Topic: Africa vs Europe population over time
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #135,243
historical population
1800
Africa: 90 million
Europe: 203 million
1945
Africa: 208 million
Europe: 400 million
1990
Africa: 683 million
Europe: 720 million
2026
Africa: 1,580 million
Europe: 743 million
projected population
2050
Africa: 2,500 million
Europe: 703 million
2100
Africa: 4,000 million
Europe: 640 million
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,437,188
Africa was colonized in the late 1800s when Europe had about 2x the population of Africa despite Africa being approximately 3 times larger than Europe by land area.
In 2100, Africa will have approximately 6 times the population of Europe despite only being 3 times larger than Europe by land area.
In 2100, Africa will have approximately 6 times the population of Europe despite only being 3 times larger than Europe by land area.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,189
This link has an animation that can help visualize how in the past when Europe dominated they made up a larger portion of humanity and how that compares to Africa in the future.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/population-regions-with-projections?time=1800..1835
All I’m saying it’s interesting nobody in politics left or right seems to acknowledge this reality that the future might not be like the past and maybe we should plan for that.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/population-regions-with-projections?time=1800..1835
All I’m saying it’s interesting nobody in politics left or right seems to acknowledge this reality that the future might not be like the past and maybe we should plan for that.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,190
So like they fuck fuck and more fuck than anyone ELSE.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,191
I’m pretty convinced the future world order hundreds of years in the future will be a struggle between Africa and Asia rather than Europe and Asia just based on the population distribution. And instead of China, it will probably be India.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,192
@1,437,190 (B)
Infant and childhood mortality in Africa was higher than in other parts of the world historically due to malaria. Everyone had a lot of children in the past, but people were less likely to make it to adulthood due to diseases which were more prevalent in Africa than Europe due to Africa’s warmer climate. Then due to Europe’s colonization of Africa during the industrial evolution, Europe stunted Africa’s industrialization and development leaving Africa with higher rates of poverty and worse infrastructure, access to education, and healthcare, which maintained Africa’s higher birth rates even as technologies were introduced that significantly lowered Africa’s child mortality rate causing their population to grow much faster than Europe in the present.
Infant and childhood mortality in Africa was higher than in other parts of the world historically due to malaria. Everyone had a lot of children in the past, but people were less likely to make it to adulthood due to diseases which were more prevalent in Africa than Europe due to Africa’s warmer climate. Then due to Europe’s colonization of Africa during the industrial evolution, Europe stunted Africa’s industrialization and development leaving Africa with higher rates of poverty and worse infrastructure, access to education, and healthcare, which maintained Africa’s higher birth rates even as technologies were introduced that significantly lowered Africa’s child mortality rate causing their population to grow much faster than Europe in the present.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,201
Which is ironic because a future where there are 6x as many Africans as Europeans would horrify the racists who colonized Africa because that’s the exact opposite of what they wanted. After the 2080s, humanity’s population will undergo a global decline, and East Asia and the West will be the furthest along in that decline so they probably won’t regain their previous dominance for at least several hundred years.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,203
Population levels are not an indicator of success.
India is packed full of people and very poor.
The US has 4% of the world's population but has economic and military supremacy that is unrivaled.
India is packed full of people and very poor.
The US has 4% of the world's population but has economic and military supremacy that is unrivaled.
boof joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,207
let us learn the lesson of the rats
Anonymous C replied with this 2 weeks ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,208
@1,437,203 (D)
Historically, India was very rich. The United States is wealthy because of World War Two, but the United States has been in relative decline since World War Two. The United States is geographically isolated from the rest of the world so after World War Two we had no industrial competition, so our GDP as a percentage of world GDP peaked in 1960. Now it’s closer to 25%.
Historically, India was very rich. The United States is wealthy because of World War Two, but the United States has been in relative decline since World War Two. The United States is geographically isolated from the rest of the world so after World War Two we had no industrial competition, so our GDP as a percentage of world GDP peaked in 1960. Now it’s closer to 25%.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,209
For most of history, the two most populous civilizations were India and China and the two wealthiest civilizations were India and China.
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/2000-years-economic-history-one-chart/
The success of western nations is relatively recent in the grand scheme of things. Reasons include the discovery of the Americas and the luck that European diseases killed the native Americans and not the other way around giving European empires access to the vast resources of the Americas which enabled Europe to industrialize first and colonize Africa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Divergence
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/2000-years-economic-history-one-chart/
The success of western nations is relatively recent in the grand scheme of things. Reasons include the discovery of the Americas and the luck that European diseases killed the native Americans and not the other way around giving European empires access to the vast resources of the Americas which enabled Europe to industrialize first and colonize Africa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Divergence
Anonymous C triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 47 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,210
It’s projected that by the end of the century India will have the largest economy not China or the United States due mostly to the rapid demographic decline of China.
Anonymous C quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,211
Now if you’re wondering why China developed before India, China has had lower dependency ratios than India for decades. Why has China had lower dependency ratios? Their birth rate fell faster meaning women had fewer children, they didn’t have to spend as much time and money raising children so they were more economically productive. Why did China see a faster decline in birth rates than India? The one child policy. But it is a double edged sword for China, they rose faster, but they’ll also fall faster.
