Topic: hey you heard of that Charlie Kirk guy?
boof started this discussion 4 weeks ago #135,246 He's some kind of asshole, a real shitbird
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago , 14 minutes later[^] [v] #1,437,234 Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago , 56 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,259 I think that you only started caring about him after you heard about his death on the news, boof. You are a shallow trend-chaser.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago , 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,261 Mr. Black Boy joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago , 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,263 Mr. Black Boy double-posted this 4 weeks ago , 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,264 Mr. Black Boy triple-posted this 4 weeks ago , 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,265 Mission failed successfully.
boof (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago , 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,266 @1,437,259 (C)
nah, I heard of that jerk for years, a shitheel propagandist for the Epstein class
Anonymous D replied with this 4 weeks ago , 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,271 @previous (boof )
literal schizobabble
boof (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago , 7 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,412 @previous (D)
it's like you don't understand things
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago , 42 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,436 boof (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago , 47 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,475 @previous (F)
OK dingdong, which word are you unfamiliar with
or are you jerking my cage
Anonymous F replied with this 4 weeks ago , 58 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,480 @previous (boof )
I understand every word just fine, it's the arrangment that makes the salad fag
boof (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago , 8 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,500 @previous (F)
OK, let's take two words at a time. is there a set of two words together that you find difficult?
Anonymous F replied with this 4 weeks ago , 53 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,504 @previous (boof )
English, please, I have no idea wtf you are saying.
boof (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago , 11 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,508 @previous (F)
god damn it, man
Anonymous D replied with this 4 weeks ago , 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,515 @1,437,412 (boof )
Hows anybody supposed to understand you when you type like a downie?
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago , 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,517 @1,437,500 (boof )
Yeah the set of all sets
boof (OP) replied with this 4 weeks ago , 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,681 @1,437,515 (D)
you had your chance to get taught, fuckface
@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
is this a Russel reference
Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 3 weeks ago , 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,712 @previous (boof )
I can't figure it out
boof (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago , 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,726 I think it's about the movement a few decades ago to make mathematics as axiomatic as possible, and they got stuck on some set logic, so maybe they came up with a hack workaround
Anonymous D replied with this 3 weeks ago , 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,804 @1,437,681 (boof )
downspoast
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago , 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,805 @1,437,726 (boof )
Gödel's incompleteness theorems > logic bros
Some things are true, and they can’t be proven with logic, and Gödel proved that with logic.
boof (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago , 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,916 @previous (Mr. Black Boi )
so I imagine that could be stated that some things are false that can't be proven false, but are false nonetheless, given whatever axioms
↕