Topic: Media and police think Montreal terrorist was targetting jews at first because he was at pornhub HQ
Anonymous A started this discussion 4 weeks ago #135,833
I wonder if that's a coincidence lol.
And they are hiding his manifesto.
And Canadian media is trying to cover up that the female cop murdered a civilian during the whole thing.
And they are hiding his manifesto.
And Canadian media is trying to cover up that the female cop murdered a civilian during the whole thing.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #1,442,682
Of course they are. That's why the media exists. You should know this by now.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,684
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,685
@1,442,682 (B)
Yeah, idk. You can find Eric Harrises journal / manifesto / diary online from the columbine school shooting. For the longest time, I only ever copied and pasted parts of it to troll on the internet, but I actually read through a bit of it one time. I wouldn’t recommend it. Reading the manifestos of psychopaths is basically just reading about a horny neanderthal yapping about how they want to rape women and kill people because of "instincts" or whatever making the most retarded spelling mistakes over and over again. I’m not even sure if it’s better or worse when they censor it because reading that is only going to rot your brain.
Yeah, idk. You can find Eric Harrises journal / manifesto / diary online from the columbine school shooting. For the longest time, I only ever copied and pasted parts of it to troll on the internet, but I actually read through a bit of it one time. I wouldn’t recommend it. Reading the manifestos of psychopaths is basically just reading about a horny neanderthal yapping about how they want to rape women and kill people because of "instincts" or whatever making the most retarded spelling mistakes over and over again. I’m not even sure if it’s better or worse when they censor it because reading that is only going to rot your brain.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous C double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,687
I’m serious, if you actually get past it’s funny and edgy that "oh wow this is a school shooter’s diary" actually read this and think about what he’s trying to say and you realize he’s just a retarded horny animal who doesn’t know how to exist in society because he’s literally just a caveman from 100,000 years ago.
https://schoolshooters.info/sites/default/files/harris_journal_1.pdf
https://schoolshooters.info/sites/default/files/harris_journal_1.pdf
Anonymous C triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,688
Just take this one paragraph for instance:
Like bruh if you really think you’re going to ready anything insightful in a psychopath’s journal…
I just want to be surrounded by the flesh of a woman, someone like who I wanted
to just fuck like hell, she made me practically drool, when she wore those shorts to work
. . . instant hard on . . . I couldn’t stop staring. and others like [several
names] in my gym class, or whatever in my gym class, and others who I just
want to overpower and engulf myself in them. mmm. I can taste the sweet flesh now
. . . the salty sweet, the animalistic movement . . . Iccchhh . . . lieeebe . . . . . . . fleisccchhhh
[German: I love flesh]. “weisses fleisch” — perfect song for me. who can I trick into
my room first? I can sweep someone off their feet, tell them what they want to hear,
be all nice and sweet, and then “fuck ’em like an animal, feel them from the inside”
as Reznor20 said. oh — that’s something else . . . that one NIN [Nine Inch Nails] video
I saw, “broken” or “closer”21 or something. the one where the guy is kidnapped and
tortured like hell . . . actual hell. I want to do that too. I want to tear a throat out with my
own teeth like a pop can. I want to gut someone with my hand, to tear a head off and rip
out the heart and lungs from the neck, to stab someone in the gut, shove it up to their
heart, and yank the fucking blade out of their rib cage! I want to grab some weak little
freshman and just tear them apart like a fucking wolf, show them who is god. strangle
them, squish their head, bite their temples in the skull, rip off their jaw, rip off their
colar bones, break their arms in half and twist them around, the lovely sounds of bones
cracking and flesh ripping, ahhh . . . so much to do and so little chances.
