Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 24 minutes later[^][v]#1,430,848
The article from the *Los Angeles Times* reports on a controversial legal and administrative battle involving Trevor Kirk, a former Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputy who was convicted of federal civil rights violations.
Here is a summary of the key points from the report:
### 1. The Core Conflict: Pay After Conviction
The central focus of the article is the revelation that Trevor Kirk continued to receive significant financial compensation—or reached a specific settlement regarding back pay—despite being found guilty of using excessive force. The report highlights a loophole or administrative delay in the Sheriff Department's ability to "fire with cause" immediately, which often results in deputies remaining on the payroll or receiving payouts while their legal cases wind through the system.
### 2. Background of the Incident
The pay dispute stems from a 2023 incident in Lancaster, CA, where Kirk was caught on video assaulting a woman outside a grocery store.
* The Assault: Kirk violently threw a woman to the ground and pepper-sprayed her while she was filming a separate police encounter.
* The Conviction: In February 2025, a federal jury found Kirk guilty of a felony count of deprivation of rights under color of law. Prosecutors argued he used "unnecessary and excessive force" and then filed a misleading report to cover his actions.
### 3. Public and Policy Outcry
The March 2026 article details the public backlash regarding the "taxpayer-funded" nature of Kirk’s compensation.
* Administrative Hurdles: The article explores the difficulties the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) faces in terminating deputies immediately due to civil service protections and union contracts.
* The "Relieved of Duty" Status: While Kirk was "relieved of duty," the article clarifies whether this status was with or without pay at various stages of his trial, pointing out that Kirk may have collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in salary and benefits between the time of the assault and his final sentencing.
### 4. Systemic Implications
The *Times* uses Kirk’s case as a lens to look at broader issues within the LASD:
* Accountability Gap: The delay in stopping pay for convicted felons in uniform is presented as a failure of oversight.
* Legislative Pressure: The article notes that this specific case has prompted local officials to call for stricter rules that would allow the county to "claw back" pay from officers convicted of violent felonies committed on the job. In summary: The article highlights the irony and public frustration of a law enforcement officer receiving a taxpayer-funded windfall or continued salary even after a jury determined he committed a violent federal crime against a citizen.