Topic: Im starting to believe that blacks are not humans
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 hours ago #135,815
... but rather are manifestations of a highly intricate government voter fraud program.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 hours ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,442,548
You know that’s got me thinking why dont blacks and whites just settle the score once and for all through Civil War 2?
Like wouldnt that resolve the animosity people have towards each other if they just fight?
Like wouldnt that resolve the animosity people have towards each other if they just fight?
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 9 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,550
Anonymous B replied with this 2 hours ago, 56 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,551
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 50 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,553
Niglet stomper joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,554
Stomp a niglet in the head
Anonymous B replied with this 2 hours ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,557
@1,442,553 (A)
Fair enough a lot of them that won’t stand for it.
But even so theres a lot of you niggerhaters right? So why not?
Fair enough a lot of them that won’t stand for it.
But even so theres a lot of you niggerhaters right? So why not?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 10 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,558
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 2 hours ago, 5 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,559
Also, if you really look into it, the reason why whites enslaved blacks in the first place is because, this is really ironic, Africans have good genetics. Think about it: when Europeans colonized the Americas, why did they ship slaves over from Africa instead of enslaving Native Americans? Because Native Americans died more often from European diseases. How come Africans had such high disease resistance? Africans have the most genetic diversity of any group of people on the planet. Think about this too: how come Africa and the Americas were both colonized but Africa is still majority African? It’s the same reason. 90% of the Native Americans died from European diseases. It would have been impossible for Europeans to wipe out the Native Americans with the technology they had at the time.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade triple-posted this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,560
Now this is more controversial, look up how many people live in Africa vs just the United States, not the whole continent, compare the entire continent of Africa to just the United States in terms of population, then look up how many Americans died from COVID and look up how many Africans died of COVID.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade quadruple-posted this 2 hours ago, 5 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,561
It’s also part of the reason why Africa was colonized when it was colonized. Africa was underpopulated for most of history, because it has a tropical climate so diseases like malaria are much more common in Africa than in Europe. Despite the population advantage Europe had, for most of history, that prevented Europeans from colonizing Africa up until the Industrial Revolution. The only issue is that colonizing Africa made Africa poor, and poor people have more children than wealthier people. Except even though Africa is poor and has a low birth rate, the rapid scientific progress in the modern era has significantly decreased the infant mortality rate in African countries, but unlike western countries, they still have a lot of children anyway.Mr. Bloody Lemonade quintuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 52 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,563
Of course, the combination of declining infant mortality with high rates of poverty leads to population growth.Mr. Bloody Lemonade sextuple-posted this 2 hours ago, 7 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,565
But basically, I could spam graphs all day about this, but there’s literally no reason to worry about black people being genocided off the face of the Earth by white racists. This is a map of births per woman by country. Each woman has to have more than 2 children on average in order to sustain the current population. In the near future if we aren’t there already, essentially 100% of humanity’s population growth will be due to just Africa and nowhere else. And if a country that isn’t African is growing, it’s only because of immigration.Mr. Bloody Lemonade replied with this 2 hours ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,566
But I still love cock!
Mr. Bloody Lemonade replied with this 2 hours ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,569
And there were very serious attempts by white people to control the population of black people through forced sterilizations, starvation, etc. but none of these things have worked. Part of the resilience of Africans is genetic. They have a million more genetic variants than every other ethnicity everywhere else outside of Africa. Even if people lump them together, they really have nothing in common with each other. There’s far too much diversity to wipe out every single type of African so in the short term (calling several hundred years the short term) Europeans could oppress Africans, but it was obviously never going to last forever.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 2 hours ago, 22 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,570
@1,442,566 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade)
> But I still love cock!
Low IQ strategy: impersonate me and act gay.
> But I still love cock!
Low IQ strategy: impersonate me and act gay.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade triple-posted this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,571
I mean, if you killed off all Africans, Africans have more diversity than every other group of people combined, so you’d be killing off most of the genetic diversity of humanity. That’s obviously not going to just happen.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade quadruple-posted this 1 hour ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,572
Just as an example of how ridiculous the diversity in Africa is, Nigeria is more than 99% black, but this is a list of all the ethnic groups in Nigeria:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_Nigeria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_Nigeria
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,573
@1,442,565 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade)
> there’s literally no reason to worry about black people being genocided off the face of the Earth by white racists.
This nigga ain't heard about nukes! 😂
> there’s literally no reason to worry about black people being genocided off the face of the Earth by white racists.
This nigga ain't heard about nukes! 😂
Mr. Bloody Lemonade replied with this 1 hour ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,575
@previous (F)
Africa isn’t going to be nuked. African countries are called third world countries because during the Cold War they weren’t aligned with the American or Soviet sphere of influence. The reason why they don’t have nuclear weapons isn’t because they don’t have the capability to produce nuclear weapons, it’s for geopolitical reasons. Mainly that they aren’t really adversaries of the US, Russia, or China, so if they produced nuclear weapons they might get sanctioned. It’s a choice because they’re not threatened. If you think it’s funny then you know nothing about geopolitics and you’re just an idiot.
Africa isn’t going to be nuked. African countries are called third world countries because during the Cold War they weren’t aligned with the American or Soviet sphere of influence. The reason why they don’t have nuclear weapons isn’t because they don’t have the capability to produce nuclear weapons, it’s for geopolitical reasons. Mainly that they aren’t really adversaries of the US, Russia, or China, so if they produced nuclear weapons they might get sanctioned. It’s a choice because they’re not threatened. If you think it’s funny then you know nothing about geopolitics and you’re just an idiot.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,576
South Africa already has enough highly enriched uranium to build nuclear bombs. Africa doesn’t need any enrichment facilities if they wanted to acquire nuclear weapons. The only reason why African countries don’t have nuclear weapons is because they literally don’t need them.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,577
In a nuclear war, Africa would actually be one of the best places to be because African countries don’t have nuclear weapons so African cities aren’t on American, Chinese, or Russian target lists.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade quadruple-posted this 1 hour ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,578
Hypothetically, if you wanted to change that, the fastest way to make African countries have nukes would be to nuke an African country.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade quintuple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,579
You know… kinda like what happened in Asia.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 seconds ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,589
@1,442,572 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade)
> muh ethnik diversity in apefrica
The ethnic diversity: 371 groups of exactly the same shovelnosed, bootlipped, slopeheaded, dung golems
> muh ethnik diversity in apefrica
The ethnic diversity: 371 groups of exactly the same shovelnosed, bootlipped, slopeheaded, dung golems