Topic: say, how's your local Masonic temple doing there folks
boof started this discussion 1 day ago #134,256
doing the good works in your towns
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,429,838
Professor JIANG says the masons are at the nexus of the american deepstate
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 12 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,839
Anonymous C double-posted this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,840
"Professor" Jiang thinks the Jesuits and the Free Masons are collaborating. Jesuits are Catholic and Catholics aren’t allowed to become Free Masons. Free Masonry advocates for rationalism which is incompatible with Catholicism.
Anonymous C triple-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,841
On top of that the Jesuits aren’t a secret society. They don’t have secret meetings, they don’t hold secret beliefs. You can just walk up to them and ask them what they are and what they believe and they’ll happily tell you.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,842
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,843
@1,429,840 (C)
It's how cartels operate, you mark your territory so there's no reason to fight and you trade for mutual benefit.
The word is carved up into spheres of influence.
It's how cartels operate, you mark your territory so there's no reason to fight and you trade for mutual benefit.
The word is carved up into spheres of influence.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,845
@1,429,842 (B)
Calling someone a dope isn’t the same thing as calling someone dope. If someone is a dope that means they’re stupid.
Calling someone a dope isn’t the same thing as calling someone dope. If someone is a dope that means they’re stupid.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 14 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,846
@1,429,841 (C)The elites know how to hide in plain sight. Blabbing to a stranger would make no sense.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,847
@1,429,845 (D)
The Jesuits have been the real power among the Catholics for a long time.
They have a "black pope" that basically means real pope (antichrist). Actual christians don't use dark magic or worship a pope, they have faith in Jesus Christ as their savior.
The Jesuits have been the real power among the Catholics for a long time.
They have a "black pope" that basically means real pope (antichrist). Actual christians don't use dark magic or worship a pope, they have faith in Jesus Christ as their savior.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 6 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,848
@1,429,843 (B)
> It's how cartels operate, you mark your territory so there's no reason to fight and you trade for mutual benefit.
>
> The word is carved up into spheres of influence.
That’s not what a cartel is. A cartel is when a group of individuals colludes to fix prices.
> It's how cartels operate, you mark your territory so there's no reason to fight and you trade for mutual benefit.
>
> The word is carved up into spheres of influence.
That’s not what a cartel is. A cartel is when a group of individuals colludes to fix prices.
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,849
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,850
@1,429,848 (D)
> > It's how cartels operate, you mark your territory so there's no reason to fight and you trade for mutual benefit.
> >
> > The word is carved up into spheres of influence.
>
> That’s not what a cartel is. A cartel is when a group of individuals colludes to fix prices.
No, it's not about individuals, it's about competing businesses that work together for mutual benefit.
Fixing prices is one way they do it.
Marking territory is another, like corners controlled by different gangs in a narco cartel in Mexico.
Sharing logistics networks is another.
There are many ways competitors can set aside their differences to work together without actually merging businesses.
> > It's how cartels operate, you mark your territory so there's no reason to fight and you trade for mutual benefit.
> >
> > The word is carved up into spheres of influence.
>
> That’s not what a cartel is. A cartel is when a group of individuals colludes to fix prices.
No, it's not about individuals, it's about competing businesses that work together for mutual benefit.
Fixing prices is one way they do it.
Marking territory is another, like corners controlled by different gangs in a narco cartel in Mexico.
Sharing logistics networks is another.
There are many ways competitors can set aside their differences to work together without actually merging businesses.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,851
@1,429,849 (D)
I lived near a Jesuit college and discussed some of this with a relative who used to teach there.
I lived near a Jesuit college and discussed some of this with a relative who used to teach there.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 25 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,852
@1,429,850 (B)
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cartel
1: a written agreement between belligerent nations
2: a combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to limit competition or fix prices
illegal drug cartels
3: a combination of political groups for common action
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cartel
1: a written agreement between belligerent nations
2: a combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to limit competition or fix prices
illegal drug cartels
3: a combination of political groups for common action
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,853
@previous (D)
All 3 of those definitions work for how I've used the word.
