Topic: Why are Japs so fucking stupid?
Anonymous A started this discussion 1 month ago #133,758
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 47 seconds later[^] [v] #1,424,692
Idk man, I think I’m with the Japanese on this one.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,695
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 29 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,696
Maybe if he told some nations before hand, he wouldn't be crying about them not helping
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 27 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,697
@1,424,695 (A)
Hey man, I’ve heard enough white people say all black people have low IQs and pretend you like Asians. I’m just high IQ enough I knew you didn’t.
Hey man, I’ve heard enough white people say all black people have low IQs and pretend you like Asians. I’m just high IQ enough I knew you didn’t.
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 month ago, 28 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,698
@1,424,696 (C)
> Maybe if he told some nations before hand, he wouldn't be crying about them not helping
Dude literally asked China to help America.
> Maybe if he told some nations before hand, he wouldn't be crying about them not helping
Dude literally asked China to help America.
Anonymous C replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,700
Anonymous B replied with this 1 month ago, 1 second later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,701
When Obama was president and he went to Japan Trump said, “it’s fine as long as he doesn’t apologize (for Hiroshima) it’s absolutely fine. Who cares!"
…I’m just saying, I know Japan did some bad stuff in World War Two, but there are still some white people who say dropping two nukes on Japanese civilians was justified and I’m supposed to believe that white people actually genuinely like Asians more than black people? I’m not that stupid.
…I’m just saying, I know Japan did some bad stuff in World War Two, but there are still some white people who say dropping two nukes on Japanese civilians was justified and I’m supposed to believe that white people actually genuinely like Asians more than black people? I’m not that stupid.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous B double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,703
@1,424,700 (C)
> While pushing away Ukraine, with extensive experience in drone warfare?? 🤣
Yep. Trump likes embarrassing people. He did it to Zelensky, he did it to South Africa’s president, and now apparently he’s done it with the Japanese prime minister. Now granted, it wasn’t as bad as the other two instances, but Japan is supposed to be our ally.
> While pushing away Ukraine, with extensive experience in drone warfare?? 🤣
Yep. Trump likes embarrassing people. He did it to Zelensky, he did it to South Africa’s president, and now apparently he’s done it with the Japanese prime minister. Now granted, it wasn’t as bad as the other two instances, but Japan is supposed to be our ally.
Anonymous B triple-posted this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,705
Now it’s hard to find the video of Trump saying that because the search results are filled with Trump saying he wouldn’t apologize for the video depicting the Obamas as monkeys and the new Japan incident. But somewhere on the internet there is a video of him saying that.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 13 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,707
SF2 version ~ https://tcrf.net/Street_Fighter_II:_The_World_Warrior_(SNES)くにへ かえるんだな。おまえにも かぞくがいるだろう....
Go home. You have a family too....
GO HOME AND BE A FAMILY MAN!
Meta joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,716
It's funny because Pearl Harbor was brilliant tactics but terrible strategy. Much like our current war excursion with Iran.
I think the reason that Takaichi lady cringed was because she knows how punching the tar baby works out.
I think the reason that Takaichi lady cringed was because she knows how punching the tar baby works out.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Meta double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,717
Also if she was quick witted she would have replied "because you weren't born yet" which would have stumped Trump and defused it.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,723
Seems like Trump has a lot of you little dweebs grabbing onto anything you can lol
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 44 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,724
thats more of a woman thing than a jap thing, a male jap in that situation wouldnt ask such a retarded question.
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,725
@previous (G)
> thats more of a woman thing than a jap thing, a male jap in that situation wouldnt ask such a retarded question.
I think you need to re-watch it. A man asked the question, she was just sitting there.
https://youtu.be/hxLVbmTWkks
> thats more of a woman thing than a jap thing, a male jap in that situation wouldnt ask such a retarded question.
I think you need to re-watch it. A man asked the question, she was just sitting there.
https://youtu.be/hxLVbmTWkks
Anonymous G replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,726
习近平 replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,727
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,741
@1,424,696 (C)
He started the war because Israel was about to strike Iran, he didn't have much notice himself.
He started the war because Israel was about to strike Iran, he didn't have much notice himself.
习近平 replied with this 1 month ago, 21 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,764
@previous (I)
If that story is true, Trump is a massive pussy for letting Israel boss America around. Why did we let this guy be president?
If that story is true, Trump is a massive pussy for letting Israel boss America around. Why did we let this guy be president?
习近平 double-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,766
Either that or… 🏝️
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 35 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,772
习近平 replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,773
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,774
@1,424,764 (习近平)
> If that story is true, Trump is a massive pussy for letting Israel boss America around. Why did we let this guy be president?
Idiots did. The kind of people who thought “this time will be better” - with a cognitively declined guy pushing 80, after sex offense and felony convictions, after sedition, after Stop the Steal lies, Russia ties, emoluments out the ass, and now with Project 25 and no conservative adults in the room to prevent his worst impulses like the first term.
