Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Meta replied with this 3 hours ago, 6 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,425,102
@previous (A)
I won't. It's just some deaths are funnier than others. You, as one of the faggots cheering when Charlie Kirk got shot, should know that better than anyone!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 hours ago, 28 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,425,103
The thing about Catholicism doesn’t really make sense since Jesus founded the Catholic Church. If you think Catholics go to Hell then you must not be a Christian since every other Christian church broke off from the original Catholic Church.
> I won't. It's just some deaths are funnier than others. You, as one of the faggots cheering when Charlie Kirk got shot, should know that better than anyone!
I don’t laugh when Charlie Kirk was shot, I just didn’t care because he’s not relevant.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 3 hours ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,425,105
I mean, Charlie Kirk’s entire legacy in this world is "guy who supported Trump" and literally nothing else. Imagine if somebody’s legacy was "guy who supporter Bill Clinton." In 15 years, nobody will care, and the next generation of kids growing up won’t know who the hell he was.
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 3 hours ago, 2 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,425,106
Charlie Kirk was popular during Covid, his videos kept getting recommended to me in 2020, but he fell off in 2021 and I completely stopped getting him recommended to me on YouTube and I almost forgot about him until I saw he was shot.
Anonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 3 hours ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,425,108
Honestly my entire opinion on this is I think celebrating death is gross, and of all people Donald Trump shouldn’t do it because he knows he’s controversial and he knows he’s at the end of his life, so people will remember this and bring it up when he does die.
Anonymous A (OP) sextuple-posted this 3 hours ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,425,110
Like Charlie Kirk for example, some people were happy that he died because he supported Trump. When Trump dies do you think it will be better or worse? And I don’t believe in celebrating anybody’s death, it’s disgusting, but I’m not stupid, it’s obvious what will happen.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 hours ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,425,119
@1,425,112 (C)
I’m a Christian and I agree with the Bible here. However, even an atheist should be able to recognize that old people tend to die and Trump isn’t much younger than Mueller.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 hour ago, 42 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,425,127
@1,425,103 (A)
Wrong. The Catholic church started when the patriarch of Rome broke from the other 4 patriarchs and attempted to unilatterally declare himself the head.
The rest of the church continued on and became known as "orthodox" after this happened.
> Wrong. The Catholic church started when the patriarch of Rome broke from the other 4 patriarchs and attempted to unilatterally declare himself the head.
The bishop of Rome always had primacy over the church.
"And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it."
Anonymous I triple-posted this 49 minutes ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,425,132
This is a more in-depth explanation of what Jesus said:
You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church: the Aramaic word kēpā’ meaning rock and transliterated into Greek as Kēphas is the name by which Peter is called in the Pauline letters (1 Cor 1:12; 3:22; 9:5; 15:4; Gal 1:18; 2:9, 11, 14) except in Gal 2:7–8 (“Peter”). It is translated as Petros (“Peter”) in Jn 1:42. The presumed original Aramaic of Jesus’ statement would have been, in English, “You are the Rock (Kēpā’) and upon this rock (kēpā’) I will build my church.” The Greek text probably means the same, for the difference in gender between the masculine noun petros, the disciple’s new name, and the feminine noun petra (rock) may be due simply to the unsuitability of using a feminine noun as the proper name of a male. Although the two words were generally used with slightly different nuances, they were also used interchangeably with the same meaning, “rock.” Church: this word (Greek ekklēsia) occurs in the gospels only here and in Mt 18:17 (twice). There are several possibilities for an Aramaic original. Jesus’ church means the community that he will gather and that, like a building, will have Peter as its solid foundation. That function of Peter consists in his being witness to Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of the living God. The gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it: the netherworld (Greek Hadēs, the abode of the dead) is conceived of as a walled city whose gates will not close in upon the church of Jesus, i.e., it will not be overcome by the power of death.
Essentially, Peter was the first pope. Peter means rock, and Jesus said that Peter would be the rock on which he would build the Christian church and that "the netherworld” (Satan) would not prevail against this church. Peter was the first pope, and the Catholic Church remains the largest domination of Christianity.
Anonymous I quintuple-posted this 31 minutes ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,425,134
That’s also why Catholics say that Jesus founded the Catholic Church, because he did. He decided to build his church upon Peter, and Peter was the first pope.
Anonymous I replied with this 18 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,425,140
@previous (G)
Peter is the rock on which Jesus built his church, Peter was the first pope. Peter traveled to Rome and established the church that Jesus founded in Rome.
> > > > the Catholic Church remains the largest domination of Christianity. > > "Remains" is the wrong word here because when Rome broke from the true church they were a minority. Most of the church rejected the primacy of Rome. > > Later on the Catholic heresy did become bigger, yes.
"And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it."
Mt 16:18
Jesus said that the gates of the netherworld will not prevail against the church he built upon Peter. The church built upon Peter cannot refer to any church other than the Roman Catholic Church. In the Bible, Jesus says that the Roman Catholic Church will be victorious. Therefore, the Catholic Church is not heretical because that would contradict the assertion by Jesus that the church built upon Peter will prevail.
Anonymous I triple-posted this 12 minutes ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,425,146
In Orthodoxy, they try to say the bishop of Rome was considered "first among equals" which doesn’t make any sense because that’s like saying, that Rome was first but it wasn’t first, which is a contradiction. Jesus clearly said he would built his church upon Peter, so that’s not how I interpret it.
Anonymous I quadruple-posted this 6 minutes ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,425,147
If Jesus said that the netherworld won’t prevail against the church built upon Peter, which Jesus says is his church, the church belonging to Jesus, if we observe that in the present day, despite the great schism and the Protestant reformation, why is the Catholic Church the largest denomination of Christianity if Jesus is God and God is all powerful if he meant something other than that the Catholic Church was his church?