Anonymous C quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,212
And now if you’re wondering why the Europeans were more advanced than the Native Americans and why America now is so much more prosperous than it was when it was populated mostly by Native Americans before Europeans arrived: it’s because the Native Americans did not have contact with the rest of the world. For example, China invented guns, Europeans came with guns. Europeans didn’t invent guns. The Native Americans didn’t have guns, because unlike Europeans, they were not trading with China, because they had no idea China or Europe existed.
Anonymous C sextuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,213
@1,437,208 (C)
> Historically, India was very rich. The United States is wealthy because of World War Two, but the United States has been in relative decline since World War Two. The United States is geographically isolated from the rest of the world so after World War Two we had no industrial competition, so our GDP as a percentage of world GDP peaked in 1960. Now it’s closer to 25%.
(I meant to say it peaked at 40% in 1960 so the US is roughly half as powerful economically as we were almost 70 years ago.)
> Historically, India was very rich. The United States is wealthy because of World War Two, but the United States has been in relative decline since World War Two. The United States is geographically isolated from the rest of the world so after World War Two we had no industrial competition, so our GDP as a percentage of world GDP peaked in 1960. Now it’s closer to 25%.
(I meant to say it peaked at 40% in 1960 so the US is roughly half as powerful economically as we were almost 70 years ago.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,214
Muh nigguhs
Anonymous C replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,216
@1,437,213 (C)
Of course, the president doesn’t act like it, but that’s because he’s over compensating, really he’s just digging our grave faster but idiots don’t understand the mechanisms at play because they only care about culture war idiocy that focuses on completely immaterial and intangible things like "culture" instead of facts and statistics.
Of course, the president doesn’t act like it, but that’s because he’s over compensating, really he’s just digging our grave faster but idiots don’t understand the mechanisms at play because they only care about culture war idiocy that focuses on completely immaterial and intangible things like "culture" instead of facts and statistics.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,218
It’s based on the whole fallacy that past success is an indicator of future success - it’s not. If you’re playing Russian roulette and you tell yourself, "This must be safe I’ve pulled the trigger so many times before and I keep winning there must be something special about me" well guess what you’re going to do on the next spin? You’re gonna blow your brains out.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,219
@1,437,208 (C)
Right, 4% of the world produces 25% of GDP, and this is after a decline.
So clearly it's not population numbers that lead to economic success.
Right, 4% of the world produces 25% of GDP, and this is after a decline.
So clearly it's not population numbers that lead to economic success.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,220
Anonymous C replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,222
@1,437,219 (D)
The United States is the third most populous country in the world, and the next largest economy after the US is China which has 20% of the world’s GDP. China was poorer than most African countries in the 1960s and it’s already in close competition with the United States. This is only possible because China’s large population.
The United States is the third most populous country in the world, and the next largest economy after the US is China which has 20% of the world’s GDP. China was poorer than most African countries in the 1960s and it’s already in close competition with the United States. This is only possible because China’s large population.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,223
For most of history the civilizations with the largest economies were India and China which had the first and second largest populations (they flipped places every so often but they were always the top two). Now the second and third largest populations are the second and first largest economies respectively. The pattern absolutely does hold that the largest countries tend to have the largest economies. Even the British Empire’s share of global wealth was proportional to its population. The British Empire at its peak had 25% of the global population and 25% of the global GDP.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,226
India isn’t evidence the pattern is wrong, India is an outlier, and in the 1960s so was China. That’s not the norm that a country with a high population has a bad economy. What is more likely is that India is developing in the same way that China did but delayed behind China. Eventually India will surpass China.
Anonymous C quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,227
At the end of the century the largest country by population will be India followed by China, followed by Pakistan, followed by Nigeria, followed by the DRC, then followed by the United States.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population_projections#:~:text=The%20UN's%202024%20report%20projects,about%2010.2%20billion%20in%202100.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population_projections#:~:text=The%20UN's%202024%20report%20projects,about%2010.2%20billion%20in%202100.
Anonymous C quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,229
The probability that the US will overcome India and China and Pakistan and Nigeria and the DRC all having larger populations is much lower than that the US will overcome just India and China. The US might overcome China because of their demographic collapse, but I doubt that the US will overcome India in the later half of the century. Then in the 22nd century when African nations become more developed, there will be too much competition and I highly doubt the US will be the number one economy. It doesn’t seem possible.
Anonymous C sextuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,230
By 2100, the US could be a minority white country as well.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 45 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,236
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,268
@1,437,222 (C)
The third most populous country has 4% of the population.
If your theory was correct, the GDP of the US would be around 4%, and China would be wealthier than the US.
The third most populous country has 4% of the population.
If your theory was correct, the GDP of the US would be around 4%, and China would be wealthier than the US.
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,269
@1,437,229 (C)
Population matters less than ever when robots are the primary mode of production rather than human labor.
A civilization that multiplies fast to create expensive, fragile workers that need sleep, rest, and medical care will lose out to a civilization that produces its goods through robotics.
Population matters less than ever when robots are the primary mode of production rather than human labor.