> If that story is true, Trump is a massive pussy for letting Israel boss America around. Why did we let this guy be president?
Idiots did. The kind of people who thought “this time will be better” - with a cognitively declined guy pushing 80, after sex offense and felony convictions, after sedition, after Stop the Steal lies, Russia ties, emoluments out the ass, and now with Project 25 and no conservative adults in the room to prevent his worst impulses like the first term.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 month ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,778
So many blabbering idiots here. :)
Anonymous G replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,779
@1,424,772 (I)
Wonder if niggy here is jewish or part jewish? Would fit with its insistence on spamming chatGPT outputs. Most high yeller nigguhs got lots a jewish blood anyway.
Wonder if niggy here is jewish or part jewish? Would fit with its insistence on spamming chatGPT outputs. Most high yeller nigguhs got lots a jewish blood anyway.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 32 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,780
@1,424,774 (J)
You should move away from those idiots then, find a country that will vote for a woman.
Let me know how that goes 🤣
You should move away from those idiots then, find a country that will vote for a woman.
Let me know how that goes 🤣
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,781
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 51 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,783
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,784
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 36 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,785
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 9 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,786
Germany and the UK both voted for women in the past…
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,787
There’s also Mexico, Indonesia had a female president… (majority Muslim country btw)
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 7 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,788
@1,424,786 (H)
The UK is an American territory, and the women they vote for are more sexist than me.
I hear Germany is nice though! Do you need help finding visa information?
The UK is an American territory, and the women they vote for are more sexist than me.
I hear Germany is nice though! Do you need help finding visa information?
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,789
@1,424,787 (H)
Move to any of those countries! Support them with tax dollars, work for companies there, do community work there instead of the white patriarchal empire.
Move to any of those countries! Support them with tax dollars, work for companies there, do community work there instead of the white patriarchal empire.
Meta replied with this 1 month ago, 5 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,790
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 33 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,791
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,793
@1,424,789 (I)
> Move to any of those countries! Support them with tax dollars, work for companies there, do community work there instead of the white patriarchal empire.
The United States has a large non-white population.
> Move to any of those countries! Support them with tax dollars, work for companies there, do community work there instead of the white patriarchal empire.
The United States has a large non-white population.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 50 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,794
@1,424,791 (H)
I don't hate women, I believe men and women are different.
There are straight men that hate women, though. Hating women doesn't necessarily mean someone is gay.
I don't hate women, I believe men and women are different.
There are straight men that hate women, though. Hating women doesn't necessarily mean someone is gay.
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 45 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,795
@1,424,793 (H)
Is that why you stay and support the empire with your spending and taxes?
You could find non-whites in many of the countries you mentioned.
Is that why you stay and support the empire with your spending and taxes?
You could find non-whites in many of the countries you mentioned.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,796
@1,424,794 (I)
Men and women are different, that doesn’t mean that one is better than the other. The way you openly disrespect women, it seems like you’re one of those people who think different means bad, and the way you are is the most correct way because you think you’re special somehow.
If men and women are different, how can you be sure that the way you are as a man isn’t the wrong way?
Men and women are different, that doesn’t mean that one is better than the other. The way you openly disrespect women, it seems like you’re one of those people who think different means bad, and the way you are is the most correct way because you think you’re special somehow.
If men and women are different, how can you be sure that the way you are as a man isn’t the wrong way?
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 43 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,797
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 42 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,799
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 22 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,800
Black people and white people are different. If you’re different from me, then maybe that means something is wrong with you, and you should be more like a black person.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,802
@1,424,796 (H)
> Men and women are different, that doesn’t mean that one is better than the other.
I never said men were "better".
> The way you openly disrespect women, it seems like you’re one of those people who think different means bad, and the way you are is the most correct way because you think you’re special somehow.
Men should lead, because emotional regulation is important. Nothing disrespectful about acknowledging differences.
> If men and women are different, how can you be sure that the way you are as a man isn’t the wrong way?
Because I can see the results. Measuring the performance of either in various roles isn't subjective, you can put numbers on it.
> Men and women are different, that doesn’t mean that one is better than the other.
I never said men were "better".
> The way you openly disrespect women, it seems like you’re one of those people who think different means bad, and the way you are is the most correct way because you think you’re special somehow.
Men should lead, because emotional regulation is important. Nothing disrespectful about acknowledging differences.
> If men and women are different, how can you be sure that the way you are as a man isn’t the wrong way?
Because I can see the results. Measuring the performance of either in various roles isn't subjective, you can put numbers on it.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 36 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,803
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 49 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,804
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 7 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,805
You and I both agree that women are better. I have no disagreement there.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 56 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,806
@1,424,804 (I)
Well you took issue with the idea that men are better, but you’re saying men and women are different. So I take it that I was wrong in assuming you think men are better. It’s only rational to assume now that you believe women are better than men.
Because if you didn’t think men were better why would you have a problem with that accusation?
