump was elected and then again before Putin invaded Ukraine. You can keep saying it but it turns out sometimes...sometimes stuff actually does happen
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,066
The way both of you talk reminds me of when I’ve seen videos of schizophrenic people online who think the government has implanted a microchip in their brain while they’re sleeping. People who believe in gang stalking or flat earthers or whatever. Convinced that you’re smarter than everyone else and everybody else is stupid but your incoherent schizophrenic ramblings are the truth everybody else is conspiring to hide.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 43 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,069
@1,443,067 (E)
What's stupid about the question? I keep asking and you just pretend I've asked a completely seperate question or make personal attacks.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,070
@1,443,068 (A)
"We didn’t say it would happen, we’ve just been arguing in your face against all the reasons why you think it would be stupid for it to happen so you’re accusing me of a straw man."
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,080
I feel like you don’t understand the concept of basic empathy. You can’t understand why killing a religious leader, the leader of one of the world’s largest religions might be offensive. I understand that some people are autistic so they don’t understand other people’s feelings, but even if you were autistic, I feel like cognitively you should be able to figure that out. But I think part of my problem with you, is you think I’m insulting you when I call you stupid, yet in the past you’ve argued that certain races of people are stupid, but when I call you stupid you think I’m being irrational and insulting you and I should stop. But when you say women are irrational or that blacks have low IQs, you can’t comprehend how that’s bad. So you have no ability to understand fairness. You can’t understand that if you’re offended by something other people probably are too. I just I’ve talked to a lot of people, I’ve never talked to anybody as stupid as you before. You’re really something else in a bad way. I just hope you’re not an adult. That’s all I can really say man.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,081
@previous (E)
A good test of empathy would be to check if someone responds to what's been said in a conversation or if their answer is unrelated.
Someone with theory of mind could model a position they don't agree with, and then create and answer that reconciles the contradiction in their mind with this empathized model.
If someone didn't have theory of mind they'd only be able to respond with a preplanned answer for a position they heard and thought about before the interaction. It's this canned answer that would reveal they lacked an empathic function.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,082
And the most annoying thing is you’re narcissistic as hell, but you’re also completely stupid at the same time and will just talk over other people even when you’re obviously wrong to anybody with half a brain but it doesn’t matter because you never listen to anyone.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,084
Like I literally can’t criticize you for anything ever without you deflecting and trying to suggest you’re better than I am. You’re so narcissistic it’s like it can’t even compute that you’re wrong about anything. And it’s so fucking retarded. You don’t look smart when you do it, you look like a moron.
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,085
Honestly, I don’t even feel scared of you. If you were smart, and this absent of empathy, I’d be afraid. But you’re so stupid, I can’t imagine you ever being successful enough at anything to cause any real damage in the world.
Hey, why hasn't God even once give black people a confirmed emissary from God?
You can strawman that one with your canned answer about how possibly one guy in Tunisia didn't have any portraits near his death so maybe the world confirmed doesn't mean anything. That or a personal attack, but I ORDER YOU not to prove you have theory of mind for this one.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,089
@1,443,086 (A)
If God created the universe, God created black people, and there are more Africans than Europeans. If God doesn’t love us, why did God create more of us than you?
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 57 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,091
And that’s not to say God loves blacks more than whites, I think God loves all of his creation. But I don’t think you have faith in God if you think that God hates people he created in his own image.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,093
@previous (A)
FYI the population of Africa surpassed Europe in the 1990s so I don’t know what the hell you’re even talking about unless you want to elaborate further.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,094
Or unless you want to give me the year when "functional" humanoid robots exist and why the existence of functional humanoid robots has anything to do with there being more black people than white people.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,099
Don’t get me wrong, robots are cool and everything. I don’t see how this changes the logic that there are more blacks than whites and God created both of us so it makes no sense to assume God doesn’t love blacks because if God didn’t love blacks, why did he create them, why did he create them first, and why did he create more of them?
