Topic: New word to dehumanize niggers when they are angry
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago #135,284
Chimp Out....
Who'd of thunk it?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/chimp-out-the-latest-phrase-used-to-dehumanize-black-people/ar-AA24pVb1?cvid=6a1ae1665e484bf0844e2df651162ce0&ocid=hpmsn&ei=6
Who'd of thunk it?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/chimp-out-the-latest-phrase-used-to-dehumanize-black-people/ar-AA24pVb1?cvid=6a1ae1665e484bf0844e2df651162ce0&ocid=hpmsn&ei=6
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later[^] [v] #1,437,721
> Race is socially constructed, yet some seem to have missed the memo.Socially defined "races" are somewhat arbitrary, but drawing lines around broad pools of genetically-similar humans doesn't magically negate the real differences in ability that stem from genetics.
No one denies that some humans are physically disabled from genetic conditions like dwarfism, or that olympians are naturally faster or stronger giving them an advantage over an average person that trains hard.
We all know that some breeds of dog will inherently be smarter or dumber than others.
But when we talk about genetic-influences on behavior in humans? Well that is magically the one place where genetics doesn't affect anything anymore. And no one promoting this view could ever explain why it only applies to humans, or why it only applies to human behavior but not human physicality.
Of course it all stems from flawed propositions that underly leftism. When the Soviet Union was peaking and vying with the US to be the dominant superpower they sabotaged their own agricultural industry by adopting Lyskenkoism, a complete rejection of genetics.
Why did a leading scientific country deny genetics? Not because of any real empirical evidence or open analysis from biologists, but simply because they saw it as promoting "racism" generally and decided they would deny ideas that made them uncomfortable and hope things worked out. Obviously reality always wins these battles and a lot of people starved.
Leftism is ungrounded from material reality. There's nothing in nature that says the random mutation occuring in a species will leave each group within it equal and special in their own way. Yet leftists think if they can just censor ideas about genetics and act like equality is the case that everything will work out. It's delusion, there's a reason leftists never make appeals to logic and are always fighting for censorship to "stop hate", it because their ideas are indefensible.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,725
@OP
Believe it or not that phrase is actually not offensive since technically humans tend to chimp out as well. Which is more appropriate because it’s neutral.
Why black folks get offended over this term ill never understand.
Believe it or not that phrase is actually not offensive since technically humans tend to chimp out as well. Which is more appropriate because it’s neutral.
Why black folks get offended over this term ill never understand.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 28 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,728
Whites are the most evil race. Who are the most dangerous people to ever exist? Who enslaved blacks for 400 years, genocided the Native Americans, genocided the Aboriginal Australians, firebombed and nuked Japanese civilians, killed 6 million Jews, and so on and so on? If any race is a threat to humanity it’s the white race. Whites have been the most selfish, most vicious, most dangerous people on the face of the Earth. And what kind of sense does racism make? Whites enslaved blacks, whites committed crimes against humanity towards blacks, and now whites hate blacks for being victims when they victimized us? Do you realize how stupid that is? That’s like being a rapist and getting mad at who you raped for being a victim as if they’re not allowed to fight back. The only solution to this is you people need to be rounded up like animals, forced to dig your own graves, lined up in front of the holes, shot in the back of the head with one bullet and pushed in like you devils did to the Jews.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,729
@1,437,721 (B)
> > Race is socially constructed, yet some seem to have missed the memo.
>
> Socially defined "races" are somewhat arbitrary, but drawing lines around broad pools of genetically-similar humans doesn't magically negate the real differences in ability that stem from genetics.
>
> No one denies that some humans are physically disabled from genetic conditions like dwarfism, or that olympians are naturally faster or stronger giving them an advantage over an average person that trains hard.
>
> We all know that some breeds of dog will inherently be smarter or dumber than others.
>
> But when we talk about genetic-influences on behavior in humans? Well that is magically the one place where genetics doesn't affect anything anymore. And no one promoting this view could ever explain why it only applies to humans, or why it only applies to human behavior but not human physicality.
