Minichan

Topic: Supreme Court strikes doen mich of the voting rights act! Big blow to black theft via government

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 hours ago #134,557

States can now cut theough parasite demographics when creating congressional districts.

The case was brought by Louisiana, but this will have huge consequences for the midterms.

Looks like the darkies will actually have to start working!

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 hours ago, 17 minutes later[^] [v] #1,432,312

When California gets their Republican governor he's going to expell the Oakland boys to Georgia.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 9 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,313

This is actually really good news for African-Americans because it will motivate them to move to a non-white country where they are no longer oppressed and get to flourish under communism!

TheDarkChad joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 8 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,314

@OP

> Supreme Court strikes doen mich of the voting rights act! Big blow to black theft via government

Why is it you people are always mental retards who can’t write in your own native language?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 4 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,318

@previous (TheDarkChad)
Die deutsche sprache wird in den USA bald wieder aufleben.

TheDarkChad replied with this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,321

@previous (A)
What a cringelord.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 2 hours ago, 47 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,322

Can you say something that doesn’t sound gay next time?

Anonymous B replied with this 2 hours ago, 14 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,323

@1,432,314 (TheDarkChad)

> you people

Oh look, another "anti-racist" who practices the very bigotry he pretends to be against.

Anonymous B double-posted this 2 hours ago, 27 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,324

@1,432,322 (TheDarkChad)

> Can you say something that doesn’t sound gay next time?

Oh look, another "progressive" that calls everyone who disagrees with him gay.

TheDarkChad replied with this 2 hours ago, 25 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,325

@1,432,323 (B)
I can’t be racist against white people, I am white. So shut up redneck.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 24 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,326

@1,432,323 (B)
@1,432,324 (B)

Don't bother, he doesn't know the meaning of good faith discussion

Anonymous B replied with this 2 hours ago, 40 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,327

@1,432,325 (TheDarkChad)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule

TheDarkChad replied with this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,329

@previous (B)
"Before the rule was outlawed by the Supreme Court in the Loving v. Virginia decision of 1967, it was used to prevent interracial marriages and in general to deny rights and equal opportunities and uphold white supremacy."

So it was outlawed 40 years before I was born. Neat.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 2 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,330

It’s crazy how sensitive you people are. You love to dish it but you can’t take it without crying. Maybe it is true that blacks have thicker skin. You people bleed too easily.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 hours ago, 3 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,332

@1,432,329 (TheDarkChad)
The Voting Rights Act was around for 60 years

¯\_( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)_/¯

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 34 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,334

@1,432,330 (TheDarkChad)
Who's crying? Trump keeps winning, we are getting our country back.

TheDarkChad replied with this 2 hours ago, 3 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,338

@previous (A)
From what?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 51 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,339

@previous (TheDarkChad)
blacks and pale-prius-pilots

(Edited 8 seconds later.)

TheDarkChad replied with this 2 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,340

Trump is 79 years old

https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

A 79 year old American male has a 5.4768% probability of dying within the next year and a life expectancy of 8.64 years. He’s not going to be alive when I turn 30.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,341

That’s if his heath was average, but it’s not, it’s below average, I mean, just look at him, he’s fat, he’s got swollen ankles, his hands are always bruised, etc.

TheDarkChad triple-posted this 2 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,342

On the other hand, a 20 year old American male has 0.1301% chance of dying within the next year and a life expectancy of 55.63 years.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 13 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,343

@1,432,340 (TheDarkChad)
Did you know that the average life expectancy of a white male in the us is 78.4 years, but for a black man is just 74 years?

I guess my point is you should keep huffing menthols.

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

TheDarkChad replied with this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,345

@previous (A)
You keep forgetting that I’m a black male and a white male. It also completely doesn’t matter because if I can expect to live more than 50 years longer, there will be medical advances in the next 50 years.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 1 hour ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,347

For example: by then they might have 3D printed organs. Adult humans still have stem cells in their spinal fluid and it’s possible to use stem cells to grow any other type of cell. The main barrier is just replicating the structure of human organs.

https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/06/blood-vessels-3d-printed-heart-organs

https://seas.harvard.edu/news/3d-printed-blood-vessels-bring-artificial-organs-closer-reality

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,352

@1,432,345 (TheDarkChad)
You can't be both.

