Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago#13,462
I'm amazed!
Wow. That's is simply WOW! When I first saw your pictures I wanted to know where they were. I thought they were from a website. I'm was very impressed that you were the creator of the files. Definitely keep up the good work! :)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later[^][v]#241,343
PLEASE FIX
First, I am a BIG FAN, and you make beautiful pictures!! I just want to discuss one in particular. Please, before you get mad and blow me off, hear my out.
Recently I saw the main image under fellatio. I find the picture to be distasteful because it reaffirms negative sterotypes of permiscuity in african american females. From the image, it can be gathered that she is married (see the ring), but she is performing fellatio on an unmarried white man (lack of ring). Safe to conclude he is not her husband. Why not have a same race picture?? All other images on that page are of people of the same race. If it is not meant to be damaging, how come the image could not have been of a white woman on a black man?? Many white people would be offended, as I and other african americans find this image offending. I don't know how to edit it, I tried, but it didn't work (sorry), but PLEASE use the image from the oral sex page that shows a woman giving head to a man while in a 69.
Many people may not understand why it is offensive, so let me explain why. It depicts the stereotype of the "black, promiscuous, subserviant" female who "worships" the phallus of her white "master/king/overseer". This is no different than having an article about chicken and watermelon that states "this is the primary food source for black americans". It is just as much a stereotype. This stereotype has been one perpetuated by the white supremacist power structure since slave days in this country. Now, I in no way believe that you, the illustrator, intended this message, but this faux pas will definitely reaffirm the stereotype in the conscious/unconscious mind of the general public. As a lover of wikipedia, I believe it ALSO belongs to me, and I prefer that we use images that would not result in the defamation of any group of people, especially one that poses significant sensitivity in today's "still-evolving" racial climate.
It is possible that you may not understand, and may not see it as a big deal, but it would still be hurtful to many people. I don't ask that you delete it, I just ask that you use the other image or at least modify it. It would mean a great deal to myself and other african americans. Thanks.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#241,346
Fisting illustration
Hi. I see that you made many illustrations of quality about sexuality. I saw that you made one of a woman fisting herself but I realized that we didn't have any illustration of somebody fisting someone else. Would you be ready to make one? Regards.
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#241,349
Seed,
I recall a page that had a woman drinking what looked like a tall glass of semen, or some kind of container, as if it were milk and she was concerned about her bone structure. What was the name of this page, and is there any place where I can find a complete gallery of your works, in an organized format?
Thank you in advance,
~Anon.
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
!jEsTERxAng joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 50 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#241,351
Sup Squared.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^][v]#241,354
Snowballing (sexual practice) has recently had several sources added to it to allow it to satisfy notability requirements. However, it is now clear from external material that the primary use of the term "snowballing" is when semen is swapped between the mouth of someone performing fellatio and the male donating the sperm. Accordingly, I have removed your image from the page, as it is misleading about the primary use of the term. It would be appropriate for a paragraph on the modified form of snowballing used in pornographic films, but as yet, I can't find an external source to justify the inclusion of that material. In any case, we need another image for the page, of a woman passing semen into a man's mouth, which should go at the top of the page, to be followed by your other image if a source can be found for the material it would be depicting. I was hoping you'd do the new picture, as your last one was pretty good, despite the fact that the paragraph it was drawn for needed to be cut.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#241,357
hi seedfeeder
first of all you are a very talented artist and i wish i had your skills, second of all, would you be willing to recreate this image it is a depiction of over the edge (of the bed) position for deepthroat, and also as a higher priority an image for Bareback (sex) which is totally lacking in illustration. i think the bukkake image is too artistic and should be less blurry so it can be more clinical and descriptive, perhaps even showing the men itself in a comparison shot to show what it really looks like and how it had to be depicted in porn due to japanese law, furthermore the snowballing image should probably be of a man and a woman or at least show the origen of the semen, i think passing it between each other although it happens isn't the best way of showing it since the main act should show them kissing with both the man/woman or women having semen in their mouths.
also i felt bad that the street prostitution image was in disuse so i added it to street prostitution keep up the good work!
p.s. you have an awesome screename, its pretty hot actually.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#241,360
Is it possible to know how You did these illustrations - which are the hottest, to me? Which software did You use etc. I know this is asking too much, but if You could ever write a kind of tutorial, with some hints, if You used a particular tool to make Your work easier, anything?! Thank You... ;)
hamfist !!snnYcROO9 joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#241,391
Uhhhhh
neat
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 10 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#241,595
Oh jesus, wtf.
This is from wikipedia?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#241,598
Is it possible that you could make a picture for Point of view pornography? I have seen your work at Mammary intercourse and Gokkun and I believe that any picture you create could greatly improve the article. Thanks in advance.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#241,601
> PLEASE FIX > > First, I am a BIG FAN, and you make beautiful pictures!! I just want to discuss one in particular. Please, before you get mad and blow me off, hear my out. > > Recently I saw the main image under fellatio. I find the picture to be distasteful because it reaffirms negative sterotypes of permiscuity in african american females. From the image, it can be gathered that she is married (see the ring), but she is performing fellatio on an unmarried white man (lack of ring). Safe to conclude he is not her husband. Why not have a same race picture?? All other images on that page are of people of the same race. If it is not meant to be damaging, how come the image could not have been of a white woman on a black man?? Many white people would be offended, as I and other african americans find this image offending. I don't know how to edit it, I tried, but it didn't work (sorry), but PLEASE use the image from the oral sex page that shows a woman giving head to a man while in a 69. > > Many people may not understand why it is offensive, so let me explain why. It depicts the stereotype of the "black, promiscuous, subserviant" female who "worships" the phallus of her white "master/king/overseer". This is no different than having an article about chicken and watermelon that states "this is the primary food source for black americans". It is just as much a stereotype. This stereotype has been one perpetuated by the white supremacist power structure since slave days in this country. Now, I in no way believe that you, the illustrator, intended this message, but this faux pas will definitely reaffirm the stereotype in the conscious/unconscious mind of the general public. As a lover of wikipedia, I believe it ALSO belongs to me, and I prefer that we use images that would not result in the defamation of any group of people, especially one that poses significant sensitivity in today's "still-evolving" racial climate. > > It is possible that you may not understand, and may not see it as a big deal, but it would still be hurtful to many people. I don't ask that you delete it, I just ask that you use the other image or at least modify it. It would mean a great deal to myself and other african americans. Thanks.
I would think there are many opinions of any interracial image, and how one is affected emotionally (either positively or negatively) by what they see. Many things shape and resolve our opinions. Family, friends, religious belief, community, history, socioeconomic and level of education are all major components of our perception of the world we live in. They shape who we are, and the morals that guide us. Each person will see something different, and thus react in significantly different ways. I can still respect the opinion of others; though my opinion may differ. I do not perceive the image in a negative way. I see a woman with an engagement ring; not a wedding band. I see two individuals in an intimate situation in which both persons are reciprocating (giving and receiving) pleasure simultaneously. Thus; I do not see the women as subservient to the man. Is it possible and reasonable to interpret the image as that of a loving couple expressing physical love for one another? Perhaps a promise of marriage bonds these two individuals, and a wondrous future of shared dreams, family, and children await them. Something to ponder.
Seedfeeder4life !9Gip574ZhQ (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 8 months later, 8 years after the original post[^][v]#1,072,515
SEEDFEEDER BUMP
Syntax joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 10 hours later, 8 years after the original post[^][v]#1,072,598
Dis thraad make the thy AND I feel bad about being so old and sexually unwanted.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 hours later, 8 years after the original post[^][v]#1,072,617