>
> Of course it all stems from flawed propositions that underly leftism. When the Soviet Union was peaking and vying with the US to be the dominant superpower they sabotaged their own agricultural industry by adopting Lyskenkoism, a complete rejection of genetics.
>
> Why did a leading scientific country deny genetics? Not because of any real empirical evidence or open analysis from biologists, but simply because they saw it as promoting "racism" generally and decided they would deny ideas that made them uncomfortable and hope things worked out. Obviously reality always wins these battles and a lot of people starved.
>
> Leftism is ungrounded from material reality. There's nothing in nature that says the random mutation occuring in a species will leave each group within it equal and special in their own way. Yet leftists think if they can just censor ideas about genetics and act like equality is the case that everything will work out. It's delusion, there's a reason leftists never make appeals to logic and are always fighting for censorship to "stop hate", it because their ideas are indefensible.
Notice how this is completely devoid of any concept of empathy, compassion, morality, right and wrong, or anything human. Whites are all blood thirsty psychopaths. He feels there is no logical reason not to rape or kill children, make no mistake. He is like a rabid dog.
> > Race is socially constructed, yet some seem to have missed the memo.
>
> Socially defined "races" are somewhat arbitrary, but drawing lines around broad pools of genetically-similar humans doesn't magically negate the real differences in ability that stem from genetics.
>
> No one denies that some humans are physically disabled from genetic conditions like dwarfism, or that olympians are naturally faster or stronger giving them an advantage over an average person that trains hard.
>
> We all know that some breeds of dog will inherently be smarter or dumber than others.
>
> But when we talk about genetic-influences on behavior in humans? Well that is magically the one place where genetics doesn't affect anything anymore. And no one promoting this view could ever explain why it only applies to humans, or why it only applies to human behavior but not human physicality.
>
> Of course it all stems from flawed propositions that underly leftism. When the Soviet Union was peaking and vying with the US to be the dominant superpower they sabotaged their own agricultural industry by adopting Lyskenkoism, a complete rejection of genetics.
>
> Why did a leading scientific country deny genetics? Not because of any real empirical evidence or open analysis from biologists, but simply because they saw it as promoting "racism" generally and decided they would deny ideas that made them uncomfortable and hope things worked out. Obviously reality always wins these battles and a lot of people starved.
>
> Leftism is ungrounded from material reality. There's nothing in nature that says the random mutation occuring in a species will leave each group within it equal and special in their own way. Yet leftists think if they can just censor ideas about genetics and act like equality is the case that everything will work out. It's delusion, there's a reason leftists never make appeals to logic and are always fighting for censorship to "stop hate", it because their ideas are indefensible.
Notice how this is completely devoid of any concept of empathy, compassion, morality, right and wrong, or anything human. Whites are all blood thirsty psychopaths. He feels there is no logical reason not to rape or kill children, make no mistake. He is like a rabid dog.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,730
@OP
If white people aren’t evil, why are you always trying to seem as evil as possible? You shouldn’t be proud of dehumanizing people. That’s disgusting.
You’re the same type of people to get offended when somebody talks about slavery because it makes you feel guilty so you claim people are trying to paint all white people as evil. I’m not saying white people are the devil, but there is some evidence. I’m just saying.
If white people aren’t evil, why are you always trying to seem as evil as possible? You shouldn’t be proud of dehumanizing people. That’s disgusting.
