Topic: The uS should publicly assassinate Karzai
sluggy started this discussion 15 years ago #13,429
He has Said that Afghanistan would side with Pakistan if it came to war between Pakistan and the US.
We gave him his power. Pakistan has actively worked against the interests of the US's billionaires. We have given them billions of dollars while they protected the people we were supposed to be hunting in afghanistan.
We should do any of the following:
Support the Taliban, and give them aid in retaking Afghanistan in exchange for assurances they don't harbor terrorist groups (who cares if they do -- they aren't any match for us. If we wanted to annihilate them, we can. It's only occupation that is difficult).
Assassinate Karzai. Don't hide the fact.
Nuke Pakistan and Iran. Why not?
We can't even keep the people we put in power as friends. If we are going to be a military power, we need to do it right.
We gave him his power. Pakistan has actively worked against the interests of the US's billionaires. We have given them billions of dollars while they protected the people we were supposed to be hunting in afghanistan.
We should do any of the following:
Support the Taliban, and give them aid in retaking Afghanistan in exchange for assurances they don't harbor terrorist groups (who cares if they do -- they aren't any match for us. If we wanted to annihilate them, we can. It's only occupation that is difficult).
Assassinate Karzai. Don't hide the fact.
Nuke Pakistan and Iran. Why not?
We can't even keep the people we put in power as friends. If we are going to be a military power, we need to do it right.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 minutes later[^] [v] #240,881
that'd be funny except it is the actual logic of establishment politicians - pretty much every except ron paul.
sluggy (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #240,883
@previous (B)
Ron Paul wants only the rich toget an education. I say he should be next on Obama's list.
Ron Paul wants only the rich toget an education. I say he should be next on Obama's list.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #240,887
Ron Paul: privatize education, tax and regulate it for revenueAnonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #240,897
@240,883 (sluggy)
No, Ron Paul wants everyone to get a good education. This is best achieved through voluntary transactions, consent and free markets; not through theft, coercion and force.
> I say he should be next on Obama's list.
Surprised he wasn't first. All the people he has assassinated had the same fundamental belief (that violence and theft are acceptable) but slightly different aims - Ron Paul operates from an entirely different philosophy of peace and love.
No, Ron Paul wants everyone to get a good education. This is best achieved through voluntary transactions, consent and free markets; not through theft, coercion and force.
> I say he should be next on Obama's list.
Surprised he wasn't first. All the people he has assassinated had the same fundamental belief (that violence and theft are acceptable) but slightly different aims - Ron Paul operates from an entirely different philosophy of peace and love.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
sluggy (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #240,905
@previous (B)
Wrong. He wants education to be available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
He is out of touch with what life is like for those in poverty.
He wants to end federal student loans.
Wrong. He wants education to be available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
He is out of touch with what life is like for those in poverty.
He wants to end federal student loans.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #240,914
@previous (sluggy)
> Wrong. He wants education to be available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
Education costs money, and IS only available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
Education is not an enumerated federal power; federal funding of education is unconstitutional.
> He is out of touch with what life is like for those in poverty.
No - in fact, it is his concern and care for the poor that makes him such an advocate of free markets, which benefit the consumer, instead of state-managed markets, which benefit corporations.
> He wants to end federal student loans.
Good. They are unconstitutional. How can a government $15T in debt give loans anyway? lol
> Wrong. He wants education to be available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
Education costs money, and IS only available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
Education is not an enumerated federal power; federal funding of education is unconstitutional.
> He is out of touch with what life is like for those in poverty.
No - in fact, it is his concern and care for the poor that makes him such an advocate of free markets, which benefit the consumer, instead of state-managed markets, which benefit corporations.
> He wants to end federal student loans.
Good. They are unconstitutional. How can a government $15T in debt give loans anyway? lol
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,936
@previous (B)
> They are unconstitutional. How can a government $15T in debt give loans anyway? lol
Seems to be working just fine.
> Education costs money, and IS only available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
Freedom costs money, which he wants only available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
> They are unconstitutional. How can a government $15T in debt give loans anyway? lol
Seems to be working just fine.
> Education costs money, and IS only available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
Freedom costs money, which he wants only available to those with money. You can't twist it any other way.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,938
@previous (C)
> Seems to be working just fine.
> GFC
You have a peculiar definition of "fine".
Freedom doesn't cost anything lol. I hope you were trolling when you said that.
> Seems to be working just fine.
> GFC
You have a peculiar definition of "fine".
Freedom doesn't cost anything lol. I hope you were trolling when you said that.
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,954
We already support the 'Taliban' by helping the libian rebels.
:/
:/
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,955
@previous ([^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3.)
Just because they got a little help from the Taliban doesn't automatically make them evil.
:/
Just because they got a little help from the Taliban doesn't automatically make them evil.
:/
Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,957
Or: withdraw from Afghanistan and Iraq and stop supporting Israel and let them sort it out themselves.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,958
Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,959
@previous (E)
You're right, we should send in troops and overthrow their governments and make them into McDemocraciesâ„¢
The Middle East: They hate us for our Freedom®
You're right, we should send in troops and overthrow their governments and make them into McDemocraciesâ„¢
The Middle East: They hate us for our Freedom®
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,966
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,967
@240,959 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
> McDemocraciesâ„¢
Fucking lol'd. But its also sad, because basically that's exactly what we do.
> McDemocraciesâ„¢
Fucking lol'd. But its also sad, because basically that's exactly what we do.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,970
@previous ([^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3.)
> Fucking lol'd. But its also sad, because basically that's exactly what we do.
Oh yeah, and then we act all surprised and butthurt when they vote for Islamist anti-American leaders.
> Fucking lol'd. But its also sad, because basically that's exactly what we do.
Oh yeah, and then we act all surprised and butthurt when they vote for Islamist anti-American leaders.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,975
@240,954 ([^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3.)
> We already support the 'Taliban' by helping the libian rebels.
>
> :/
Most retarded thing I have ever read.
> We already support the 'Taliban' by helping the libian rebels.
>
> :/
Most retarded thing I have ever read.
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,982
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. double-posted this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,984
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,985
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,988
@previous (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
I put 'Taliban' in quotes because I couldn't spell al qaeda
I put 'Taliban' in quotes because I couldn't spell al qaeda
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,990
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,991
@previous (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
I was going to type Taliban/al qaeda.
If you replace Taliban with al qaeda does it make sense?
I was going to type Taliban/al qaeda.
If you replace Taliban with al qaeda does it make sense?
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,992
@previous ([^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3.)
Yes it makes more sense, but it's still way too early to tell if the Libyan revolution has helped Al Qaeda.
Yes it makes more sense, but it's still way too early to tell if the Libyan revolution has helped Al Qaeda.
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #240,994
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #241,001
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #241,006
[^_^] !yyQ9.ZkX3. replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #241,013
@241,001 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8391632/Libya-the-West-and-al-Qaeda-on-the-same-side.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8391632/Libya-the-West-and-al-Qaeda-on-the-same-side.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html
(Edited 57 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #241,063
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #241,138
@previous (C)
where would we be if da brave boys hadn't killed all dem brown people in vietnam, iraq, afghanistan, libya, somalia, yemen, lebanon etc
where would we be if da brave boys hadn't killed all dem brown people in vietnam, iraq, afghanistan, libya, somalia, yemen, lebanon etc