Topic: Israel strikes another neighbor
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #135,593
Iran says deal is off. The world pays, especially the poorest, because Israel couldn't stop warmongering.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,440,691
Glass ALL of the middle east. then throw all the remaining middle easterners into the glowing wasteland.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 14 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,694
@previous (B)
Americans would rather just do whatever Israel wants, but if you make enemies out of everyone, one day your back will be turned, again.
Americans would rather just do whatever Israel wants, but if you make enemies out of everyone, one day your back will be turned, again.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 36 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,697
"Another" neighbor? Israel has been attacking Lebanon, this isn't new.
And Trump says there's a deal every week or two, Iran denies it, and then the media repeats the obviously fake announcement without a note.
If anyone believes these deals/ceasefires mean anything they are extremely gullible.
And Trump says there's a deal every week or two, Iran denies it, and then the media repeats the obviously fake announcement without a note.
If anyone believes these deals/ceasefires mean anything they are extremely gullible.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,699
@previous (C)
Well if the conditions are that Israel doesn't attack some neighbor, then yes I would say it's unlikely to happen
Well if the conditions are that Israel doesn't attack some neighbor, then yes I would say it's unlikely to happen
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 29 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,700
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,701
@previous (B)
Tell that to everyone who needs cheaper oil. I'm sure they would love to pay more so Israel can be violent, I mean, if they are Americans at least
Tell that to everyone who needs cheaper oil. I'm sure they would love to pay more so Israel can be violent, I mean, if they are Americans at least
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,702
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,703
Mr. Bloody Lemonade joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,713
@previous (A)
I think anon B is one of those low IQ racists that wants Trump to kill all the brown people in the world, but he’s so low IQ he doesn’t realize Trump has been president for years and hasn’t done it, so he probably never will. The risk of the United States using a nuclear weapon is basically zero. The US only nuked Japan because no other country in the world has nuclear weapons, Japan attacked us first, everyone was tried from two world wars, and most Americans still had racist views so they could get away with it. Ever since the Soviet Union developed nuclear weapons, the United States hasn’t used nuclear weapons in any war, even against countries that don’t have nuclear weapons and aren’t allied with Russia because we’re not sure if that would result in us being vaporized. Even if it didn’t, Europe and China would stop trading with us, and we’d end up being a third world country.
I think anon B is one of those low IQ racists that wants Trump to kill all the brown people in the world, but he’s so low IQ he doesn’t realize Trump has been president for years and hasn’t done it, so he probably never will. The risk of the United States using a nuclear weapon is basically zero. The US only nuked Japan because no other country in the world has nuclear weapons, Japan attacked us first, everyone was tried from two world wars, and most Americans still had racist views so they could get away with it. Ever since the Soviet Union developed nuclear weapons, the United States hasn’t used nuclear weapons in any war, even against countries that don’t have nuclear weapons and aren’t allied with Russia because we’re not sure if that would result in us being vaporized. Even if it didn’t, Europe and China would stop trading with us, and we’d end up being a third world country.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,715
Even after 1945, it only took Russia 4 years to develop nuclear weapons. It’s not actually that hard to make nuclear weapons, it’s more of a political decision for a country not to. In the modern world, if North Korea can make nuclear weapons, trust me, almost anybody could make nuclear weapons if they felt like it.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,724
@1,440,697 (C)
> "Another" neighbor? Israel has been attacking Lebanon, this isn't new.
>
> And Trump says there's a deal every week or two, Iran denies it, and then the media repeats the obviously fake announcement without a note.
>
> If anyone believes these deals/ceasefires mean anything they are extremely gullible.
Trump’s art of the deal is four bankrupt companies and shifting debt onto investors. He was always a chaotic manager and entrepreneurial failure. I’m sure that will only improve now that he’s 80.
> "Another" neighbor? Israel has been attacking Lebanon, this isn't new.
>
> And Trump says there's a deal every week or two, Iran denies it, and then the media repeats the obviously fake announcement without a note.
>
> If anyone believes these deals/ceasefires mean anything they are extremely gullible.
Trump’s art of the deal is four bankrupt companies and shifting debt onto investors. He was always a chaotic manager and entrepreneurial failure. I’m sure that will only improve now that he’s 80.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,731
@previous (E)
He's in a position to manipulate the market, and insider trading isn't complicated.