A civilization that multiplies fast to create expensive, fragile workers that need sleep, rest, and medical care will lose out to a civilization that produces its goods through robotics.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 23 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,277
Yes, maybe if you make your 50th topic about how population numbers prove that Africa is the best, then all of Minichan will suddenly agree with you.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,278
@1,437,268 (D)
> If your theory was correct, the GDP of the US would be around 4%, and China would be wealthier than the US.
If you account for differences in exchange rates the Chinese economy is larger than the American economy in terms of GDP PPP.
> If your theory was correct, the GDP of the US would be around 4%, and China would be wealthier than the US.
If you account for differences in exchange rates the Chinese economy is larger than the American economy in terms of GDP PPP.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,280
However, in terms of nominal GDP, the US still has a larger economy, because we are the world’s reserve currency, because once again WWII.
Rizz⚝Master replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,281
@1,437,277 (I)
R-selection is the brown creatures nature, specifically because they arent talented or creative to do anything better. That same deficency also makes their retard solution a source of pride.
R-selection is the brown creatures nature, specifically because they arent talented or creative to do anything better. That same deficency also makes their retard solution a source of pride.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,283
@previous (Rizz⚝Master)
Either you exist or you don’t exist. If you judge me for existing, but you don’t want to exist yourself, then when you don’t exist and I exist, nobody will be judging me anyway. So I don’t see a reason to care about this.
Either you exist or you don’t exist. If you judge me for existing, but you don’t want to exist yourself, then when you don’t exist and I exist, nobody will be judging me anyway. So I don’t see a reason to care about this.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,286
@1,437,269 (D)
> Population matters less than ever when robots are the primary mode of production rather than human labor.
Replacing yourself with a robot to stop yourself from getting replaced by Africans isn’t the brilliant solution you think it is. You’re still being replaced either way. The government isn’t going to give you a handout if a robot takes your job, you’re just going to be poor.
> Population matters less than ever when robots are the primary mode of production rather than human labor.
Replacing yourself with a robot to stop yourself from getting replaced by Africans isn’t the brilliant solution you think it is. You’re still being replaced either way. The government isn’t going to give you a handout if a robot takes your job, you’re just going to be poor.
Rizz⚝Master replied with this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,287
@1,437,283 (Mr. Black Boi)
George thought so too, but when fent came for george, he stopped existing. Hence why we laugh at him.
George thought so too, but when fent came for george, he stopped existing. Hence why we laugh at him.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,288
@previous (Rizz⚝Master)
If you were smart you wouldn’t laugh at someone for being dead. Everyone dies. You’re going to die too.
If you were smart you wouldn’t laugh at someone for being dead. Everyone dies. You’re going to die too.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,289
Maybe you think there’s no God and you’ll never pay for your sins, but the truth is that humanity is powerless. We are completely at the mercy of nature. The Earth is an incredibly tiny planet and out of all the billions of people who have ever lived, less than a thousand have been to space. If you truly think that you’re above death, God will humble you.
Rizz⚝Master replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,291
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,292
The difference in scale between the head of a needle and the size of the sun is smaller than the difference in size between the sun and the galaxy, and there are about 2 trillion galaxies that we can observe, probably an infinite number of them. The limit of the greatest empires that have ever existed is the surface of the Earth. We’re absolutely nothing compared to God, and if you think you can disrespect death because you think you’re greater than God, death will always win. You can’t escape it, and if you want to laugh about death, then you’re just foolish. If you play with a stove, you’ll get burned. Playing with the universe like that is just stupid in my view.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,294
@1,437,291 (Rizz⚝Master)
All you can do is say words to make yourself feel better. One day you’re going to be silenced forever and will have to sit with that forever.
All you can do is say words to make yourself feel better. One day you’re going to be silenced forever and will have to sit with that forever.
Rizz⚝Master replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,295
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
All you can do is say words to make yourself feel better. One day you’re going to be silenced forever and will have to sit with that forever.
All you can do is say words to make yourself feel better. One day you’re going to be silenced forever and will have to sit with that forever.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,316
@1,437,286 (Mr. Black Boi)
I never said it would work out for humans in the west, and I'm not the one automating jobs.
The point I'm making is that the plan of increasing the population to make a country stronger is already an obsolete strategy.
Think about what value those new humans are going to bring to some African country. What jobs are they going to do? Chances are those jobs are already partially or fully automatable- and machines do it faster for cheaper.
Africa is increasing it's liability. They will have more mouths to feed, more people that need housing and medical care. They're doing this for essentially no economic advantage as robotics continues to advance.
Even if robotics doesn't work out in my favor, that doesn't change the fact that a larger population is no longer an advantage for nations.
I never said it would work out for humans in the west, and I'm not the one automating jobs.
The point I'm making is that the plan of increasing the population to make a country stronger is already an obsolete strategy.
Think about what value those new humans are going to bring to some African country. What jobs are they going to do? Chances are those jobs are already partially or fully automatable- and machines do it faster for cheaper.
Africa is increasing it's liability. They will have more mouths to feed, more people that need housing and medical care. They're doing this for essentially no economic advantage as robotics continues to advance.