You’re the same type of people to get offended when somebody talks about slavery because it makes you feel guilty so you claim people are trying to paint all white people as evil. I’m not saying white people are the devil, but there is some evidence. I’m just saying.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,731
@1,437,721 (B)
And what even is this by the way? You’re trying to make the claim that equality is bad and dehumanizing people is good. Obviously dehumanizing people is morally wrong so you have to lie to yourself that evil is okay because it’s true and good is bad because it’s false. Evil isn’t true, evil is false. You only believe that the truth is evil because you hate God. That’s why you’re blasphemous against Christianity, you want to make a mockery out of faith by reducing the church down to racist political ideology that didn’t exist 2,000 years ago. I’m convinced that when you die you’re going to burn in hell. You are a helpless narcissist who is so weak you can’t accept even the smallest criticism or admit to the slightest fault because you think you’re perfect. You think you are the sole bearer of truth in the universe. Essentially, you think you’re God. But you’re not God. You are like Satan, obsessed with your beauty and jealous of the creator of the universe, and like Satan you will be cast out of Heaven and rejected by God.
And what even is this by the way? You’re trying to make the claim that equality is bad and dehumanizing people is good. Obviously dehumanizing people is morally wrong so you have to lie to yourself that evil is okay because it’s true and good is bad because it’s false. Evil isn’t true, evil is false. You only believe that the truth is evil because you hate God. That’s why you’re blasphemous against Christianity, you want to make a mockery out of faith by reducing the church down to racist political ideology that didn’t exist 2,000 years ago. I’m convinced that when you die you’re going to burn in hell. You are a helpless narcissist who is so weak you can’t accept even the smallest criticism or admit to the slightest fault because you think you’re perfect. You think you are the sole bearer of truth in the universe. Essentially, you think you’re God. But you’re not God. You are like Satan, obsessed with your beauty and jealous of the creator of the universe, and like Satan you will be cast out of Heaven and rejected by God.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 49 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,742
@1,437,729 (D)
> Notice how this is completely devoid of any concept of empathy, compassion, morality, right and wrong, or anything human.
Only if your moral system says that it's better to tell comforting lies.
A better moral system is sticking to truth, and making the best of reality.
@1,437,730 (Mr. Black Boi)
> If white people aren’t evil, why are you always trying to seem as evil as possible? You shouldn’t be proud of dehumanizing people. l
Once again you use a word in a way that has nothing to do with the actual definition.
Saying some humans are more capable than other humans isn't "dehumanizing" them, it implies both are human.
Just as saying some dogs are more skilled than other dogs doesn't mean that the less skilled aren't dogs.
Basically every argument you make relies upon redefining a word in a way that is disconnected from it's actual meaning.
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
> And what even is this by the way? You’re trying to make the claim that equality is bad and dehumanizing people is good.
Again, that's not what dehumanizing means.
Would it be dehumanizing to say some are less athletically gifted? Of course not. So why would it be dehumanizing to say some *humans* are less capable mentally?
> Notice how this is completely devoid of any concept of empathy, compassion, morality, right and wrong, or anything human.
Only if your moral system says that it's better to tell comforting lies.
A better moral system is sticking to truth, and making the best of reality.
@1,437,730 (Mr. Black Boi)
> If white people aren’t evil, why are you always trying to seem as evil as possible? You shouldn’t be proud of dehumanizing people. l
Once again you use a word in a way that has nothing to do with the actual definition.
Saying some humans are more capable than other humans isn't "dehumanizing" them, it implies both are human.
Just as saying some dogs are more skilled than other dogs doesn't mean that the less skilled aren't dogs.
Basically every argument you make relies upon redefining a word in a way that is disconnected from it's actual meaning.
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
> And what even is this by the way? You’re trying to make the claim that equality is bad and dehumanizing people is good.
Again, that's not what dehumanizing means.
Would it be dehumanizing to say some are less athletically gifted? Of course not. So why would it be dehumanizing to say some *humans* are less capable mentally?
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,750
@previous (B)
Did you reply to OP’s post without reading it? The title of this thread is literally about dehumanizing black people. Are you slow or something? Stop trying to gaslight me over something that obvious.
Did you reply to OP’s post without reading it? The title of this thread is literally about dehumanizing black people. Are you slow or something? Stop trying to gaslight me over something that obvious.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,751
Let me ask you a question, what’s the title of this thread? Okay, then shut the fuck up with your dumbass question about why I mentioned dehumanization.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,755
@1,437,750 (Mr. Black Boi)
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
You cited me and said I thought dehumanizing was good, but nice try.