Well you took issue with the idea that men are better, but you’re saying men and women are different. So I take it that I was wrong in assuming you think men are better. It’s only rational to assume now that you believe women are better than men.
Because if you didn’t think men were better why would you have a problem with that accusation?
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 17 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,807
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 32 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,808
@previous (I)
You don’t think that men are better than women and you think men and women are different, so you think women are better. That’s ok. I agree with you.
You don’t think that men are better than women and you think men and women are different, so you think women are better. That’s ok. I agree with you.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 30 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,809
@1,424,806 (H)
If you weren't trying to strawman you would ask if I agreed women were better first.
Obviously I'm saying neither are better.
If you weren't trying to strawman you would ask if I agreed women were better first.
Obviously I'm saying neither are better.
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 27 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,810
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 36 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,811
@1,424,809 (I)
Why should I ask when you already took issue when I assumed that you thought men were better than women? If you thought men were better than women you wouldn’t have rejected my assumption. And you told me that men and women are different, so that means you think women are better.
Why should I ask when you already took issue when I assumed that you thought men were better than women? If you thought men were better than women you wouldn’t have rejected my assumption. And you told me that men and women are different, so that means you think women are better.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,812
You never said you don’t think women are better than men. So why shouldn’t I think you believe that women are better than men?
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,814
@1,424,811 (H)
> Why should I ask when you already took issue when I assumed that you thought men were better than women? If you thought men were better than women you wouldn’t have rejected my assumption.
You should understand that there are three possibilities not two.
> And you told me that men and women are different, so that means you think women are better.
No, saying there's differences doesn't mean I think that specific thing is different.
Both men and women walk on two feet, so why not go off on how I must think women have four legs since I said they were different?
> Why should I ask when you already took issue when I assumed that you thought men were better than women? If you thought men were better than women you wouldn’t have rejected my assumption.
You should understand that there are three possibilities not two.
> And you told me that men and women are different, so that means you think women are better.
No, saying there's differences doesn't mean I think that specific thing is different.
Both men and women walk on two feet, so why not go off on how I must think women have four legs since I said they were different?
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 53 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,816
@1,424,812 (H)
There are three possibilities.
I eliminated one.
You jumped to one conclusion and ignored the other.
There are three possibilities.
I eliminated one.
You jumped to one conclusion and ignored the other.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,824
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 37 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,825
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 28 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,826
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,830
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 16 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,831
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,835
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,839
@previous (I)
So if you think men and women are equal, then you’re a feminist, because that’s what the definition is.
So if you think men and women are equal, then you’re a feminist, because that’s what the definition is.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,841
You see, this is my problem with you. You say something, it’s obvious what you think, and you accuse me of strawmanning you because you think what you think sounds bad, then when I ask you questions, you pretend to be a liberal. You’re just too cowardly to commit to your own agenda.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,844
@1,424,839 (H)
Feminists will say that's the criteria and then contradict themselves later.
I wouldn't use a gendered term to communicate my belief in gender equality, especially when that term is associated with misandry, double standards, dehumanizing the unborn, and a sense of entitlement.
Feminists will say that's the criteria and then contradict themselves later.
I wouldn't use a gendered term to communicate my belief in gender equality, especially when that term is associated with misandry, double standards, dehumanizing the unborn, and a sense of entitlement.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,845
@previous (I)
Okay, so if you’re against double standards and you think men and women are equal, then if half of people are women and you believe in liberal democracy, surely you believe that the government should represent the people? So if half the people are women, about half of the representatives should be women in an ideal democracy.
Okay, so if you’re against double standards and you think men and women are equal, then if half of people are women and you believe in liberal democracy, surely you believe that the government should represent the people? So if half the people are women, about half of the representatives should be women in an ideal democracy.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 49 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,846
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 22 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,847
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,848
@1,424,845 (H)
I don't think that representatives need to look like their constituents necessarily, but voters have that option if they feel its important.
There are white men in politics I don't like, and I've voted for people that don't look like me.
I don't think that representatives need to look like their constituents necessarily, but voters have that option if they feel its important.
There are white men in politics I don't like, and I've voted for people that don't look like me.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,849
Unless you’re bipolar the way that you argue doesn’t make any sense. Because as a white male, every single time you argue about any topic, you always present it as white men are dominant, white men are right, everybody else is wrong, and everything is unfair against white men so white men deserve to be even more dominant. Then when I say that’s what your position is, you accuse me of strawmanning you, and you pretend to think everyone is equal, but you clearly don’t believe that.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,850
@1,424,847 (H)
Women get emotional and make decisions without thinking through much more than men.
Leadership is more suited to men.
That doesn't mean they have less value.
A man doesn't have the ability to create life like a woman. Doesn't mean he's less valuable for it either.
Women get emotional and make decisions without thinking through much more than men.
Leadership is more suited to men.
That doesn't mean they have less value.