Even if robotics doesn't work out in my favor, that doesn't change the fact that a larger population is no longer an advantage for nations.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,317
@previous (D)
The economy is still very much dependent on population growth. Just look at Japan’s economic growth. I mean you can’t because it doesn’t exist, but you get what I mean.
The economy is still very much dependent on population growth. Just look at Japan’s economic growth. I mean you can’t because it doesn’t exist, but you get what I mean.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,318
Just compare India’s birth rate to Japan’s then compare their economic growth. You have a nice theory but you need to back it up with evidence otherwise it’s just an idea and your idea might have nothing to do with how things actually work.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,319
Hell, let me take this to the extremes. Compare South Sudan’s birth rate to Germany then compare their GDP growth.
Mr. Black Boi quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,325
This isn’t even cherry picking, pick a random African country, Nigeria, Kenya, the DRC, whatever. Compare it to a random European country, Germany, Italy, the UK. This isn’t a fluke.
RedLayer !lM.ud0eSEk joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,327
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,330
The only country it probably won’t hold for is South Africa, but South Africa has the lowest birth rate and the highest white population in Africa.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 51 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,332
Like this is a really, really strong pattern and I find it annoying how everybody just wants to ignore it like it isn’t real.
Gorman !jEMv9xJVWo replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,336
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,361
@1,437,317 (Mr. Black Boi)
Japan has a shrinking, aging population and refuses to allow immigration...
And they are the 4th largest economy.
That is more evidence population growth isn't tied to economic performance.
Japan has a shrinking, aging population and refuses to allow immigration...
And they are the 4th largest economy.
That is more evidence population growth isn't tied to economic performance.
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,362
@1,437,318 (Mr. Black Boi)
I've already gone over multiple examples of countries where population numbers don't correlate to economic output.
You haven't shown any evidence your theory is correct.
And I haven't presented a theory, I've just shown that your theory is unfounded. What evidence do you expect exactly? Burden of proof is on you, and I've still given counter examples.
I've already gone over multiple examples of countries where population numbers don't correlate to economic output.
You haven't shown any evidence your theory is correct.
And I haven't presented a theory, I've just shown that your theory is unfounded. What evidence do you expect exactly? Burden of proof is on you, and I've still given counter examples.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 31 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,364
@previous (D)
Okay, now you’re just being delusional. You haven’t cited any numbers or statistics while I’ve been doing that this entire time.
Okay, now you’re just being delusional. You haven’t cited any numbers or statistics while I’ve been doing that this entire time.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,365
@1,437,361 (D)
Yeah, and they used to have the second largest economy. That’s not good economic performance. That means Japan is getting worse over time not better. This isn’t hard to understand. If you wanted to make a high return on investment, investing in the Japanese stock market wouldn’t make sense. You would make way more money by investing in the American stock market instead because our economy actually grows because we have immigration.
Yeah, and they used to have the second largest economy. That’s not good economic performance. That means Japan is getting worse over time not better. This isn’t hard to understand. If you wanted to make a high return on investment, investing in the Japanese stock market wouldn’t make sense. You would make way more money by investing in the American stock market instead because our economy actually grows because we have immigration.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,366
American stocks have averaged close to 10% annual returns over the past few decades while Japan has been closer to 1%. Using Japan as an example of a good economy is insane. African countries experience more economic growth than Japan does because they’re developing countries. Just because Japan is above average now doesn’t mean it will continue to be into the future. Japan has already been surpassed by China, and I don’t have much doubt that it will be surpassed again in the future by other Asian economies.
Mr. Black Boi quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 50 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,367
Technically India surpassed Japan but then there was that whole crisis with oil and Iran so that flipped back again, but that’s a short term effect, long term, India will almost certainly surpass Japan a second time.
Mr. Black Boi quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,368
The thing about not having immigrants, is Japanese people don’t have a lot of children. The amount of professionals they train in their universities is just the amount of professionals they train in their universities, that’s a limited supply, they’re limiting themselves in that way by not brain draining the world. Chinese people and Indians come to the top schools in the US, and they become CEOs of tech companies the CEO of google is India, the CEO of Nvidia is Taiwanese, the CEO of Microsoft was born in India. If you can selected the smartest people out of 8 billion, you’re going to have way more smart and talented people than if you don’t have immigration. That’s why the American economy is so exceptional in spite of our declining birth rates. We should be down the same path as Japan but we’re not in terms of population decline, our population is growing, and we’re not in terms of economic decline, and the only explanation is immigration. Without immigration we would experience both population and economic decline. The United States becomes more diverse year after year and the portion of the US that is ethnically Caucasian decreases year after year, but we remain the most powerful country because this is a superior strategy.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,369
Which is pretty bad, because if i wanted tiny brown peepees in my anus id just bend over infront of a melanated american. I go out of my way for pale cocks, im not going to india for the same tiny brown pee pees i can get here in new york.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,370
It’s not just in tech. Have you ever looked at a research paper published at a top American university and noticed how many of the names are Chinese names? All those people are just people. They would be just as smart no matter where on earth you put them, but every one of those smart people doing research here instead of in China advantages us a little bit over China.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,371
@1,437,369 (Mr. Black Boi)
Yeaaaaaah, I think you’ve lost the argument buddy. If you have to resort to impersonation, you’re a lost cause.