to just fuck like hell, she made me practically drool, when she wore those shorts to work
. . . instant hard on . . . I couldn’t stop staring. and others like [several
names] in my gym class, or whatever in my gym class, and others who I just
want to overpower and engulf myself in them. mmm. I can taste the sweet flesh now
. . . the salty sweet, the animalistic movement . . . Iccchhh . . . lieeebe . . . . . . . fleisccchhhh
[German: I love flesh]. “weisses fleisch” — perfect song for me. who can I trick into
my room first? I can sweep someone off their feet, tell them what they want to hear,
be all nice and sweet, and then “fuck ’em like an animal, feel them from the inside”
as Reznor20 said. oh — that’s something else . . . that one NIN [Nine Inch Nails] video
I saw, “broken” or “closer”21 or something. the one where the guy is kidnapped and
tortured like hell . . . actual hell. I want to do that too. I want to tear a throat out with my
own teeth like a pop can. I want to gut someone with my hand, to tear a head off and rip
out the heart and lungs from the neck, to stab someone in the gut, shove it up to their
heart, and yank the fucking blade out of their rib cage! I want to grab some weak little
freshman and just tear them apart like a fucking wolf, show them who is god. strangle
them, squish their head, bite their temples in the skull, rip off their jaw, rip off their
colar bones, break their arms in half and twist them around, the lovely sounds of bones
cracking and flesh ripping, ahhh . . . so much to do and so little chances.
Like bruh if you really think you’re going to ready anything insightful in a psychopath’s journal…
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,689
@1,442,685 (C)
That was a long time ago, before the internet even.
Can we really expect them to have coherant, refined views about the problems of the world and how to solve them?
These days the manifestos are much more insightful.
If you want an old manifesto that actually reads well, look up the Unabomber.
That was a long time ago, before the internet even.
Can we really expect them to have coherant, refined views about the problems of the world and how to solve them?
These days the manifestos are much more insightful.
If you want an old manifesto that actually reads well, look up the Unabomber.
Anonymous C replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,690
@previous (A)
The unabomber went to Harvard and U of M though, he was educated. That’s not any indication of what the average psycho who goes on a killing spree is like. Most of them are retarded.
The unabomber went to Harvard and U of M though, he was educated. That’s not any indication of what the average psycho who goes on a killing spree is like. Most of them are retarded.
Anonymous C double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,691
The thing is, even if you have zero empathy and you’re a complete psychopath, there isn’t really a logical reason to go and kill a bunch of people as a regular civilian. It doesn’t really advantage you in any particular way. If you think about psychopaths who are relatively smart like Vladimir Putin for example, it doesn’t make sense to kill people if you don’t have the legal authority to do it. It makes much more sense to try to become powerful first, then kill people. If Hitler was stupid and went and shot up his local neighborhood in Germany he wouldn’t have killed millions of people because then they’d just execute him and then the whole thing would be done with.
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,692
@1,442,690 (C)
> The unabomber went to Harvard and U of M though, he was educated. That’s not any indication of what the average psycho who goes on a killing spree is like. Most of them are retarded.
Is this niganon again?
Literally every time you strawman.
I never said it was typical of psychos, I said it was the only manifesto that reads well pre-internet, I was literally stating the opposite of what you infered.
> The unabomber went to Harvard and U of M though, he was educated. That’s not any indication of what the average psycho who goes on a killing spree is like. Most of them are retarded.
Is this niganon again?
Literally every time you strawman.
I never said it was typical of psychos, I said it was the only manifesto that reads well pre-internet, I was literally stating the opposite of what you infered.
Anonymous C replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,693
One of the things that’s weird about Hitler though, is people commonly point out that one major contradiction with his ideology is he was a white supremacist but he allied with the Japanese who are Asian. I thought about it a bit more, and the more I thought about it the more I realized Hitler’s ideology doesn’t make any sense, because he thought the Slavs were inferior even though they’re white and look just like Germans, but the Japanese were superior, but the Koreans were inferior even though they look just like the Japanese. So I read through some bits of Mein Kampf instead of just the cherry picked stuff where people try to make it sound like he had an overwhelmingly positive view of the Japanese (he said some less than positive stuff as well). I think Hitler was smart enough that he literally just invented his entire racial ideology over which countries he thought would help him win a war to take over the world and nothing else. Because if you read it that way it makes a lot more sense.