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
You cited me and said I thought dehumanizing was good, but nice try.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,761
Guys guys guys. You’re all chimping out over a fucking term lol
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,763
@1,437,755 (B)
You do though, you’re a racist. That’s what racism is, it’s when you dehumanize other people based on their skin color.
You do though, you’re a racist. That’s what racism is, it’s when you dehumanize other people based on their skin color.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 53 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,764
That’s why racists have murdered millions of people. That’s why racism is evil, I don’t understand why you don’t want me to label you as evil when you seem like you’re trying really hard to look as evil as possible. You do know you’re evil, right? You can’t be that dumb.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,767
You should realize in all of your arguments you know what is completely absent from all of your arguments? You never make an appeal to morality not even once. There’s no concept of morality in your worldview, it’s completely amoral and sociopathic.
Mr. Black Boi quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,768
Really, I genuinely think you might be a psychopath. When you were talking about your own mother, you have no respect or love for your parents dude, it’s crazy. Love means absolutely nothing to you.
Mr. Black Boi quintuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,769
And, like there are different levels of psychopathy. Vladimir Putin is a psychopath, if I asked Vladimir Putin what he thinks about his parents, he would be smart enough to tell a lie that sounds good and makes him look normal, you know? You don’t even have the cognitive awareness to pretend to seem normal.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,770
@1,437,763 (Mr. Black Boi)
> You do though, you’re a racist. That’s what racism is, it’s when you dehumanize other people based on their skin color.
No, here's the first definition of racism that came up:
> The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
So yea, I'm racist, but that doesn't mean you (necessarily) think blacks aren't human.
Blacks are human, I don't deny that. But humans have a range of abilities and blacks fall below average on cognitive abilities which account for their behavior.
@1,437,764 (Mr. Black Boi)
I'm not going to believe that the one exception to biodiversity is human cognition just because some people did bad things as a result.
I wouldn't expect a socialist to stop believing in worker's rights just because millions were murdered in the name of worker's rights either.
The union organizers in my city aren't likely to start murdering people anymore than the residents of the racially homogenous neighborhood.
> You do though, you’re a racist. That’s what racism is, it’s when you dehumanize other people based on their skin color.
No, here's the first definition of racism that came up:
> The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
So yea, I'm racist, but that doesn't mean you (necessarily) think blacks aren't human.
Blacks are human, I don't deny that. But humans have a range of abilities and blacks fall below average on cognitive abilities which account for their behavior.
@1,437,764 (Mr. Black Boi)
I'm not going to believe that the one exception to biodiversity is human cognition just because some people did bad things as a result.
I wouldn't expect a socialist to stop believing in worker's rights just because millions were murdered in the name of worker's rights either.
The union organizers in my city aren't likely to start murdering people anymore than the residents of the racially homogenous neighborhood.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,771
@1,437,768 (Mr. Black Boi)
You can't even define love, you refuse to give any definition for it.
And we both know why. Whether you think someone is rational, and whether you love them are two entirely separate questions.
But as always, you use words in a way that has nothing to do with their actual definition.
You can't even define love, you refuse to give any definition for it.
And we both know why. Whether you think someone is rational, and whether you love them are two entirely separate questions.
But as always, you use words in a way that has nothing to do with their actual definition.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,774
@1,437,770 (B)
I’m clearly much more intelligent than you are since I’m able to grasp things like empathy. You have a personality disorder. You’re mentally ill, I don’t think you’re in a position to be judging me or black people over intelligence. Why would you even use that word with me? Never talk about cognitive abilities with me.
I’m clearly much more intelligent than you are since I’m able to grasp things like empathy. You have a personality disorder. You’re mentally ill, I don’t think you’re in a position to be judging me or black people over intelligence. Why would you even use that word with me? Never talk about cognitive abilities with me.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 37 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,775
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 43 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,776
Just at face value, saying something disrespectful about your mom and then hiding behind the excuse of, "well it’s true." That’s not honorable. You’re not a man for that.
