Topic: China tho

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #135,739

Obviously developed countries were always developed and poor countries were always poor because of nature and that never changes.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,441,992

Obviously Africa will remain poor forever and never develop because they’re biologically incapable of living in societies larger than tribes as shown by these satellite images of Lagos.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 14 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,093

Obviously if 29% of Nigerian immigrants to the United States have graduate degrees compared to 31% of Chinese immigrants and IQ was created as a metric to predict success in school, then if Nigerians score lower than Chinese people on IQ tests, that’s a sign that IQ has no cultural bias whatsoever and IQ scores between radically different cultures can be cross compared at face value.

Anonymous B double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,094

And if Nigerians score lower on IQ tests than white Americans despite being more successful than white Americans in academics, obviously that’s a sign that Nigerians are less intelligent than white Americans and that it’s biological. From this it is logical to conclude that there’s no such thing as collective intelligence. The total intelligence of the population doesn’t matter, only the average intelligence of the population matters, therefore, it doesn’t matter that Nigeria is growing faster than the United States and will surpass the United States in population this century and when it was colonized it was significantly less populous than the UK. That will totally have no consequences whatsoever.

Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,095

And the fact that Africa is urbanizing twice as fast as Europe did while maintaining high birth rates at the same time will have absolutely no consequences for the speed of urban development of African cities.

Anonymous B quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 38 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,096

There is absolutely no way cities growing exponentially could ever surpass western cities that aren’t.

Anonymous B quintuple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,097

And it absolutely does not matter the graph of the population of Lagos only goes back to 1950 while the graph of NYC goes back to 1800, and Lagos is bigger than NYC. Totally is irrelevant that Lagos grew that much faster than NYC. There is absolutely no reason anybody should project anything positive about the future of Africa, clearly this is a hopeless society that will never develop because they must have lost to Europeans when Europe had two or three times the population of Africa because they were stupid. Clearly population had nothing to do with anything.

Anonymous B sextuple-posted this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,098

Clearly being an ethnic minority and the negative consequences that come with it had nothing to do with the fact black people were a statistical minority in the world population compared with white people and clearly this will not change in the future when it’s the other way around.

Anonymous B septuple-posted this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,099

And obviously the reason why Africa is still poor has nothing to do with the fact that Africa has the worst dependency ratio of any continent due to their high birth rate, it’s because they have low IQs. The fact that China was poorer than Africa until their birth rate fell dramatically after the one child policy has absolutely nothing to do with Africa and you can’t extrapolate anything about the future development of Africa based on the development of China because black people are stupid, therefore they will never develop.

Anonymous B octuple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,100

And just because Japan’s population pyramid looks like this:

Anonymous B nonuple-posted this 1 month ago, 20 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,101

And Nigeria’s looks like this:

Anonymous B decuple-posted this 1 month ago, 56 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,102

Means absolutely nothing, Nigeria will be behind Japan forever and Japan’s economy will be fine even though they have a birth rate far below replacement and no immigration. Somehow they will "preserve their culture" by replacing themselves with robots because they’re high IQ and Nigerians will "lose" by actually existing in the future somehow.

Anonymous B undecuple-posted this 1 month ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,103

And obviously Chinese investment in Africa is a sign Africans are destined to always be slaves and not a sign that the Chinese are smart enough to look at graphs and notice if their population graph looks like this, maybe investing in Africa would be a good idea.

Anonymous B duodecuple-posted this 1 month ago, 24 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,104

"Oh but IQ is correlated with income and black Americans are poor it must be because they’re stupid and not because the United States has a long history of discrimination against black people."

Completely ignoring African Americans are ethnically Nigerian and Nigerians from Nigeria in the US who didn’t grow up with American culture do as well as whites do economically:

56.9% of Nigerian Americans work in Management, business, science, and arts occupations compared to 43.2% for the total population. Nigerian Americans in 2023 had a median household income of $80,711 which was higher than the total population's. However, Nigerian Americans had a slightly lower per capita income ($43,030) than the total population ($43,313). Personal earnings for Nigerian American males was $67,475 and $61,208 for females, both of which were higher than the total population's which was $63,975 for males and $52,437 for females. Nigerian Americans had a slightly lower poverty rate than the total population. Nigerian American families also had a lower poverty rate than the total population. Nigerian Americans have a high labor force participation rate of 77.7%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerian_Americans

Anonymous B tridecuple-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,105

But yeah totally none of this will ever matter so we should call African countries shithole countries, cut foreign aid and let Russia and China have all the influence they want on the continent because this will never come back to bite us when anti western countries that are adversaries of the United States are influencing a developing continent that remembers we invaded and enslaved them. Totally, no possible way our bigoted attitudes could ever screw us over in the long run.

(Edited 54 seconds later.)

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,107

Raping nigguhs!

Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,109

You know let’s just drone strike African countries to kill a statistically insignificant number of people while that other country is building railroads to increase the economic productivity of the continent. Absolutely no possible way those two things could ever collide.

Anonymous B double-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,442,111

And there’s absolutely no possible way that right wing anti immigrant propaganda couldn’t possibly have the opposite of the intended effect in majority black countries and lead to populist anti immigrant movements in South Africa against foreigners instead of convincing black South Africans they’re inferior. And that absolutely would advance the interests of the United States instead of doing the opposite.