Anonymous C double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,694
@1,442,692 (A)
If you’re going to reply to me, can you say something smart? I don’t want to have another conversation with you were you just argue over the most asinine details nobody cares about to the point where it distracts from the subject we’re talking about and you forget what we were talking about and ask me to remind you.
If you’re going to reply to me, can you say something smart? I don’t want to have another conversation with you were you just argue over the most asinine details nobody cares about to the point where it distracts from the subject we’re talking about and you forget what we were talking about and ask me to remind you.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 52 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,695
@1,442,693 (C)
Shut the fuck up.
Walls of trivia that are tangentially related are no contributing to the discussion.
Try to figure out what you need to do to stop strawmanning in every thread you enter.
Shut the fuck up.
Walls of trivia that are tangentially related are no contributing to the discussion.
Try to figure out what you need to do to stop strawmanning in every thread you enter.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,696
@1,442,694 (C)
It's not asinine, if someone says "this is the only text that's not retarded" and you heard "all texts are smart like this one" then you have a severe congnitive problem you need to work on.
Understanding what you are reading is a prerequisite to discussing anything, and random factoid walls doesn't make up for that.
It's not asinine, if someone says "this is the only text that's not retarded" and you heard "all texts are smart like this one" then you have a severe congnitive problem you need to work on.
Understanding what you are reading is a prerequisite to discussing anything, and random factoid walls doesn't make up for that.
Anonymous C replied with this 4 weeks ago, 8 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,697
@1,442,693 (C)
Basically, I don’t think Hitler actually believed in what he claimed to believe in, because if you read it that way, it’s incoherent and contradictory. I still think he was evil, it’s just the racism was a means to take over the world, but the racism itself wasn’t logical at all.
Basically, I don’t think Hitler actually believed in what he claimed to believe in, because if you read it that way, it’s incoherent and contradictory. I still think he was evil, it’s just the racism was a means to take over the world, but the racism itself wasn’t logical at all.
Anonymous C double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,698
Anonymous C triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,699
@1,442,697 (C)
Like it’s not even that it’s bad, it literally just doesn’t make logical sense at face value. At one point he said the Germans invented Japanese culture, there’s no way he didn’t realize he was making up bullshit.
Like it’s not even that it’s bad, it literally just doesn’t make logical sense at face value. At one point he said the Germans invented Japanese culture, there’s no way he didn’t realize he was making up bullshit.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,700
@1,442,698 (C)
So if you infer the exact opposite of what was written, I'm just supposed to ignore it, even though that will mean we are talking past each other?
Because that's what happened:
1. I said there was one text that wasn't retarded.
2. You infered I was saying the exact opposite of that
3. I point out your mistake
4. You call it asinine.
You need to make sure the person you are talking to actually said the thing you think they did. Make a habit of using quotes if you need to.
Comprehending what was said is not some small thing, a real conversation is impossible without doing that.
So if you infer the exact opposite of what was written, I'm just supposed to ignore it, even though that will mean we are talking past each other?
Because that's what happened:
1. I said there was one text that wasn't retarded.
2. You infered I was saying the exact opposite of that
3. I point out your mistake
4. You call it asinine.
You need to make sure the person you are talking to actually said the thing you think they did. Make a habit of using quotes if you need to.
Comprehending what was said is not some small thing, a real conversation is impossible without doing that.
Anonymous C replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,701
@previous (A)
I still stand by the fact that this is asinine to the point it’s distracting from the original conversation and next you’re going to forget what we were talking about and ask me to remind you and then somehow get upset with me like it’s my fault lol.
I still stand by the fact that this is asinine to the point it’s distracting from the original conversation and next you’re going to forget what we were talking about and ask me to remind you and then somehow get upset with me like it’s my fault lol.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,702
@previous (C)
If you can't understand what you read in any thread you get involved in, there's no point in talking to you.