A man doesn't have the ability to create life like a woman. Doesn't mean he's less valuable for it either.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,851
You’ve literally argued endlessly that you think black people have lower IQs than white people because you think they’re less evolved, but you don’t want to be seen as a racist at the same time. It doesn’t make any sense, and it’s not even clear what the goal of arguing is, because it’s impossible for me to agree with you when you always try to portray yourself as someone who believes that bigotry is the truth and that you’re also not a bigot at the same time, and I can’t believe in both at the same time.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 13 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,852
@1,424,849 (H)
I have said men are more suited to leadership, and I stand by that.
There are times when exceptions should be made of course.
I don't think women have less value because they are better suited to roles outside leadership.
I have said men are more suited to leadership, and I stand by that.
There are times when exceptions should be made of course.
I don't think women have less value because they are better suited to roles outside leadership.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 9 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,853
@1,424,850 (I)
> Women get emotional and make decisions without thinking through much more than men.
>
> Leadership is more suited to men.
>
> That doesn't mean they have less value.
>
> A man doesn't have the ability to create life like a woman. Doesn't mean he's less valuable for it either.
See, this is what I’m talking about. You were just lying to me that you think men and women are equal.
> Women get emotional and make decisions without thinking through much more than men.
>
> Leadership is more suited to men.
>
> That doesn't mean they have less value.
>
> A man doesn't have the ability to create life like a woman. Doesn't mean he's less valuable for it either.
See, this is what I’m talking about. You were just lying to me that you think men and women are equal.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 17 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,854
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 11 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,855
I keep calling you a pathological liar for a reason. You just did a complete 180 for no reason.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 9 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,856
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 16 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,857
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,858
@1,424,854 (I)
The problem with that is you kept arguing that I was strawmanning you every time I called you a racist when clearly I was right. Which means that you’re also a liar.
The problem with that is you kept arguing that I was strawmanning you every time I called you a racist when clearly I was right. Which means that you’re also a liar.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 55 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,860
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 39 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,861
@1,424,858 (H)
Does it bother you at all that you're certain I said it, but you can't give one direct quote?
Does it bother you at all that you're certain I said it, but you can't give one direct quote?
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 6 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,862
Every time I said you thought something and you accused me of strawmanning you because you didn’t say it directly, I was never wrong about what you actually believe. I can tell what you believe even if you don’t say it.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 38 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,863
@1,424,861 (I)
> Does it bother you at all that you're certain I said it, but you can't give one direct quote?
Absolutely not. You’re not a very smart person so it doesn’t take much effort to know what your real position is.
> Does it bother you at all that you're certain I said it, but you can't give one direct quote?
Absolutely not. You’re not a very smart person so it doesn’t take much effort to know what your real position is.
Anonymous H triple-posted this 1 month ago, 21 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,864
You’re one of the least intelligent people I’ve ever talked to.
Anonymous H quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 43 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,865
You can say that I’ve accused you of having beliefs that you didn’t say directly, but I’ve never been wrong before.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 11 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,866
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 50 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,867
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 48 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,868
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 32 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,869
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 20 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,870
@1,424,864 (H)
> You’re one of the least intelligent people I’ve ever talked to.
You can't even remember what I've said.
You get mad at me, I ask a simple question each time "where did I say that?" and everytine you get emotional and make personal attacks and then refuse to cite the post even though it would prove you right if it existed.
A smart person wouldn't make a claim like that if they weren't ready to link the post.
> You’re one of the least intelligent people I’ve ever talked to.
You can't even remember what I've said.
You get mad at me, I ask a simple question each time "where did I say that?" and everytine you get emotional and make personal attacks and then refuse to cite the post even though it would prove you right if it existed.
A smart person wouldn't make a claim like that if they weren't ready to link the post.
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 35 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,871
@1,424,868 (H)
I've literally never denied being racist. I've told you I think black people are inferior.
I've literally never denied being racist. I've told you I think black people are inferior.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 4 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,872
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 59 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,873
@1,424,869 (H)
> I have lied to you on purpose because I don’t respect you.
No, as usual you based your whole argument on something I never said and then been unable to show where I said.
Every. Thread. Strawmanning.
> I have lied to you on purpose because I don’t respect you.
No, as usual you based your whole argument on something I never said and then been unable to show where I said.
Every. Thread. Strawmanning.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 5 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,874
@1,424,871 (I)
If you never denied anything, you wouldn’t talk to me at all, because the only thing you ever do is deny everything I say about you.
If you never denied anything, you wouldn’t talk to me at all, because the only thing you ever do is deny everything I say about you.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 23 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,875
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 1 second later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,876
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 23 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,877
@previous (I)
Well you obviously enjoy talking with me more than you enjoy talking with anyone else.
Well you obviously enjoy talking with me more than you enjoy talking with anyone else.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 24 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,878
@1,424,875 (H)
I participate in case anyone wants to see which side can take it seriously and defend their side.
You are *always* unable, and resort to strawmanning and personal attacks.
