Topic: You know what would be crazy

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #134,612

What if in the 2026 midterms, the democrats take the house and the senate, a democrat wins the presidency in 2028, then in 2029 the AfD wins in Germany, Germany starts the forth reich, and the USA goes full socialist?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 23 minutes later[^] [v] #1,432,789

If they "take the House and the Senate" as they say together with the Presidency aren't the going to pass an abortion law as they promised?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,797

@previous (B)
If the AfD wins aren’t they going to bring the draft back?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,860

The supreme court just voided the voting rights act and allowed racial gerrymandering. The democrats are going to lose in the midterms.

California will be getting 2 republicans to chose between for the election too.

TheDarkChad joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,861

@previous (D)
You do realize this also means that democratic states can also rig their elections too, right?

TheDarkChad double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,863

California has already done this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_California_Proposition_50

Anonymous D replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,864

@previous (TheDarkChad)
How did California take advantage of a court ruling that came out this past week all the way back in November? lol

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,865

@previous (D)
I didn’t say that they took advantage of the current court ruling. My point is that elections are managed at the state level so anything that makes it easier for republicans to rig elections equally makes it easier for democrats to rig elections, so this doesn’t necessarily help republicans.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,867

It could actually hurt them since voters could see this as a desperate move by republicans.

Anonymous D replied with this 1 month ago, 19 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,872

@1,432,865 (TheDarkChad)
@previous (TheDarkChad)
It benefits Republicans much more than Democrats. Go watch any video analyzing how this affects the midterms.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,873

@previous (D)
The democrats have an incentive to say it benefits republicans because that will inspire more people to vote democrat, and the republicans have an incentive to say it benefits republicans because they’re republicans and republicans want republicans to win.

(Edited 16 seconds later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,875

@previous (TheDarkChad)
And the analysts want to make the right prediction to maintain their reputation.

Analysts on all sides are saying it benefits Republicans.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 month ago, 21 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,876

Now it always can benefit your opponent if your opponent fights dirty, until you also decide to fight dirty. For example, in World War Two, the Nazis and Japanese thought they were so clever for their brutality until the allies started firebombing axis cities and whatnot.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,896

*Chirp*

Minichan