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 41 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,101
@1,443,098 (A)
Why are you comparing what white people and Chinese people have created to what God has created? That doesn’t make any sense. Humans technically can’t create anything, because the laws of physics dictate that nothing can be created or destroyed only transformed. God is the reason there is something instead of nothing. We can only rearrange what God has already created.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,106
@previous (A)
That’s a vague question. I interpret Genesis poetically, not literally. In the literal sense, Adam and Eve aren’t individuals, but concepts. Man and woman. If you’re asking if Adam and Eve, if male and female as concepts are equally descended from God, then the only correct answer is yes, because males and females evolved from single celled organisms that originally reproduced asexually. So we both come from the same origin.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,108
I won’t claim I know the reason why male and female exist, but there are some arguments I find compelling about the spread of beneficial genes throughout a population, the best example is disease resistance. If an organism reproduces asexually and only members of the species with a specific mutation can survive it, then you have to wait for every lineage other than the one containing the mutation to go extinct, losing any beneficial genes those individuals had in order for the whole species to become resistant. If you reproduce sexually, beneficial genes can spread through populations much faster.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,111
@1,443,108 (E)
Because if you think about it, having a child with a woman is really sort of like you sharing your genetic material with her so that her children have some of your DNA instead of just hers. Even animals that can reproduce sexually and asexually usually the females will prefer to reproduce sexually if possible because it has such a genetic advantage.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,115
@1,443,113 (A)
The oldest human remains have been found in East Africa. The first humans would have had dark skin. Even the first Europeans had darks skin, but they evolved lighter skin tones later once they got to Europe.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,117
Although, I should say, that’s because East Africa had conditions conducive to fossilization, that doesn’t mean there weren’t also early humans in west Africa, it’s just their remains didn’t fossilize if they were there too.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,121
@previous (A) > The Pride cult is slop you believe in was made to make you more geographically fungible for trade.
The gay cult is nonsense that I believe in in order to make myself into currency for international trade?
So basically, you’re saying I think gay people exist, and the reason why I think gay people exist is so that I can exchange currency with other countries?
Anonymous E replied with this 3 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,123
The part I’d disagree with right off the bat is I’m not in a cult because I think gay people exist. Obviously I believe gay people are real, I’m talking to you after all, aren’t I?
> It’s not even the first time you’ve said something gay lol. But it’s okay, we both know you don’t like women.
Just because I think women are irrational, that doesn’t mean I’m gay. I can love an irrational person. Love doesn’t mean you lie to someone and you tell them that they’re equal to you when they’re in fact inferior. Basic logic would tell you this. This is why niggas can’t build any societies, because you’re so homophobic you call everybody you disagree with gay. I have nothing against gays, western society was founded on freedom of expression which includes sexual expression. There’s nothing wrong with homosexuality.
Anonymous G replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,130
When has a nigger ever been to a pride parade? You blacks hate the gays, that’s why you still live in mud huts and are still reproducing by putting a penis in a vagina like an animal. Whites and Chinese are more evolved so we invented the technology to reproduce without dealing with irrational women who have been indoctrinated by Jewish intellectualism. We just invented functional humanoid robots so we don’t need women anymore. This is why blacks always lose because you’re always inferior and behind! How are you going to win against us now if Trump sends an army of humanoid robots into Nigeria? It will be metal against flesh, there’s no way you can win!
Anonymous G double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 34 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,133
You stupid monkeys can’t even use logic that’s why instead of debating me and telling me why I’m wrong you resort to insults! There’s nothing wrong with being gay even though I’m not.
Anonymous G triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 38 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,443,134
You know what? I don’t even want to talk with you anymore if you won’t learn how to have a civil conversation. Your chimp instincts have gotten the best of you.
> When has a nigger ever been to a pride parade? You blacks hate the gays, that’s why you still live in mud huts and are still reproducing by putting a penis in a vagina like an animal. Whites and Chinese are more evolved so we invented the technology to reproduce without dealing with irrational women