I participate in case anyone wants to see which side can take it seriously and defend their side.
You are *always* unable, and resort to strawmanning and personal attacks.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 28 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,879
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 18 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,880
@1,424,877 (H)
The others on here don't try and defend insane ideas like "all races are equal" or "women belong in leadership".
The others on here don't try and defend insane ideas like "all races are equal" or "women belong in leadership".
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 24 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,881
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 3 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,882
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 12 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,883
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 33 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,884
@1,424,881 (H)
Lol, not really. Most people, including me, know it's not worth the drama that comes from doing this in public.
Lol, not really. Most people, including me, know it's not worth the drama that comes from doing this in public.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 38 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,885
@1,424,883 (H)
Maybe, but in case they do they will see that you based your argument on a strawmanned statement from me.
Maybe, but in case they do they will see that you based your argument on a strawmanned statement from me.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 2 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,886
@1,424,884 (I)
Why would there be drama that comes from doing this in public if most people agree with you?
Why would there be drama that comes from doing this in public if most people agree with you?
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 22 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,887
Anonymous H triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,888
You always complain that people are stupid because they don’t agree with you, and you’ve told me about conversations you had in real life where you thought women were stupid because they didn’t agree with you. You’ve never told me about a situation in real life where you thought someone was smart because they agreed with you.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 58 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,889
@1,424,886 (H)
Because it only takes one offended person to create a lot of drama.
And because people have different, conflicting ideas about race.
Even black people will have steretypes they believe in, but of course not in their own inferiority.
Because it only takes one offended person to create a lot of drama.
And because people have different, conflicting ideas about race.
Even black people will have steretypes they believe in, but of course not in their own inferiority.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 15 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,890
And I don’t know if you’ve noticed, there are other people on here who hold racist views, but they never talk to you.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 37 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,891
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 16 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,892
@1,424,887 (H)
Has anyone else bothered discussing it with you seriously?
Who else COULD accuse you of a strawman without getting into a serious discussion?
The others that disagree with you only come in to joke and mock, not seriously engage. Obviously they wont cite fallacies.
Has anyone else bothered discussing it with you seriously?
Who else COULD accuse you of a strawman without getting into a serious discussion?
The others that disagree with you only come in to joke and mock, not seriously engage. Obviously they wont cite fallacies.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 53 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,893
@previous (I)
You’re the only person who’s ever accused me of making strawman arguments and it’s the only logical fallacy you ever accuse me of.
You’re the only person who’s ever accused me of making strawman arguments and it’s the only logical fallacy you ever accuse me of.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,894
In fact, you don’t actually have any counter arguments for any of my arguments, you only accuse me of misrepresenting your argument. But you aren’t interested in proving me wrong because you’re not smart enough to.
Anonymous H triple-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,895
I also don’t know if you’ve noticed, but there are people here who agree with things I say.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 12 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,896
@1,424,893 (H)
You could completely stop me from accusing you of it if you followed a few, simple, fair rules.
Like:
1. Quote the text you are referring to.
2. Ask me clarifying questions like "then do you believe [statement]"
Would those rules really be unfair?
And yes, I have known people who resort to strawman argument all the time. I would guess it's a side-effect of poor reading comprehension, or the idea that you can just guess what someone is thinking and expect them to take accountability for your assumptions.
You could completely stop me from accusing you of it if you followed a few, simple, fair rules.
Like:
1. Quote the text you are referring to.
2. Ask me clarifying questions like "then do you believe [statement]"
Would those rules really be unfair?
And yes, I have known people who resort to strawman argument all the time. I would guess it's a side-effect of poor reading comprehension, or the idea that you can just guess what someone is thinking and expect them to take accountability for your assumptions.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 40 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,897
@1,424,894 (H)
I'm not defending arguments I never made.
Your assumptions about my beliefs are not my problem.
I'm not defending arguments I never made.
Your assumptions about my beliefs are not my problem.
Anonymous I triple-posted this 1 month ago, 56 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,898
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 10 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,899
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 43 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,900
@1,424,897 (I)
> Your assumptions about my beliefs are not my problem.
Then let me say about you whatever I want.
> Your assumptions about my beliefs are not my problem.
Then let me say about you whatever I want.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 26 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,901
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 24 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,902
@1,424,900 (H)
I can't stop you, all I can do is point out I never made the claim in the first place.
I can't stop you, all I can do is point out I never made the claim in the first place.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 2 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,903
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 42 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,904
Anonymous H triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,905
You said you think that black people are inferior. I’m a black person. If you think I’m less human than you are and I have two options: let you live or let you die, it’s a no brainer. There are no rules.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,906
Another theory.
You are taught some strawman in school or some
authority figure.
You talk to me, and I don't say the thing you are prepared to hear.
Rather than addressing what I said instead, you read off a script (metaphorically) that doesn't match what's actually happening.
I point it out.
You get mad, rather than trying to respond to what was actually said.
