Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 15 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,429,229
@previous (Oatmeal Fucker !BYUc1TwJMU)
When you run a major news outlet you should know which word to use when talking about truth of all things.
White liberal women have a particularly hard time with the concept, constantly saying shit like "my truth". When one goes out in public and acts like she doesn't know the difference between perspective and truth it should be obvious that she's also unable to grasp the difference.
Even someone who is apparently her sworn enemy immediately recognises that her "my truth" is the same thing as "my perspective of the truth".
Which by the way is obvious from full content of the Ted Talk, which you have taken context-free snippets from in order to make this smear.
It's pretty ironic that the one positioning himself as some kind of defender of the truth is the one partaking in the kind of selective "truth telling" that she warns against in her speech, in the process proving her entirely correct and blowing up your own credibility.
Lucky you're anonymous bro, I don't think I would be able to live with people knowing I'd self owned to this extent.
> Even someone who is apparently her sworn enemy immediately recognises that her "my truth" is the same thing as "my perspective of the truth".
Yes, and the point I'm making is: why doesn't she use the correct word?
It's easy to dismiss it as a figure of speech, but with more and more women talking this way it just means we lose words for objective statements and only have subjective statements. In time liberals will attack the word objective itself. The point is newspeak that eliminates ways of expressing concepts that upset them.
That's fine for them because women inherently lack the ability to grasp an objective reality. It's fine for simps who don't care about language because it's another easy way to score points with the tribe.
> Lucky you're anonymous bro, I don't think I would be able to live with people knowing I'd self owned to this extent.
I know plenty of people in person who share my view.
That's not your point at allx it's just what you're pivoting to now so you don't look stupid.
Anyway, the speech isn't about the readers perspective on facts but is about the harm of media outlets presenting a limited range of divisive facts and abusing those facts to build a wider narrative that only serves to drive people apart.
> That's not your point at allx it's just what you're pivoting to now so you don't look stupid.
What do you think my point was? Can you actually show it in my actual text?
> Anyway, the speech isn't about the readers perspective on facts but is about the harm of media outlets presenting a limited range of divisive facts and abusing those facts to build a wider narrative that only serves to drive people apart.
There's a way to communicate that and use the word truth correctly.
It's not a meaningless word choice, she's repeating a mistake many people in her demographic make constantly.