What part of the definition do you think backs you up here? I've already agreed that fixing prices is one way that cartels operate
All 3 of those definitions work for how I've used the word.
What part of the definition do you think backs you up here? I've already agreed that fixing prices is one way that cartels operate
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,854
@1,429,852 (D)
Definition 1 explains the Jesuit/Masonic Cartels. They controll different nations but have agreements to not fight.
Definition 1 explains the Jesuit/Masonic Cartels. They controll different nations but have agreements to not fight.
Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 day ago, 38 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,855
@1,429,852 (D)
Definition 3 explains the Jesuit/Masonic Cartel and the political dimension to the Mexican cartels.
Definition 3 explains the Jesuit/Masonic Cartel and the political dimension to the Mexican cartels.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 4 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,856
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,857
@previous (D)
You said it was fixing prices, and then quoted 3 definitions that also cover how I was using the word.
Do you realize you proved me right?
You said it was fixing prices, and then quoted 3 definitions that also cover how I was using the word.
Do you realize you proved me right?
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 24 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,858
@1,429,854 (B)
> Definition 1 explains the Jesuit/Masonic Cartels. They controll different nations but have agreements to not fight.
You’re claiming that the Jesuits and the Freemasons control nations and also claiming that they don’t control the same nations. This is a fucking stupid thing to say.
> Definition 1 explains the Jesuit/Masonic Cartels. They controll different nations but have agreements to not fight.
You’re claiming that the Jesuits and the Freemasons control nations and also claiming that they don’t control the same nations. This is a fucking stupid thing to say.
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 55 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,859
Which nations do you think the Jesuits control and which nations do you think the Freemasons control?
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 41 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,860
@1,429,858 (D)
What does this have to do with the definition of cartel?
They are two organizations that work together. They saw more value in cooperation than conflict.
What does this have to do with the definition of cartel?
They are two organizations that work together. They saw more value in cooperation than conflict.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,861
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 21 seconds later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,862
@1,429,859 (D)
The Freemasons control the USA, and the Jesuits exert their influence through Catholic countries.
It's not 100% cut and dry but Jesuits have more influence in Mexico, for example.
I can't give you a precise list because I'm not a spook with insider memos.
The Freemasons control the USA, and the Jesuits exert their influence through Catholic countries.
It's not 100% cut and dry but Jesuits have more influence in Mexico, for example.
I can't give you a precise list because I'm not a spook with insider memos.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 19 seconds later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,863
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 39 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,864
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 28 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,865
The vice president and First Lady are also Catholic.
Anonymous D triple-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,866
There’s no agreement between Freemasons and the Catholic Church that the Catholic Church doesn’t have influence in the United States. The Catholic Church is the largest denomination of Christianity in the US.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,867
@1,429,864 (D)
And they play by a certain set of rules to stay friendly with the Masons.
Wearing robes and having official ceremonies to grant titles is nice, but its the Masons who control the military industrial complex.
It's just not in the Jesuits interests to try to upend the social order and go to war with a technologically advanced society that they are profitably working with.
And they play by a certain set of rules to stay friendly with the Masons.
Wearing robes and having official ceremonies to grant titles is nice, but its the Masons who control the military industrial complex.
It's just not in the Jesuits interests to try to upend the social order and go to war with a technologically advanced society that they are profitably working with.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,868
@previous (B)
The Jesuits don’t control the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church does not have any agreement with Freemasons. The Catholic Church rejects Freemasonry, the largest denomination of Christianity in the United States (also on Earth) is the Catholic Church. Catholics are over represented in positions of power in the United States. You’re just saying bullshit.
The Jesuits don’t control the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church does not have any agreement with Freemasons. The Catholic Church rejects Freemasonry, the largest denomination of Christianity in the United States (also on Earth) is the Catholic Church. Catholics are over represented in positions of power in the United States. You’re just saying bullshit.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 22 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,869
@1,429,866 (D)
There are secret agreements that we can observe because those two orders do not fight when they interact.