Every single thread you strawman, and are incapable of understanding the mistake you endlessly repeat.
Bye retard 👋
If you can't understand what you read in any thread you get involved in, there's no point in talking to you.
Every single thread you strawman, and are incapable of understanding the mistake you endlessly repeat.
Bye retard 👋
Anonymous C replied with this 4 weeks ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,703
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,706
@1,442,692 (A)
> I never said it was typical of psychos, I said it was the only manifesto that reads well pre-internet, I was literally stating the opposite of what you infered.
Look, the point you’re making is stupid. People could write before the internet.
> I never said it was typical of psychos, I said it was the only manifesto that reads well pre-internet, I was literally stating the opposite of what you infered.
Look, the point you’re making is stupid. People could write before the internet.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,707
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 9 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,745
@1,442,685 (C)
> Yeah, idk. You can find Eric Harrises journal / manifesto / diary online from the columbine school shooting. For the longest time, I only ever copied and pasted parts of it to troll on the internet, but I actually read through a bit of it one time. I wouldn’t recommend it. Reading the manifestos of psychopaths is basically just reading about a horny neanderthal yapping about how they want to rape women and kill people because of "instincts" or whatever making the most retarded spelling mistakes over and over again. I’m not even sure if it’s better or worse when they censor it because reading that is only going to rot your brain.
It’s all misplaced rage and sexual frustration. Plus teenage hormones and lack of parenting to put in guardrails. I was convinced one of my brood was a psychopath, and he may still be, but it’s sublimated and he won’t bomb or shoot anyone.
> Yeah, idk. You can find Eric Harrises journal / manifesto / diary online from the columbine school shooting. For the longest time, I only ever copied and pasted parts of it to troll on the internet, but I actually read through a bit of it one time. I wouldn’t recommend it. Reading the manifestos of psychopaths is basically just reading about a horny neanderthal yapping about how they want to rape women and kill people because of "instincts" or whatever making the most retarded spelling mistakes over and over again. I’m not even sure if it’s better or worse when they censor it because reading that is only going to rot your brain.
It’s all misplaced rage and sexual frustration. Plus teenage hormones and lack of parenting to put in guardrails. I was convinced one of my brood was a psychopath, and he may still be, but it’s sublimated and he won’t bomb or shoot anyone.
boof joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 5 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,784
@OP
> I wonder if that's a coincidence lol.
>
> And they are hiding his manifesto.
>
> And Canadian media is trying to cover up that the female cop murdered a civilian during the whole thing.
well there's reporting that his manifesto had a negative attitude about porn. so if this guy doesn't even let himself jack off to calm down, if he's got psychopathism too then that's not a good combonation
what's the source of the information about cop killing a someone that wasn't that shooting guy?
> I wonder if that's a coincidence lol.
>
> And they are hiding his manifesto.
>
> And Canadian media is trying to cover up that the female cop murdered a civilian during the whole thing.
well there's reporting that his manifesto had a negative attitude about porn. so if this guy doesn't even let himself jack off to calm down, if he's got psychopathism too then that's not a good combonation
what's the source of the information about cop killing a someone that wasn't that shooting guy?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,803
@previous (boof)
There's a video floating around. He goes up to her looking for help and she shoots him 3 times.
Every outlet is saying he "got caught in the crossfire" which does not sound like it was point blank, really implies he was walking around and just stepped in front of a bullet.
There's a video floating around. He goes up to her looking for help and she shoots him 3 times.