Yeaaaaaah, I think you’ve lost the argument buddy. If you have to resort to impersonation, you’re a lost cause.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,373
But you know what, I’m gonna say it because I feel like saying it. Japan isn’t a diverse company. How many products from tech companies do you use every day that are American vs Japanese? Do you use a Japanese web browser? Do you use a Japanese operating system? Was your computer manufactured by a Japanese company? Do you use Japanese social media apps? When you need a ride from the airport, do you use a Japanese taxi app? I’m just saying, the American way of doing things is superior, diversity is vastly superior to homogeneity and tradition because homogeneity and tradition don’t produce new ideas, they don’t produce new technologies and new innovations, they produce the same old same old. That’s why Japan fell behind.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,374
So anyway, i got a solid titanium fuckpost carved in the shape of trump yesterday and i guess i was a bit to vigorous because my calimari ripped the titanium dong off of the trump statue it was carved out of. Ordinarily i wouldnt mind this development but the sheer girth means i cannot get it out and i reeeeaaly need to poop but the metal trumpwang is plugging me up quite ably.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,375
Then when you are using a product from an American tech company, where is the company based inside the US? Almost always California.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,377
And you know what? I’m feeling extra petty. You said Japan was the 4th largest economy like "oh wow that’s really impressive."
Look at a bar graph, the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th largest economies all range between 3 and 5 trillion USD
The united states has a $32 trillion USD GDP and China has a $20 trillion USD GDP no other country comes close to the US or China. The only country that has a chance to is India.
Look at a bar graph, the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th largest economies all range between 3 and 5 trillion USD
The united states has a $32 trillion USD GDP and China has a $20 trillion USD GDP no other country comes close to the US or China. The only country that has a chance to is India.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,378
Then even in Japan, Japan is extremely homogenous, the tiny amount of diversity Japan has still benefits the Japanese economy, like Masayoshi Son for example, he’s a Japanese billionaire but he’s ethnically Korean. It advantages your country if everyone isn’t exactly the same, you need different people to get different outcomes.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,379
@1,437,365 (Mr. Black Boi)
The US has an abundance of arable land, it can keep growing its population for some gain but its not a general rule for any country.
Japan is full, add more people and you'll have malnourished underskilled citizens.
For some regions in Africa growing the population will make sense, but it isn't the deciding factor in what makes a country winner.
Capital is in the west, and exponential machine growth will beat fragile water balloons that take 2 decades to prepare for office work.
The US has an abundance of arable land, it can keep growing its population for some gain but its not a general rule for any country.
Japan is full, add more people and you'll have malnourished underskilled citizens.
For some regions in Africa growing the population will make sense, but it isn't the deciding factor in what makes a country winner.
Capital is in the west, and exponential machine growth will beat fragile water balloons that take 2 decades to prepare for office work.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,385
@previous (D)
That explanation doesn’t make sense, Africa is a net importer of food and so is Japan.
That explanation doesn’t make sense, Africa is a net importer of food and so is Japan.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,386
It is true that Africa has 60% of the world’s unused arable land, but the trend is that Africa is rapidly urbanizing and there’s a net flow of people away from rural areas into cities instead of into farmland. As African countries develop, they aren’t constrained by their own land resources and in fact they’re actually not really using most of their land resources because they can earn more money in cities and then buy food from other parts of the world for less effort than it would take to farm their land.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,389
It’s kind of weird if you think about it though. Africa used to have a lot of famines because the population was too high to be sustained by their own farmland, even though they have an abundance of land that could be used for farming. But the reason why there are fewer famines now even though the population is higher is because Africans moved into cities away from their farms where they could make more money and afford to import food from abroad. But they’re still underutilizing their land.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
Mr. Black Boi quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,391
On google earth, there’s a timelapse feature where you can look at a timelapse of satellite pictures since 1980, you can actually see cities growing in Africa, and you can see how much faster they’ve been growing compared to European and American cities. If you look at the growth of Lagos or Kinshasa vs New York, London, or Chicago, it’s a huge difference.
Mr. Black Boi quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,392
Like looking at population statistics is one thing, you can actually see it. It’s like a growth emerging out the jungle and when you look at western cities over the same time, the African cities get twice as big while the western cities stay almost the same size.
Anonymous H replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,393
raping nigguhs?
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,394
@1,437,385 (Mr. Black Boi)
> Africa is a net importer of food
Because they have less output per acre of arable land, not because they lack arable land.
> so is Japan.
Which matches what I said about Japan being overpopulated.
Japan has mechanized, productive agricultural land, but they don't have enough arable land.
> Africa is a net importer of food
Because they have less output per acre of arable land, not because they lack arable land.
> so is Japan.
Which matches what I said about Japan being overpopulated.
