Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago#134,976
Wouldn’t it be hilarious if the president of the United States ran on anti immigration but he was also an anti black racist who had sympathies for white South African beneficiaries of Apartheid so he offered to import migrants from South Africa as long as they’re white to save them from a non-existent white genocide while coincidently anti foreigner sentiment in South Africa was brewing among blacks against illegal immigration?
That would be so funny and random and ironic and would never happen IRL.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 25 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,435,493
@previous (C)
Thousands of years, possibly millions even; though not really sure how youd count it because it only appears as a country grows old, corrupt, and feeble before getting violently set back to the minimum for a time as the country dies or gets reborn.
Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,435,515
@1,435,493 (D)
I think one of the problems with the concept of multiculturalism is it’s not objective whether two people are part of the same culture or not. For example, people might say America is multicultural because we have black people and white people and China isn’t because they just have Chinese people. But all the black people and white people in America all speak English, but in China, some people speak Mandarin, some people speak Cantonese, some people speak Shanghainese, etc. So whether you say a place is diverse or isn’t diverse is entirely dependent on whatever you subjectively care about. Even in homogenous countries like China where 90% of the population is Han Chinese, that’s ignoring how many different subgroups of Han there are. Genetic diversity is something that is more objective, but genetic diversity doesn’t map onto the way people are socially categorized. For example, sub Saharan Africans have a million more genetic variants than everybody else outside of Africa, so it would make more sense to classify everyone outside of Africa as one race and Africans as multiple races than to classify Europeans and Asians as two separate races and Africans as one race. It’s all a bunch of nonsense, people are just people, it’s whatever.
Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,435,518
Then even in white countries like the British Isles for example, the idea that there wasn’t diversity in the past is a modern invention. They used to speak English in England, Welsh in Wales, Irish in Ireland, etc. Homogeneity is made up by conquerors to try and convince everybody that they’re the same so they’re more controllable even if they’re really not.