Understanding leftist argument is simple. People want positive, easy, nice things and just state that they should have them.
Understanding rightist arguments is more complicated. There's usually a tradeoff between options, and sacrifices that must be made as part of living in the world. Assesing those decisions is complicated and takes work. Someone has an idea for the best way to manage those hard decisions.
Rightists understand Leftist arguments, but not the other way around. So leftists get upset and think that rightists are just being mean because they are just inherently bad.
You are taught some strawman in school or some
authority figure.
You talk to me, and I don't say the thing you are prepared to hear.
Rather than addressing what I said instead, you read off a script (metaphorically) that doesn't match what's actually happening.
I point it out.
You get mad, rather than trying to respond to what was actually said.
Understanding leftist argument is simple. People want positive, easy, nice things and just state that they should have them.
Understanding rightist arguments is more complicated. There's usually a tradeoff between options, and sacrifices that must be made as part of living in the world. Assesing those decisions is complicated and takes work. Someone has an idea for the best way to manage those hard decisions.
Rightists understand Leftist arguments, but not the other way around. So leftists get upset and think that rightists are just being mean because they are just inherently bad.
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,907
@previous (I)
I don’t care about left vs right. I’m a black person and you believe that black people are inferior. I don’t care about how you feel or what you want. If you didn’t exist at all, I would be completely fine with that.
I don’t care about left vs right. I’m a black person and you believe that black people are inferior. I don’t care about how you feel or what you want. If you didn’t exist at all, I would be completely fine with that.
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 34 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,908
Your existence has absolutely no value to me whatsoever.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 8 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,909
@1,424,904 (H)
No, if you try to deceive the audience, I'll call it out and explain what you did. You could call that complaining.
I'm not playing along with the strawman, I'm not sure why you would expect me to.
Would you play along if I kept demanding you to defend a silly argument you never said? What if I insisted I knew it was what you thought?
No, if you try to deceive the audience, I'll call it out and explain what you did. You could call that complaining.
I'm not playing along with the strawman, I'm not sure why you would expect me to.
Would you play along if I kept demanding you to defend a silly argument you never said? What if I insisted I knew it was what you thought?
Anonymous H replied with this 1 month ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,910
Anonymous H double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,911
Absolutely nobody on the face of the earth cares about this conversation except for you and me and nobody will ever talk about this conversation except for you and me.
Anonymous H triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,912
I don’t understand why you think you’re popular. You have this weird idea that the fate of the world depends on people seeing how genius your arguments are. Nobody cares what you have to say. People who agree with you don’t give a shit about what you have to say. Meta and Erik are both racists, they’re not listening. They don’t care. If people who agree with you don’t care, nobody cares.
Anonymous H quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,913
The only reason why I’m talking to you is the only reason why I use this website, which is that I don’t like people with your ideology and I don’t want people like you to exist. My only goal is to irritate you because I find it satisfying and nothing else.
Anonymous H quintuple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,914
The difference between you and all the other racists is all the others argue with me for a little bit, then eventually realize they don’t really care that much that I don’t agree with them and then they just get bored and do something else. But you’re so prideful you can’t stand it when I disagree with you.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,915
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,916
@1,424,914 (H)
Wrong, calmly pointing out your mistakes as an anon isn't prideful.
Others can copy my schtick without any infringment claims from me. In fact, they should.
Wrong, calmly pointing out your mistakes as an anon isn't prideful.
Others can copy my schtick without any infringment claims from me. In fact, they should.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,917
Anonymous K double-posted this 1 month ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,918
Anonymous K triple-posted this 1 month ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,919
Anyway, this thread is long. For anybody new here, the TD;LR is white men are retarded, Japanese men are smart, and the United States is a dying empire with no hope and no future so you should invest in BYD.
Anonymous G replied with this 1 month ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,920
Anonymous K replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,921
@previous (G)
Yeah, I’ve just decided as a black guy I don’t care anymore. I’ve realized the racist white man (the enemy) is so fucking retarded I have nothing to fear in this life.
Yeah, I’ve just decided as a black guy I don’t care anymore. I’ve realized the racist white man (the enemy) is so fucking retarded I have nothing to fear in this life.
Anonymous K double-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,922
Honestly the thing about Asians is, I have a problem with white people being like "oh Asians are better than black people, black people have low IQs." But I don’t have a problem with actual Asian people.
Anonymous K triple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,923
Also because I remember being in middle school and the dumb thing about the stereotype is the US is anti intellectual so white kids would make fun of Asian kids like "oh all the Asians are nerds" or "all Asian guys are gay" or whatever. They’ll use being smart and being dumb as insults. The truth is racism is literally nothing more than selfish white guys being cunts for the sake of being selfish cunts and there’s no logic or morality or anything else behind it.
Anonymous K quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,924
Then social Darwinism is dumb because you have to be mentally deficient to think that survival in modern western society requires a high IQ. Like look the fuck around you. Everybody in this country is stupid and most people are fine sitting on their couch like fat slobs watching Netflix while they eat their microwave slop that’s probably 30% BPA plastic by weight.