White skin, blue eyes, blonde hair, straight hair, the ability to drink milk as an adult, and quick brain activity are all recessive traits.

A little bit of black DNA and all those finely tuned genes are screwed.

Try replacing 5% of Lonux code with BSD code randomly. Do you think it will run well?

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,354

@previous (A)
Black people and white people have almost exactly the same DNA. Humans have 3 billion base pairs and only about 3 million base pairs vary, which is 0.1%. We’re all 99.9% genetically identical to each other.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,355

@previous (TheDarkChad)
We are also about 95% genetically related to all mammals, that doesnt mean anybody should start fucking ground squirrels.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,356

@previous (D)
What’s your point? If you can’t tell the difference between 5% and 0.1%, you must have failed math.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,357

@1,432,354 (TheDarkChad)
@1,432,355 (D)
Exactly this.

In fact humans and cucumbers share 75% of their DNA!

Does anyone think a woman is going to have a viable baby with a cucumber?? lol

% it shares is basically meaningless because a lot of it is just coding for energy production, protein synthesis, cell structure, DNA repair, and basic metabolism.

This nigger has already had this explained multiple times but thinks ignoring it makes him right.

The tiny, tiny changes in DNA between mammal species, or different tribes of humans has a very dramatic impact on the organism.

If it really worked the way Dark thought, then humans would only be 25% different than a cucumber and 5% different than a mouse.

(Edited 37 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,359

@1,432,356 (TheDarkChad)
If you can't grasp that humans are more than 25% different than a cucumber, and more than 5% different than a mouse, then you will never understand.

That .1% has an exponential impact, and makes whites 3x smarter than a black at minimum.

(Edited 19 seconds later.)

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 11 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,360

You also can’t really compare DNA to operating systems. DNA has 4 nucleotide bases, binary only has two states 1 and 0. If human DNA has 3 billion base pairs, that means can store 3 * 4^(10^9) possible states. Ubuntu Desktop is roughly 4GB, which would mean there are 4 * 2^(10^9). Human DNA is a lot more complex than an operating system.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 1 hour ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,361

@1,432,359 (A)

> If you can't grasp that humans are more than 25% different than a cucumber, and more than 5% different than a mouse, then you will never understand.
>
> That .1% has an exponential impact, and makes whites 3x smarter than a black at minimum.

I’m not convinced you’re 3x smarter than a cucumber to tell you the truth.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,362

@1,432,360 (TheDarkChad)

So you don't understand that means each base pair contains more info than an operating system?

Thus 1% of DNA is a bigger change than 1% difference in computer code?

LOL you are literally making our point for us. The differences are more, not less, for DNA.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,363

That’s also a stupid thing to say because intelligence is a dimensionless metric, you can’t say someone is n times smarter than another person.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,364

@1,432,361 (TheDarkChad)
You just explained that DNA is more complex (thus each % is a bigger change) than computer code.

Yet you somehow came to the conclusion that it means theres less of a diffference LOL.

You are such an idiot, you do this all the time, you are so desperate to drop some factoid that you argue against your own claim 😂

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,365

@1,432,362 (A)
Doesn’t that also mean 99.9% similarity in a base 4 sequence is more significant than 99.9% similarity in a base 2 sequence?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 7 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,366

@1,432,363 (TheDarkChad)
Yes, you can actually.

You can measure how long it takes someone to learn a new skill. You can also measure how many mistakes they make.

For example, if you show that DNA is MORE complex, and think that it means there's LESS of a difference then you are showing — by an injective metric — that your cognitive abilities are impaired

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,367

@1,432,364 (A)
I feel like you’re not really thinking this through mathematically.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,368

@1,432,365 (TheDarkChad)

No, dumbass, because we are not 75% the same as a cucumber.

It's the little changes that have exponential impacts that make a species entirely different.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 hour ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,369

@1,432,367 (TheDarkChad)
So do you think a human and a cucumber are 75% the same?

Because that's the logically consistent conclusion if you think blacks and whites are 99% the same.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,370

@1,432,368 (A)
Humans and cucumbers are both eukaryotes, there’s more overlap in our function at a cellular level than you would think. We both have mitochondria for example.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,371

@previous (TheDarkChad)
So do you think cucumbers are 75% the same phenotypically, because they are 75% the same genotypically?

