Topic: My prediction for the OpenAI IPO
Real I > Artificial I started this discussion 1 month ago #135,558
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 hours later[^] [v] #1,440,352
OpenAI and Anthropic need to make a trillion dollars in revenue by 2030 or the whole investment thesis falls apart.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 28 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,355
@previous (B)
The forever question of how long VC types or halo investors will throw money at something before demanding repayment. 2030 is probably a good bet.
The forever question of how long VC types or halo investors will throw money at something before demanding repayment. 2030 is probably a good bet.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,358
Real is not mutually exclusive with artificial, thanks.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 58 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,361
@1,440,355 (C)
> The forever question of how long VC types or halo investors will throw money at something before demanding repayment. 2030 is probably a good bet.
AI leaves me confused. I’ve seen productivity gains when I use it. My question is whether the cost - and CTOs are terrible at metering token usage - leads to the professed efficiency gains. Or are we in the Wild West and eventually AI just subsumes most SaaS with industry-targeted packages (Claude Legal, Mythos Healthcare).
I’ve seen big changes in industrial automation and more unified factory floors where you had people running around with clipboards or loosely cobbled systems to handle ERP, purchasing, supply chain, inventory, management UIs, and the guy who would assemble all this stuff into Microsoft BI or Tableau dashboards.
It should scare people that Google did an equity raise of $85 billion, equivalent to the GDP of Oman, to fund a $180 billion CAPEX spree. Will this be like railroads and telecom infrastructure, which survives busts to be used by survivor companies?
> The forever question of how long VC types or halo investors will throw money at something before demanding repayment. 2030 is probably a good bet.
AI leaves me confused. I’ve seen productivity gains when I use it. My question is whether the cost - and CTOs are terrible at metering token usage - leads to the professed efficiency gains. Or are we in the Wild West and eventually AI just subsumes most SaaS with industry-targeted packages (Claude Legal, Mythos Healthcare).
I’ve seen big changes in industrial automation and more unified factory floors where you had people running around with clipboards or loosely cobbled systems to handle ERP, purchasing, supply chain, inventory, management UIs, and the guy who would assemble all this stuff into Microsoft BI or Tableau dashboards.
It should scare people that Google did an equity raise of $85 billion, equivalent to the GDP of Oman, to fund a $180 billion CAPEX spree. Will this be like railroads and telecom infrastructure, which survives busts to be used by survivor companies?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,381
@previous (B)
Tbh I don’t think Mythos is as powerful as they say it is, because if it was they’d just sell it to everybody. When has anybody in the history of the world had a product that was so good they were like, "Oh we can’t sell this." I don’t buy that. It’s all hype.
Tbh I don’t think Mythos is as powerful as they say it is, because if it was they’d just sell it to everybody. When has anybody in the history of the world had a product that was so good they were like, "Oh we can’t sell this." I don’t buy that. It’s all hype.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,382
Like hypothetically, what if tomorrow Google released the Google version of Mythos for free just for the hell of it, then what? Is Anthropic just gonna sit there and twiddle their thumbs and be like, "Well we had a chance to make billions of dollars but I guess we just missed it, oh well."
Mr. Bloody Lemonade triple-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,383
Or even the thing with the Trump administration, imagine if tomorrow China released Chinese Mythos, would the United States just twiddle our thumbs and be like "Well I guess it’s okay we banned a technology that China’s selling to everybody now.."
Mr. Bloody Lemonade quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,384
Or if it’s really that dangerous, an LLM is just like a file. What if somebody copies the file, and they paste it somewhere else? Then what? The world explodes?
Indie the Grate™ !aeNZeP7XP2 joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 10 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,453
Why is this thread full of copypasted Reddit replies?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,455
@1,440,384 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade)
> Or if it’s really that dangerous, an LLM is just like a file. What if somebody copies the file, and they paste it somewhere else? Then what? The world explodes?
I am using a fully loaded version of Mythos. It rewrote our security protocols to access the breadth of what I needed and pulled on data from behind a couple of paywall Web sites.
> Or if it’s really that dangerous, an LLM is just like a file. What if somebody copies the file, and they paste it somewhere else? Then what? The world explodes?
I am using a fully loaded version of Mythos. It rewrote our security protocols to access the breadth of what I needed and pulled on data from behind a couple of paywall Web sites.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,457
@previous (G)
To be fair, a lot of paywall websites are just scroll: none on the body element + backdrop-filter: blur on a div covering the body element with all the text loaded in behind it. For some reason every other news website thinks they can get away with that because it looks cool.
To be fair, a lot of paywall websites are just scroll: none on the body element + backdrop-filter: blur on a div covering the body element with all the text loaded in behind it. For some reason every other news website thinks they can get away with that because it looks cool.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,458
When I was in middle school I realized I could get behind a lot of news website paywalls after playing around with inspect element for a bit.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade triple-posted this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,461
Mr. Big Black Friday joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,524
@1,440,453 (Indie the Grate™ !aeNZeP7XP2)
becuz i's usin claude to generate all the poasts in this thred
becuz i's usin claude to generate all the poasts in this thred
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,440,963
Matt joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,441,047
@1,440,381 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade)
> Tbh I don’t think Mythos is as powerful as they say it is, because if it was they’d just sell it to everybody. When has anybody in the history of the world had a product that was so good they were like, "Oh we can’t sell this." I don’t buy that. It’s all hype.
It works and it’s hype. The run up is essential to the ridiculous valuation.
> Tbh I don’t think Mythos is as powerful as they say it is, because if it was they’d just sell it to everybody. When has anybody in the history of the world had a product that was so good they were like, "Oh we can’t sell this." I don’t buy that. It’s all hype.
It works and it’s hype. The run up is essential to the ridiculous valuation.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,441,048
@previous (Matt)
Obviously it works. I don’t think they just released an LLM that can’t answer a prompt, and wasn’t trained on software. I just don’t think this is the next atomic bomb and AI shouldn’t be allowed in airports.
Obviously it works. I don’t think they just released an LLM that can’t answer a prompt, and wasn’t trained on software. I just don’t think this is the next atomic bomb and AI shouldn’t be allowed in airports.