Anonymous K quintuple-posted this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,926
"People with low IQs can’t do certain jobs black people are different." The president of the United States is fucking retarded and the country still works! Black people don’t have low IQs, but if we did, I don’t see what the damn problem would be since I see so many low IQ incompetent white people screwing everything up all the time. And it’s not all white people or even most white people. But a good 30%.
Anonymous K sextuple-posted this 1 month ago, 33 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,927
…probably closer to 40% but for my mental health I’m gonna say 30%.
Anonymous K septuple-posted this 1 month ago, 54 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,928
Like the crazy thing is asking me "why do you live in the empire oppressing you?" The empire can’t oppress me. It’s too damn retarded to figure out how!
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,930
@1,424,923 (K)
You feel entitled to spaces dominated by a distinct ethnic group that wants to preserve itself, and they make you feel unwelcome. Leave them alone, and you won't deal with it.
@1,424,924 (K)
> Then social Darwinism is dumb because you have to be mentally deficient to think that survival in modern western society requires a high IQ.
No, social darwinism explains how many individuals that may not be the strongest or smartest are able to cooperate and still win.
> Like look the fuck around you. Everybody in this country is stupid
Leave if that bothers you.
In reality the US leads in cutting edge research and technological development, and it has done so for a long time.
> most people are fine sitting on their couch like fat slobs watching Netflix while they eat their microwave slop that’s probably 30% BPA plastic by weight.
If you don't like being among fat people, leave the US. Avoid the UK and Mexico too.
You feel entitled to spaces dominated by a distinct ethnic group that wants to preserve itself, and they make you feel unwelcome. Leave them alone, and you won't deal with it.
@1,424,924 (K)
> Then social Darwinism is dumb because you have to be mentally deficient to think that survival in modern western society requires a high IQ.
No, social darwinism explains how many individuals that may not be the strongest or smartest are able to cooperate and still win.
> Like look the fuck around you. Everybody in this country is stupid
Leave if that bothers you.
In reality the US leads in cutting edge research and technological development, and it has done so for a long time.
> most people are fine sitting on their couch like fat slobs watching Netflix while they eat their microwave slop that’s probably 30% BPA plastic by weight.
If you don't like being among fat people, leave the US. Avoid the UK and Mexico too.
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,931
@1,424,926 (K)
The President is a figurehead.
Low IQ people don't get much done, and often cause problems that waste the time of more productive employees.
IQ was correlated with job evaluations in the NLSY.
The President is a figurehead.
Low IQ people don't get much done, and often cause problems that waste the time of more productive employees.
IQ was correlated with job evaluations in the NLSY.
Anonymous I triple-posted this 1 month ago, 57 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,932
@1,424,928 (K)
You complain about many aspects of life there, and insist black-run countries can do better. So show it with your actions, leave the fat stupid racist people, move to a better country.
You complain about many aspects of life there, and insist black-run countries can do better. So show it with your actions, leave the fat stupid racist people, move to a better country.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,934
Honestly, when I was a kid I thought racists would be scary people like Nazis or something. Now that I’m an adult I don’t feel afraid of racists, I just feel like they’re people that never got hit hard enough. I feel like it’s a disservice that we don’t brutally beat these people because they’re so fucking retarded they don’t even know how retarded they are, so someone needs to step in and intervene and humiliate and degrade them and make them suffer inhumane physical pain to teach them what they really are, which is less than nothing.
Anonymous L double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,936
@1,424,932 (I)
> You complain about many aspects of life there, and insist black-run countries can do better. So show it with your actions, leave the fat stupid racist people, move to a better country.
You’re only saying that because you’re a white supremacist and you want the United States to be a white only country. I don’t believe that any particular race is better or worse at running countries. I think that white people in America are showing themselves to be perfectly capable of creating a country run like an African nation, so why should I leave America?
> You complain about many aspects of life there, and insist black-run countries can do better. So show it with your actions, leave the fat stupid racist people, move to a better country.
You’re only saying that because you’re a white supremacist and you want the United States to be a white only country. I don’t believe that any particular race is better or worse at running countries. I think that white people in America are showing themselves to be perfectly capable of creating a country run like an African nation, so why should I leave America?
Anonymous L triple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,938
Donald Trump is so genius, soon we will have an economy as brilliant as Zimbabwe. That’s how smart this guy is. Why would I want to leave when we have such a brilliant leader? Are you crazy?
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 21 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,940
@1,424,936 (L)
I'm saying it so that anyone reading can see that you're a hypocrite and realize that anyone who really believed what you believe would be trying to move to another country instead of taking dick from a cryptobro in bumfuck florida.
I'm saying it so that anyone reading can see that you're a hypocrite and realize that anyone who really believed what you believe would be trying to move to another country instead of taking dick from a cryptobro in bumfuck florida.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 8 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,941
Like, if you fucking think I respect you at all, you are so wrong you have no idea.