The answer is No, which is why you won't answer plainly.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,372

@1,432,369 (A)
Have you ever considered that maybe the DNA proves your intuition about similarity between organisms is incorrect?

TheDarkChad double-posted this 1 hour ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,373

@1,432,371 (A)
Just because two things look different doesn’t mean that they are different.

TheDarkChad triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,375

If you looked at what’s happening on a cellular level inside the cells of a cucumber and inside the cells of a human, you would notice a lot of similar organelles. Not all the same obviously, but we are technically related to cucumbers.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,376

@1,432,372 (TheDarkChad)
@1,432,373 (TheDarkChad)

You know that is absurd, which is why you are too cowardly to give a straightforward answer.

No one thinks that humans and cucumbers are 75% the same.

That 25% difference in genotype creates a species that has a difference (in appearance, behavior, and impact on the world) that is thousands of times different.

You are so prideful you will never admit when you are wrong.

Go fuck a cucumber if you think the difference isn't that big

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,377

@1,432,375 (TheDarkChad)
I don't want to live in a society full of ugly idiots who cause massive economic destruction just because "on the cellular level" 🤓☝️ it looks the same.

Use some common sense.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,378

Also the comment about differences in intelligence between blacks and whites being a 3x difference doesn’t make sense. Humans have brains that are 3x larger than chimpanzees. It wouldn’t make sense to say that whites are 3x smarter than blacks, when blacks and whites have brains that are the same size. Human brain size is very strongly correlated to height. When certain human populations have differences in brain size it always correlates directly with how tall they are. I think it’s more likely that all humans, black people and white people, are only about 3x smarter than a chimpanzee.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 1 hour ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,379

@1,432,376 (A)

> You are so prideful you will never admit when you are wrong.

I’m not the one denouncing genetics on the basis of "I feel like I’m superior to everybody else therefore I am."

TheDarkChad triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,380

Like what even is your argument based on? I’m citing numbers and genetics and you’re over here talking about cucumbers like you can compare the differences between a cucumber and a white person to a black person and a white person. You aren’t even trying to seem reasonable.

TheDarkChad quadruple-posted this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,381

@1,432,377 (A)

> I don't want to live in a society full of ugly idiots who cause massive economic destruction just because "on the cellular level" 🤓☝️ it looks the same.

Why are you mocking me if what I’m saying is factually correct? Humans and cucumbers share DNA because we share a lot of the same cellular functions because we’re both eukaryotes. That’s just a scientific fact.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,382

Achondroplasia (dwarfism) is different by a *single* nucleotide.

Imagine thinking that a dwarf is 99.999% the same because that negligible genotypically. Yet in reality we know that it is a serious lifelong disability that will make life very hard.

Very small changes have very big impacts. And the difference between whites and blacks is far greater than one nucleotide. It should not be hard to understand that the difference, then, can be far greater than between a dwarf and non-dwarf of the same race.

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,383

You asked me why tf a cucumber and a human share so much DNA, I told you why. It isn’t because the difference matters so much more than the similarity, that’s not how it works. There’s just more similarity than you realize because a lot of biological functions are microscopic and you can’t see those.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,384

@1,432,381 (TheDarkChad)
Because you are too stupid to know the difference between the % shared genotypically and the % shared phenotypically.

A 1% change in genotype can have performance changes in phenotype by 1000%.

Yet you keep ignoring that and acting like genotype is all there is.

Anonymous D replied with this 1 hour ago, 4 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,385

@1,432,356 (TheDarkChad)
We should rape nigguhs!

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,386

@1,432,382 (A)
Just because two people are different sizes doesn’t mean they’re massively biologically different. Someone who’s 3 feet tall still has a four chambered heart just like me, they still have two eyes, just like me. There are way more similarities than differences, you’re just biased towards differences over similarities for ideological reasons.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,387

@1,432,383 (TheDarkChad)
You can keep pretending I am denying the % change in genotype, just like you spent 3 hours acting like I disagreed about multiplicative inversion.

But I'm not playing this time. We don't disagree on % change in genotype, we disagree on % change in phenotype. This isn't complicated, and I'm not going to repeat this for hours while you ignore it and strawman the argument.

Learn to overcome pride nigger.

