Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 hours ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#1,426,151
Well, I have found some of the ideas racists have to be quite enlightening. For example, social darwinists say some people are too dumb to do certain jobs and that if someone is dumb it is because of genetics so there’s nothing you can do to fix them. That is completely true. You see, racists know quite a bit about stupid people. You can learn a lot from a racist. They have first hand experience. They are simply wrong about who the stupid people are.
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 hours ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,426,152
They also seem to be obsessed with the idea that some people are 10 or 100 times smarter than other people. Now if that doesn’t make sense to you, that’s because you’re not 10 to 100 times dumber than the average person so you’ve never observed this.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 48 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,426,168
@op
I tried that statement before. It doesn’t work. Nobody thinks racism is stupid/low IQ. You can try to frame it like it’s something that people should be ashamed of but someone will provide a detailed explanation using history and data to justify it. Everyone will agree and no counter argument is strong enough to beat it.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,426,171
@previous (D)
Racism is pretty low IQ. Racist governments tend to collapse. Why do we talk about Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Imperial Japan, Apartheid South Africa, Rhodesia, and the Confederacy all in past tense? It has a worse track record than authoritarian communism.
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 hour ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,426,173
Especially South Africa. We talk about, "what if the Nazis or the Japanese got to the bomb first?" In South Africa, the white supremacists did build nuclear weapons, and they still lost. So why do people think that white supremacy is ever going to work? The problem is that white people aren’t actually superior so whatever gains they've tried to make in the short term they’ve always lost in the long term. It doesn’t matter what empire you’re talking about in what time period, it happens every time, but they don’t learn from their mistakes.
Anonymous E triple-posted this 1 hour ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,426,174
Now in the modern age it’s even more ridiculous because the west is so deluded we base our superiority off of being richer than other countries, except there is a very strong correlation between more wealth and lower birth rates, and we have fiat currency backed by nothing. So essentially what the west is doing is having fewer children than the rest of the world to make numbers on computers bigger so people can look at a website and be like, "My country has a bigger number than that country, wow we must be so smart." Meanwhile, European countries have surprisingly small standing armies and have aging populations.
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 1 hour ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,426,175
Like, the biggest country in Europe is Russia. Nobody thinks anything of Nigeria, but if you look at Nigeria’s population size and compare it to Russia, and you look at their median age and compare it to Russia, you have to wonder if hypothetically at some point European countries were to fight African countries, who would have the advantage. Because the last time Europe took over Africa, Europe had more than twice as many people as Africa. Now that’s the other way around and on average Europeans are twice as old as Africans, so you have to wonder who has more 18 year old boys. Now that doesn’t matter as long as Europe never tries to take over Africa again, but if they did try, and it went the opposite of the way it went last time because the demographic imbalance is the opposite of what it was 200 years ago, that would be interesting. Even during World War Two, Africa was still smaller than Europe. It would be a different thing if it was tried today. God forbid Europe tries it 20 or 30 years from now.
Anonymous E replied with this 51 minutes ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,426,177
@previous (F)
No. They’re completely different. Charles Darwin didn’t invent the idea of evolution, he just discovered the mechanism of natural selection. The comment you replied to had nothing to do with natural selection or evolution.