Japan has mechanized, productive agricultural land, but they don't have enough arable land.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,395
Also if you look at Africa on google earth, apart from Southern Africa, if you look outside Lagos for example, it’s a city with a metro population of like 20 million people, there’s no farmland there. There’s just no farmland but there are 20 million people. If you look anywhere in Europe or the US you’ll find lots of farmland, but it turns out the industrialized farming in the west is so efficient Africa doesn’t really need a lot of farmland despite having massive land resources.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,396
@1,437,394 (D)
But they’re literally not using the land though, and they have massively growing populations that aren’t starving. It’s really amazing.
But they’re literally not using the land though, and they have massively growing populations that aren’t starving. It’s really amazing.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,397
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
So I was right, Africa has room for population growth.
You said that didn't make sense because of food imports. Clearly you can have unused and underutilized arable land and still need to import food.
So I was right, Africa has room for population growth.
You said that didn't make sense because of food imports. Clearly you can have unused and underutilized arable land and still need to import food.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,398
If you zoom in on the green area on google earth around Lagos or Kinshasa it’s mostly just trees.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,399
@1,437,397 (D)
My point is that your point about malnourishment doesn’t make sense. Japanese people wouldn’t starve, they have to import food anyway. If they imported more people they could maintain their current population without growing, right now they’re shrinking faster than they were during World War Two.
My point is that your point about malnourishment doesn’t make sense. Japanese people wouldn’t starve, they have to import food anyway. If they imported more people they could maintain their current population without growing, right now they’re shrinking faster than they were during World War Two.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,400
@1,437,398 (Mr. Black Boi)
https://www.irishtimes.com/world/africa/2025/02/17/widespread-ecological-damage-from-oil-spills-in-niger-delta-revealed-in-international-study/
https://www.irishtimes.com/world/africa/2025/02/17/widespread-ecological-damage-from-oil-spills-in-niger-delta-revealed-in-international-study/
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,401
@1,437,399 (Mr. Black Boi)
The Japanese would probably risk dying as a nation if the alternative was giving brown people citizenship.
You can dismiss that as millions of people being needlessly bigoted, but they are all real people who came to that conclusion through a lived experience that informed their belief. Disrupting their peaceful society with loud inconsiderate banter, increasing petty crime, and disrespecting social norms just isn't worth the marginal gain in GDP that will be overshadowed by exponential machine growth.
The Japanese would probably risk dying as a nation if the alternative was giving brown people citizenship.
You can dismiss that as millions of people being needlessly bigoted, but they are all real people who came to that conclusion through a lived experience that informed their belief. Disrupting their peaceful society with loud inconsiderate banter, increasing petty crime, and disrespecting social norms just isn't worth the marginal gain in GDP that will be overshadowed by exponential machine growth.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,402
@previous (D)
Yeah I can call them needlessly bigoted because they are. They’re literally making themselves poorer for no reason. That’s a racist argument it’s not an argument based on facts or statistics or anything other than a subjective cultural judgement.
Yeah I can call them needlessly bigoted because they are. They’re literally making themselves poorer for no reason. That’s a racist argument it’s not an argument based on facts or statistics or anything other than a subjective cultural judgement.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,403
Look: in the modern world you have two options if you’re a developed nation with a declining birth rate.
1. Don’t import foreigners and die quickly
2. Import foreigners and survive longer
Japan is just choosing the die fast route.
1. Don’t import foreigners and die quickly
2. Import foreigners and survive longer
Japan is just choosing the die fast route.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,404
And even the argument about crime is completely stupid. Imagine for a second that black people really were more predisposed to violent crime and that you really were less safe living around black people. Africa’s population is going up, the white majority counties have populations that would decrease without immigration. Clearly, most black people in Africa are never the victims of murder. You’re more likely to not be murdered than you are to be murdered no matter what country you come from, the vast majority of people in every country don’t get murdered, even in a war, most people live actually. It’s not rational to say you don’t want to accept a small increase in the probability you’ll die for a dramatic decrease in your wage. It’s worth it to accept a higher risk of death for higher pay. Death is always a risk that cannot be avoided entirely. Also, most people tend to be murdered by people they know in real life not by strangers. That’s why most murders in the US are black people killing black people and white people killing white people and interracial murders are much less common.
Mr. Black Boi quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,405
And you know what, if you want to completely ignore reason and make decisions based on unwise emotions like fear of people who look different from you, you’re going to make stupid decisions that won’t help you achieve your goals. Japan isn’t achieving anything right now. It’s a bad example.
Mr. Black Boi quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,408
And then the argument that you want Japan to be a safe place for children to grow up is out the window because children aren’t growing up there because Japanese people aren’t having children because they can’t afford to have children because they’re shooting themselves in the foot economically with this conservative idiocy.
Mr. Black Boi sextuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 39 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,409
And you know what, if the west goes the route of Japan, the west will be surpassed.
Mr. Black Boi septuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,410
Honestly racists are retarded. You people don’t have shit for brains.