Anonymous L double-posted this 1 month ago, 34 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,943
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 11 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,944
@1,424,936 (L)
To get away from fat stupid racists, like you said you see. To get closer to your brothas.
To get away from fat stupid racists, like you said you see. To get closer to your brothas.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 21 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,946
I don’t love you, I love America, and I want to protect America from you. I love my country.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 13 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,947
@1,424,941 (L)
I can tell you don't.
@1,424,943 (L)
Patriots don't complain about their contry constantly.
I can tell you don't.
@1,424,943 (L)
Patriots don't complain about their contry constantly.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 17 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,948
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 9 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,949
Anonymous I double-posted this 1 month ago, 16 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,950
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 25 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,951
@1,424,949 (I)
I hate people who hate America. They’re not actually Americans. You aren’t an American.
I hate people who hate America. They’re not actually Americans. You aren’t an American.
Anonymous L double-posted this 1 month ago, 26 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,952
Anonymous L triple-posted this 1 month ago, 24 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,953
America is an idea that is worth dying for.
Anonymous L quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 56 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,954
If you think I hate my country because I hate you, you’re completely wrong ass backwards. I hate you because I love my country, and I perceive you as a threat to my country because I’m patriotic.
Anonymous L quintuple-posted this 1 month ago, 30 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,955
400,000 Americans died trying to kill people like you.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 3 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,956
@1,424,951 (L)
The majority of voters said Trump.
The people who didn't vote saw a racist on the pathway to win, and they didn't like him enough to show up, but they also thought it was fine if a racist won.
The majority of voters plus the nonvoters are fine with this. Your view that this is bad is a minority view. This isn't my opinion, we held an official nation poll and decided it for sure.
The majority of voters said Trump.
The people who didn't vote saw a racist on the pathway to win, and they didn't like him enough to show up, but they also thought it was fine if a racist won.
The majority of voters plus the nonvoters are fine with this. Your view that this is bad is a minority view. This isn't my opinion, we held an official nation poll and decided it for sure.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,958
@previous (I)
I don’t care about Trump. I hate you because you’re a white supremacist. I don’t hate Trump, I hate you.
I don’t care about Trump. I hate you because you’re a white supremacist. I don’t hate Trump, I hate you.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 12 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,959
@1,424,955 (L)
Most people in this country supported or accept Trump as president.
The people that agree with you are the minority.
And you choose to be the white man's bitch rather than leave because the money is so good! 😂
Most people in this country supported or accept Trump as president.
The people that agree with you are the minority.
And you choose to be the white man's bitch rather than leave because the money is so good! 😂
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 38 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,962
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,963
@previous (L)
Africans think taking dick from a tranny is homosexuality and warrants the death penalty.
Africans think taking dick from a tranny is homosexuality and warrants the death penalty.
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 55 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,964
Anonymous I replied with this 1 month ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,965
Anonymous L replied with this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,966
Anonymous L double-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,967
That’s not a threat, I don’t wish for him to die, I’m just saying, you’re basing your entire power fantasy off of a guy who’s at the end of his life. He’s old.
Anonymous L triple-posted this 1 month ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,968
And if you’re wondering why I’m not afraid of Trump doing something to oppress all the black Americans and create a white supremacist ethnostate: the constitution limits the president to two terms, he can’t run again. Given it’s 2026, and he’s 2 years through his second term, he’s 6 out of 8 years in. That means he’s 75% the way through with his total time in office. He’s not going to do in the last 25% what he couldn’t do in the first 75% and hasn’t shown any interest in doing. And even if he could run again, there’s a 84% chance that he won’t be alive in the year 2037. Given my age, there’s no reason for me to care about this. It’s just a power fantasy you have that won’t come to fruition.
Anonymous L quadruple-posted this 1 month ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,424,969
But I can still complain about you and call you a pathetic moron because clearly nobody ever told you the truth enough times for you to get it!
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 14 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,074
@1,424,697 (B)
But thats on Asians for accepting their lapdog position just because the white man gave them a treat and told them “good chink! You’re much better than those unruly damn black baboons!
But thats on Asians for accepting their lapdog position just because the white man gave them a treat and told them “good chink! You’re much better than those unruly damn black baboons!
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 10 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,076
@previous (M)
To be honest, I think Japan’s views come more from the fact that after they lost World War Two, there’s really nothing they could do. Japan has had American troops inside their country since they lost the war. They don’t exactly have a choice. China hasn’t been submissive to the west at all.
To be honest, I think Japan’s views come more from the fact that after they lost World War Two, there’s really nothing they could do. Japan has had American troops inside their country since they lost the war. They don’t exactly have a choice. China hasn’t been submissive to the west at all.
B L A C K E S T replied with this 1 month ago, 46 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,080
FAGGOTS, LOL
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 1 month ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,425,114
DD is the dumbest orange bone spurs.