There are more evangelical protestants than Catholics in the US, so that's misleading. Evangelicals will start a new denomination for a single congregation if they feel like it, but its still more protestants.
There are secret agreements that we can observe because those two orders do not fight when they interact.
There are more evangelical protestants than Catholics in the US, so that's misleading. Evangelicals will start a new denomination for a single congregation if they feel like it, but its still more protestants.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,870
@1,429,868 (D)
How many times do I have to tell you they are separate organizations?
I reject veganism but I have a vegan roommate. We split the rent for mutual benefit, and we don't fight. If you see me eating a burger, he's still a vegan.
How many times do I have to tell you they are separate organizations?
I reject veganism but I have a vegan roommate. We split the rent for mutual benefit, and we don't fight. If you see me eating a burger, he's still a vegan.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 40 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,871
The Catholic Church also would never "go to war" with the United States, because they have a lot of influence in the United States. For example, six out of nine Supreme Court justices are Catholic, they have a majority of the Supreme Court. Catholic morality can influence how the US government interprets American law. The Catholic Church isn’t anti American and doesn’t have aspirations to go to war with the United States and the US government isn’t opposed to Catholicism. They’re compatible with each other.
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 32 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,872
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,873
@1,429,871 (D)
The Catholic church has never actual control over the US like the Masons.
Influential? Yes of course. But second to Masonic will. The Masons took out JFK, and the Jesuits backed down. Letting that escalate would be bad for everyone.
The Catholic church has never actual control over the US like the Masons.
Influential? Yes of course. But second to Masonic will. The Masons took out JFK, and the Jesuits backed down. Letting that escalate would be bad for everyone.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,874
@1,429,872 (D)
Secret societies don't publish their treaties online, what do you expect?
If you see two gangs in sight of each other, but neither crosses a street and they never shoot at each other you can use your brain to figure out their bosses shook on something.
Secret societies don't publish their treaties online, what do you expect?
If you see two gangs in sight of each other, but neither crosses a street and they never shoot at each other you can use your brain to figure out their bosses shook on something.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 3 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,875
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,876
@previous (D)
These are deepstate ghouls with extensive personal histories. They are like brothers.
No one is publishing an expose on their blog.
These are deepstate ghouls with extensive personal histories. They are like brothers.
No one is publishing an expose on their blog.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 42 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,877
@previous (B)
You’re just making excuses for why you don’t have evidence, but those excuses aren’t evidence. You could make up anything and say that.
You’re just making excuses for why you don’t have evidence, but those excuses aren’t evidence. You could make up anything and say that.
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 39 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,878
This is so stupid. How old are you? There’s no way you’re an adult.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,879
@1,429,877 (D)
Once again, what kind of evidence do you think there would be when two deepstate secret societies ink out a treaty?
Once again, what kind of evidence do you think there would be when two deepstate secret societies ink out a treaty?
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,880
@1,429,878 (D)
Where do you get evidence for deals street gangs make? Where do you find the illegal collusions agreements big corporations make between each other?
Jesuits and Masons are more discrete than either of those.
Where do you get evidence for deals street gangs make? Where do you find the illegal collusions agreements big corporations make between each other?
Jesuits and Masons are more discrete than either of those.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 16 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,881
@1,429,879 (B)
You said that they have an agreement where some countries are controlled by Freemasons and some countries are controlled by Jesuits. I gave an example of how the Catholic Church has disproportionate power in the United States and you completely ignored it. There’s obviously no agreement between the Catholic Church and Freemasons that the Catholic Church can’t exert influence over the United States, when it’s clearly obvious that the Catholic Church has an incredible amount of influence in the United States.