Mr. Black Boi octuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,413
And what fucking culture do you want to protect from black people so bad? You don’t have a fucking culture.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,415
That’s something I’ve noticed about racists, you never say what your culture is, you just say, "protect our culture this," "protect our culture that," what’s the name of your fucking culture, do you even know? It doesn’t have a name because it doesn’t exist, because there is no culture, there’s just skin, and you don’t like people who were born different from you, because you’re a sack of shit who can’t be a decent human being.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,417
It’s also selfish to the point it looks ridiculous. If I was born in America can you really tell me I should be able to live my life here and be successful and do what I want to do because you feel like you can’t practice your culture when I’m minding my own business? What the fuck is wrong with you? You have your house, I have mine, I can practice whatever the hell I want, so can you, me existing doesn’t limit you somehow, you types just want control over other people because you’re tyrants.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,418
And if you don’t think I have a right to exist, how is it unfair if I decide that you don’t have a right to exist either? Because, I’m going to exist. I know I’m going to exist. I don’t know what you think you’re going to do, but I’m gonna keep on existing. I don’t give a fuck about you.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,421
@1,437,402 (Mr. Black Boi)
@1,437,403 (Mr. Black Boi)
They are the fourth largest economy and human labor is less relevant than ever.
You are still convinced of a theory you have no actual evidence for. There are more counter examples than examples.
@1,437,403 (Mr. Black Boi)
They are the fourth largest economy and human labor is less relevant than ever.
You are still convinced of a theory you have no actual evidence for. There are more counter examples than examples.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,422
Anonymous I replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,423
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
Hey fuck you, he's pointing out holes in your theory and you can't even refute him.
Hey fuck you, he's pointing out holes in your theory and you can't even refute him.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,424
We had a little chat, I know what you’re about, and I’ve made up my mind about you. I completely reject you, and I don’t care what you have to say anymore. Nothing you say now can change how I feel. Okay?
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,425
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,426
@1,437,422 (Mr. Black Boi)
@1,437,424 (Mr. Black Boi)
Whenever you are unable to defend your position you degenerate and start freaking out.
The whole line about Japan being racist and hurting themselves is moot if the premise that "more population is good" is completely wrong.
You can't just skip the part where you establish the premise is true, because this will be an issue in whatever next example you come up with.
@1,437,424 (Mr. Black Boi)
Whenever you are unable to defend your position you degenerate and start freaking out.
The whole line about Japan being racist and hurting themselves is moot if the premise that "more population is good" is completely wrong.
You can't just skip the part where you establish the premise is true, because this will be an issue in whatever next example you come up with.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,427
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,428
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,430
I’m not sure what’s more gay: two men on the internet sending love letters to each other or one guy opening up a second browser to tell himself "I love you" after getting ratted out for being a racist.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,431
@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
I've never denied being a racist, we've been over this.
Try establishing your premise before moving on to the next step, boy.
I've never denied being a racist, we've been over this.
Try establishing your premise before moving on to the next step, boy.
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,432
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 46 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,433
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,434
Mr. Black Boi replied with this 2 weeks ago, 36 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,435
Like honestly, a real man wouldn’t have this type of weak insecurity that you have to feel special because of your race, that’s the saddest most pathetic thing. I don’t think you’re a man. I’m sorry, I just don’t.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,437
@1,437,434 (D)
If you want to be a gay racist, be a gay racist, but put the cock back in your mouth so I don’t have to hear you speak again.
If you want to be a gay racist, be a gay racist, but put the cock back in your mouth so I don’t have to hear you speak again.
Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 54 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,438
You’re a fucking pussy. It’s pathetic.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,439
@1,437,435 (Mr. Black Boi)
"You're insecure, you're not a man"
These are the cheap inneffective tactics that feminists think will sway views in lieu of logic.
Did you ever bother to learn any logic? Last time it came up you started rambling about computational logic.
"You're insecure, you're not a man"
These are the cheap inneffective tactics that feminists think will sway views in lieu of logic.
Did you ever bother to learn any logic? Last time it came up you started rambling about computational logic.
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,440
@1,437,437 (Mr. Black Boi)
Literally always calling men gay.
I never hear it from conservatives, even though they officially are against it if you ask them.
Every woke lib does this though. I could say I see some merits in tarrif policy and the response would be that I must have sex with men.
Literally always calling men gay.
I never hear it from conservatives, even though they officially are against it if you ask them.
Every woke lib does this though. I could say I see some merits in tarrif policy and the response would be that I must have sex with men.
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,441
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 22 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,442
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,443
@1,437,440 (D)
> Every woke lib does this though.
People call you gay often?
Hold up, are you gay or do you like women?
> Every woke lib does this though.
People call you gay often?
Hold up, are you gay or do you like women?
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,444
@1,437,441 (X)
No, but I find it ironic that this is the go-to insult any time a lib/leftie/wokester is angry about some disagreement.
No, but I find it ironic that this is the go-to insult any time a lib/leftie/wokester is angry about some disagreement.
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 45 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,445
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 28 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,446
@1,437,443 (X)
Open up any political thread and this is how they talk.
It can be anyone disagreeing with anything the libs do.
Open up any political thread and this is how they talk.
It can be anyone disagreeing with anything the libs do.
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 15 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,447
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,448
Because I’ll tell you what I love women, I think women are smart, beautiful, loving people.
Anonymous X double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,449
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 41 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,450
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,451
Anonymous X double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 21 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,452
…was your mom smart?