Every outlet is saying he "got caught in the crossfire" which does not sound like it was point blank, really implies he was walking around and just stepped in front of a bullet.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 15 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,805
manifesto: https://www.usasupreme.com/read-his-manifesto-the-montreal-shooters-full-document-is-out-watch-the-story-disappear-in-321-video/
he blames zionists too
he blames zionists too
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,823
Drawn and written smut is largely made by Gentiles, while filmed pornography is produced by Jews.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 12 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,825
@1,442,805 (A)
It’s weird, it’s like you’re looking for a conspiracy when it’s right in your face that it’s not a conspiracy. If he wrote about Zionism in his manifesto, and you know that because they released his manifesto, there wasn’t a conspiracy to hide his manifesto and they didn’t think he was targeting Jews for a conspiratorial reason. This whole thing is low IQ.
It’s weird, it’s like you’re looking for a conspiracy when it’s right in your face that it’s not a conspiracy. If he wrote about Zionism in his manifesto, and you know that because they released his manifesto, there wasn’t a conspiracy to hide his manifesto and they didn’t think he was targeting Jews for a conspiratorial reason. This whole thing is low IQ.
Anonymous H double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,826
@1,442,803 (A)
> Every outlet is saying he "got caught in the crossfire" which does not sound like it was point blank, really implies he was walking around and just stepped in front of a bullet.
It’s so weird I got in an argument with you before where you insisted that cops don’t kill innocent people. You didn’t want to believe it when it was something that went against your political bias, but now you’re all for the idea. 🙄
> Every outlet is saying he "got caught in the crossfire" which does not sound like it was point blank, really implies he was walking around and just stepped in front of a bullet.
It’s so weird I got in an argument with you before where you insisted that cops don’t kill innocent people. You didn’t want to believe it when it was something that went against your political bias, but now you’re all for the idea. 🙄
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago, 15 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,828
boof replied with this 4 weeks ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,876
@1,442,803 (A)
I looked up usasupreme.com as I had never heard of it. it is found in lists of fake news sites. perhaps it would be prudent to be less sure of what you are seeing there.
Christ, it's getting evaulated lower than Brietbart was, and that was a fucking Bannon propaganda project
I looked up usasupreme.com as I had never heard of it. it is found in lists of fake news sites. perhaps it would be prudent to be less sure of what you are seeing there.
Christ, it's getting evaulated lower than Brietbart was, and that was a fucking Bannon propaganda project
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,894
Bomb the building!Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,909
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 56 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,915
@1,442,805 (A)
> manifesto: https://www.usasupreme.com/read-his-manifesto-the-montreal-shooters-full-document-is-out-watch-the-story-disappear-in-321-video/
>
> he blames zionists too
He’s verbose and writes like a lightweight who wants to emulate a professor. One who also writes poorly. Look at this loser with the bad tattoos and ear spacers.
> manifesto: https://www.usasupreme.com/read-his-manifesto-the-montreal-shooters-full-document-is-out-watch-the-story-disappear-in-321-video/
>
> he blames zionists too
He’s verbose and writes like a lightweight who wants to emulate a professor. One who also writes poorly. Look at this loser with the bad tattoos and ear spacers.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,917
boof replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,948
@1,442,909 (A)
I don't know that everything on the site is made up. I'd rather avoid such a source of information altogether is what I'm saying because what's the point of giving such a place your time at all.
I don't know that everything on the site is made up. I'd rather avoid such a source of information altogether is what I'm saying because what's the point of giving such a place your time at all.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,984
@previous (boof)
You can find the same manifesto on other sites, and the quotes on this one match what I've seen other news outlets report.
If you love jews and its gets you off thinking about the porn industry exploiting women, just say that, there are no consequences.
You can find the same manifesto on other sites, and the quotes on this one match what I've seen other news outlets report.
If you love jews and its gets you off thinking about the porn industry exploiting women, just say that, there are no consequences.
boof replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,175
@previous (A)
that second line of yours I don't understand the angle you're going for there
anyway, was it published online before the shooting, and found, or did some authority leak it
that second line of yours I don't understand the angle you're going for there
anyway, was it published online before the shooting, and found, or did some authority leak it
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,348
Meta joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,443,472
That's an antisemitic trope!