He won't produce anything, but with the media helping him along it is easy to make money. If people realized that Iran denying a deal proved he was full of shit, there wouldn't be suckers for these insider trades. Clearly the masses are easy to fool.
He's in a position to manipulate the market, and insider trading isn't complicated.
He won't produce anything, but with the media helping him along it is easy to make money. If people realized that Iran denying a deal proved he was full of shit, there wouldn't be suckers for these insider trades. Clearly the masses are easy to fool.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,769
@previous (C)
Well the whole thing is stupid, Obama already had a deal, and Trump is the one who withdrew from it, not Iran. If we had a deal that said Iran wouldn’t make nuclear weapons, Trump got rid of the deal, then Iran started making nuclear weapons, it’s like, duh.
Well the whole thing is stupid, Obama already had a deal, and Trump is the one who withdrew from it, not Iran. If we had a deal that said Iran wouldn’t make nuclear weapons, Trump got rid of the deal, then Iran started making nuclear weapons, it’s like, duh.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,770
Anonymous F replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,771
Then the whole thing about Trump complaining "Iran doesn’t want to make a deal." The supreme leader of Iran is a bad dude, but Trump killed his father, it’s like… obviously he’s not going to make a deal with the guy that killed his father. That would be dumb.
Anonymous F double-posted this 1 month ago, 45 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,772
If anything, if Iran wasn’t making nuclear weapons before, now they are.
Anonymous F triple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,773
Like if you listen to what Iran says they say, "We can negotiate, but we have a right to enrichment." That tells you the entire thing.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 month ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,774
I pretty much said the same thing while talking to buddy of mines. Like if Iran wasn't even remotely entertaining the idea before, now they are and tbh they have the right to enrich. It's their property. its on their land.
The U.S will once again reap what it sow because history really does repeat itself.
The U.S will once again reap what it sow because history really does repeat itself.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,776
@1,440,715 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade)
> Even after 1945, it only took Russia 4 years to develop nuclear weapons. It’s not actually that hard to make nuclear weapons, it’s more of a political decision for a country not to. In the modern world, if North Korea can make nuclear weapons, trust me, almost anybody could make nuclear weapons if they felt like it.
The entire U.S. nuclear apparatus was infiltrated by Russian spies and Western traitors. Alger Hiss, a bunch of blackmailed gays, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. The Soviets were more independent in their build of the hydrogen bomb.
> Even after 1945, it only took Russia 4 years to develop nuclear weapons. It’s not actually that hard to make nuclear weapons, it’s more of a political decision for a country not to. In the modern world, if North Korea can make nuclear weapons, trust me, almost anybody could make nuclear weapons if they felt like it.
The entire U.S. nuclear apparatus was infiltrated by Russian spies and Western traitors. Alger Hiss, a bunch of blackmailed gays, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. The Soviets were more independent in their build of the hydrogen bomb.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,777
@1,440,769 (F)
Obama's deal was to give them pallets of cash while UN inspectors dod walkthroughs of decoy sites.
Iran was able to keep a lot of underground facilities secret. Their missile range capabilities weren't even known until the war was on.
Obama's deal was to give them pallets of cash while UN inspectors dod walkthroughs of decoy sites.
Iran was able to keep a lot of underground facilities secret. Their missile range capabilities weren't even known until the war was on.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 28 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,779
@1,440,776 (H)
In all fairness, there have been no detonations of nuclear bombs over civilian cities since Russia got the bomb so I don’t think it can be categorized as a bad thing
In all fairness, there have been no detonations of nuclear bombs over civilian cities since Russia got the bomb so I don’t think it can be categorized as a bad thing
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,780
@1,440,777 (C)
Okay. That’s how deals work. You can’t just have a deal that doesn’t give Iran any advantages or they won’t agree to it. Paying them to not build nuclear weapons is advantageous for both sides. America has an infinite supply of money.
Okay. That’s how deals work. You can’t just have a deal that doesn’t give Iran any advantages or they won’t agree to it. Paying them to not build nuclear weapons is advantageous for both sides. America has an infinite supply of money.
Anonymous I triple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,781
I’m just saying, Asians still like us because we nuked Japan and only Japan and Japan invaded all of Asia, so they think it’s just a thing with us and Japan. But in an alternate universe where Russia never had nuclear weapons and we nuked Korea and Vietnam… that could get a lot darker.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,784
@1,440,780 (I)
It's only an advantage to Iran, who gets free cash and continues building nukes in one of their many discrete bases.
