Topic: Was Yu-Gi-Oh secretly about homosexuality?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 week ago #135,282
The backside of the cards is the anal entrance.Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,437,709
That was the flag of India before they changed it
boof joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 9 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,710
well they were grown men pretending to fight by flashing a god damn card at each other
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 29 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,711
@previous (boof)It's not gay if it's masturbation and the other half of you is actually some ancient God. It's way passed the gayness line and into narcissistic psychosis
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 5 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,716
After my time but it felt like it was trying to be 'cooler' than pokemon for the middleschool kids. It appears to have done fine commercially of course, and by that I mean there's a whole new batch of 18 year old twinks out there to wreck their bootyholes so go nuts guys.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
boof replied with this 1 week ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,727
maybe the card is a cock
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 50 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,732
@1,437,709 (B)
> That was the flag of India before they changed it
Isn’t that kinda racist against the British? The British flag doesn’t look like an asshole.
> That was the flag of India before they changed it
Isn’t that kinda racist against the British? The British flag doesn’t look like an asshole.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 1 week ago, 35 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,733
🇬🇧 it’s just shaped like this >|<
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 4 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,815
Its weird how with nigguhs everything comes back to their butthoal
习近平 joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,818
习近平 double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,819
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 4 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,867
As the fora's premier Yu-Gi-Oh fan, I can assure you that it is an extremely heterosexual franchise.
I'm trying to post proof but keep getting this error when uploading an image:
Warning (2): exif_read_data(phpiaFLxz): Illegal IFD size in /post.php on line 311
Fix your board, r04r! >:(
I'm trying to post proof but keep getting this error when uploading an image:
Warning (2): exif_read_data(phpiaFLxz): Illegal IFD size in /post.php on line 311
Fix your board, r04r! >:(
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 23 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,869
Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,911
@1,437,867 (H)
your your posting a jpg that is actually a png, or vise versa, or at least that was what was causing this problem for me on the latest incarnation of laghouls. insteada properly converting it, someone simply renamed the file extension, and that causes sloppily constructed foras to shit themselves.
your your posting a jpg that is actually a png, or vise versa, or at least that was what was causing this problem for me on the latest incarnation of laghouls. insteada properly converting it, someone simply renamed the file extension, and that causes sloppily constructed foras to shit themselves.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 week ago, 7 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,913
@previous (F)
Hm, that'd be interesting if that were the case since I edited the image prior to uploading, meaning that Mac's built-in image viewer/editor would have had to re-save the image. It'd be weird behavior I think for it to not adhere to the proper format specifications when saving. I assumed it was some weird malformed exif data but even stripping it gave me the same error. I'll try converting to a different format and see if that does anything.
Hm, that'd be interesting if that were the case since I edited the image prior to uploading, meaning that Mac's built-in image viewer/editor would have had to re-save the image. It'd be weird behavior I think for it to not adhere to the proper format specifications when saving. I assumed it was some weird malformed exif data but even stripping it gave me the same error. I'll try converting to a different format and see if that does anything.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 week ago, 18 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,914
Oh nice it worked. I present a real panel from the first chapter of the original Yu-Gi-Oh manga.(Edited 41 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 15 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,920
@1,437,913 (H)
@previous (H)
i want to make a mac joke, but i feel the point is now moot due to windows falling to macs level of quality.
also, womens basketball would greatly be improved by them using skirts, cuz thatd absolutely justify how bad women are at sports.
@previous (H)
i want to make a mac joke, but i feel the point is now moot due to windows falling to macs level of quality.
also, womens basketball would greatly be improved by them using skirts, cuz thatd absolutely justify how bad women are at sports.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 1 week ago, 8 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,922
@previous (F)
Believe me, ten years ago I'd be making fun of me too. But Mac's problem was never quality, it was being locked to specific, retardedly expensive hardware. I got into Mac by happenstance and cannot deny the experience is generally fantastic, but I'd still recommend people buy better value hardware and use a mainstream linux distro like Ubuntu over Windows.
Believe me, ten years ago I'd be making fun of me too. But Mac's problem was never quality, it was being locked to specific, retardedly expensive hardware. I got into Mac by happenstance and cannot deny the experience is generally fantastic, but I'd still recommend people buy better value hardware and use a mainstream linux distro like Ubuntu over Windows.
Anonymous F replied with this 4 days ago, 3 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,438,504
@previous (H)
> But Mac's problem was never quality, it was being locked to specific, retardedly expensive hardware.
If Mac is in anyway comparable to iOS, this is a pretty audacious lie.
> But Mac's problem was never quality, it was being locked to specific, retardedly expensive hardware.
If Mac is in anyway comparable to iOS, this is a pretty audacious lie.
