Topic: Desserters get a bad rep
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #133,767
People say what about the enemy forces? Who will protect us from them? Well, if desertion was acceptable over there on that side too, there probably wouldn't be any enemy forces
Edit: deserters 🙄
Edit: deserters 🙄
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,425,021
This gets a bad rap???Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,022
Iran can’t really reach the US in the first place. Neither could Afghanistan… or Iraq… or Vietnam… or North Korea…
Japan, did. But nobody really believes that if we didn’t use nuclear weapons the Japanese would have won World War Two.
Japan, did. But nobody really believes that if we didn’t use nuclear weapons the Japanese would have won World War Two.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,032
You're thinking of Deserters.
Desserters eat something sweet after the main course.
Desserters eat something sweet after the main course.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,042
@previous (D)
There's the issue of terrorism though. I don't really know anything about the numbers or real risk, but fucking up a country abruptly and leaving, I think that's escalation. Not saying that maybe Iran wasn't the one who started it or whatever, but it doesn't seem like it's helpful to bomb a country as punishment for that.
There's the issue of terrorism though. I don't really know anything about the numbers or real risk, but fucking up a country abruptly and leaving, I think that's escalation. Not saying that maybe Iran wasn't the one who started it or whatever, but it doesn't seem like it's helpful to bomb a country as punishment for that.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,043
@1,425,032 (D)
But are they related to each other? Is it because people for some reason deserted the main course and went straight to the dessert? In a desert?
But are they related to each other? Is it because people for some reason deserted the main course and went straight to the dessert? In a desert?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,046
@1,425,042 (A)
The US is allied with wealthy countries and bombs poor countries. Saudi Arabia isn’t much better than Iran in terms of how democratic it is.
The US is allied with wealthy countries and bombs poor countries. Saudi Arabia isn’t much better than Iran in terms of how democratic it is.
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,048
Now racists will say stuff like "oh those poor countries are just poor because they’re inferior and too stupid to invent anything."
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E triple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,051
Of course, if you mow the grass every so often and ask why it doesn’t get long it’s like…
I’m not gonna say it, but you know. Why we bomb poor countries, they say what they don’t want these people to create.
I’m not gonna say it, but you know. Why we bomb poor countries, they say what they don’t want these people to create.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,054
Or even ""western"" countries, you know like Japan. (Japan isn’t western but they have bases so they’re """western""". Japan’s economy almost surpassed America’s. Then Japan had economic stagnation for decades and has now gotten to the point where in terms of nominal GDP they’re behind India now. How did that happen?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 39 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,055
Anonymous E replied with this 1 month ago, 47 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,056
Japan can enrich, they sell it to other countries. Japan doesn’t have any bombs. So what’s going on there?
Anonymous E double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,057
Or South Africa for example. They’re in a similar position to Japan. They have a HEU stockpile. They don’t have any bombs. Why is that?
Anonymous E triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,058
If you want to have a global hierarchy and Africans are supposed to be some poor starving stupid people on the bottom who are just there for charity and exploitation or whatever, do you say, "Well, okay, sure, you people can have the technology to destroy the world."
Anonymous E quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,059
And there’s been a balance for a while, where they know could do it if they wanted to, but they don’t because they don’t want to be perceived as a threat and they’re left alone. But what if the world changes its mind?
Anonymous D replied with this 1 month ago, 4 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,126
@1,425,046 (E)
The resson given for bombing Iran was to stop them from getting a nuke, not because they aren't a democracy.
The resson given for bombing Iran was to stop them from getting a nuke, not because they aren't a democracy.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)