Mr. Black Boi quadruple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,778
Even in the Bible, you were complaining about religion to me, in the Ten Commandments, it says you should honor your father and your mother. It’s not a new concept, it’s a concept that people understood thousands of years ago.
Mr. Black Boi quintuple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,779
And especially dude, you know I don’t like you. It’s one thing to say something less than positive about your mother to a perfect stranger, why the hell would you say it in front of me if you know I don’t like you? Why would you do that to her? That doesn’t make any sense. I don’t like you, but you shouldn’t do that to yourself.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,780
@1,437,769 (Mr. Black Boi)
> he would be smart enough to tell a lie that sounds good and makes him look normal, you know? You don’t even have the cognitive awareness to pretend to seem normal.
This is anonymous website, there's no reason to lie.
I have women in my life that I love, but of course they aren't rational.
Women's beliefs and actions have very little do to with reason. They have emotions, they act on them, they don't reflect, and they repeat those same irrational behaviors.
I can love irrational people. Sure, in person you can't point out they are irrational or they lose control over their emotions (proving the point) and cause problems.
> he would be smart enough to tell a lie that sounds good and makes him look normal, you know? You don’t even have the cognitive awareness to pretend to seem normal.
This is anonymous website, there's no reason to lie.
I have women in my life that I love, but of course they aren't rational.
Women's beliefs and actions have very little do to with reason. They have emotions, they act on them, they don't reflect, and they repeat those same irrational behaviors.
I can love irrational people. Sure, in person you can't point out they are irrational or they lose control over their emotions (proving the point) and cause problems.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,783
@1,437,779 (Mr. Black Boi)
Again, it's an anonymous website, why should I care?
My mother tipped me off to the differences in men and women early on lol. She wouldn't say "irrational" but she knows women get emotional and form their beliefs based on what's trending.
You have said multiple times you have beliefs that are about what sounds nice, or what you must believe "as a black man" or whatever in other threads. You have basically admitted you don't care about the truth and then spam angry rants at me because I just state what I think is true.
Again, it's an anonymous website, why should I care?
My mother tipped me off to the differences in men and women early on lol. She wouldn't say "irrational" but she knows women get emotional and form their beliefs based on what's trending.
You have said multiple times you have beliefs that are about what sounds nice, or what you must believe "as a black man" or whatever in other threads. You have basically admitted you don't care about the truth and then spam angry rants at me because I just state what I think is true.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,784
@previous (B)
I don’t care if it’s on an anonymous website, I don’t care if nobody on the planet will ever know. If I love someone I’m not going to disrespect them.
I don’t care if it’s on an anonymous website, I don’t care if nobody on the planet will ever know. If I love someone I’m not going to disrespect them.
Anonymous G replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,785
@1,437,780 (B)
Perhaps it’s because not everyone appreciates a baseless over generalization based on your perceived bias that a woman’s belief and have actions have little to do with reason. Perhaps the women in your life lack reasoning but I personally know women who are mature, make sound judgments and their actions are deeply rooted in facts and very little to do with emotion.
The last bit you wrote is why the term “gaslighting” exists.
Perhaps it’s because not everyone appreciates a baseless over generalization based on your perceived bias that a woman’s belief and have actions have little to do with reason. Perhaps the women in your life lack reasoning but I personally know women who are mature, make sound judgments and their actions are deeply rooted in facts and very little to do with emotion.
The last bit you wrote is why the term “gaslighting” exists.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,786
@previous (G)
Obviously men and women are both human and both have the ability to be rational and emotional. Both rationality and emotion are capabilities that evolved for a reason. If women didn’t have the ability to think, our species wouldn’t be here.