It's only an advantage to Iran, who gets free cash and continues building nukes in one of their many discrete bases.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 42 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,785
@previous (C)
> It's only an advantage to Iran, who gets free cash and continues building nukes in one of their many discrete bases.
It should tell us something that Iran leads the world in patents for super concrete.
> It's only an advantage to Iran, who gets free cash and continues building nukes in one of their many discrete bases.
It should tell us something that Iran leads the world in patents for super concrete.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,788
@1,440,784 (C)
They agreed to have inspectors determine they didn’t have weapons grade uranium. If you want Iran to make a bomb, you should support Trump, because he’s put them right on that path.
They agreed to have inspectors determine they didn’t have weapons grade uranium. If you want Iran to make a bomb, you should support Trump, because he’s put them right on that path.
Anonymous J double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,790
@1,440,785 (H)
Why would they patent it if they want to keep it secret? That’s like when Russia hacks stuff and everybody knows it’s Russia because Russia just wants to be known as the big scary hacker country.
Why would they patent it if they want to keep it secret? That’s like when Russia hacks stuff and everybody knows it’s Russia because Russia just wants to be known as the big scary hacker country.
Anonymous J triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,791
Tbh the only reason Trump withdrew from the deal is because Obama had the audacity to be black, which is also the only reason Trump is president, he’s completely unqualified.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,792
@1,440,788 (J)
I already said it twice, if you want to catch up and respond to where we are now please do.
I already said it twice, if you want to catch up and respond to where we are now please do.
Anonymous J replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,793
Anonymous J double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,796
If you think about it, in the past, empires with superior technology have dominated the world, but what always happens is the empires assume the people they rule over are too stupid to invent the same technology, and then those empires wind up falling. For example, the British thought Africans were too stupid to invent gunpowder, even though the British got it from the Chinese. Well now there’s no British Empire.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,798
@1,440,793 (J)
If you buy time a lot could happen. They could become democratic.
Would you let a kid run around with a knife because in the long run they'll get it anyway?
If you buy time a lot could happen. They could become democratic.
Would you let a kid run around with a knife because in the long run they'll get it anyway?
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,800
@1,440,796 (J)
Britain switched to a neocolonial empire. Capital assets around the world, a permanent seat on the security council, special relationship with the hegemon, double-digit UN voting through British controlled microstates, and a network of obligations between royal sovereigns.
The map isn't pink anymore, but the sun technically never set on it.
Britain switched to a neocolonial empire. Capital assets around the world, a permanent seat on the security council, special relationship with the hegemon, double-digit UN voting through British controlled microstates, and a network of obligations between royal sovereigns.
The map isn't pink anymore, but the sun technically never set on it.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 23 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,802
Mr. Bloody Lemonade joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 49 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,808
@1,440,800 (C)
This is pure cope. The two most powerful countries are China and the United States, Britain isn’t close.
This is pure cope. The two most powerful countries are China and the United States, Britain isn’t close.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 1 month ago, 22 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,809
I like Britain, but we have to be honest here, their empire is long dead.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,810
GDP by country(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,811
Now if you adjust for purchasing power parody.Mr. Bloody Lemonade quintuple-posted this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,813
In the future, China, India, and the United States will dominate the global economy until African countries stop growing population-wise in the 22nd century. The United Kingdom doesn’t really factor into any of that. Great country, it ain’t the British Empire.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade sextuple-posted this 1 month ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,814
But to be fair, the US, China, and India aren’t any more special than the British Empire. The British Empire had a quarter of the world’s GDP, because they had a quarter of the world’s population. The US, China, and India are going to be the top 3 economies in the second half of the 21st century because they’re the 3 largest population centers. Military power comes from economic power which comes from having a large population. Of course historically during the Industrial Revolution, there was rapid change when some countries industrialized first which allowed them to have a massive advantage over unindustrialized countries which is why for example, Africa was colonized. But that period in history is ending and it’s returning back to normal where the largest countries in terms of population are the most powerful countries and the UK will not be able to compete anywhere near where it did during the British Empire.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade septuple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,815
Even if you look at emerging technologies like AI for example, the two countries that are the best at it are the US and China, for the same reason.