Topic: Remember that tweet about the neighbor getting cats, and the coyotes kept eating them?
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 hours ago #134,048
It reminds me of what the US is doing with fighter jets in Iran right now.Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #1,428,327
It’s kinda funny how Pete Hegseth talks about the war like a rapist, but he’s obviously not winning at the same time.
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,428,328
"We’re beating them while they’re down and that’s how it should be, there’s nothing they can do. They should just sit back and take it. We’re sending them back to the Stone Age, because we have the most advanced military in the world. 90% of their missile launchers have been destroyed, and we sank their entire navy on the first day."
Breaking news: the Iranian navy has just set an oil tanker on fire and shot down an American fighter jet!
Breaking news: the Iranian navy has just set an oil tanker on fire and shot down an American fighter jet!
Anonymous B triple-posted this 2 hours ago, 56 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,428,329
I know people are dying, but there’s something comedic about that dichotomy. It’s like a comedy skit.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 hours ago, 19 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,428,332
@1,428,328 (B)
I half-suspect it's part of The Plan™ and each downed jet is another Lockheed or Ratheon purchase order.
They pump and dump Iran press releases are less effective each time, but ordering a fly over is a few billion in the bank for the MIC investors.
I half-suspect it's part of The Plan™ and each downed jet is another Lockheed or Ratheon purchase order.
They pump and dump Iran press releases are less effective each time, but ordering a fly over is a few billion in the bank for the MIC investors.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 1 hour ago, 8 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,428,338
@previous (A)
I just hope they’re not stupid enough to actually try a ground invasion and they’re also simultaneously stupid enough to not realize they can’t win the war without a ground invasion. Because based on the population of Iran, I think we might actually need a draft and mass mobilization in order to actually conquer that country. Sorta like Vietnam but probably worse.
I just hope they’re not stupid enough to actually try a ground invasion and they’re also simultaneously stupid enough to not realize they can’t win the war without a ground invasion. Because based on the population of Iran, I think we might actually need a draft and mass mobilization in order to actually conquer that country. Sorta like Vietnam but probably worse.
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,428,340
Interesting take: https://youtu.be/TPx76MfQXAI
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 hour ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,428,341
@1,428,338 (B)
We can't afford for all those people to draw on social security and use the GI bill, a ground invasion is the only fiscally responsible plan.
We can't afford for all those people to draw on social security and use the GI bill, a ground invasion is the only fiscally responsible plan.