Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later[^][v]#1,431,479
Technically the guy on the right is an American native because he was born in the U.S but he's not aboriginal in the sense that he's not descended from a tribe.
Though I get the point the guy on the on left was trying to make but since both were getting in their feeling neither of them paying attention to the what other was saying.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,431,480
However the bit about "whites are native American" is funny. Technically based on his logic anybody that was born in the U.S is a Native American, it's not just "whites".
So if your parents happen to be Asian or African but you ended being born in the U.S then you're a native of the U.S.
A black guy pointing stuff out double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 7 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,431,526
@1,431,480 (A)
I think his logic was more that whites are "real" Americans because his ancestors lived here longer. Which is dumb logic since hominis (the lineage that leads to Homo sapiens) diverged from panins (the lineage that leads to the genus Pan - Chimpanzees) 7 million years ago with interbreeding ending 5 million years ago, the first hominins left Africa 1 million years ago, but they were all killed off by our species when we evolved 300,000 years ago. So his ancestors lived in America for hundreds of years, Europe for thousands of years, and Africa for millions of years, so by that logic, he’s not a real American or a real European, he’s a heritage black.
A black guy pointing stuff out triple-posted this 3 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,431,527
Idk why, racists seem uninterested in anything that happened before 1492. Apparently European dominance after 1492 needs a biological explanation but Egyptian, Arab, Chinese, Indian civilization, etc. doesn’t need one. Just ignore 90% of recorded history and pretend Europeans always win.