Topic: lots of famous people got trans kids

boof started this discussion 3 weeks ago #134,885

sooner or later, I check who

https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query=famous+people+who+have+trans+kids&cat=web&pl=opensearch&language=english

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,434,855

I read some shit on BuzzFeed and I noticed that it all happened in like 2015-2022

boof (OP) replied with this 3 weeks ago, 49 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,434,861

I found Eddy Murphy in one of the lists, and that amuses me because of his arrest some years ago when driving with a prostitute who was a dude dressed as a lady.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 18 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,434,944

@previous (boof)

> I found Eddy Murphy in one of the lists, and that amuses me because of his arrest some years ago when driving with a prostitute who was a dude dressed as a lady.

It was an accident. He just happened to be driving and “she” needed a ride. And being a multimillionaire movie star and comedian he casually provided rides to prostitutes.

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,294

A small percentage of humanity are considered celebrities, and I'm assuming it's roughly 1:5 who have trans kids maybe even only 1:8, and if it feels higher it would most likely be the visibility of those trans kids or the visibility of the fact they are trans, and that visibility would be socially disproportionate due to the inherent nature of celebrity visibility.

So it's it lots? Or is it like most things in this area where there's just a lot of hullabaloo about a small percentage of humanity who are trans?

boof (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,386

like, you ever see a man buy nuts? it doesn't take many to notice that it's a lot of nuts!

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,415

@1,435,294 (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

> I'm assuming it's roughly 1:5 who have trans kids maybe even only 1:8,

You live in a world where 12.5% prevalence feels ridiculously low?

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 2 weeks ago, 15 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,512

@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
> and if it feels higher it would most likely be the visibility of those trans kids or the visibility of the fact they are trans, and that visibility would be socially disproportionate due to the inherent nature of celebrity visibility.

12.5% of whatever % of humanity is celebrities, feels ridiculous to make a hullabaloo about, yes.

(Edited 34 seconds later.)

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,547

@previous (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

So in your essentially random poll of around 300,000 people. You think it's reasonable to suppose 12.5-20% of their children will be trans.

Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,548

You all sure are interested in transgenderism.

Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,549

Now famous people are’t more likely to be trans, but if they were, then you’d have to start wondering if somehow being trans makes you more successful than average, which it doesn’t. So yeah. That’s my take.

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,558

@1,435,547 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
You formed your observations about celebrities with trans children from BuzzFeed observations, and you think my opinion is weird?

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 weeks ago, 52 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,559

@previous (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

Having the opinion that 1 in 8 people being trans is a ridiculously low number is way weirder than some commentary on a BuzzFeed article

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,612

I wouldn't want my kids to be trans but I'd rather them be trans than dead.

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 2 weeks ago, 11 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,643

@1,435,559 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
Check your reading comprehension, when did I say it was "ridiculously low"? In any of my posts? I just don't think it's something to make such a hullabaloo about.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,644

@previous (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)
Do YOU still have your penis or?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 18 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,646

@previous (G)
He acts like one of the 41kin that is too cowardly take the final step and is bitter at his weakness.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,647

@previous (H)

> He acts like one of the 41kin that is too cowardly take the final step and is bitter at his weakness.

No clue what gender he is into. IF a man then his partner will just have to enjoy a larger than regular clitoris.

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,663

@1,435,643 (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

Check your reading comprehension, when did I say it was "weird"? But getting back to the point, you live in a world where 20% of people being trans feels like a reasonable number.

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,713

@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
1 in 5? Yeah, I don't see why there would be a problem with that. I don't think 1 in 5 people are trans though, but I do think maybe 1 in 5 kids of celebrities might be trans? Idk, I have no real strong feelings about my ratio just guessing, but I wonder what you think a "reasonable" amount of trans people is?

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,714

@1,435,663 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
And again, I think my reading comprehension is fine, I literally never said you thought it was "weird".

Do you have strong feelings about trans people existing in some quantifiable way?

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,749

@1,435,713 (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

Like 0.5-1%

@previous (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

I think you're very defensive about being called out for a retarded opinion

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,766

@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
So probably the amount that actually exist vs the proportion of American media that focuses on them thanks.

I don't know what's retarded about an opinion that one in 5 people could be trans and that I'd have no problem with it.

boof (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,771

do we know what percent of trans had what the jargon calls body dysmorphia suffering?

boof (OP) double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,773

@1,435,749 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
I was curious about comparing to what seems fairly common in the world, type 1 diabetes. That's only 0.1% prevalence. That puts trans as 5 to 10 times as prevalent as type 1 diabetes.

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,777

@previous (boof)

I googled it and my thought of 0.5-1% is actually pretty accurate

@1,435,766 (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

It's not your fault, it's the world you live in.

boof (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,785

@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
nice figuring! yep, I was surprised that the type 1 diabetes, which seems common enough, was so relatively low

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Lady Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,798

@1,435,777 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
Would you have a problem with it if the percentage was higher than currently recorded?

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 26 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,799

@previous (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)
If everybody is trans, nobody is trans.

Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,904

@1,435,798 (Lady Dead !Pool..v42s)

Would you have a problem with it if the moon was made of green cheese?

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,962

@1,435,777 (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
I'm surprised it isn't higher considering the amount of chemicals and hormones in the ultraprocessed slop known as American food.

Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,435,964

@previous (K)
No, no, no. The chemicals don’t turn you trans, they turn you into a school shooter.

Minichan