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

TheDarkChad replied with this 1 hour ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,388

You know how easy it is to list similarities between black people and white people?

Four chambered heart, two eyes, one tongue, five fingers on each hand, two arms, two legs, two nipples, five toes on each foot, two legs, two lungs, one liver, two kidneys, one spleen, one stomach, two nostrils, two knees, two elbows, and so on and so on.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 1 hour ago, 49 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,389

We’re 99.9% genetically similar, because we actually biologically are 99.9% similar on a structural level, microscopic and macroscopic.

TheDarkChad triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,390

@1,432,387 (A)

> Learn to overcome pride nigger.

As if you’re not the one who’s arguing you’re better for no reason while rejecting genetics.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 53 minutes ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,393

@1,432,387 (A)
I say:
> We don't disagree on % change in genotype, we disagree on % change in phenotype.

And then nigger says:
@previous (TheDarkChad)

> As if you’re not the one who’s arguing you’re better for no reason while rejecting genetics.

This is always his strategy. Even if you explicitly lay out what your argument is and is not, he will just insist you are saying the exact opposite so he has some strawman to argue against.

Literally every single thread. He did this for 3 hours, ignoring when I said over and over I already agreed on multiplicative inversion, and now he will keep pretending I am disagreeing on genotypical difference no matter how many times I spell it out.

You can't fix stupid, and people who are slaves to their pride are even more stuck in their ways than the idiots.

This is more of an addendum to the readers, I have no confidence in nigger to ever get better. Most people know how embarassing it is to keep strawmanning when the clarification has been laid out multiple times.

TheDarkChad replied with this 52 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,394

@previous (A)
Your entire argument is based off of "black people and white people look different therefore they are different and genetics doesn’t matter." It’s the most low IQ argument ever. It’s like if you were shouting about how a red house and a blue house have nothing in common. You’re fucking retarded.

(Edited 47 seconds later.)

TheDarkChad replied with this 49 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,396

On the other hand my arguement is black people are human cuz i says it be.

Learn to think proppa and construct basic logics like me, whyte dog.

TheDarkChad replied with this 48 minutes ago, 38 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,397

@previous (TheDarkChad)
Real mature, now you’re impersonating me because you can’t win the argument.

Anonymous B replied with this 47 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,398

Blacks: 3/5th a person
Cucumbers 3/4th a person

Blacks: Get voting rights
Cucumbers: Deserve voting rights even more!!

TheDarkChad replied with this 47 minutes ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,399

If you were smart you wouldn’t have to impersonate me and use racial slurs. You’re like a toddler having a temper tantrum.

TheDarkChad double-posted this 46 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,401

@1,432,398 (B)
Great that means if I shoot you in the back of the head and grow two cucumbers, that’s a net benefit to the world.

TheDarkChad replied with this 43 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,402

I dont actually believe theres impostors tho, i's do it for the love of the game

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 43 minutes ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,403

@1,432,398 (B)
Why not lol. No cucumber ever strawmanned my argument

TheDarkChad replied with this 42 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,405

@previous (A)
Dude, I don’t understand why you don’t just kill yourself honestly. The world would be better if you didn’t exist. I’ve never talked to anybody as worthless as you.

TheDarkChad replied with this 42 minutes ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,407

@1,432,401 (TheDarkChad)
I cannot agree with this as that would mean less nigguhs are available torape.

TheDarkChad replied with this 41 minutes ago, 38 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,408

@previous (TheDarkChad)

> I cannot agree with this as that would mean less nigguhs are available torape.

Have you ever considered that joking about raping people makes you look bad?

TheDarkChad double-posted this 37 minutes ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,409

Normally I’m pretty empathetic, but I honestly don’t care why you’re the way you are anymore. I don’t know what trauma you went through that made you this insecure. But honestly, I don’t even have words for this. If I kill a bug, and then I see it twitching a little bit after, I feel like I wouldn’t even feel that tiny feeling I feel for a bug that’s twitching for you. I feel like you’re not even that. If I dropped an inanimate object I’d feel more regret.

TheDarkChad triple-posted this 37 minutes ago, 48 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,410

But I am sad for you. I’m sad that God created you.

TheDarkChad quadruple-posted this 34 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,432,411

And I’m sure Satan is sad at you too.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.