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 16 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,453
@1,437,449 (X)
If I open a random political thread and the libs are calling everyone gay they aren't questioning my sexuality, are they?
It's whoever bothered to post or whoever got mention from the conservative side.
If I open a random political thread and the libs are calling everyone gay they aren't questioning my sexuality, are they?
It's whoever bothered to post or whoever got mention from the conservative side.
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,454
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,455
@1,437,451 (X)
There's exceptions to every rule.
@1,437,452 (X)
Smart for a woman. Just as irrational as the rest.
There's exceptions to every rule.
@1,437,452 (X)
Smart for a woman. Just as irrational as the rest.
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 19 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,456
Anonymous X double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 42 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,457
Yeah, anyway, my mom was smart, and I know a lot of smart women in my family, so uh, yeah.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,458
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 33 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,459
Anonymous X double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,460
Having to backhand compliment your own mom is crazy though. Must be sad.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 13 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,461
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 25 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,462
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,463
@previous (D)
There were two parts to what I said and you asked me if that’s the part that I meant and I said no.
I don’t know if your little narcissistic brain can comprehend what that implies, but I’ll let you not figure it out on your own because it’s kind of funny to watch.
There were two parts to what I said and you asked me if that’s the part that I meant and I said no.
I don’t know if your little narcissistic brain can comprehend what that implies, but I’ll let you not figure it out on your own because it’s kind of funny to watch.
Anonymous X double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,464
Technically I didn’t even say it, you said it yourself about your own mother.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 30 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,465
@1,437,460 (X)
It's not a backhanded compliment, it makes no sense to judge a woman by a man's standard. That's why we have women's leagues for sports.
If a woman win's gold in her category, is it backhanded to say she won the women's? Of course not, amateur high school boys routinely do better than the best women in a field.
You have some weird ideologically corruption that's convinced you that to love or respect a woman you have to judge her by a man's standards.
It's not a backhanded compliment, it makes no sense to judge a woman by a man's standard. That's why we have women's leagues for sports.
If a woman win's gold in her category, is it backhanded to say she won the women's? Of course not, amateur high school boys routinely do better than the best women in a field.
You have some weird ideologically corruption that's convinced you that to love or respect a woman you have to judge her by a man's standards.
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 48 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,466
@previous (D)
Yeah, I have this weird ideological corruption called loving my parents because they’re my parents. Totally weird bro.
Yeah, I have this weird ideological corruption called loving my parents because they’re my parents. Totally weird bro.
Anonymous X double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,467
Like… dude, you think I’m weird? You think I’m weird. Oh man… this is bad lol
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,468
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 51 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,469
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,470
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,471
I wonder if you came from some type of Nazi breeding cult where they kept the women locked up like barn animals and that’s how you grew up thinking this way.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,472
@previous (X)
So you won't define love?
Your side always avoids simple questions. Do you think it's worth thinking about, the fact that one side can and one side can't?
So you won't define love?
Your side always avoids simple questions. Do you think it's worth thinking about, the fact that one side can and one side can't?
Anonymous X replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,474
Anyway, no doubt you’re white now. If I said that about my mother, I’d be white too.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,477
Anonymous Z-1 joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,506
@1,437,452 (X)
> …was your mom smart?
@1,437,455 (D)
> There's exceptions to every rule.
>
>
> Smart for a woman. Just as irrational as the rest.
@1,437,465 (D)
> It's not a backhanded compliment, it makes no sense to judge a woman by a man's standard. That's why we have women's leagues for sports.
>
> If a woman win's gold in her category, is it backhanded to say she won the women's? Of course not, amateur high school boys routinely do better than the best women in a field.
>
> You have some weird ideologically corruption that's convinced you that to love or respect a woman you have to judge her by a man's standards.
@1,437,470 (D)
> I'm curious how you define "love", but you usually avoid clarifying anything.
This is what mental illness looks like.
> …was your mom smart?
@1,437,455 (D)
> There's exceptions to every rule.
>
>
> Smart for a woman. Just as irrational as the rest.
@1,437,465 (D)
> It's not a backhanded compliment, it makes no sense to judge a woman by a man's standard. That's why we have women's leagues for sports.
>
> If a woman win's gold in her category, is it backhanded to say she won the women's? Of course not, amateur high school boys routinely do better than the best women in a field.
>
> You have some weird ideologically corruption that's convinced you that to love or respect a woman you have to judge her by a man's standards.
@1,437,470 (D)
> I'm curious how you define "love", but you usually avoid clarifying anything.
This is what mental illness looks like.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,513
Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,526
@previous (D)
Between you and Hitler, I think I’d rather talk to Hitler, because at least Hitler wasn’t an autist.
Between you and Hitler, I think I’d rather talk to Hitler, because at least Hitler wasn’t an autist.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 week ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,532
@previous (Z-2)
Knowing what words mean isn't autistic.
Using words without knowing what they mean is idiotic.
Knowing what words mean isn't autistic.
Using words without knowing what they mean is idiotic.
习近平 joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,437,822
@previous (D)> Knowing what words mean isn't autistic.
>
> Using words without knowing what they mean is idiotic.
https://youtu.be/VDDX2m_vd-g