You said that they have an agreement where some countries are controlled by Freemasons and some countries are controlled by Jesuits. I gave an example of how the Catholic Church has disproportionate power in the United States and you completely ignored it. There’s obviously no agreement between the Catholic Church and Freemasons that the Catholic Church can’t exert influence over the United States, when it’s clearly obvious that the Catholic Church has an incredible amount of influence in the United States.
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 27 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,882
Anonymous D triple-posted this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,883
@1,429,881 (D)
> You said that they have an agreement where some countries are controlled by Freemasons and some countries are controlled by Jesuits. I gave an example of how the Catholic Church has disproportionate power in the United States and you completely ignored it. There’s obviously no agreement between the Catholic Church and Freemasons that the Catholic Church can’t exert influence over the United States, when it’s clearly obvious that the Catholic Church has an incredible amount of influence in the United States.
However, it’s important to note that the influence the Catholic Church has in American politics is not illegal or secret. Catholics are overrepresented on the US Supreme Court, but this was achieved through legal means and there’s absolutely nothing secret about it.
> You said that they have an agreement where some countries are controlled by Freemasons and some countries are controlled by Jesuits. I gave an example of how the Catholic Church has disproportionate power in the United States and you completely ignored it. There’s obviously no agreement between the Catholic Church and Freemasons that the Catholic Church can’t exert influence over the United States, when it’s clearly obvious that the Catholic Church has an incredible amount of influence in the United States.
However, it’s important to note that the influence the Catholic Church has in American politics is not illegal or secret. Catholics are overrepresented on the US Supreme Court, but this was achieved through legal means and there’s absolutely nothing secret about it.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,884
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,885
In fact, some of those people are people Trump put into their positions of power.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,886
@1,429,883 (D)
All top US officials have CIA microwave weapons trained on them constantly to ensure compliance. The CIA is a front for the Masons.
All top US officials have CIA microwave weapons trained on them constantly to ensure compliance. The CIA is a front for the Masons.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 6 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,887
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,888
@1,429,886 (B)
I have a microwave weapon too, it’s called a microwave, but watch what happens when I smash a hole in the door.
I have a microwave weapon too, it’s called a microwave, but watch what happens when I smash a hole in the door.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,889
@1,429,887 (D)
> Catholics are forbidden from joining secret societies.
lol, that settles it then. Members of secret societies would never lie about joining secret societies...
> Catholics are forbidden from joining secret societies.
lol, that settles it then. Members of secret societies would never lie about joining secret societies...
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,890
Anonymous D double-posted this 1 day ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,891
@1,429,888 (D)
> I have a microwave weapon too, it’s called a microwave, but watch what happens when I smash a hole in the door.
Now is it as good as what the CIA has? No. But do you want to try it out for yourself? Probably not.
> I have a microwave weapon too, it’s called a microwave, but watch what happens when I smash a hole in the door.
Now is it as good as what the CIA has? No. But do you want to try it out for yourself? Probably not.
Anonymous B replied with this 1 day ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,892
@previous (D)
The Catholics in the Supreme Court should use their majority to give the US to Spain and Portugal lol.
Masons can discombobulate their synapses with triggerhappyinstrusivethoughts on their neuralink.
The Catholics in the Supreme Court should use their majority to give the US to Spain and Portugal lol.
Masons can discombobulate their synapses with triggerhappyinstrusivethoughts on their neuralink.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,893
You guys argue about the weirdest things.
Anonymous D replied with this 1 day ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,896
@previous (E)
Well if somebody says something normal it tends to not start an argument because everybody agrees with it.
For example, if I say a hotdog is a sandwich, everybody will agree with it.
Well if somebody says something normal it tends to not start an argument because everybody agrees with it.
For example, if I say a hotdog is a sandwich, everybody will agree with it.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 12 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,944
The Masons are like the elk lodge and Shriners and the rest. All based loosely on old Islamic brotherhoods.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 day ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,429,960
Exactly where it needs to be, dead and buried. Last white nigguh in our area just died balls deep in a chicken.