Obviously men and women are both human and both have the ability to be rational and emotional. Both rationality and emotion are capabilities that evolved for a reason. If women didn’t have the ability to think, our species wouldn’t be here.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,789
And even this whole thing about emotion, men feel emotions and the fact that women feel emotions isn’t bad. Emotions aren’t inherently irrational. If you were a caveman or a cavewoman and you saw a lion, I mean you probably should be scared. That’s probably smart actually. These things exist for reasons.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,790
Emotions can actually be a sign of intelligence. Like chimpanzees for example, one of the things that separates them from other animals and makes them more similar to us is that chimpanzees are intelligent enough that they have a concept of justice. They’ve done experiments where they’ll put food on a tray between two cages with a chimp in each cage and if a researcher moves the tray so only one chimp can eat the food, the other chimp doesn’t get mad, they only get mad if they see the other chimp pull the tray away. Other animals don’t have that. It requires a theory of mind, the ability for one animal to understand what another animal is thinking and whether their intentions are good or bad.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 29 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,794
That’s the other thing though, if you just label half the planet as stupid that’s incredibly limiting. It takes a level of intelligence to realize someone else is also intelligent. I think humans have actually made a lot of assumptions about the intelligence of animals that are wrong. With chimpanzees for example, overall, they’re not nearly as smart as humans, but intelligence isn’t a one dimensional thing. Chimpanzees have photographic memory, so they actually have superior short term memory to humans. But we have language and they don’t have as sophisticated of an ability to use and understand language which is why humans are more successful. But I just feel like if humans could underestimate the intelligence of a crow, then this whole thing of judging other members of our own species based on skin color is just stupid.
https://youtu.be/nTgeLEWr614
https://youtu.be/nTgeLEWr614
Anonymous G replied with this 3 weeks ago, 19 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,799
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 19 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,811
@1,437,750 (Mr. Black Boi)
instead of screaming endlessly and futilely like a retarded ape about darkies being dehumanized, you should instead try to prove the humanity of browns.
instead of screaming endlessly and futilely like a retarded ape about darkies being dehumanized, you should instead try to prove the humanity of browns.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,812
习近平 double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,813
@1,437,811 (L)> instead of screaming endlessly and futilely like a retarded ape about darkies being dehumanized, you should instead try to prove the humanity of browns.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,814
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,848
@1,437,799 (G)
We all know that genetics is reaponsible for physical/behavioral differences in every other animal, so why does anyone pretend it's suddenly different for this one species?
We all know that genetics is reaponsible for physical/behavioral differences in every other animal, so why does anyone pretend it's suddenly different for this one species?
Anonymous L replied with this 3 weeks ago, 10 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,850
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,890
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,893
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,895
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,896
Plaque can form in your heart or your penis causing erectile dysfunction and you’re over here worried about generics??!!!!!??!!!
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,897
What you need isn’t a black father to fix your genetics. What you need is less sugar, less tobacco, and less alcohol to slam your penis. You think we can do that? Come on now…
Anonymous B replied with this 3 weeks ago, 29 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,899
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,900
@previous (B)
Xiang, I know you think genetics are reaponsible, but you don’t know how to use generics in go and I think that’s causing problems for you.
https://youtu.be/WpTKqnfp5dY
Xiang, I know you think genetics are reaponsible, but you don’t know how to use generics in go and I think that’s causing problems for you.
https://youtu.be/WpTKqnfp5dY
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous L replied with this 3 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,902
raping nigguhs!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,438,046
Damn, y'all be chimping out over nothing.
Go drink some grape soda, smoke a Kool cigarette and chill the fuck out.
Go drink some grape soda, smoke a Kool cigarette and chill the fuck out.
Mr Black Boi replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,438,049
@previous (A)
MUP DA DOO DIDDA PO MO GUB BIDDA BE DAT TUM MUHFUGEN BIX NOOD COCKS BIN DUB HO MUFGGUHA!
MUP DA DOO DIDDA PO MO GUB BIDDA BE DAT TUM MUHFUGEN BIX NOOD COCKS BIN DUB HO MUFGGUHA!