Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 weeks ago#134,721
This isn’t the way it works, but what’s intuitive to me is it would make rational sense if the Asians were the least homophonic race followed by native Americans, and then blacks, followed by whites, and then Arabs as the most homophonic race. Because of biology. Asians have the least ass hair, Arabs have the most.
> This isn’t the way it works, but what’s intuitive to me is it would make rational sense if the Asians were the least homophonic race followed by native Americans, and then blacks, followed by whites, and then Arabs as the most homophonic race. Because of biology. Asians have the least ass hair, Arabs have the most.
Thank you for being the brave intellectual who probes the great questions of our time. And, apparently, men’s assholes.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,433,554
Arabs are an ethnic group.
Race is a social construct lumping people by their general phenotypic profile: black, white, Asian, etc. There is no agreed classification of races because it is a social construct that has changed with time.
And ethnic groups are social constructs based around language and culture: German, Italian, Finn, Slav, Arab, etc. These too are not fixed and ethnicities can die and be born.
This is called an ethno-genesis, when a group begins to identify as a single identifiable group. Like Italian identity, or German, which only date to the medieval period.